VITAL: Isavuconazole in the Treatment of Renally Impaired Aspergillosis and Rare Fungi
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole in the treatment of renally impaired participants with invasive fungal infections caused by Aspergillus and participants with invasive fungal disease caused by rare fungi.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
Acute invasive fungal infections caused by aspergillus, rare moulds, yeasts or dimorphic fungi are life threatening diseases. Early treatment with highly effective anti-fungals reduces mortality. This study investigates the safety and efficacy of isavuconazole in participants with aspergillosis and renal impairment, and in participants suffering from invasive infections from rare fungi.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Isavuconazole Administration of isavuconazole 3 times a day in the vein (IV) or oral as a capsule for 2 days followed by daily administration of isavuconazole (IV) or oral |
Drug: isavuconazole
Administration of 200 mg isavuconazole 3 times a day in the vein (IV) or oral as a capsule for 2 days, followed by daily administration of 200 mg isavuconazole (IV) or oral
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT). [Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]
The DRC assessed overall response based on individual clinical, mycological and radiological response assessments. Overall response outcomes were described as Success (complete or partial). Complete success was defined as a resolution of all clinical symptoms and physical findings associated with IFD. Partial success was defined as a resolution of at least some clinical symptoms and physical findings associated with IFD End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT [Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]
The DRC evaluated clinical response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Clinical response outcomes were described as Success [Resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings and Partial resolution of attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
- Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT [Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]
The DRC evaluated mycological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Mycological response outcomes were described as Success [Eradication and Presumed eradication]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
- Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT [Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]
The DRC evaluated radiological response to treatment at at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Radiological response outcomes were described as Success [Improvement of at least 25% from baseline for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections], [Improvement of at least 50% from baseline for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections]; and [Improvement of at least 25% from baseline if EOT occurs prior to day 42 and at least 50% improvement from baseline if EOT occurs after day 42 for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
- Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT [Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]
The Investigator evaluated clinical response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Clinical response outcomes were described as Success [Resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings] and [Resolution of some attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
- Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT [Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]
The Investigator evaluated mycological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Mycological response outcomes were described as Success [Eradication,Presumed eradication]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
- Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT [Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]
The Investigator evaluated radiological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Radiological response outcomes were described as Success [≥ 90% improvement,≥ 50% to < 90% improvement and ≥ 25% to < 50% improvement (for day 42 and EOT, if EOT occurs prior to day 42)]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
- All-cause Mortality Through Day 42 and Day 84 [Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]
All-cause Mortality was assessed through Day 42 and Day 84 and summarized for ITT population End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
- Safety - Overall Number of TEAEs [From the first study drug administration until 28 days after the last dose of study drug]
A Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) is any adverse event that starts after the first administration of study drug until 28 days after the last dose of study drug.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
•Participants meeting EORTC/MSG (European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group) definition of proven or culture positive probable IFD (invasive fungal disease) caused by rare moulds, yeasts, or dimorphic fungi (i.e. fungal pathogens other than Aspergillus fumigatus or Candida species) whether renally impaired or not (including dialysis) who require primary therapy for their IFD at the time of enrollment.
OR
•Participants who had proven or probable zygomycosis, whether renally impaired or not (including dialysis), who require primary therapy. Zygomycosis must be documented by culture or histology / cytology.
OR
•Participants meeting EORTC/MSG definition of proven or culture positive probable IFD caused by rare moulds, yeasts, or dimorphic fungi (i.e., fungal pathogens other than Aspergillus fumigatus or Candida species), whether RI or not (including dialysis), who were refractory to current treatment defined as,
-
Clear documentation of progression of disease. Note: radiological progression only in association with white blood cell (WBC) count recovery was not acceptable.
-
Failure to improve clinically despite receiving at least 7 days of standard antifungal regimen. Prior to enrolling patients who fell into this category, the Medical Monitor was contacted for approval.
OR
• Participants meeting EORTC/MSG definition of proven or culture positive probable IFD caused by rare moulds, yeasts, or dimorphic fungi (i.e., fungal pathogens other than Aspergillus fumigatus or Candida species), whether RI or not (including dialysis), who were intolerant to current treatment for example:
-
Doubling of serum creatinine value to higher than the upper limit of normal (ULN) within 48 hours.
-
Serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/mL and current treatment with polyene or IV voriconazole.
-
Other significant drug-related adverse reaction(s) to the current antifungal agent, resulting in discontinuation of the treatment, e.g., persistence of visual disturbance, allergic reaction, phototoxicity or severe infusion reaction (hypertensive crisis, severe chills or shock).
