Research on the Efficacy of the "T.O.P. Computer Training" Procedure in the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence

Sponsor
University Ghent (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03338361
Collaborator
PZ Heilig Hart (Other), PZ Sint-Camillus (Other), University of Amsterdam (Other)
247
1
4
28.1
8.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators evaluate the efficacy of a computerised program (T.O.P. tool) consisting of an approach avoidance training (AAT) (to retrain action tendencies for alcohol-related stimuli), a visual probe training (VPT) (to retrain attentional bias for alcohol-related stimuli) and the combination of both training procedures versus placebo training, as an add-on to treatment as usual (psycho-education and cognitive behavioral therapy).

The investigators include hospitalized detoxified alcohol-dependent patients, who receive a four week training procedure, existing of a pre-assessment, 6 training sessions and a post-assessment.

Outcome measures consist of behavioral measures (consumption of alcohol - self report over 1 year), questionnaires (AUDIT; craving on 9-point likert scale) and approach avoidance and visual probe measurement tasks.

A six month and 1 year follow-up is included (behavioral measures and AUDIT). Further, the investigators will also assess credibility (9-point likert scale) of the training procedure before the start of the training and immediately after the assessment of the AAT and VPT training.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: active approach avoidance training and sham visual probe training
  • Behavioral: sham approach avoidance training and active visual probe training
  • Behavioral: active approach avoidance training and active visual probe training
  • Behavioral: sham approach avoidance training and sham visual probe training
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
247 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Efficacy of Approach Avoidance and Attentional Bias Retraining in Alcohol-dependent Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial in a Clinical Setting
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 26, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 29, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Feb 29, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: AAT active - VPT sham

Approach avoidance training active intervention and visual probe training sham intervention

Behavioral: active approach avoidance training and sham visual probe training
patients receive active AAT training and sham VPT training

Experimental: VPT active - AAT sham

Visual probe training active condition and approach avoidance training sham condition

Behavioral: sham approach avoidance training and active visual probe training
patients receive sham AAT training and active VPT training

Experimental: AAT active - VPT active

Approach avoidance training active condition and visual probe training active condition

Behavioral: active approach avoidance training and active visual probe training
patients receive active AAT training and active VPT training

Sham Comparator: AAT sham - VPT sham

Approach avoidance training sham condition and visual probe training sham condition

Behavioral: sham approach avoidance training and sham visual probe training
patients receive sham AAT training and sham VPT training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. change in drink behavior [baseline, at 6 months and 1-year post training: change in auditscores between baseline, 6 months and 1-year post-training, and differences between groups]

    AUDIT score

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. change in Retraining attentional bias [baseline and between 1 and 7 days after completion of the 6 training sessions: change]

    The effect on a VPT task

  2. change in Retraining action tendencies [baseline and between 1 and 7 days after completion of the 6 training sessions: change in action tendencies]

    The effect on a AAT task

Other Outcome Measures

  1. change in drinking behavior [baseline; At 3 months post-training: change in audit-c score at baseline and 3 months post training]

    score of AUDIT-c (first 3 questions of the AUDIT)

  2. Time to first drink [assessed at 3 months post-training]

    Time it takes between finalization of the training and the day the patients drinks an alcoholic beverage

  3. Time to first drink [assessed at 6 months post-training]

    Time it takes between finalization of the training and the day the patients drinks an alcoholic beverage

  4. Time to first drink [assessed at 1 year post-training]

    Time it takes between finalization of the training and the day the patients drinks an alcoholic beverage

  5. Time to first heavy drinking day [assessed at 3 months post-training]

    Time it takes between finalization of the training and the day a female patient drinks ≥ 4 alcoholic units/day and a male patient drinks ≥ 5 alcoholic units/day

  6. Time to first heavy drinking day [assessed at 6 monthspost-training]

    Time it takes between finalization of the training and the day a female patient drinks ≥ 4 alcoholic units/day and a male patient drinks ≥ 5 alcoholic units/day

  7. Time to first heavy drinking day [assessed at 1 year post-training]

    Time it takes between finalization of the training and the day a female patient drinks ≥ 4 alcoholic units/day and a male patient drinks ≥ 5 alcoholic units/day

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • hospitalized alcohol-dependent patients, choosing for abstinence en committed to treatment

  • detoxification (with benzodiazepines) is terminated

  • Dutch speaking

Exclusion Criteria:
  • neurological condition, such as Korsakoff syndrome

  • cognitive problems (cut-off <26/30 on the Montral Cognitive Assessment)

  • psychotic disorders

  • visual and motor problems at the hands

  • non-Dutch speaking

  • mental retardation

  • patients who are illiterate

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University Ghent Ghent Belgium 9000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University Ghent
  • PZ Heilig Hart
  • PZ Sint-Camillus
  • University of Amsterdam

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: sarah C herremans, PhD, MD, UZ Gent

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University Ghent
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03338361
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • EC/2017/1079
First Posted:
Nov 9, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Dec 21, 2021
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by University Ghent
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Dec 21, 2021