CAVIARDS: Careful Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (COVID-19)

Sponsor
Unity Health Toronto (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03963622
Collaborator
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (Other), University of Toronto (Other), Applied Health Research Centre (Other)
740
31
2
47.3
23.9
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial with an adaptive design assessing the efficacy of setting the ventilator based on measurements of respiratory mechanics (recruitability and effort) to reduce Day 60 mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

The CAVIARDS study is also a basket trial; a basket trial design examines a single intervention in multiple disease populations. CAVIARDS consists of an identical 2-arm mechanical ventilation protocol implemented in two different study populations (COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients). As per a typical basket trial design, the operational structure of both the COVID-19 substudy (CAVIARDS-19) and non-COVID-19 substudy (CAVIARDS-all) is shared (recruitment, procedures, data collection, analysis, management, etc.).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Respiratory Mechanics
  • Other: Standard Ventilation Strategy
N/A

Detailed Description

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major public health problem affecting approximately 10% of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 23% of all patients on a breathing machine (mechanical ventilator). The short-term mortality of patients with ARDS is approximately 40% and better ventilation of these patients has the greatest potential to improve outcomes.

The lungs in patients with ARDS are severely inflamed which reduces lung volume and their ability to stretch, making ventilation difficult and dangerous. However, mechanical ventilation is the mainstay of supportive therapy. Although it is life-saving, it can also can generate secondary injury and inflammation, called ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The investigators know that inadequate mechanical ventilation worsens outcomes but are uncertain of the optimal way to manage ventilators at the bedside.

Furthermore, ARDS is challenging because there is no treatment for the alveolar-capillary leak characterizing this syndrome; aside from treating the underlying cause, the only supportive therapy is mechanical ventilation. This is specially the case for COVID-19 induced ARDS. Despite best practices, over-distension of the lung or inappropriate positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is common. Finally, once spontaneous breathing has resumed and is assisted by the ventilator, an additional phenomenon occurs, called patient self-inflicted lung injury. The drive for breathing in many patients is stimulated by lung inflammation, and strong breathing efforts can generate high distending pressures, causing lung (and systemic) inflammation and organ damage. Whether the management of COVID-19 induced ARDS should differ from all other ARDS has been debated at length but has no clear response

Recent advances in our understanding of bedside physiology (airway closure, recruitability, lung distension, respiratory drive) can now be applied for an individual titration of mechanical ventilation.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
740 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
This study is also a basket design, which examines a single intervention in multiple disease populations. This basket trial consists of an identical 2-arm mechanical ventilation protocol implemented in two different study populations (patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS, and patients with all ARDS not induced by COVID-19). The protocol and procedures are identical between the two study populations in this basket trial.This study is also a basket design, which examines a single intervention in multiple disease populations. This basket trial consists of an identical 2-arm mechanical ventilation protocol implemented in two different study populations (patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS, and patients with all ARDS not induced by COVID-19). The protocol and procedures are identical between the two study populations in this basket trial.
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Careful Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 23, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Control

Standard ventilation strategy.

Other: Standard Ventilation Strategy
Patients randomized to the control arm will receive standard care. The PEEP is adjusted for oxygenation based on a PEEP-FiO2 table, either the low PEEP-FiO2 or the high PEEP-FiO2 table. Volume targeted ventilation with initial VT 6 mL·kg-1 and Plateau pressure at 30 cmH2O or below, targeting PaO2 60-80 or SpO2 90-95%, adjusted as per the protocol. Pressure-support ventilation is at physician's discretion, but recommended when FiO2 <60%, and is titrated VT 6-8 mL·kg-1.

Experimental: Respiratory Mechanics

The goal of this arm is to individualize tidal volume (VT) and PEEP according to respiratory mechanics.