-
Documented inability to achieve adequate blood levels of posaconazole, voriconazole or itraconazole.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
A known condition of the participants that may jeopardize adherence to the protocol requirements
-
Participants who are unlikely to survive 30 days
-
Participants with a body weight < 40 kg
-
Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | University of Alabama at Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama | United States | 35294 |
2 | City Of Hope National Medical Center | Duarte | California | United States | 91010 |
3 | University of California Davis Health System | Sacramento | California | United States | 95817 |
4 | California Pacific Medical Center | San Francisco | California | United States | 94110 |
5 | University of California at San Francisco | San Francisco | California | United States | 94143 |
6 | Stanford University Hospital | Stanford | California | United States | 94303 |
7 | University Of Colorado Health Sciences Center | Aurora | Colorado | United States | 80045 |
8 | Emory Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia | United States | 30322 |
9 | University of Chicago, Division of Infectious Diseases | Chicago | Illinois | United States | 60637 |
10 | Indiana BMT | Beech Grove | Indiana | United States | 46107 |
11 | Infectious Disease of Indiana | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States | 46280 |
12 | Ochsner Clinic Foundation | New Orleans | Louisiana | United States | 70121 |
13 | Brigham & Womens Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | United States | 02115 |
14 | UMASS Memorial Medical Center | Worcester | Massachusetts | United States | 01655 |
15 | Wayne State University School of Medicine | Detroit | Michigan | United States | 48201 |
16 | Henry Ford Hospital | Detroit | Michigan | United States | 48202 |
17 | University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | United States | 55455 |
18 | Upstate Infectious Diseases Association LLP | Albany | New York | United States | 12208 |
19 | Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio | United States | 44195 |
20 | Regional Infection Diseases Infusion Center Inc. | Lima | Ohio | United States | 45801 |
21 | Temple University Health Sciences | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States | 19140 |
22 | University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | United States | 15213 |
23 | University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | United States | 77030 |
24 | Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Clinical Research | Seattle | Washington | United States | 98109 |
25 | Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires | Ciudad Autonoma | Argentina | 1181 | |
26 | Instituto Medico Especializado Alexander Fleming | Ciudad Autonoma | Argentina | 1426 | |
27 | Hospital Nuestra Senora de la Misericordia | Cordoba | Argentina | 5000 | |
28 | Hospital San Roque | Cordoba | Argentina | 5000 | |
29 | Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Investigación Clínica - CER San Juan | San Juan | Argentina | 5402 | |
30 | Mater Medical Centre | South Brisbane | Australia | 4101 | |
31 | Princess Alexandria Hospital | Woolloongabba | Australia | 4102 | |
32 | Institut Jules Bordet | Brussels | Belgium | 1000 | |
33 | Erasme Hospital | Bruxelles | Belgium | 1070 | |
34 | Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent | Gent | Belgium | 9000 | |
35 | Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven | Leuven | Belgium | 3000 | |
36 | Hospital Felicio Rocho | Belo Horizonte | Brazil | 30110-908 | |
37 | Santa Casa de Misericordia de Belo Horizonte | Belo Horizonte | Brazil | 30150-221 | |
38 | Hospital das Clinicas da UFPR | Curitiba | Brazil | 80060-150 | |
39 | Hospital de Clinicas da FMUSP - Ribeirao Preto | Ribeirao Preto | Brazil | 14048-900 | |
40 | Hospital Universitario Clementino Fraga Filho | Rio de Janeiro | Brazil | 21941-913 | |
41 | Hospital Universitario de Santa Maria | Santa Maria | Brazil | 97105-900 | |
42 | Hospital Professor Edmundo Vasconcelos | São Paulo | Brazil | 04038-905 | |
43 | Hamilton Health Sciences - Henderson Site | Hamilton | Ontario | Canada | L8V 1C3 |
44 | The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus | Ottawa | Ontario | Canada | K1H 8L6 |
45 | Hôpital Maisonneuve - Rosemont | Montreal | Quebec | Canada | H1T 2M4 |
46 | Hôpital Maisonneuve - Rosemont | Montréal | Quebec | Canada | H1T 2M4 |
47 | Hospital Clinico San Borja Arriaran | Santiago | Chile | 8320000 | |
48 | Alexandria University Hospital | Alexandria | Egypt | 21131 | |
49 | National Cancer Institute | Cairo | Egypt | 11796 | |
50 | Nasser Institute | Cairo | Egypt | 12655 | |
51 | Hôpital Edouard Herriot | Lyon cedex 3 | France | 69437 | |
52 | Institut Paoli Calmette - Marseille | Marseille Cedex 9 | France | 13273 | |
53 | Hotel Dieu | Nantes | France | 44093 | |
54 | Hôpital Saint-Louis | Paris Cedex 10 | France | 75475 | |
55 | Hopital Hautepierre | Strasbourg Cedex | France | 67048 | |
56 | Hôpital de Brabois Adultes | Vandoeuvre les Nancy | France | 54511 | |
57 | Universitaetsklinikum Aachen | Aachen | Germany | 52074 | |
58 | Charite-Campus Benjamin Franklin | Berlin | Germany | 12200 | |
59 | Universitaet Koeln | Köln | Germany | 50931 | |
60 | Klinikum Neuperlach | Muenchen | Germany | 81737 | |
61 | Medizinische Klinik und Polyklinik II | Würzburg | Germany | 97080 | |
62 | Medanta Medicity Hospital | Gurgaon | Haryan | India | 122001 |
63 | Shirdi Sai Baba Cancer Hospital K. M. C. Hospital | Manipal | Kama | India | 576104 |
64 | Tata Memorial Hopital, Department of Anesthesia | Mumbai | Mahara | India | 400012 |
65 | Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital & Research Centre | Pune | Mahara | India | 411004 |
66 | Global Hospitals & Health City | Chennai | Tamilna | India | 600100 |
67 | Sterling Hospital | Ahmedabad | India | 380052 | |
68 | Apollo Hospitals | Hyderabad | India | 500033 | |
69 | Sahyadri Specialty Hospital | Pune | India | 411004 | |
70 | Rambam Health Care Campus | Haifa | Israel | 31096 | |
71 | Hadassah Universtiy Hospital - Ein Kerem | Jerusalem | Israel | 91200 | |
72 | Rabin MC | Petah Tikva | Israel | 49100 | |
73 | Chaim Sheba Medical Center | Ramat-Gan | Israel | 52621 | |
74 | Sourasky MC Ichilov Hospital Tel Aviv | Tel Aviv | Israel | 64239 | |
75 | Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital | Buchon-si | Korea, Republic of | 420-767 | |
76 | Gachon University Gil Hospital | Incheon | Korea, Republic of | 405-760 | |
77 | Samsung Medical Center | Seoul | Korea, Republic of | 135-710 | |
78 | The Catholic University of Korea | Seoul | Korea, Republic of | 137-701 | |
79 | Asan Medical Center | Seoul | Korea, Republic of | 138-736 | |
80 | American University of Beirut Medical Center | Beirut | Lebanon | 11-0236 | |
81 | Clinique Dr. Rizk | Beirut | Lebanon | 1107-2130 | |
82 | Rafik Hariri University Hospital | Beirut | Lebanon | 5244 | |
83 | Antiguo Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde | Guadalajara | Mexico | 44280 | |
84 | Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador | Mexico City | Mexico | 14000 | |
85 | Hospital Universitario Dr Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez | Monterrey | Mexico | 64460 | |
86 | Hospital Central Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto | San Luis Potosi | Mexico | 78240 | |
87 | Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny | Warszawa | Poland | 02097 | |
88 | S.I. Russian Oncological Research Center n.a. N.N. Blokhin | Moscow | Russian Federation | 115478 | |
89 | State Institution "Hematology Research Center" RAMS | Moscow | Russian Federation | 125167 | |
90 | Republican Hospital named after V.A. Baranov | Petrozavodsk | Russian Federation | 185019 | |
91 | St-Petersburg MA Postgraduate Education | St. Petersburg | Russian Federation | 194291 | |
92 | Private Practice | Lyttleton | Gauteng | South Africa | 0157 |
93 | Songklanagarind Hospital | Hat Yai | Thailand | 90110 | |
