ELECTROPAD: Effect of a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Program on Walking Capacity in Peripheral Artery Disease Patients

Sponsor
Rennes University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03795103
Collaborator
AD REM TECHNOLOGY (Other), Ecole Normale Supérieure de Rennes (Other)
120
9
3
47.7
13.3
0.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (LEPAD) is a highly prevalent chronic disease. Cardiovascular mortality of LEPAD patients at five years ranges between 18 to 30%. LEPAD is primarily caused by atherosclerosis that induces an inadequate blood flow to meet the tissues demand due to the narrowing of the arteries. An aggravation of the arterial lesions in LEPAD patients induces a worsening of patients' symptoms and a severe limitation of their walking capacity, contributing to an impairment of their quality of life.

Interventions designed to improve walking impairment may have a significant impact on the functional capacity in LEPAD patients. Lower extremity electrical stimulation is an older technique that relies on different types of electrical stimulations with different expected physiological effects on hemodynamics, skeletal muscle functions or pain pathway. The aim of the ELECTRO-PAD study is to assess the effect of a 12 weeks program of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on the absolute walking distance (AWD) measured during a treadmill test in peripheral artery disease patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: neuromuscular electrical stimulator
  • Other: Walking sessions
  • Other: Advices
N/A

Detailed Description

The aim of the ELECTRO-PAD study is to assess the effect of a 12 weeks program of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on the absolute walking distance (AWD) measured during a treadmill test in peripheral artery disease patients.

Arteriopatic patients will be randomized in 2 groups :
  • patients submitted to a 12 weeks program of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES group)

  • patients without any program (control group) All patients will also receive a study participation guide that will include an information leaflet outlining tips for active living and walking.

After eligibility criteria will be assessed, patient will be included and randomized (visit 1). A second visit will be performed after 12 weeks (visit 2).

In parallel, 2 ancillary studies will be performed :
  • Among Rennes' arteriopatic patients, endothelial function will be assessed using measures from 40 patients. Assessment will be done between 1 and 14 days after visit 1 (visit 1')

  • The second ancillary study concerns 40 volunteers with no cardiac or vascular pathology, only in the coordinating center Rennes. The same measures will be performed for these volunteers and for arteriopatic patients.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
120 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Investigator)
Masking Description:
Investigators won't know which arm is allocated to arteriopathic patients. Program will be send to patients by a outcome research engineer
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effect of a Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Program on Walking Capacity in Peripheral Artery Disease Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 9, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Patients achieving neuromuscular electrical stimulation

LEPAD patients achieving a 12-week program of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Group of arteriopathic patients who will perform electrostimulation sessions at home and independently. These patients will also receive a study participation guide that will include an information leaflet outlining tips for active living and walking.

Device: neuromuscular electrical stimulator
A 12-week program of neuromuscular electrical stimulation

Other: Control

Group of artriopathic patients who will maintain their usual drug management. These patients will also receive a study participation guide that will include an information leaflet outlining tips for active living and walking.

Other: Advices
The usual practice associated with an information leaflet outlining tips for active living and walking.

Other: Healthy volunteers

Ancillary study. Participants will perform a precise program of walking sessions performed outdoors and independently and the same biological parameters as those assessed in arteriopathic patients will be assessed

Other: Walking sessions
A 12-week program of walking sessions performed outdoors and independently

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in treadmill walking distance to maximal leg pain (absolute walking distance) [12 weeks]

    Comparison of change in treadmill walking distance to maximal leg pain (absolute walking distance) after 12 weeks between ESM group and control group (between visit 1 and visit 2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Change in treadmill walking distance to onset of leg pain [12 weeks]

    Comparison of change in treadmill walking distance to onset of leg pain between visit 1 and visit 2, and between NMES and control group

  2. Change in 6-minute total walk distance [12 weeks]

    Comparison of change in 6-minute total walk distance between visit 1 and visit 2, and between NMES and control group

  3. Change in maximal walking distance and medium walking speed under natural outdoor conditions [12 weeks]

    Comparison of change in maximal walking distance and medium walking speed under natural outdoor conditions between visit 1 and visit 2, and between NMES and control group

  4. Change in the Walking Impairment Questionnaire score [12 weeks]

    Comparison of change in the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) score between visit 1 and visit 2 and between NMES and control group. the WIQ is a valid tool to detect improvement or deterioration in the daily walking ability of patients with intermittent claudication. The higher the WIQ score is, the better the patient's functional walking ability is.

  5. Change in the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF36) score [12 weeks]

    Comparison of change in the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF36) score between visit 1 and visit 2, and between NMES and control group. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. To calculate the scores it is necessary to purchase special software.

  6. Change in the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ) score [12 weeks]

    Comparison of change in the Peripheral Artery Questionnaire score between visit 1 and visit 2, and between NMES and control group. The Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ) is a 20-item questionnaire developed to meet this need by quantifying patients' physical limitations, symptoms, social function, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life. higher scores represent fewer symptoms and better health status

  7. Change in in actigraphy measures [12 weeks]

    Comparison of change in actigraphy measures to define daily physical activity level between visit 1 and visit 2 and between NMES, and control group

  8. Change in ankle brachial index [12 weeks]

    Comparison of change in ankle brachial index between visit 1 and visit 2, and between NMES and control group. The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is the ratio of the blood pressure at the ankle to the blood pressure in the upper arm (brachium). Compared to the arm, lower blood pressure in the leg suggests blocked arteries due to peripheral artery disease (PAD). The ABI is calculated by dividing the systolic blood pressure at the ankle by the systolic blood pressure in the arm

  9. Change in TcPO2 DROP during treadmill walking test [12 weeks]

    Comparison of change in TcPO2 DROP during treadmill walking test between visit 1 and visit 2 and between NMES and control group

  10. Number of patients submitted to a revascularization procedure [12 weeks]

    Comparison in the number of patients submitted to a revascularization procedure between visit 1 and visit 2, and between NMES and control group

  11. Change in results of Contrast imaging with laser granularity [12 weeks]

    Comparison of change in endothelial function using Contrast imaging with laser granularity, only for arteriopathic patients included in Rennes, between visit 1 and visit 2 and between NMES and control group. Laser Contrast Granularity Analysis is a method that allows the visualization of tissue blood perfusion instantly in real time.

