VITAL: Isavuconazole in the Treatment of Renally Impaired Aspergillosis and Rare Fungi

Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Inc (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00634049
Collaborator
Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd (Industry)
149
97
1
96.4
1.5
0

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of isavuconazole in the treatment of renally impaired participants with invasive fungal infections caused by Aspergillus and participants with invasive fungal disease caused by rare fungi.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 3

Detailed Description

Acute invasive fungal infections caused by aspergillus, rare moulds, yeasts or dimorphic fungi are life threatening diseases. Early treatment with highly effective anti-fungals reduces mortality. This study investigates the safety and efficacy of isavuconazole in participants with aspergillosis and renal impairment, and in participants suffering from invasive infections from rare fungi.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
149 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Open-label Study of Isavuconazole in the Treatment of Participants With Aspergillosis and Renal Impairment or of Participants With Invasive Fungal Disease Caused by Rare Moulds, Yeasts or Dimorphic Fungi
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 22, 2008
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 3, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
May 5, 2016

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Isavuconazole

Administration of isavuconazole 3 times a day in the vein (IV) or oral as a capsule for 2 days followed by daily administration of isavuconazole (IV) or oral

Drug: isavuconazole
Administration of 200 mg isavuconazole 3 times a day in the vein (IV) or oral as a capsule for 2 days, followed by daily administration of 200 mg isavuconazole (IV) or oral
Other Names:
  • BAL8557
  • ASP9766
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT). [Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]

      The DRC assessed overall response based on individual clinical, mycological and radiological response assessments. Overall response outcomes were described as Success (complete or partial). Complete success was defined as a resolution of all clinical symptoms and physical findings associated with IFD. Partial success was defined as a resolution of at least some clinical symptoms and physical findings associated with IFD End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT [Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]

      The DRC evaluated clinical response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Clinical response outcomes were described as Success [Resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings and Partial resolution of attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

    2. Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT [Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]

      The DRC evaluated mycological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Mycological response outcomes were described as Success [Eradication and Presumed eradication]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

    3. Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT [Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]

      The DRC evaluated radiological response to treatment at at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Radiological response outcomes were described as Success [Improvement of at least 25% from baseline for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections], [Improvement of at least 50% from baseline for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections]; and [Improvement of at least 25% from baseline if EOT occurs prior to day 42 and at least 50% improvement from baseline if EOT occurs after day 42 for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

    4. Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT [Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]

      The Investigator evaluated clinical response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Clinical response outcomes were described as Success [Resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings] and [Resolution of some attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

    5. Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT [Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]

      The Investigator evaluated mycological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Mycological response outcomes were described as Success [Eradication,Presumed eradication]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

    6. Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT [Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]

      The Investigator evaluated radiological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Radiological response outcomes were described as Success [≥ 90% improvement,≥ 50% to < 90% improvement and ≥ 25% to < 50% improvement (for day 42 and EOT, if EOT occurs prior to day 42)]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

    7. All-cause Mortality Through Day 42 and Day 84 [Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])]

      All-cause Mortality was assessed through Day 42 and Day 84 and summarized for ITT population End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.

    8. Safety - Overall Number of TEAEs [From the first study drug administration until 28 days after the last dose of study drug]

      A Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) is any adverse event that starts after the first administration of study drug until 28 days after the last dose of study drug.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:

    •Participants meeting EORTC/MSG (European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group) definition of proven or culture positive probable IFD (invasive fungal disease) caused by rare moulds, yeasts, or dimorphic fungi (i.e. fungal pathogens other than Aspergillus fumigatus or Candida species) whether renally impaired or not (including dialysis) who require primary therapy for their IFD at the time of enrollment.

    OR

    •Participants who had proven or probable zygomycosis, whether renally impaired or not (including dialysis), who require primary therapy. Zygomycosis must be documented by culture or histology / cytology.

    OR

    •Participants meeting EORTC/MSG definition of proven or culture positive probable IFD caused by rare moulds, yeasts, or dimorphic fungi (i.e., fungal pathogens other than Aspergillus fumigatus or Candida species), whether RI or not (including dialysis), who were refractory to current treatment defined as,

    • Clear documentation of progression of disease. Note: radiological progression only in association with white blood cell (WBC) count recovery was not acceptable.

    • Failure to improve clinically despite receiving at least 7 days of standard antifungal regimen. Prior to enrolling patients who fell into this category, the Medical Monitor was contacted for approval.

    OR

    • Participants meeting EORTC/MSG definition of proven or culture positive probable IFD caused by rare moulds, yeasts, or dimorphic fungi (i.e., fungal pathogens other than Aspergillus fumigatus or Candida species), whether RI or not (including dialysis), who were intolerant to current treatment for example:

    • Doubling of serum creatinine value to higher than the upper limit of normal (ULN) within 48 hours.

    • Serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/mL and current treatment with polyene or IV voriconazole.

    • Other significant drug-related adverse reaction(s) to the current antifungal agent, resulting in discontinuation of the treatment, e.g., persistence of visual disturbance, allergic reaction, phototoxicity or severe infusion reaction (hypertensive crisis, severe chills or shock).

    • Documented inability to achieve adequate blood levels of posaconazole, voriconazole or itraconazole.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • A known condition of the participants that may jeopardize adherence to the protocol requirements