94 | Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital | Muang | Thailand | 30000 | |
95 | Srinagarind Hospital | Muang | Thailand | 40002 | |
96 | Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital | Muang | Thailand | 50200 | |
97 | Ramathibodi Hospital | Ratchathewi | Thailand | 10400 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Astellas Pharma Inc
- Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd
Investigators
- Study Director: Medical Director, Astellas Pharma Global Development
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- 9766-CL-0103
- WSA-CS-003
- 2006-005003-33
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | Consenting adult participants with proven, probable or possible invasive aspergillosis and renally impaired (RI) or of participants with invasive fungal disease (IFD) caused by rare moulds, yeasts or dimorphic fungi meeting the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were considered for entry into the study. |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail | Analysis and interpretation of the results was pathogen dependent and each pathogen was quite rare, therefore it was not feasible to enroll a sufficient number of participants in a randomized controlled trial to power the study adequately to allow statistical comparisons. |
Arm/Group Title | Isavuconazole |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a loading dose of isavuconazole, 200 mg three times a day administered intravenously (IV) or orally (PO) [or per os (PO)] for the first 2 days followed by a maintenance dose from Day 3 of 200 mg once daily either IV or orally until they reached a treatment endpoint or for a maximum of 180 days; with an option for extended treatment under specified criteria. |
Period Title: Overall Study | |
STARTED | 149 |
COMPLETED | 146 |
NOT COMPLETED | 3 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Isavuconazole |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received a loading dose of isavuconazole, 200 mg three times a day administered intravenously (IV) or orally (PO) [or per os (PO)] for the first 2 days followed by a maintenance dose from Day 3 of 200 mg once daily either IV or orally until they reached a treatment endpoint or for a maximum of 180 days; with an option for extended treatment under specified criteria. |
Overall Participants | 146 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
49.9
(16.78)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
46
31.5%
|
Male |
100
68.5%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |
American Indian or Alaska Native |
0
0%
|
Asian |
24
16.4%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
Black or African American |
10
6.8%
|
White |
108
74%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
4
2.7%
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number] | |
Hispanic or Latino |
22
15.1%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
124
84.9%
|
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
Brazil |
20
13.7%
|
India |
5
3.4%
|
Israel |
21
14.4%
|
Lebanon |
1
0.7%
|
Mexico |
8
5.5%
|
Russian Federation |
2
1.4%
|
Korea, Republic of |
2
1.4%
|
Thailand |
14
9.6%
|
Belgium |
13
8.9%
|
Germany |
4
2.7%
|
United States |
56
38.4%
|
Therapy status (participants) [Number] | |
Primary Therapy |
93
63.7%
|
Refractory |
38
26%
|
Intolerant |
12
8.2%
|
Missing |
3
2.1%
|
Hematologic malignancy (participants) [Number] | |
Yes |
63
43.2%
|
No |
83
56.8%
|
Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)/Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) (participants) [Number] | |
Yes |
26
17.8%
|
No |
120
82.2%
|
Uncontrolled malignancy (participants) [Number] | |
Yes |
46
31.5%
|
No |
100
68.5%
|
Neutropenic (participants) [Number] | |
Yes |
38
26%
|
No |
66
45.2%
|
Missing |
42
28.8%
|
Corticosteroid use (participants) [Number] | |
Yes |
35
24%
|
No |
111
76%
|
T-cell immunosuppressant use (participants) [Number] | |
Yes |
61
41.8%
|
No |
48
32.9%
|
Missing |
37
25.3%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT). |
---|---|
Description | The DRC assessed overall response based on individual clinical, mycological and radiological response assessments. Overall response outcomes were described as Success (complete or partial). Complete success was defined as a resolution of all clinical symptoms and physical findings associated with IFD. Partial success was defined as a resolution of at least some clinical symptoms and physical findings associated with IFD End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days. |
Time Frame | Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180]) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT) |
Arm/Group Title | mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired] | mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired] | mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy) | mITT - Mucorales (Refractory) | mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant) | mITT- Other Filamentous Fungi | mITT- Other Mould Species Only | mITT- Other Dimorphic Fungi | mITT- Other Non-Candida Yeast | mITT-Other Mixed Infection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Aspergillus - Renally Impaired (RI) mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, and whether they are renally impaired and not renally impaired. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for patients who had a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). | Aspergillus - Not Renally Impaired (NRI) mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status (Renally Impaired and Not Renally Impaired). Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT- Aspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). | Mucorales - Primary Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 21 participants receiving isavuconazole as a primary therapy. | Mucorales - Refractory Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis).The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 11 participants whose IFD was refractory to prior antifungal therapy (AFT) | Mucorales - Intolerant mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participant had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 5 participants who were intolerant to prior antifungal therapy (AFT). | Other Filamentous Fungi mITT population consisted of 17 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by other filamentous fungi (4 Fusarium, 2 Exophiala, 2 Cladosporium, 2 Scopulariopsis and 1 each of Acremonium, Alternaria, Curvularia, Exserohilum, Paecilomyces, Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium). | Other Mould Species mITT population consisted of 7 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mould species. | Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT population consisted of 29 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by dimorphic fungi (10 Paracoccidiodes, 9 Coccidiodides, 7 Histoplasma, 3 Blastomyces). | Other non-Candida Yeast mITT population consisted of 11 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by non-Candida yeast (4 Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 Cryptococcus gatii, 2 Cryptococcus not otherwise specified (NOS) and 2 Trichosporon). | Other Mixed Infections mITT group consisted of 15 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mixed infections aspergillosis/mucormycosis. |
Measure Participants | 20 | 4 | 21 | 11 | 5 | 17 | 7 | 29 | 11 | 15 |
Day 42- Success Rate |
25.0
17.1%
|
50.0
NaN
|
14.3
NaN
|
9.1
NaN
|
0
NaN
|
47.1
NaN
|
28.6
NaN
|
41.4
NaN
|
36.4
NaN
|
13.3
NaN
|
Day 84 - Success Rate |
30.0
20.5%
|
25.0
NaN
|
9.5
NaN
|
36.4
NaN
|
20.0
NaN
|
41.2
NaN
|
28.6
NaN
|
44.8
NaN
|
36.4
NaN
|
13.3
NaN
|
End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate |
30.0
20.5%
|
66.7
NaN
|
31.6
NaN
|
36.4
NaN
|
20.0
NaN
|
64.7
NaN
|
28.6
NaN
|
64.3
NaN
|
72.7
NaN
|
14.3
NaN
|
Title | Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT |
---|---|
