Intravenous Dexamethasone Administration in Patients Undergoing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Sponsor
Christian Candrian (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04507412
Collaborator
(none)
74
1
2
143.7
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate if intravenous steroid supplementation can provide advantages over routine analgesia protocols in terms of post-operative symptoms (pain and nausea), length of hospital stay, shoulder range of motion, function and patient satisfaction

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to detect the efficacy of intravenous perioperative steroid supplementation for total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) surgeries in terms of short-term and long-term clinical outcomes and to demonstrate its advantages over the routine anaesthesia protocol. The comparison will be evaluated in terms of post- operative pain and function, opioids and analgesic drugs consumption, patient satisfaction, patient reported outcome measures (validated clinical scores), clinician-assessed clinical scores, systemic inflammatory response, length of hospital stay and long-term outcomes. Moreover, to confirm the safety of steroid supplementation all treatment related adverse events- and reactions are going to be recorded and reported, as well as post-operative glycaemia will be monitored.

The primary objective of the study is to show the efficacy on post-operative pain of intravenous perioperative dexamethasone supplementation for TSA.

The secondary objectives of the study are to show superiority by comparison of the intravenous peri- operative dexamethasone supplementation group to the routine analgesia protocol (no steroid supplementation group), in terms of post-operative pain and function, patient satisfaction, shoulder active- and passive range of motion, quantification with validated clinician- and patient reported outcome measures as the Constant, ASES and SSV Scores for function and EQ-5D-3L Score for health-related quality of life, opioids and analgesic drugs consumption, systemic inflammatory response, time until first mobilization and until the patient first slept through at night, the length of hospital stay and presence or absence of a frozen shoulder at the postoperative follow-up, as well as adverse events and reactions, in order to document the advantage over the absence of steroid supplementation in the short-, mid- term- and long-term follow up.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
74 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
This study is a 2-arm randomized controlled trial comparing i.v. dexamethasone supplementation (arm-A) and no steroid supplementation (arm-B) for total shoulder arthroplastyThis study is a 2-arm randomized controlled trial comparing i.v. dexamethasone supplementation (arm-A) and no steroid supplementation (arm-B) for total shoulder arthroplasty
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
The present study will be double blinded: both participants and assessors will be blinded to the assigned treatment. Surgeons will be also blinded, only anaesthetists taking part to surgery will be aware of the group to which the patient was assigned but they will not take part to the follow-up visits.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effect of Perioperative Intravenous Dexamethasone Administration in Patients Undergoing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis, in Terms of Post-operative Pain, Function, Nausea, Hospitalization Length, and Risk of Complications
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 9, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jul 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 31, 2032

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: arm A

• 9 mg of i.v. dexamethasone

Drug: dexamethasone
perioperatively 9 mg i.v subministration
Other Names:
  • Steroids
  • No Intervention: arm B

    • no steroid supplementation

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. mean post-operative daily pain at rest [first 3 days after surgery]

      0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)from 0 to 10, with 10 being most painful

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Post-operative shoulder pain [first 3 months after surgery]

      0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)from 0 to 10, with 10 being most painful

    2. Post-operative shoulder pain [2 and 6 weeks after surgery and 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 ,120 months after surgery]

      0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)from 0 to 10, with 10 being most painful

    3. Post-operative global shoulder function score [daily during the first 3 months]

      0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)from 0 to 10, with 10 being most functional

    4. Post-operative global shoulder function score [2 and 6 weeks after surgery and 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 ,120 months after surgery]

      0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)from 0 to 10, with 10 being most functional

    5. The clinician assessed Constant score [2 and 6 weeks after surgery and 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 ,120 months after surgery]

      The Constant Score questionnaire consists of 8 questions (giving a score of 0 -100, with 100 being the best score) evaluating pain, activity level and range of motion

    6. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES Score) [2 and 6 weeks after surgery and 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 ,120 months after surgery]

      The ASES Score is a patient reported outcome measure (PROM), a validated score evaluating pain and function for daily living and leisure activity. A maximum of 100 points means maximum (normal) functionality and no pain. MCID is 13.6 ± 2.3 points after total shoulder prosthesis

    7. The Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) [2 and 6 weeks after surgery and 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 ,120 months after surgery]

      The SSV is a percent of the subjective value of the shoulder given from the patient from 0-100%.