    • Participants who are unlikely to survive 30 days

    • Participants with a body weight < 40 kg

    • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama United States 35294
    2 City Of Hope National Medical Center Duarte California United States 91010
    3 University of California Davis Health System Sacramento California United States 95817
    4 California Pacific Medical Center San Francisco California United States 94110
    5 University of California at San Francisco San Francisco California United States 94143
    6 Stanford University Hospital Stanford California United States 94303
    7 University Of Colorado Health Sciences Center Aurora Colorado United States 80045
    8 Emory Hospital Atlanta Georgia United States 30322
    9 University of Chicago, Division of Infectious Diseases Chicago Illinois United States 60637
    10 Indiana BMT Beech Grove Indiana United States 46107
    11 Infectious Disease of Indiana Indianapolis Indiana United States 46280
    12 Ochsner Clinic Foundation New Orleans Louisiana United States 70121
    13 Brigham & Womens Hospital Boston Massachusetts United States 02115
    14 UMASS Memorial Medical Center Worcester Massachusetts United States 01655
    15 Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit Michigan United States 48201
    16 Henry Ford Hospital Detroit Michigan United States 48202
    17 University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota United States 55455
    18 Upstate Infectious Diseases Association LLP Albany New York United States 12208
    19 Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio United States 44195
    20 Regional Infection Diseases Infusion Center Inc. Lima Ohio United States 45801
    21 Temple University Health Sciences Philadelphia Pennsylvania United States 19140
    22 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System Pittsburgh Pennsylvania United States 15213
    23 University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas United States 77030
    24 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Clinical Research Seattle Washington United States 98109
    25 Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Ciudad Autonoma Argentina 1181
    26 Instituto Medico Especializado Alexander Fleming Ciudad Autonoma Argentina 1426
    27 Hospital Nuestra Senora de la Misericordia Cordoba Argentina 5000
    28 Hospital San Roque Cordoba Argentina 5000
    29 Centro Polivalente de Asistencia e Investigación Clínica - CER San Juan San Juan Argentina 5402
    30 Mater Medical Centre South Brisbane Australia 4101
    31 Princess Alexandria Hospital Woolloongabba Australia 4102
    32 Institut Jules Bordet Brussels Belgium 1000
    33 Erasme Hospital Bruxelles Belgium 1070
    34 Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent Gent Belgium 9000
    35 Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven Leuven Belgium 3000
    36 Hospital Felicio Rocho Belo Horizonte Brazil 30110-908
    37 Santa Casa de Misericordia de Belo Horizonte Belo Horizonte Brazil 30150-221
    38 Hospital das Clinicas da UFPR Curitiba Brazil 80060-150
    39 Hospital de Clinicas da FMUSP - Ribeirao Preto Ribeirao Preto Brazil 14048-900
    40 Hospital Universitario Clementino Fraga Filho Rio de Janeiro Brazil 21941-913
    41 Hospital Universitario de Santa Maria Santa Maria Brazil 97105-900
    42 Hospital Professor Edmundo Vasconcelos São Paulo Brazil 04038-905
    43 Hamilton Health Sciences - Henderson Site Hamilton Ontario Canada L8V 1C3
    44 The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus Ottawa Ontario Canada K1H 8L6
    45 Hôpital Maisonneuve - Rosemont Montreal Quebec Canada H1T 2M4
    46 Hôpital Maisonneuve - Rosemont Montréal Quebec Canada H1T 2M4
    47 Hospital Clinico San Borja Arriaran Santiago Chile 8320000
    48 Alexandria University Hospital Alexandria Egypt 21131
    49 National Cancer Institute Cairo Egypt 11796
    50 Nasser Institute Cairo Egypt 12655
    51 Hôpital Edouard Herriot Lyon cedex 3 France 69437
    52 Institut Paoli Calmette - Marseille Marseille Cedex 9 France 13273
    53 Hotel Dieu Nantes France 44093
    54 Hôpital Saint-Louis Paris Cedex 10 France 75475
    55 Hopital Hautepierre Strasbourg Cedex France 67048
    56 Hôpital de Brabois Adultes Vandoeuvre les Nancy France 54511
    57 Universitaetsklinikum Aachen Aachen Germany 52074
    58 Charite-Campus Benjamin Franklin Berlin Germany 12200
    59 Universitaet Koeln Köln Germany 50931
    60 Klinikum Neuperlach Muenchen Germany 81737
    61 Medizinische Klinik und Polyklinik II Würzburg Germany 97080
    62 Medanta Medicity Hospital Gurgaon Haryan India 122001
    63 Shirdi Sai Baba Cancer Hospital K. M. C. Hospital Manipal Kama India 576104
    64 Tata Memorial Hopital, Department of Anesthesia Mumbai Mahara India 400012
    65 Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital & Research Centre Pune Mahara India 411004
    66 Global Hospitals & Health City Chennai Tamilna India 600100
    67 Sterling Hospital Ahmedabad India 380052
    68 Apollo Hospitals Hyderabad India 500033
    69 Sahyadri Specialty Hospital Pune India 411004
    70 Rambam Health Care Campus Haifa Israel 31096
    71 Hadassah Universtiy Hospital - Ein Kerem Jerusalem Israel 91200
    72 Rabin MC Petah Tikva Israel 49100
    73 Chaim Sheba Medical Center Ramat-Gan Israel 52621
    74 Sourasky MC Ichilov Hospital Tel Aviv Tel Aviv Israel 64239
    75 Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital Buchon-si Korea, Republic of 420-767
    76 Gachon University Gil Hospital Incheon Korea, Republic of 405-760
    77 Samsung Medical Center Seoul Korea, Republic of 135-710
    78 The Catholic University of Korea Seoul Korea, Republic of 137-701
    79 Asan Medical Center Seoul Korea, Republic of 138-736
    80 American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut Lebanon 11-0236
    81 Clinique Dr. Rizk Beirut Lebanon 1107-2130
    82 Rafik Hariri University Hospital Beirut Lebanon 5244
    83 Antiguo Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde Guadalajara Mexico 44280
    84 Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Mexico City Mexico 14000
    85 Hospital Universitario Dr Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez Monterrey Mexico 64460
    86 Hospital Central Dr Ignacio Morones Prieto San Luis Potosi Mexico 78240
    87 Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny Warszawa Poland 02097
    88 S.I. Russian Oncological Research Center n.a. N.N. Blokhin Moscow Russian Federation 115478
    89 State Institution "Hematology Research Center" RAMS Moscow Russian Federation 125167
    90 Republican Hospital named after V.A. Baranov Petrozavodsk Russian Federation 185019
    91 St-Petersburg MA Postgraduate Education St. Petersburg Russian Federation 194291
    92 Private Practice Lyttleton Gauteng South Africa 0157
    93 Songklanagarind Hospital Hat Yai Thailand 90110
    94 Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital Muang Thailand 30000
    95 Srinagarind Hospital Muang Thailand 40002
    96 Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital Muang Thailand 50200
    97 Ramathibodi Hospital Ratchathewi Thailand 10400