Description | The DRC evaluated clinical response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Clinical response outcomes were described as Success [Resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings and Partial resolution of attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days. |
Time Frame | Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180]) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT) |
Arm/Group Title | mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired] | mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired] | mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy) | mITT - Mucorales (Refractory) | mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant) | mITT-Other Filamentous Fungi | mITT- Other Mould Species Only | mITT- Other Dimorphic Fungi | mITT- Other Non-Candida Yeast | mITT-Other Mixed Infection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Aspergillus - Renally Impaired (RI) mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, and whether they are renally impaired or not renally impaired. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for patients who had a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). | Aspergillus - Not Renally Impaired (NRI) mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status (Renally Impaired and Not Renally Impaired). Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT- Aspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). | Mucorales - Primary Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 21 participants receiving isavuconazole as a primary therapy. | Mucorales - Refractory Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis).The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 11 participants whose IFD was refractory to prior AFT. | Mucorales - Intolerant mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participant had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 5 participants who were intolerant to prior AFT. | Other Filamentous Fungi mITT population consisted of 17 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by other filamentous fungi (4 Fusarium, 2 Exophiala, 2 Cladosporium, 2 Scopulariopsis and 1 each of Acremonium, Alternaria, Curvularia, Exserohilum, Paecilomyces, Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium). | Other Mould Species mITT population consisted of 7 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mould species. | Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT population consisted of 29 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by dimorphic fungi (10 Paracoccidiodes, 9 Coccidiodides, 7 Histoplasma, 3 Blastomyces). | Other non-Candida Yeast mITT population consisted of 11 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by non-Candida yeast (4 Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 Cryptococcus gatii, 2 Cryptococcus not otherwise specified (NOS) and 2 Trichosporon). | Other Mixed Infections mITT group consisted of 15 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mixed infections aspergillosis/mucormycosis. |
Measure Participants | 20 | 4 | 21 | 11 | 5 | 17 | 7 | 29 | 11 | 15 |
Day 42- Success Rate |
55.0
37.7%
|
75.0
NaN
|
50.0
NaN
|
33.3
NaN
|
50.0
NaN
|
68.8
NaN
|
71.4
NaN
|
79.3
NaN
|
70.0
NaN
|
42.9
NaN
|
Day 84 - Success Rate |
45.0
30.8%
|
25.0
NaN
|
40.0
NaN
|
22.2
NaN
|
50.0
NaN
|
62.5
NaN
|
42.9
NaN
|
82.8
NaN
|
70.0
NaN
|
35.7
NaN
|
End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate |
55.0
37.7%
|
66.7
NaN
|
55.6
NaN
|
22.2
NaN
|
50.0
NaN
|
81.3
NaN
|
85.7
NaN
|
82.1
NaN
|
70.0
NaN
|
38.5
NaN
|
Title | Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT |
---|---|
Description | The DRC evaluated mycological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Mycological response outcomes were described as Success [Eradication and Presumed eradication]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days. |
Time Frame | Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180]) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT) |
Arm/Group Title | mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired] | mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired] | mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy) | mITT - Mucorales (Refractory) | mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant) | mITT-Other Filamentous Fungi | mITT- Other Mould Species Only | mITT- Other Dimorphic Fungi | mITT- Other Non-Candida Yeast | mITT-Other Mixed Infection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Aspergillus - Renally Impaired mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participants IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, renally impaired and not renally impaired. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who have a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for participants who have a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). | Aspergillus - Not Renally Impaired (NRI) mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status (Renally Impaired and Not Renally Impaired). Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT- Aspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). | Mucorales - Primary Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 21 participants receiving isavuconazole as a primary therapy. | Mucorales - Refractory Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis).The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 11 participants whose IFD was refractory to prior AFT. | Mucorales - Intolerant mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participant had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 5 participants who were intolerant to prior AFT. | Other Filamentous Fungi mITT population consisted of 17 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by other filamentous fungi (4 Fusarium, 2 Exophiala, 2 Cladosporium, 2 Scopulariopsis and 1 each of Acremonium, Alternaria, Curvularia, Exserohilum, Paecilomyces, Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium). | Other Mould Species mITT population consisted of 7 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mould species. | Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT population consisted of 29 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by dimorphic fungi (10 Paracoccidiodes, 9 Coccidiodides, 7 Histoplasma, 3 Blastomyces). | Other non-Candida Yeast mITT population consisted of 11 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by non-Candida yeast (4 Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 Cryptococcus gatii, 2 Cryptococcus not otherwise specified (NOS) and 2 Trichosporon). | Other Mixed Infections mITT population consisted of 15 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mixed infections aspergillosis/mucormycosis. |
Measure Participants | 20 | 4 | 21 | 11 | 5 | 17 | 7 | 29 | 11 | 15 |
Day 42- Success Rate |
30.0
20.5%
|
50.0
NaN
|
4.8
NaN
|
0
NaN
|
0
NaN
|
29.4
NaN
|
28.6
NaN
|
27.6
NaN
|
45.5
NaN
|
13.3
NaN
|
Day 84 - Success Rate |
35.0
24%
|
25.0
NaN
|
9.5
NaN
|
27.3
NaN
|
40.0
NaN
|
35.3
NaN
|
28.6
NaN
|
27.6
NaN
|
45.5
NaN
|
13.3
NaN
|
End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate |
35.0
24%
|
66.7
NaN
|
31.6
NaN
|
36.4
NaN
|
40.0
NaN
|
70.6
NaN
|
28.6
NaN
|
53.6
NaN
|
81.8
NaN
|
14.3
NaN
|
Title | Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT |
---|---|
Description | The DRC evaluated radiological response to treatment at at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Radiological response outcomes were described as Success [Improvement of at least 25% from baseline for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections], [Improvement of at least 50% from baseline for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections]; and [Improvement of at least 25% from baseline if EOT occurs prior to day 42 and at least 50% improvement from baseline if EOT occurs after day 42 for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days. |
Time Frame | Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180]) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT) |