Other: Respiratory Mechanics
Different maneuvers based on respiratory mechanics will be assessed at the bedside and will be used to individualize ventilator parameters. Recruitability will be assessed with a one breath decremental PEEP maneuver, and search for airway closure with a low-flow pressure volume or pressure-time curve. If the patient has airway closure, the minimal PEEP will be set at the airway opening pressure to avoid closure. If the patient is considered recruitable, the goal is to set PEEP at or above 15cmH20 to maximize alveolar recruitment, until the plateau pressure reaches the safety limit. Volume control ventilation at 6ml·kg-1 will be used. Once spontaneous breathing has started, the occlusion pressure (P0.1) will be maintained within targets.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. All-cause 60-day mortality [60 days]

    The lack of an appropriate surrogate endpoint, and the high baseline mortality rate mandate a multicentre RCT to determine the mortality effects of setting the ventilator based on recruitability and effort compared with conventional ventilation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Duration of ventilation [May exceed 60 days]

    Duration of ventilation in days

  2. Duration of ICU and hospital stay [May exceed 60 days]

    Duration of ICU and hospital stay in days

  3. Number of patients with organ dysfunction [Day 1-7, 14, 21, 28]

    Organ dysfunction as per the SOFA score

  4. Number of patients with barotrauma [Up to 60 days]

    Barotrauma defined as new onset of pneumothorax

  5. Mortality at ICU discharge, 28 days, and hospital discharge [Up to date of ICU discharge, 28 days, and hospital discharge]

    Mortality

Other Outcome Measures

  1. The change in biomarker expression [Baseline, 24 and 72 hours]

    Biomarkers include interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFr1), soluble receptor of the advanced glycation end products (sRAGE), and surfactant protein D (SPD). All measured in pg/ml

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Age ≥ 18 y

  2. Moderate or severe ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 mmHg) within 48 h of meeting Berlin ARDS criteria

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Received continuous mechanical ventilation > 7 days

  2. Known or clinically suspected elevated intracranial pressure (>18mmHg) necessitating strict control of PaCO2

  3. Known pregnancy

  4. Broncho-pleural fistula

  5. Severe liver disease (Child-Pugh Score ≥ 10)

  6. BMI >40kg/m2

  7. Anticipating withdrawal of life support and/or shift to palliation as the goal of care

  8. Patient is receiving ECMO at time of randomization

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 New York University Grossman School of Medicine New York New York United States 10016
2 Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Dr Norberto Quirno (CEMIC) Buenos Aires Argentina
3 Complejo Médico Policía Federal Argentina Churruca Visca Buenos Aires Argentina
4 Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires Argentina
5 Sanatorio Anchorena Recoleta Buenos Aires Argentina
6 Sanatorio Mater Dei Buenos Aires Argentina
7 Sanatorio Anchorena San Martín San Martín Argentina
8 St. Michael's Hospital Toronto Canada
9 Toronto General Hospital Toronto Canada
10 Toronto Western Hospital Toronto Canada
11 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago de Chile Chile
12 Centre hospitalier universitaire d'Angers Angers France
13 CH Victor Dupouy Argenteuil France
14 CH de Beauvais Beauvais France
15 CHU Bordeaux - Haut Leveque Bordeaux France
16 Hopital de la Cavale Blanche - CHRU Brest Brest France
17 CH de Cholet Cholet France
18 Hopital Intercommunal de Creteil Creteil France
19 CHU Grenoble-Alpes Grenoble France
20 Hopital Roger Salengro - CHU Lille Lille France
21 Groupe Hospitalier de la Region de Mulhouse et Sud Alsace Mulhouse France
22 Hopital de l'Archet 1 - CHU de Nice Nice France
23 Hopital Europeen Georges-Pompidou Paris France
24 CHU de Poitiers - La Miletrie Poitiers France
25 CH Bretagne Atlantique Vannes-Auray Vannes France
26 HIA Robert Picque Villenave-d'Ornon France
27 Arcispedale Sant'Anna Ferrara Italy
28 University of Foggia Foggia Italy
29 Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Rome Italy
30 L'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Barcelona Spain
31 Vall d'Hebron University Hospital Barcelona Spain

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Unity Health Toronto
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  • University of Toronto
  • Applied Health Research Centre

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laurent Brochard, MD, Unity Health Toronto

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Unity Health Toronto
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03963622
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1765
First Posted:
May 24, 2019
Last Update Posted:
Jun 30, 2022
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Unity Health Toronto
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jun 30, 2022