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Astellas Pharma Inc
    • Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd

    Investigators

    • Study Director: Medical Director, Astellas Pharma Global Development

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Astellas Pharma Inc
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00634049
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 9766-CL-0103
    • WSA-CS-003
    • 2006-005003-33
    First Posted:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 2, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2017
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by Astellas Pharma Inc
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details Consenting adult participants with proven, probable or possible invasive aspergillosis and renally impaired (RI) or of participants with invasive fungal disease (IFD) caused by rare moulds, yeasts or dimorphic fungi meeting the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were considered for entry into the study.
    Pre-assignment Detail Analysis and interpretation of the results was pathogen dependent and each pathogen was quite rare, therefore it was not feasible to enroll a sufficient number of participants in a randomized controlled trial to power the study adequately to allow statistical comparisons.
    Arm/Group Title Isavuconazole
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a loading dose of isavuconazole, 200 mg three times a day administered intravenously (IV) or orally (PO) [or per os (PO)] for the first 2 days followed by a maintenance dose from Day 3 of 200 mg once daily either IV or orally until they reached a treatment endpoint or for a maximum of 180 days; with an option for extended treatment under specified criteria.
    Period Title: Overall Study
    STARTED 149
    COMPLETED 146
    NOT COMPLETED 3

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Isavuconazole
    Arm/Group Description Participants received a loading dose of isavuconazole, 200 mg three times a day administered intravenously (IV) or orally (PO) [or per os (PO)] for the first 2 days followed by a maintenance dose from Day 3 of 200 mg once daily either IV or orally until they reached a treatment endpoint or for a maximum of 180 days; with an option for extended treatment under specified criteria.
    Overall Participants 146
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    49.9
    (16.78)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    46
    31.5%
    Male
    100
    68.5%
    Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
    American Indian or Alaska Native
    0
    0%
    Asian
    24
    16.4%
    Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    0
    0%
    Black or African American
    10
    6.8%
    White
    108
    74%
    More than one race
    0
    0%
    Unknown or Not Reported
    4
    2.7%
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized (participants) [Number]
    Hispanic or Latino
    22
    15.1%
    Not Hispanic or Latino
    124
    84.9%
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    Brazil
    20
    13.7%
    India
    5
    3.4%
    Israel
    21
    14.4%
    Lebanon
    1
    0.7%
    Mexico
    8
    5.5%
    Russian Federation
    2
    1.4%
    Korea, Republic of
    2
    1.4%
    Thailand
    14
    9.6%
    Belgium
    13
    8.9%
    Germany
    4
    2.7%
    United States
    56
    38.4%
    Therapy status (participants) [Number]
    Primary Therapy
    93
    63.7%
    Refractory
    38
    26%
    Intolerant
    12
    8.2%
    Missing
    3
    2.1%
    Hematologic malignancy (participants) [Number]
    Yes
    63
    43.2%
    No
    83
    56.8%
    Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)/Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) (participants) [Number]
    Yes
    26
    17.8%
    No
    120
    82.2%
    Uncontrolled malignancy (participants) [Number]
    Yes
    46
    31.5%
    No
    100
    68.5%
    Neutropenic (participants) [Number]
    Yes
    38
    26%
    No
    66
    45.2%
    Missing
    42
    28.8%
    Corticosteroid use (participants) [Number]
    Yes
    35
    24%
    No
    111
    76%
    T-cell immunosuppressant use (participants) [Number]
    Yes
    61
    41.8%
    No
    48
    32.9%
    Missing
    37
    25.3%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Crude Success Rate of Overall Outcome of Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT).
    Description The DRC assessed overall response based on individual clinical, mycological and radiological response assessments. Overall response outcomes were described as Success (complete or partial). Complete success was defined as a resolution of all clinical symptoms and physical findings associated with IFD. Partial success was defined as a resolution of at least some clinical symptoms and physical findings associated with IFD End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
    Time Frame Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT)
    Arm/Group Title mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired] mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired] mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy) mITT - Mucorales (Refractory) mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant) mITT- Other Filamentous Fungi mITT- Other Mould Species Only mITT- Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT- Other Non-Candida Yeast mITT-Other Mixed Infection
    Arm/Group Description Aspergillus - Renally Impaired (RI) mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, and whether they are renally impaired and not renally impaired. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for patients who had a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). Aspergillus - Not Renally Impaired (NRI) mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status (Renally Impaired and Not Renally Impaired). Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT- Aspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). Mucorales - Primary Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 21 participants receiving isavuconazole as a primary therapy. Mucorales - Refractory Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis).The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 11 participants whose IFD was refractory to prior antifungal therapy (AFT) Mucorales - Intolerant mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participant had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 5 participants who were intolerant to prior antifungal therapy (AFT). Other Filamentous Fungi mITT population consisted of 17 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by other filamentous fungi (4 Fusarium, 2 Exophiala, 2 Cladosporium, 2 Scopulariopsis and 1 each of Acremonium, Alternaria, Curvularia, Exserohilum, Paecilomyces, Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium). Other Mould Species mITT population consisted of 7 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mould species. Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT population consisted of 29 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by dimorphic fungi (10 Paracoccidiodes, 9 Coccidiodides, 7 Histoplasma, 3 Blastomyces). Other non-Candida Yeast mITT population consisted of 11 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by non-Candida yeast (4 Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 Cryptococcus gatii, 2 Cryptococcus not otherwise specified (NOS) and 2 Trichosporon). Other Mixed Infections mITT group consisted of 15 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mixed infections aspergillosis/mucormycosis.
    Measure Participants 20 4 21 11 5 17 7 29 11 15
    Day 42- Success Rate
    25.0
    17.1%
    50.0
    NaN
    14.3
    NaN
    9.1
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    47.1
    NaN
    28.6
    NaN
    41.4
    NaN
    36.4
    NaN
    13.3
    NaN
    Day 84 - Success Rate
    30.0
    20.5%
    25.0
    NaN
    9.5
    NaN
    36.4
    NaN
    20.0
    NaN
    41.2
    NaN
    28.6
    NaN