Arm/Group Title | mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired] | mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired] | mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy) | mITT - Mucorales (Refractory) | mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant) | mITT-Other Filamentous Fungi | mITT- Other Mould Species Only | mITT- Other Dimorphic Fungi | mITT- Other Non-Candida Yeast | mITT-Other Mixed Infection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Aspergillus - Renally Impaired mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participants IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, renally impaired and not renally impaired. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who have a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for participants who have a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). | Aspergillus - Renally Impaired mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participants IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, renally impaired and not renally impaired. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITTAspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). | Mucorales - Primary Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 21 participants receiving isavuconazole as a primary therapy. | Mucorales - Refractory Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis).The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 11 participants whose IFD was refractory to prior AFT. | Mucorales - Intolerant mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participant had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 5 participants who were intolerant to prior AFT. | Other Filamentous Fungi mITT population consisted of 17 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by other filamentous fungi (4 Fusarium,2 Exophiala,2 Cladosporium,2 Scopulariopsis and 1 each of Acremonium, Alternaria, Curvularia,Exserohilum, Paecilomyces,Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium). | Other Mould Species mITT population consisted of 7 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mould species. | Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT population consisted of 29 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by dimorphic fungi (10 Paracoccidiodes,9 Coccidiodides, 7 Histoplasma, 3 Blastomyces). | Other Non Candida Yeast mITT population consisted of 11 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by non-Candida yeast (4 Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 Cryptococcus gatii, 2 Cryptococcus NOS and 2 Trichosporon). | Other Mixed Infections mITT population consisted of 15 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mixed infections aspergillosis/mucormycosis. |
Measure Participants | 20 | 4 | 21 | 11 | 5 | 17 | 7 | 29 | 11 | 15 |
Day 42- Success Rate |
30.0
20.5%
|
25.0
NaN
|
0
NaN
|
10.0
NaN
|
0
NaN
|
25.0
NaN
|
16.7
NaN
|
21.4
NaN
|
0
NaN
|
7.1
NaN
|
Day 84 - Success Rate |
20.0
13.7%
|
25.0
NaN
|
4.8
NaN
|
20.0
NaN
|
20.0
NaN
|
6.3
NaN
|
0
NaN
|
28.6
NaN
|
10.0
NaN
|
14.3
NaN
|
End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate |
15.0
10.3%
|
66.7
NaN
|
16.7
NaN
|
20.0
NaN
|
20.0
NaN
|
50.0
NaN
|
0
NaN
|
33.3
NaN
|
10.0
NaN
|
7.7
NaN
|
Title | Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT |
---|---|
Description | The Investigator evaluated clinical response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Clinical response outcomes were described as Success [Resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings] and [Resolution of some attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days. |
Time Frame | Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180]) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT) |
Arm/Group Title | mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired] | mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired] | mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy) | mITT - Mucorales (Refractory) | mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant) | mITT- Other Filamentous Fungi | mITT- Other Mould Species Only | mITT- Other Dimorphic Fungi | mITT- Other Non-Candida Yeast | mITT-Other Mixed Infection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Aspergillus - Renally Impaired (RI) mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, and whether they are renally impaired and not renally impaired. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for participants who had a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). | Aspergillus - Not Renally Impaired (NRI) mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status (Renally Impaired and Not Renally Impaired). Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT- Aspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). | Mucorales - Primary Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 21 participants receiving isavuconazole as a primary therapy. | Mucorales - Refractory Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis).The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 11 participants whose IFD was refractory to prior AFT | Mucorales - Intolerant mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participant had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 5 participants who were intolerant to prior AFT. | Other Filamentous Fungi mITT population consisted of 17 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by other filamentous fungi (4 Fusarium, 2 Exophiala, 2 Cladosporium, 2 Scopulariopsis and 1 each of Acremonium, Alternaria, Curvularia, Exserohilum, Paecilomyces, Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium). | Other Mould Species mITT population consisted of 7 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mould species. | Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT population consisted of 29 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by dimorphic fungi (10 Paracoccidiodes, 9 Coccidiodides, 7 Histoplasma, 3 Blastomyces). | Other non-Candida Yeast mITT population consisted of 11 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by non-Candida yeast (4 Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 Cryptococcus gatii, 2 Cryptococcus not otherwise specified (NOS) and 2 Trichosporon). | Other Mixed Infections mITT group consisted of 15 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mixed infections aspergillosis/mucormycosis. |
Measure Participants | 20 | 4 | 21 | 11 | 5 | 17 | 7 | 29 | 11 | 15 |
Day 42 |
60.0
41.1%
|
75.0
NaN
|
50.0
NaN
|
28.6
NaN
|
25.0
NaN
|
81.3
NaN
|
85.7
NaN
|
75.9
NaN
|
70.0
NaN
|
50.0
NaN
|
Day 84 |
55.0
37.7%
|
55.0
NaN
|
21.4
NaN
|
25.0
NaN
|
20.0
NaN
|
62.5
NaN
|
42.9
NaN
|
82.2
NaN
|
70.0
NaN
|
35.7
NaN
|
End of Treatment (EOT) |
60.0
41.1%
|
75.0
NaN
|
42.9
NaN
|
28.6
NaN
|
66.7
NaN
|
81.3
NaN
|
71.4
NaN
|
79.3
NaN
|
70.0
NaN
|
42.9
NaN
|
Title | Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT |
---|---|
Description | The Investigator evaluated mycological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Mycological response outcomes were described as Success [Eradication,Presumed eradication]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days. |
Time Frame | Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180]) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT) |