  12. Percentage of physiological response achieved by patients [12 weeks]

    Percentage of physiological response achieved by patients for all outcome measures (comparison with parameters of volunteers without any cardiac or vascular disease) between all visits

  13. Change in maximum walking distance according to the location of the arterial obstruction [12 weeks]

    Change in maximum walking distance according to the location of the arterial obstruction using scan images between visit 1 and visit 2 and between NMES and control group.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
41 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
Arteriopatic patients :
  • Age > 40 years old.

  • Subjects with Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery disease (LEPAD). LEPAD is defined by the presence of at least one of the following criteria:

  • History of revascularization in the lower limbs due to LEPAD; OR

  • Ankle brachial index (ABI) of ≤ 0.90; OR

  • ABI or ankle systolic blood pressure decrease during recovery from treadmill walking test > 20 % or > 30 mmHg, respectively; OR

  • Toe-brachial index ≤0.70 if ABI cannot be measured and if incompressible arteries are suspected.

  • Complain of exertional calf pain (fatigue, discomfort or cramping) that can begin or not at rest, causes the participant to stop walking and relieves or lessens within 10 minutes of rest (assessed using the San Diego questionnaire AND confirmed during treadmill testing);

  • Pain (fatigue, discomfort or cramping) is mainly located at the calves' level, with the presence of a most symptomatic side.

  • Maximal walking distance on treadmill < 300 m (treadmill protocol 3.2 km/h, 10% grade);

  • Subject receiving from at least one month the recommend medical therapy for LEPAD management (antiplatelet therapy and statin medication).

  • Obtained informed consent.

Healthy volunteers

  • Age > 50 years old;

  • Absence of pain reported in the lower limbs during walking as supported by a negative score in the San Diego Questionnaire;

  • Absence of any functional limitation during the treadmill walking test: 15 min of walking at 3.2 km/h and 10% slope;

  • ABI ≥1.00 and ≤1.40.

  • Obtained informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
Arteriopatic patients :
  • Patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator;

  • Patients with acute or critical limb ischemia;

  • Ambulation limited by exertional symptoms other than intermittent claudication (e.g., dyspnea or angina pectoris);

  • Ambulation limited by exertional symptoms indicative of intermittent claudication but affecting muscles in the lower extremities other than the calves, or affecting the two calves equally;

  • Contraindication to exercise testing according to the American Heart Association and the American College of Sports Medicine;

  • Major cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction or stroke) or major surgery within the previous three months before inclusion;

  • Female patients who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or lactating;

  • Known presence of an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta > 4cm or an aneurysm of the iliac artery >1.5cm;

  • Patient subject to legal protection (guardianship or tutelage measure) and persons deprived from their liberty (according to French law);

  • Simultaneous participation to another ongoing clinical research protocol;

  • Unwilling or unable to engage in the completion of a 12 week programme;

  • Any planned event(s) that could interfere with the completion of the protocol: e.g., extended holidays preventing the completion of the intervention or planned hospitalization for a prolonged period of time.

  • Body mass > 160 kg (may exceed treadmill limit).

  • Inability to understand and sign informed consent forms due to cognitive or language barriers

  • LEPAD due to other causes than atherosclerosis.

Healthy volunteers :
  • Contraindication to walking;

  • ABI <1.00 or >1.40;

  • Inability to obtain a measure of ABI due to uncompressible arteries;

  • Limitation(s) and/or symptoms during the treadmill walking test;

  • Treadmill walking test uncompleted.

  • Presence of hypertension, heart failure, angina pectoris, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, supported by the presence of a medical treatment and the medical history.

  • Presence of conditions likely to cause a functional limitation in walking and/or significant modification of physiological responses to the exercise: current or former smoker from less than 6 months, cancer (ongoing), Parkinson's disease, renal failure (ongoing), supported by the presence of a medical treatment and the medical history.

  • History of cardiovascular disease (heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction) reported by the patient.

  • Female volunteers who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or lactating;

  • Volunteers subject to legal protection (guardianship or tutelage measure) and persons deprived from their liberty (according to French law).

  • Simultaneous participation to another ongoing clinical research protocol.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Ploermel Hospital Ploermel Brittany France 56804
2 CHU Angers Angers France
3 Private Medical Office Richard Cayman Bourgoin-Jallieu France 38300
4 CHU Brest Brest France 29000
5 CHU Caen Caen France
6 CH Louis Pasteur Dole France 39100
7 Private Medical Office Arnaud Perrouillet Ploërmel France 56800
8 CHU de Rennes Rennes France 35033
9 Hôpital de Rangueil Toulouse France 31403

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Rennes University Hospital
  • AD REM TECHNOLOGY
  • Ecole Normale Supérieure de Rennes

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guillaume Mahe, Pr, Rennes University Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Rennes University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03795103
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 35RC15_8961_ELECTROPAD
First Posted:
Jan 7, 2019
Last Update Posted:
May 5, 2022
Last Verified:
Apr 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Rennes University Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 5, 2022