    44.8
    NaN
    36.4
    NaN
    13.3
    NaN
    End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate
    30.0
    20.5%
    66.7
    NaN
    31.6
    NaN
    36.4
    NaN
    20.0
    NaN
    64.7
    NaN
    28.6
    NaN
    64.3
    NaN
    72.7
    NaN
    14.3
    NaN
    2. Secondary Outcome
    Title Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT
    Description The DRC evaluated clinical response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Clinical response outcomes were described as Success [Resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings and Partial resolution of attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
    Time Frame Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT)
    Arm/Group Title mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired] mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired] mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy) mITT - Mucorales (Refractory) mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant) mITT-Other Filamentous Fungi mITT- Other Mould Species Only mITT- Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT- Other Non-Candida Yeast mITT-Other Mixed Infection
    Arm/Group Description Aspergillus - Renally Impaired (RI) mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, and whether they are renally impaired or not renally impaired. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for patients who had a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). Aspergillus - Not Renally Impaired (NRI) mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status (Renally Impaired and Not Renally Impaired). Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT- Aspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). Mucorales - Primary Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 21 participants receiving isavuconazole as a primary therapy. Mucorales - Refractory Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis).The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 11 participants whose IFD was refractory to prior AFT. Mucorales - Intolerant mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participant had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 5 participants who were intolerant to prior AFT. Other Filamentous Fungi mITT population consisted of 17 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by other filamentous fungi (4 Fusarium, 2 Exophiala, 2 Cladosporium, 2 Scopulariopsis and 1 each of Acremonium, Alternaria, Curvularia, Exserohilum, Paecilomyces, Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium). Other Mould Species mITT population consisted of 7 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mould species. Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT population consisted of 29 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by dimorphic fungi (10 Paracoccidiodes, 9 Coccidiodides, 7 Histoplasma, 3 Blastomyces). Other non-Candida Yeast mITT population consisted of 11 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by non-Candida yeast (4 Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 Cryptococcus gatii, 2 Cryptococcus not otherwise specified (NOS) and 2 Trichosporon). Other Mixed Infections mITT group consisted of 15 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mixed infections aspergillosis/mucormycosis.
    Measure Participants 20 4 21 11 5 17 7 29 11 15
    Day 42- Success Rate
    55.0
    37.7%
    75.0
    NaN
    50.0
    NaN
    33.3
    NaN
    50.0
    NaN
    68.8
    NaN
    71.4
    NaN
    79.3
    NaN
    70.0
    NaN
    42.9
    NaN
    Day 84 - Success Rate
    45.0
    30.8%
    25.0
    NaN
    40.0
    NaN
    22.2
    NaN
    50.0
    NaN
    62.5
    NaN
    42.9
    NaN
    82.8
    NaN
    70.0
    NaN
    35.7
    NaN
    End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate
    55.0
    37.7%
    66.7
    NaN
    55.6
    NaN
    22.2
    NaN
    50.0
    NaN
    81.3
    NaN
    85.7
    NaN
    82.1
    NaN
    70.0
    NaN
    38.5
    NaN
    3. Secondary Outcome
    Title Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT
    Description The DRC evaluated mycological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Mycological response outcomes were described as Success [Eradication and Presumed eradication]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
    Time Frame Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT)
    Arm/Group Title mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired] mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired] mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy) mITT - Mucorales (Refractory) mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant) mITT-Other Filamentous Fungi mITT- Other Mould Species Only mITT- Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT- Other Non-Candida Yeast mITT-Other Mixed Infection
    Arm/Group Description Aspergillus - Renally Impaired mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participants IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, renally impaired and not renally impaired. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who have a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for participants who have a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). Aspergillus - Not Renally Impaired (NRI) mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status (Renally Impaired and Not Renally Impaired). Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT- Aspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). Mucorales - Primary Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 21 participants receiving isavuconazole as a primary therapy. Mucorales - Refractory Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis).The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 11 participants whose IFD was refractory to prior AFT. Mucorales - Intolerant mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participant had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 5 participants who were intolerant to prior AFT. Other Filamentous Fungi mITT population consisted of 17 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by other filamentous fungi (4 Fusarium, 2 Exophiala, 2 Cladosporium, 2 Scopulariopsis and 1 each of Acremonium, Alternaria, Curvularia, Exserohilum, Paecilomyces, Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium). Other Mould Species mITT population consisted of 7 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mould species. Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT population consisted of 29 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by dimorphic fungi (10 Paracoccidiodes, 9 Coccidiodides, 7 Histoplasma, 3 Blastomyces). Other non-Candida Yeast mITT population consisted of 11 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by non-Candida yeast (4 Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 Cryptococcus gatii, 2 Cryptococcus not otherwise specified (NOS) and 2 Trichosporon). Other Mixed Infections mITT population consisted of 15 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mixed infections aspergillosis/mucormycosis.
    Measure Participants 20 4 21 11 5 17 7 29 11 15
    Day 42- Success Rate
    30.0
    20.5%
    50.0
    NaN
    4.8
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    29.4
    NaN
    28.6
    NaN
    27.6
    NaN
    45.5
    NaN
    13.3
    NaN
    Day 84 - Success Rate
    35.0
    24%
    25.0
    NaN
    9.5
    NaN
    27.3
    NaN
    40.0
    NaN
    35.3
    NaN
    28.6
    NaN
    27.6
    NaN
    45.5
    NaN
    13.3
    NaN
    End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate
    35.0
    24%
    66.7
    NaN
    31.6
    NaN
    36.4
    NaN
    40.0
    NaN
    70.6
    NaN
    28.6
    NaN
    53.6
    NaN
    81.8
    NaN
    14.3
    NaN
    4. Secondary Outcome
    Title Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Data Review Committee (DRC) at Day 42, 84 and EOT