Arm/Group Title | mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired] | mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired] | mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy) | mITT - Mucorales (Refractory) | mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant) | mITT- Other Filamentous Fungi | mITT- Other Mould Species Only | mITT- Other Dimorphic Fungi | mITT- Other Non-Candida Yeast | mITT-Other Mixed Infection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Aspergillus - Renally Impaired (RI) mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, and whether they are renally impaired and not renally impaired. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for patients who had a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). | Aspergillus - Not Renally Impaired (NRI) mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status (Renally Impaired and Not Renally Impaired). Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT- Aspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). | Mucorales - Primary Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 21 participants receiving isavuconazole as a primary therapy. | Mucorales - Refractory Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis).The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 11 participants whose IFD was refractory to prior AFT | Mucorales - Intolerant mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participant had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 5 participants who were intolerant to prior AFT. | Other Filamentous Fungi mITT population consisted of 17 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by other filamentous fungi (4 Fusarium, 2 Exophiala, 2 Cladosporium, 2 Scopulariopsis and 1 each of Acremonium, Alternaria, Curvularia, Exserohilum, Paecilomyces, Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium). | Other Mould Species mITT population consisted of 7 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mould species. | Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT population consisted of 29 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by dimorphic fungi (10 Paracoccidiodes, 9 Coccidiodides, 7 Histoplasma, 3 Blastomyces). | Other non-Candida Yeast mITT population consisted of 11 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by non-Candida yeast (4 Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 Cryptococcus gatii, 2 Cryptococcus not otherwise specified (NOS) and 2 Trichosporon). | Other Mixed Infections mITT group consisted of 15 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mixed infections aspergillosis/mucormycosis. |
Measure Participants | 20 | 4 | 21 | 11 | 2 | 17 | 7 | 29 | 11 | 15 |
Day 42 |
46.7
32%
|
66.7
NaN
|
50.0
NaN
|
28.6
NaN
|
25.0
NaN
|
69.2
NaN
|
83.3
NaN
|
70.6
NaN
|
50.0
NaN
|
18.2
NaN
|
Day 84 |
44.4
30.4%
|
50.0
NaN
|
21.4
NaN
|
25.0
NaN
|
20.0
NaN
|
64.3
NaN
|
42.9
NaN
|
80.0
NaN
|
25.0
NaN
|
33.3
NaN
|
End of Treatment (EOT) |
50.0
34.2%
|
66.7
NaN
|
42.9
NaN
|
28.6
NaN
|
66.7
NaN
|
78.6
NaN
|
66.7
NaN
|
76.9
NaN
|
50.0
NaN
|
25.0
NaN
|
Title | Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT |
---|---|
Description | The Investigator evaluated radiological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Radiological response outcomes were described as Success [≥ 90% improvement,≥ 50% to < 90% improvement and ≥ 25% to < 50% improvement (for day 42 and EOT, if EOT occurs prior to day 42)]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days. |
Time Frame | Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180]) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT) |
Arm/Group Title | mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired] | mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired] | mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy) | mITT - Mucorales (Refractory) | mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant) | mITT- Other Filamentous Fungi | mITT- Other Mould Species Only | mITT- Other Dimorphic Fungi | mITT- Other Non-Candida Yeast | mITT-Other Mixed Infection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Aspergillus - Renally Impaired (RI) mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, and whether they are renally impaired and not renally impaired. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for participants who had a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). | Aspergillus - Not Renally Impaired (NRI) mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status (Renally Impaired and Not Renally Impaired). Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT- Aspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). | Mucorales - Primary Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 21 participants receiving isavuconazole as a primary therapy. | Mucorales - Refractory Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis).The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 11 participants whose IFD was refractory to prior AFT | Mucorales - Intolerant mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participant had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 5 participants who were intolerant to prior AFT. | Other Filamentous Fungi mITT population consisted of 17 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by other filamentous fungi (4 Fusarium, 2 Exophiala, 2 Cladosporium, 2 Scopulariopsis and 1 each of Acremonium, Alternaria, Curvularia, Exserohilum, Paecilomyces, Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium). | Other Mould Species mITT population consisted of 7 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mould species. | Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT population consisted of 29 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by dimorphic fungi (10 Paracoccidiodes, 9 Coccidiodides, 7 Histoplasma, 3 Blastomyces). | Other non-Candida Yeast mITT population consisted of 11 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by non-Candida yeast (4 Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 Cryptococcus gatii, 2 Cryptococcus not otherwise specified (NOS) and 2 Trichosporon). | Other Mixed Infections mITT group consisted of 15 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mixed infections aspergillosis/mucormycosis. |
Measure Participants | 20 | 4 | 21 | 11 | 5 | 17 | 7 | 29 | 11 | 15 |
Day 42 |
35.0
24%
|
75.0
NaN
|
40.0
NaN
|
0
NaN
|
40.0
NaN
|
46.7
NaN
|
20.0
NaN
|
32.1
NaN
|
9.1
NaN
|
28.6
NaN
|
Day 84 |
40.0
27.4%
|
50.0
NaN
|
25.0
NaN
|
11.1
NaN
|
40.0
NaN
|
40.0
NaN
|
20.0
NaN
|
37.0
NaN
|
0
NaN
|
7.1
NaN
|
End of Treatment (EOT) |
35.0
24%
|
50.0
NaN
|
30.0
NaN
|
22.2
NaN
|
20.0
NaN
|
33.3
NaN
|
40.0
NaN
|
55.6
NaN
|
10.0
NaN
|
14.3
NaN
|
Title | All-cause Mortality Through Day 42 and Day 84 |
---|---|
Description | All-cause Mortality was assessed through Day 42 and Day 84 and summarized for ITT population End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days. |
Time Frame | Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180]) |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Intent-To-Treat population (ITT) |
Arm/Group Title | Renally Impaired | Not Renally Impaired |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Renally Impaired (RI) population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who had a baseline eGFR-MDRD < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for patients who had a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). | Not Renally Impaired (NRI) population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status (Renally Impaired and Not Renally Impaired). Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT- Aspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). |
Measure Participants | 59 | 87 |
All-cause Mortality Through Day 42 |
22.0
15.1%
|
16.1
NaN
|
All-cause Mortality Through Day 84 |
30.5
20.9%
|
20.7
NaN
|
Title | Safety - Overall Number of TEAEs |
---|---|
Description | A Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) is any adverse event that starts after the first administration of study drug until 28 days after the last dose of study drug. |
Time Frame | From the first study drug administration until 28 days after the last dose of study drug |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The safety analysis set (SAF) consists of all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug as this was a non-comparative open-label study |
Arm/Group Title | Isavuconazole |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Participants received Isavuconazole intravenous (IV) or per oral (PO) over period of 2 days, on days 1 and 2 three doses of 200 mg were administered every 8 hours for a total of six doses. From Day 3 to End of Treatment (EOT) maintenance dose of 200 mg isavuconazole was administered once daily up to 180 days; with an option for extended treatment under specified criteria. |