    8. European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Level [2 and 6 weeks after surgery and 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 ,120 months after surgery]

      "Health-Related Quality-of-Life Score" and is preferred evaluating cost utility analysis and changes in general health after surgical operations. It contains 5 questions and the maximum (best) score is 1. MCID is 0.07 units

    9. PainDETECT [2 and 6 weeks after surgery and 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 ,120 months after surgery]

      PainDETECT consists of seven questions that address the quality of pain symptoms; it is completed by the patient and no physical examination is required. A score ≤12 indicates that pain is unlikely to have a neuropathic component (< 15%), while a score of ≥19 suggests that pain is likely to have a neuropathic component (> 90%). An intermediate score (≥13, ≤18) indicates a possible neuropathic component.

    10. Patient satisfaction [2 and 6 weeks after surgery and 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 ,120 months after surgery]

      0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)

    11. Post-operative nausea [first 3 days post-operative days during hospitalisation]

      incidence and intensity (on a 0-10 NRS) will be evaluated. The 0-10 NRS is a valid and reliable instrument used for the self- assessment of symptoms: it consists in a single 11-point numeric scale, with 0 indicating no nausea and 10 reflecting the worst possible nausea

    12. Post-operative opioids and analgesic drugs consumption [first 3 days post-operative days during hospitalisation]

      Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) score. It is calculated for each medication by taking a consensus-based detriment weight for a given pharmacologic class and multiplying it by a score for dosage. The calculated values for each medication are then summed for a total MQS score. The score can provide a useful point measure of medication usage for any pain medication regime

    13. Postoperative inflammatory response [preoperatively and first 3 days post-operative days during hospitalisation]

      This outcome will be evaluated in terms of hematic C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (the medical chart will be evaluated)

    14. Time from surgery to first mobilization [During Hospitalization, approximately 1 days]

      Time from surgery to first mobilization

    15. Rate of frozen shoulders [1 week post-operative during hospitalisation]

      This is considered a complication occurring up to 11% and is induced by postoperative inflammatory processes that can lead to adhesive capsulitis

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Rate of serious adverse events related to steroid supplementation [2 and 6 weeks after surgery and 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 ,120 months after surgery]

      Rate of serious adverse events related to steroid supplementation

    2. Rate of prosthetic joint infections [2 and 6 weeks after surgery and 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 ,120 months after surgery]

      Rate of prosthetic joint infections

    3. Rate of wound infections [2 and 6 weeks after surgery and 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 ,120 months after surgery]

      Rate of wound infections

    4. Rate of wound healing problems [2 and 6 weeks after surgery and 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 ,120 months after surgery]

      Rate of wound healing problems

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    58 Years to 85 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients undergoing unilateral primary total anatomical or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (Total Shoulder Arthroplasty)

    • Patients with a BMI >18.5 and <35

    • Patients able to provide informed consent and follow all the study procedures as indicated by the protocol

    • Informed Consent as documented by signature

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Contraindications to steroids

    • Revision and post-traumatic TSA

    • Active steroid or immunosuppressive therapy in the last 30 days before the operation

    • Pregnant or breast-feeding women

    • Presence of other clinically significant concomitant disease states (ASA IV)

    • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus

    • Contraindications to Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

    • Chronic systemic diseases as immunodeficiency, autoimmune disease (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus), gout, rheumatic arthritis

    • Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse

    • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant.

    • Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study

    • Previous enrolment into the current study

    • Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Christian Candrian Lugano Switzerland 6900

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Christian Candrian

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Christian Candrian, Prof.Dr.med, EOC

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Christian Candrian, Principal Investigator, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04507412
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • ORL-ORT- 020
    First Posted:
    Aug 11, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Jul 14, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Jul 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Keywords provided by Christian Candrian, Principal Investigator, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jul 14, 2022