    Description The DRC evaluated radiological response to treatment at at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Radiological response outcomes were described as Success [Improvement of at least 25% from baseline for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections], [Improvement of at least 50% from baseline for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections]; and [Improvement of at least 25% from baseline if EOT occurs prior to day 42 and at least 50% improvement from baseline if EOT occurs after day 42 for invasive aspergillosis and other filamentous mold infections]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
    Time Frame Day 42, 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT)
    Arm/Group Title mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired] mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired] mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy) mITT - Mucorales (Refractory) mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant) mITT-Other Filamentous Fungi mITT- Other Mould Species Only mITT- Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT- Other Non-Candida Yeast mITT-Other Mixed Infection
    Arm/Group Description Aspergillus - Renally Impaired mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participants IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, renally impaired and not renally impaired. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who have a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for participants who have a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). Aspergillus - Renally Impaired mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participants IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, renally impaired and not renally impaired. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITTAspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). Mucorales - Primary Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 21 participants receiving isavuconazole as a primary therapy. Mucorales - Refractory Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis).The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 11 participants whose IFD was refractory to prior AFT. Mucorales - Intolerant mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participant had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 5 participants who were intolerant to prior AFT. Other Filamentous Fungi mITT population consisted of 17 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by other filamentous fungi (4 Fusarium,2 Exophiala,2 Cladosporium,2 Scopulariopsis and 1 each of Acremonium, Alternaria, Curvularia,Exserohilum, Paecilomyces,Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium). Other Mould Species mITT population consisted of 7 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mould species. Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT population consisted of 29 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by dimorphic fungi (10 Paracoccidiodes,9 Coccidiodides, 7 Histoplasma, 3 Blastomyces). Other Non Candida Yeast mITT population consisted of 11 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by non-Candida yeast (4 Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 Cryptococcus gatii, 2 Cryptococcus NOS and 2 Trichosporon). Other Mixed Infections mITT population consisted of 15 participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mixed infections aspergillosis/mucormycosis.
    Measure Participants 20 4 21 11 5 17 7 29 11 15
    Day 42- Success Rate
    30.0
    20.5%
    25.0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    10.0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    25.0
    NaN
    16.7
    NaN
    21.4
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    7.1
    NaN
    Day 84 - Success Rate
    20.0
    13.7%
    25.0
    NaN
    4.8
    NaN
    20.0
    NaN
    20.0
    NaN
    6.3
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    28.6
    NaN
    10.0
    NaN
    14.3
    NaN
    End of Treatment (EOT) - Success Rate
    15.0
    10.3%
    66.7
    NaN
    16.7
    NaN
    20.0
    NaN
    20.0
    NaN
    50.0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    33.3
    NaN
    10.0
    NaN
    7.7
    NaN
    5. Secondary Outcome
    Title Crude Success Rate of Clinical Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT
    Description The Investigator evaluated clinical response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Clinical response outcomes were described as Success [Resolution of all attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings] and [Resolution of some attributable clinical symptoms and physical findings]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
    Time Frame Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT)
    Arm/Group Title mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired] mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired] mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy) mITT - Mucorales (Refractory) mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant) mITT- Other Filamentous Fungi mITT- Other Mould Species Only mITT- Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT- Other Non-Candida Yeast mITT-Other Mixed Infection
    Arm/Group Description Aspergillus - Renally Impaired (RI) mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, and whether they are renally impaired and not renally impaired. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for participants who had a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). Aspergillus - Not Renally Impaired (NRI) mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status (Renally Impaired and Not Renally Impaired). Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT- Aspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). Mucorales - Primary Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 21 participants receiving isavuconazole as a primary therapy. Mucorales - Refractory Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis).The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 11 participants whose IFD was refractory to prior AFT Mucorales - Intolerant mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participant had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 5 participants who were intolerant to prior AFT. Other Filamentous Fungi mITT population consisted of 17 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by other filamentous fungi (4 Fusarium, 2 Exophiala, 2 Cladosporium, 2 Scopulariopsis and 1 each of Acremonium, Alternaria, Curvularia, Exserohilum, Paecilomyces, Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium). Other Mould Species mITT population consisted of 7 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mould species. Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT population consisted of 29 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by dimorphic fungi (10 Paracoccidiodes, 9 Coccidiodides, 7 Histoplasma, 3 Blastomyces). Other non-Candida Yeast mITT population consisted of 11 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by non-Candida yeast (4 Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 Cryptococcus gatii, 2 Cryptococcus not otherwise specified (NOS) and 2 Trichosporon). Other Mixed Infections mITT group consisted of 15 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mixed infections aspergillosis/mucormycosis.
    Measure Participants 20 4 21 11 5 17 7 29 11 15
    Day 42
    60.0
    41.1%
    75.0
    NaN
    50.0
    NaN
    28.6
    NaN
    25.0
    NaN
    81.3
    NaN
    85.7
    NaN
    75.9
    NaN
    70.0
    NaN
    50.0
    NaN
    Day 84
    55.0
    37.7%
    55.0
    NaN
    21.4
    NaN
    25.0
    NaN
    20.0
    NaN
    62.5
    NaN
    42.9
    NaN
    82.2
    NaN
    70.0
    NaN
    35.7
    NaN
    End of Treatment (EOT)
    60.0
    41.1%
    75.0
    NaN
    42.9
    NaN
    28.6
    NaN
    66.7
    NaN
    81.3
    NaN
    71.4
    NaN
    79.3
    NaN
    70.0
    NaN
    42.9
    NaN
    6. Secondary Outcome
    Title Crude Success Rate of Mycological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT
    Description The Investigator evaluated mycological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Mycological response outcomes were described as Success [Eradication,Presumed eradication]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
    Time Frame Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT)
    Arm/Group Title mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired] mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired] mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy) mITT - Mucorales (Refractory) mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant) mITT- Other Filamentous Fungi mITT- Other Mould Species Only mITT- Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT- Other Non-Candida Yeast mITT-Other Mixed Infection
    Arm/Group Description Aspergillus - Renally Impaired (RI) mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, and whether they are renally impaired and not renally impaired. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for patients who had a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). Aspergillus - Not Renally Impaired (NRI) mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status (Renally Impaired and Not Renally Impaired). Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT- Aspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). Mucorales - Primary Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 21 participants receiving isavuconazole as a primary therapy. Mucorales - Refractory Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis).The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 11 participants whose IFD was refractory to prior AFT Mucorales - Intolerant mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participant had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 5 participants who were intolerant to prior AFT. Other Filamentous Fungi mITT population consisted of 17 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by other filamentous fungi (4 Fusarium, 2 Exophiala, 2 Cladosporium, 2 Scopulariopsis and 1 each of Acremonium, Alternaria, Curvularia, Exserohilum, Paecilomyces, Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium). Other Mould Species mITT population consisted of 7 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mould species. Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT population consisted of 29 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by dimorphic fungi (10 Paracoccidiodes, 9 Coccidiodides, 7 Histoplasma, 3 Blastomyces). Other non-Candida Yeast mITT population consisted of 11 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by non-Candida yeast (4 Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 Cryptococcus gatii, 2 Cryptococcus not otherwise specified (NOS) and 2 Trichosporon). Other Mixed Infections mITT group consisted of 15 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mixed infections aspergillosis/mucormycosis.
    Measure Participants 20 4 21 11 2 17 7 29 11 15
    Day 42
    46.7
    32%
    66.7
    NaN
    50.0
    NaN
    28.6
    NaN
    25.0
    NaN
    69.2
    NaN
    83.3
    NaN
    70.6
    NaN
    50.0
    NaN
    18.2
    NaN
    Day 84
    44.4
    30.4%
    50.0
    NaN
    21.4
    NaN
    25.0
    NaN
    20.0
    NaN
    64.3
    NaN
    42.9
    NaN
    80.0
    NaN
    25.0
    NaN
    33.3
    NaN
    End of Treatment (EOT)
    50.0
    34.2%
    66.7
    NaN
    42.9
    NaN
    28.6
    NaN
    66.7
    NaN
    78.6
    NaN
    66.7
    NaN
    76.9
    NaN
    50.0
    NaN
    25.0
    NaN
    7. Secondary Outcome
    Title Crude Success Rate of Radiological Response to Treatment Evaluated by the Investigator at Day 42, Day 84 and EOT
    Description The Investigator evaluated radiological response to treatment at day 42, day 84 and EOT. Radiological response outcomes were described as Success [≥ 90% improvement,≥ 50% to < 90% improvement and ≥ 25% to < 50% improvement (for day 42 and EOT, if EOT occurs prior to day 42)]. End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
    Time Frame Day 42, Day 84 and End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Modified Intent-To-Treat population (mITT)
    Arm/Group Title mITT - Aspergillus [Renally Impaired] mITT - Aspergillus [Not Renally Impaired] mITT - Mucorales (Primary Therapy) mITT - Mucorales (Refractory) mITT - Mucorales (Intolerant) mITT- Other Filamentous Fungi mITT- Other Mould Species Only mITT- Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT- Other Non-Candida Yeast mITT-Other Mixed Infection
    Arm/Group Description Aspergillus - Renally Impaired (RI) mITT population consisted of participants who have had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status, and whether they are renally impaired and not renally impaired. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR-MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for participants who had a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). Aspergillus - Not Renally Impaired (NRI) mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status (Renally Impaired and Not Renally Impaired). Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT- Aspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI). Mucorales - Primary Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 21 participants receiving isavuconazole as a primary therapy. Mucorales - Refractory Therapy mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participants had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis).The DRC also categorized each patient by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 11 participants whose IFD was refractory to prior AFT Mucorales - Intolerant mITT population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Based on the DRC assessment 37 participants were assessed to have proven or probable Mucorales infection (32 participant had proven and 5 participants had probable invasive mucormycosis). The DRC also categorized each participant by therapy status; these groups were primary therapy, refractory and intolerant. There were 5 participants who were intolerant to prior AFT. Other Filamentous Fungi mITT population consisted of 17 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by other filamentous fungi (4 Fusarium, 2 Exophiala, 2 Cladosporium, 2 Scopulariopsis and 1 each of Acremonium, Alternaria, Curvularia, Exserohilum, Paecilomyces, Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium). Other Mould Species mITT population consisted of 7 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mould species. Other Dimorphic Fungi mITT population consisted of 29 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by dimorphic fungi (10 Paracoccidiodes, 9 Coccidiodides, 7 Histoplasma, 3 Blastomyces). Other non-Candida Yeast mITT population consisted of 11 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by non-Candida yeast (4 Cryptococcus neoformans, 3 Cryptococcus gatii, 2 Cryptococcus not otherwise specified (NOS) and 2 Trichosporon). Other Mixed Infections mITT group consisted of 15 participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC caused by mixed infections aspergillosis/mucormycosis.
    Measure Participants 20 4 21 11 5 17 7 29 11 15
    Day 42
    35.0
    24%
    75.0
    NaN
    40.0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    40.0
    NaN
    46.7
    NaN
    20.0
    NaN
    32.1
    NaN
    9.1
    NaN
    28.6
    NaN
    Day 84
    40.0
    27.4%
    50.0
    NaN
    25.0
    NaN
    11.1
    NaN
    40.0
    NaN
    40.0
    NaN
    20.0
    NaN
    37.0
    NaN
    0
    NaN
    7.1
    NaN
    End of Treatment (EOT)
    35.0
    24%
    50.0
    NaN
    30.0
    NaN
    22.2
    NaN
    20.0
    NaN
    33.3
    NaN
    40.0
    NaN
    55.6
    NaN
    10.0
    NaN
    14.3
    NaN
    8. Secondary Outcome
    Title All-cause Mortality Through Day 42 and Day 84
    Description All-cause Mortality was assessed through Day 42 and Day 84 and summarized for ITT population End of treatment (EOT) is the last day of study drug administration, with an estimated duration up to 180 days.
    Time Frame Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT [Day 180])