Measure Participants | 146 |
TEAEs |
139
95.2%
|
Study Drug-Related TEAEs |
60
41.1%
|
Serious TEAEs |
89
61%
|
Study Drug-Related Serious TEAEs |
13
8.9%
|
TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Stud |
19
13%
|
Study Drug TEAEs Leading to Perm Discontinuation |
7
4.8%
|
TEAEs Leading to Death |
44
30.1%
|
Study Drug-Related TEAEs Leading to Death |
1
0.7%
|
Deaths |
47
32.2%
|
Deaths Through 28 Days after Last Dose Study Drug |
42
28.8%
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | From the first administration of study drug until 28 days after the last dose of study drug. For the days when IV and oral doses were administered on the same day, the day was split into one-half day for each route's duration. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | The safety analysis set is identical to the intent -to-treat (ITT) population (i.e., all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug) as this was a non-comparative open-label study. | |||
Arm/Group Title | Renally Impaired (RI) | Not Renally Impaired (NRI) | ||
Arm/Group Description | Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who have a baseline as eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. | Not Renally impaired participants were defined as no if they have a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Renally Impaired (RI) | Not Renally Impaired (NRI) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Renally Impaired (RI) | Not Renally Impaired (NRI) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 43/59 (72.9%) | 46/87 (52.9%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Anaemia | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Febrile neutropenia | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Pancytopenia | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Acute myocardial infarction | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Atrial fibrillation | 2/59 (3.4%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Atrioventricular block complete | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Cardiac failure acute | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Cardio-respiratory arrest | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Electromechanical dissociation | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Eye disorders | ||||
Retinal artery occlusion | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Retinal haemorrhage | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Vitreous haemorrhage | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdominal pain | 2/59 (3.4%) | 3/87 (3.4%) | ||
Colitis | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Colitis ulcerative | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Constipation | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Diarrhoea | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Dysphagia | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | 3/59 (5.1%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Localised intraabdominal fluid collection | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Nausea | 0/59 (0%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Oesophagitis | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Pancreatitis | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Pancreatitis chronic | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Pancreatitis relapsing | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Vomiting | 0/59 (0%) | 4/87 (4.6%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Death | 1/59 (1.7%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
General physical health deterioration | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Multi-organ failure | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Non-cardiac chest pain | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Oedema peripheral | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Pyrexia | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||
Acute hepatic failure | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Cholangiolitis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Cholecystitis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Cholelithiasis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Liver disorder | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Immune system disorders | ||||
Acute graft versus host disease | 2/59 (3.4%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Graft versus host disease | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Lung transplant rejection | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Abdominal abscess | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Appendicitis | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Aspergillosis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
BK virus infection | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Bacteraemia | 3/59 (5.1%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Bacterial sepsis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Brain abscess | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Bronchiectasis | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Bronchiolitis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Catheter site infection | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Clostridium difficile colitis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Cytomegalovirus enteritis | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Cytomegalovirus infection | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Empyema | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Enterococcal bacteraemia | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Escherichia bacteraemia | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Escherichia sepsis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Fungal infection | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Fungal sepsis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Gastroenteritis norovirus | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Gastroenteritis viral | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Herpes zoster | 0/59 (0%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Influenza | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Lung infection | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Lung infection pseudomonal | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Mucormycosis | 0/59 (0%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Pneumonia | 1/59 (1.7%) | 6/87 (6.9%) | ||
Pneumonia bacterial | 1/59 (1.7%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Pneumonia blastomyces | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Pneumonia fungal | 0/59 (0%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Pneumonia influenzal | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Pneumonia primary atypical | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Pseudomonal sepsis | 0/59 (0%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Pseudomonas bronchitis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Sepsis | 2/59 (3.4%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Septic shock | 6/59 (10.2%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Sinusitis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Sinusitis fungal | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Staphylococcal bacteraemia | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Staphylococcal infection | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Staphylococcal sepsis | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Streptococcal bacteraemia | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Subcutaneous abscess | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Urinary tract infection | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Urosepsis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Viral diarrhoea | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Zygomycosis | 0/59 (0%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Dehydration | 2/59 (3.4%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Hyperkalaemia | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Hypoglycaemia | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Hyponatraemia | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Malnutrition | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Arthritis | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Musculoskeletal chest pain | 2/59 (3.4%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Pain in extremity | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Systemic lupus erythematosus | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Acute lymphocytic leukaemia recurrent | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Acute myeloid leukaemia | 2/59 (3.4%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Acute myeloid leukaemia recurrent | 0/59 (0%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Malignant neoplasm progression | 0/59 (0%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Leukaemia recurrent | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Leukaemic infiltration | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Aphasia | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Cerebral infarction | 2/59 (3.4%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Cerebrovascular accident | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Convulsion | 0/59 (0%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Haemorrhagic transformation stroke | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Headache | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Hemiparesis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Transient ischaemic attack | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Abnormal behaviour | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Aggression | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Agitation | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Confusional state | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Hallucination | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Renal failure | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Renal failure acute | 6/59 (10.2%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Reproductive system and breast disorders | ||||
Benign prostatic hyperplasia | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Acute respiratory distress syndrome | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Acute respiratory failure | 0/59 (0%) | 3/87 (3.4%) | ||
Dyspnoea | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Haemoptysis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Hypercapnia | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Hypoxia | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Pleural effusion | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Pneumonia aspiration | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Pulmonary alveolar haemorrhage | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Pulmonary embolism | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Pulmonary infarction | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Pulmonary oedema | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Respiratory failure | 4/59 (6.8%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Sinus disorder | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Tachypnoea | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Wheezing | 0/59 (0%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Arteritis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Deep vein thrombosis | 1/59 (1.7%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Hypotension | 2/59 (3.4%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Renally Impaired (RI) | Not Renally Impaired (NRI) | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 54/59 (91.5%) | 68/87 (78.2%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Febrile neutropenia | 4/59 (6.8%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Neutropenia | 6/59 (10.2%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Atrial fibrillation | 4/59 (6.8%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Sinus tachycardia | 3/59 (5.1%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Tachycardia | 4/59 (6.8%) | 4/87 (4.6%) | ||
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Abdominal pain | 7/59 (11.9%) | 4/87 (4.6%) | ||
Abdominal pain upper | 1/59 (1.7%) | 5/87 (5.7%) | ||
Constipation | 5/59 (8.5%) | 10/87 (11.5%) | ||
Diarrhoea | 16/59 (27.1%) | 10/87 (11.5%) | ||
Haematochezia | 3/59 (5.1%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Nausea | 19/59 (32.2%) | 14/87 (16.1%) | ||
Stomatitis | 3/59 (5.1%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Vomiting | 16/59 (27.1%) | 17/87 (19.5%) | ||
General disorders | ||||
Asthenia | 1/59 (1.7%) | 7/87 (8%) | ||
Chills | 5/59 (8.5%) | 3/87 (3.4%) | ||
Fatigue | 4/59 (6.8%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Oedema peripheral | 8/59 (13.6%) | 8/87 (9.2%) | ||
Pain | 3/59 (5.1%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Pyrexia | 9/59 (15.3%) | 15/87 (17.2%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Clostridial infection | 3/59 (5.1%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Clostridium difficile colitis | 3/59 (5.1%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Herpes zoster | 1/59 (1.7%) | 5/87 (5.7%) | ||
Upper respiratory tract infection | 5/59 (8.5%) | 6/87 (6.9%) | ||
Urinary tract infection | 7/59 (11.9%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Investigations | ||||
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | 3/59 (5.1%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased | 4/59 (6.8%) | 6/87 (6.9%) | ||
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||||
Decreased appetite | 4/59 (6.8%) | 6/87 (6.9%) | ||
Hyperglycaemia | 3/59 (5.1%) | 4/87 (4.6%) | ||
Hyperkalaemia | 7/59 (11.9%) | 4/87 (4.6%) | ||
Hypernatraemia | 3/59 (5.1%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Hypocalcaemia | 3/59 (5.1%) | 3/87 (3.4%) | ||
Hypokalaemia | 6/59 (10.2%) | 6/87 (6.9%) | ||
Hypomagnesaemia | 2/59 (3.4%) | 7/87 (8%) | ||
Hypophosphataemia | 3/59 (5.1%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Back pain | 6/59 (10.2%) | 8/87 (9.2%) | ||
Musculoskeletal chest pain | 3/59 (5.1%) | 5/87 (5.7%) | ||
Myalgia | 3/59 (5.1%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Pain in extremity | 4/59 (6.8%) | 3/87 (3.4%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Dizziness | 3/59 (5.1%) | 5/87 (5.7%) | ||
Headache | 11/59 (18.6%) | 14/87 (16.1%) | ||
Psychiatric disorders | ||||
Confusional state | 7/59 (11.9%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Insomnia | 5/59 (8.5%) | 8/87 (9.2%) | ||
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Oliguria | 3/59 (5.1%) | 0/87 (0%) | ||
Renal impairment | 3/59 (5.1%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Cough | 3/59 (5.1%) | 12/87 (13.8%) | ||
Dyspnoea | 6/59 (10.2%) | 7/87 (8%) | ||
Epistaxis | 2/59 (3.4%) | 5/87 (5.7%) | ||
Haemoptysis | 3/59 (5.1%) | 1/87 (1.1%) | ||
Oropharyngeal pain | 4/59 (6.8%) | 2/87 (2.3%) | ||
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | ||||
Pruritus | 2/59 (3.4%) | 7/87 (8%) | ||
Vascular disorders | ||||
Hypertension | 3/59 (5.1%) | 5/87 (5.7%) | ||
Hypotension | 5/59 (8.5%) | 5/87 (5.7%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
Publication. At least sixty (60) days prior to submitting or presenting a manuscript or other materials relating to the Study to a publisher, reviewer, or other outside persons, the Site shall provide to Sponsor a copy of all such manuscripts and materials , and allow Sponsor sixty (60) days to review and comment on them.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Vice President, Medical Head ID/IM/TX |
---|---|
Organization | Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. |
Phone | (224) 205-8800 |
Astellas.resultsdisclosure@astellas.com |
- 9766-CL-0103
- WSA-CS-003
- 2006-005003-33