FLUGAZA: Azacytidine (Vidaza®) Versus Fludarabine and Cytarabine (Fluga Scheme) in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Sponsor
PETHEMA Foundation (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT02319135
Collaborator
Dynamic Solutions (Industry)
289
1
2
60.9
4.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The hypothesis is that the replacement of the standard fludarabine and cytarabine based therapy by azacytidine could result in an improvement of RFS and OS rates in the experimental arm. To fulfill the medical needs in such frail and elderly population, improvements in terms of atileukemic efficacy in the azacytidine experimental arm should be attained without increasing the therapy-related toxicity or decreasing the patients QoL.

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, randomized 1:1, open, and at national level, Phase III clinical trial.

This study will be conducted in 3 phases of different duration:
  1. Selection phase (up to 14 days from the signature of informed consent): informed consent and review of the inclusion and exclusion criteria performing the relevant assessments.

  2. Treatment Phase (from the start of treatment until the end of cycle 9): Induction phase (3 cycles) and consolidation phase (cycles 4-9). Study visits during treatment will be weekly during the induction phase (first 3 cycles) and every 2 weeks until the end of the consolidation phase.

  3. Follow-up phase: monthly monitoring will be performed on all patients until they have completed a minimum of 2 years from the start of treatment, whether or not they continue receiving azacitidine cycles or Mini-Fluga according to the protocol. Following these 24 months, follow-up will be carried out at least quarterly. Patients suffering disease progression or relapse of the disease, or being early withdrawn due to any of the reasons specified in the protocol will be followed-up for survival until the end of the study or until the death of all patients, whichever comes first.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
289 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A PHASE III, MULTICENTRE, RANDOMIZED, OPEN LABEL CLINICAL TRIAL OF AZACYTIDINE (VIDAZA®) VERSUS FLUDARABINE AND CYTARABINE (FLUGA SCHEME) IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA.
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2014
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 28, 2018
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 28, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: fludarabine cytarabine

Priming with daily administration of subcutaneous G-CSF (lenograstim or filgrastim 5 mcg /kg / day, days -1, 1 and 2) (not given if hyperleukocytosis> 25 x 109/l), followed by: Oral fludarabine (40 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5) and subcutaneous cytarabine (75mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5) (FLUGA scheme) (fludarabine and cytarabine only days 1 to 4 if age ≥75 years), OR Fludarabine (25 mg/m2/day) and cytarabine (75 mg/m2/day infusion of 6 hours) on their intravenous formulations if the patient is hospitalized (patients with hyperleukocytosis or other unfavourable conditions). Treatment cycles every 28 days

Drug: Fludarabine

Drug: Cytarabine

Drug: Lenograstim

Drug: Filgastrim

Experimental: Azacitidine

Subcutaneous Azacitidine 75 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 7. Treatment cycles every 28 days.

Drug: Azacitadine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Efficacy (overall survival (OS) attained without increasing the therapy-related toxicity or decreasing the patients QoL. [4 years]

    To evaluate the overall survival (OS) in one year treatment with 2 first-line regimens in newly diagnosed elderly patients: 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy based on fludarabine and cytarabine (FLUGA scheme) followed by maintenance with reduced doses(Mini-FLUGA) (standard treatment arm) versus subcutaneous azacitidine cycles (experimental treatment arm).

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Efficacy (Event free survival (EFS) [4 years]

    Event free survival (EFS)

  2. Efficacy (Duration of remission.) [4 years]

    Duration of remission.

  3. Efficacy (Overall survival) Efficcacy [3 years]

    Overall survival at 2nd and 3rd year.

  4. Safety (Compare hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity) [3 years]

    Compare hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity in both arms.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
65 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
    • Having voluntarily given informed consent before performing any test that is not part of

routine care of patients.

    • Age greater than or equal to 65.
    • Morphological diagnosis of non-promyelocytic AML according to the WHO criteria.
    • Newly diagnosed AML.
    • ECOG performance status <4.
    • Ability and willingness to comply with the schedule of study visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
    • Genetic diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia.
    • Patients with AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or chronic myeloproloferative syndrome who have been previously treated with antileukemic agents

(hypomethylating or standard chemotherapy). Treatment with hydroxyurea prior to randomization is allowed.

    • Serum creatinine ≥ 250 mmol / l (≥ 2.5 mg/dL) (unless attributed to AML).
    • Bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase or ALT > 5 times the value of the upper limit of normal (unless attributed to AML) .
    • Presence of an active and/or non controlled pathology different to AML which is severe and life-threatening, that in the investigator's opinion, prevents the subject participation in the study.
    • Other active concomitant malignancy or whose remission is less than one year from the screening day (except carcinoma in situ).
    • Presence of any psychiatric illness or medical condition that, in the investigator's opinion, prevents the subject participation in the study.
    • Life expectancy less than X months.
    • Inability of the patient or his legal representative to understand and voluntarily sign the informed consent form.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe Valencia Spain 46026

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • PETHEMA Foundation
  • Dynamic Solutions

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pau Montesinos, Dr, PETHEMA Foundation

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
PETHEMA Foundation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02319135
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • FLUGAZA
First Posted:
Dec 18, 2014
Last Update Posted:
Apr 6, 2020
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2020
Keywords provided by PETHEMA Foundation
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Apr 6, 2020