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    Intent-To-Treat population (ITT)
    Arm/Group Title Renally Impaired Not Renally Impaired
    Arm/Group Description Renally Impaired (RI) population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who had a baseline eGFR-MDRD < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2, no for patients who had a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT-Aspergillus population out of which 20 participants were classified as Renally Impaired (RI). Not Renally Impaired (NRI) population consisted of participants who had proven or probable IFD as determined by the DRC. Classification by the DRC was based on the type of pathogen which was found to be the cause of participant's IFD. The Aspergillus-mITT population was presented by renal status (Renally Impaired and Not Renally Impaired). Overall there were 24 participants in the mITT- Aspergillus population out of which 4 participants were classified as Not Renally Impaired (NRI).
    Measure Participants 59 87
    All-cause Mortality Through Day 42
    22.0
    15.1%
    16.1
    NaN
    All-cause Mortality Through Day 84
    30.5
    20.9%
    20.7
    NaN
    9. Secondary Outcome
    Title Safety - Overall Number of TEAEs
    Description A Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) is any adverse event that starts after the first administration of study drug until 28 days after the last dose of study drug.
    Time Frame From the first study drug administration until 28 days after the last dose of study drug

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The safety analysis set (SAF) consists of all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug as this was a non-comparative open-label study
    Arm/Group Title Isavuconazole
    Arm/Group Description Participants received Isavuconazole intravenous (IV) or per oral (PO) over period of 2 days, on days 1 and 2 three doses of 200 mg were administered every 8 hours for a total of six doses. From Day 3 to End of Treatment (EOT) maintenance dose of 200 mg isavuconazole was administered once daily up to 180 days; with an option for extended treatment under specified criteria.
    Measure Participants 146
    TEAEs
    139
    95.2%
    Study Drug-Related TEAEs
    60
    41.1%
    Serious TEAEs
    89
    61%
    Study Drug-Related Serious TEAEs
    13
    8.9%
    TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Stud
    19
    13%
    Study Drug TEAEs Leading to Perm Discontinuation
    7
    4.8%
    TEAEs Leading to Death
    44
    30.1%
    Study Drug-Related TEAEs Leading to Death
    1
    0.7%
    Deaths
    47
    32.2%
    Deaths Through 28 Days after Last Dose Study Drug
    42
    28.8%

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame From the first administration of study drug until 28 days after the last dose of study drug. For the days when IV and oral doses were administered on the same day, the day was split into one-half day for each route's duration.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description The safety analysis set is identical to the intent -to-treat (ITT) population (i.e., all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study drug) as this was a non-comparative open-label study.
    Arm/Group Title Renally Impaired (RI) Not Renally Impaired (NRI)
    Arm/Group Description Renal impairment was defined as yes for participants who have a baseline as eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. Not Renally impaired participants were defined as no if they have a baseline eGFR-MDRD ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula.
    All Cause Mortality
    Renally Impaired (RI) Not Renally Impaired (NRI)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total / (NaN) / (NaN)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Renally Impaired (RI) Not Renally Impaired (NRI)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 43/59 (72.9%) 46/87 (52.9%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia 1/59 (1.7%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Febrile neutropenia 1/59 (1.7%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Pancytopenia 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Acute myocardial infarction 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Atrial fibrillation 2/59 (3.4%) 0/87 (0%)
    Atrioventricular block complete 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Cardiac failure acute 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Cardio-respiratory arrest 1/59 (1.7%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Electromechanical dissociation 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Eye disorders
    Retinal artery occlusion 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Retinal haemorrhage 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Vitreous haemorrhage 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain 2/59 (3.4%) 3/87 (3.4%)
    Colitis 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Colitis ulcerative 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Constipation 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Diarrhoea 1/59 (1.7%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Dysphagia 1/59 (1.7%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Gastrointestinal haemorrhage 3/59 (5.1%) 0/87 (0%)
    Localised intraabdominal fluid collection 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Nausea 0/59 (0%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Oesophagitis 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Pancreatitis 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Pancreatitis chronic 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Pancreatitis relapsing 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Vomiting 0/59 (0%) 4/87 (4.6%)
    General disorders
    Death 1/59 (1.7%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    General physical health deterioration 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Multi-organ failure 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Non-cardiac chest pain 1/59 (1.7%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Oedema peripheral 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Pyrexia 1/59 (1.7%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Acute hepatic failure 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Cholangiolitis 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Cholecystitis 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Cholelithiasis 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Liver disorder 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Immune system disorders
    Acute graft versus host disease 2/59 (3.4%) 0/87 (0%)
    Graft versus host disease 1/59 (1.7%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Lung transplant rejection 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Infections and infestations
    Abdominal abscess 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Appendicitis 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Aspergillosis 1/59 (1.7%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    BK virus infection 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Bacteraemia 3/59 (5.1%) 0/87 (0%)
    Bacterial sepsis 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Brain abscess 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Bronchiectasis 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Bronchiolitis 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Catheter site infection 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Clostridium difficile colitis 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Cytomegalovirus enteritis 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Cytomegalovirus infection 1/59 (1.7%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Empyema 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Enterococcal bacteraemia 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Escherichia bacteraemia 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Escherichia sepsis 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Fungal infection 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Fungal sepsis 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Gastroenteritis norovirus 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Gastroenteritis viral 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Herpes zoster 0/59 (0%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Influenza 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Lung infection 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Lung infection pseudomonal 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Mucormycosis 0/59 (0%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Pneumonia 1/59 (1.7%) 6/87 (6.9%)
    Pneumonia bacterial 1/59 (1.7%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Pneumonia blastomyces 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Pneumonia fungal 0/59 (0%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Pneumonia influenzal 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Pneumonia primary atypical 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Pseudomonal sepsis 0/59 (0%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Pseudomonas bronchitis 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Sepsis 2/59 (3.4%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Septic shock 6/59 (10.2%) 0/87 (0%)
    Sinusitis 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Sinusitis fungal 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Staphylococcal bacteraemia 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Staphylococcal infection 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Staphylococcal sepsis 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Streptococcal bacteraemia 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Subcutaneous abscess 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Urinary tract infection 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Urosepsis 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Viral diarrhoea 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Zygomycosis 0/59 (0%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Dehydration 2/59 (3.4%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Hyperkalaemia 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Hypoglycaemia 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Hyponatraemia 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Malnutrition 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthritis 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Musculoskeletal chest pain 2/59 (3.4%) 0/87 (0%)
    Pain in extremity 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Systemic lupus erythematosus 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Acute lymphocytic leukaemia recurrent 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Acute myeloid leukaemia 2/59 (3.4%) 0/87 (0%)
    Acute myeloid leukaemia recurrent 0/59 (0%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Malignant neoplasm progression 0/59 (0%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Leukaemia recurrent 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Leukaemic infiltration 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Aphasia 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Cerebral infarction 2/59 (3.4%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Cerebrovascular accident 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Convulsion 0/59 (0%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Haemorrhagic transformation stroke 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Headache 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Hemiparesis 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Transient ischaemic attack 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Abnormal behaviour 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Aggression 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Agitation 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Confusional state 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Hallucination 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Renal failure 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Renal failure acute 6/59 (10.2%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Benign prostatic hyperplasia 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Acute respiratory distress syndrome 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Acute respiratory failure 0/59 (0%) 3/87 (3.4%)
    Dyspnoea 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Haemoptysis 1/59 (1.7%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Hypercapnia 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Hypoxia 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Pleural effusion 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Pneumonia aspiration 1/59 (1.7%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Pulmonary alveolar haemorrhage 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Pulmonary embolism 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Pulmonary infarction 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Pulmonary oedema 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Respiratory failure 4/59 (6.8%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Sinus disorder 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Tachypnoea 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Wheezing 0/59 (0%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Vascular disorders
    Arteritis 1/59 (1.7%) 0/87 (0%)
    Deep vein thrombosis 1/59 (1.7%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Hypotension 2/59 (3.4%) 0/87 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Renally Impaired (RI) Not Renally Impaired (NRI)
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 54/59 (91.5%) 68/87 (78.2%)
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Febrile neutropenia 4/59 (6.8%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Neutropenia 6/59 (10.2%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Cardiac disorders
    Atrial fibrillation 4/59 (6.8%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Sinus tachycardia 3/59 (5.1%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Tachycardia 4/59 (6.8%) 4/87 (4.6%)
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal pain 7/59 (11.9%) 4/87 (4.6%)
    Abdominal pain upper 1/59 (1.7%) 5/87 (5.7%)
    Constipation 5/59 (8.5%) 10/87 (11.5%)
    Diarrhoea 16/59 (27.1%) 10/87 (11.5%)
    Haematochezia 3/59 (5.1%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Nausea 19/59 (32.2%) 14/87 (16.1%)
    Stomatitis 3/59 (5.1%) 0/87 (0%)
    Vomiting 16/59 (27.1%) 17/87 (19.5%)
    General disorders
    Asthenia 1/59 (1.7%) 7/87 (8%)
    Chills 5/59 (8.5%) 3/87 (3.4%)
    Fatigue 4/59 (6.8%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Oedema peripheral 8/59 (13.6%) 8/87 (9.2%)
    Pain 3/59 (5.1%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Pyrexia 9/59 (15.3%) 15/87 (17.2%)
    Infections and infestations
    Clostridial infection 3/59 (5.1%) 0/87 (0%)
    Clostridium difficile colitis 3/59 (5.1%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Herpes zoster 1/59 (1.7%) 5/87 (5.7%)
    Upper respiratory tract infection 5/59 (8.5%) 6/87 (6.9%)
    Urinary tract infection 7/59 (11.9%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Investigations
    Blood alkaline phosphatase increased 3/59 (5.1%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased 4/59 (6.8%) 6/87 (6.9%)
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Decreased appetite 4/59 (6.8%) 6/87 (6.9%)
    Hyperglycaemia 3/59 (5.1%) 4/87 (4.6%)
    Hyperkalaemia 7/59 (11.9%) 4/87 (4.6%)
    Hypernatraemia 3/59 (5.1%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Hypocalcaemia 3/59 (5.1%) 3/87 (3.4%)
    Hypokalaemia 6/59 (10.2%) 6/87 (6.9%)
    Hypomagnesaemia 2/59 (3.4%) 7/87 (8%)
    Hypophosphataemia 3/59 (5.1%) 0/87 (0%)
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Back pain 6/59 (10.2%) 8/87 (9.2%)
    Musculoskeletal chest pain 3/59 (5.1%) 5/87 (5.7%)
    Myalgia 3/59 (5.1%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Pain in extremity 4/59 (6.8%) 3/87 (3.4%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness 3/59 (5.1%) 5/87 (5.7%)
    Headache 11/59 (18.6%) 14/87 (16.1%)
    Psychiatric disorders
    Confusional state 7/59 (11.9%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Insomnia 5/59 (8.5%) 8/87 (9.2%)
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Oliguria 3/59 (5.1%) 0/87 (0%)
    Renal impairment 3/59 (5.1%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough 3/59 (5.1%) 12/87 (13.8%)
    Dyspnoea 6/59 (10.2%) 7/87 (8%)
    Epistaxis 2/59 (3.4%) 5/87 (5.7%)
    Haemoptysis 3/59 (5.1%) 1/87 (1.1%)
    Oropharyngeal pain 4/59 (6.8%) 2/87 (2.3%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Pruritus 2/59 (3.4%) 7/87 (8%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension 3/59 (5.1%) 5/87 (5.7%)
    Hypotension 5/59 (8.5%) 5/87 (5.7%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    Enrollment in the clinical study was suspended in January 2009 pending further characterization of newly identified impurities. After successful study completion resumption of enrollment started in April 2011 for the 9766-CL-0103/WSA-CS-003 study.

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    Publication. At least sixty (60) days prior to submitting or presenting a manuscript or other materials relating to the Study to a publisher, reviewer, or other outside persons, the Site shall provide to Sponsor a copy of all such manuscripts and materials , and allow Sponsor sixty (60) days to review and comment on them.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Vice President, Medical Head ID/IM/TX
    Organization Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
    Phone (224) 205-8800
    Email Astellas.resultsdisclosure@astellas.com
    Responsible Party:
    Astellas Pharma Inc
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00634049
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 9766-CL-0103
    • WSA-CS-003
    • 2006-005003-33
    First Posted:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Last Update Posted:
    Jan 2, 2018
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2017