SPEC: Spectacle Prescribing in Early Childhood

Sponsor
University of Arizona (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04728451
Collaborator
National Eye Institute (NEI) (NIH)
172
1
2
61.2
2.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare developmental outcome for young children (12 to 35 months of age) with astigmatism meeting American Academy of Ophthalmology spectacle prescribing guidelines and who are prescribed and provided spectacles for either Full-Time wear (encouraged and reinforced) or Ad Lib wear (wear dependent on child acceptance).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Spectacle wear support
  • Device: Spectacles
N/A

Detailed Description

The benefits and drawbacks of spectacle treatment for bilateral astigmatism in young children are not known. The SPEC study compares outcomes for young children (12 to < 35 months of age) with astigmatism meeting spectacle prescribing recommendations and randomized to either Full-Time spectacle wear (encouraged and reinforced) or Ad Lib spectacle wear (only as accepted by the child). The primary outcome analysis compares cognitive development at 38-42 months in children randomized to the Full-Time and Ad Lib groups. Secondary analyses compare Language, Motor, Social-Emotional, and Adaptive Behavior developmental outcomes and visual acuity outcome for children randomized to the Full-Time and Ad Lib groups.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
172 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Spectacle Prescribing in Early Childhood (SPEC)
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 26, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2026
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
May 1, 2026

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Full-Time Spectacle Wear

Parents are asked to encourage their child to wear the spectacles full-time (all waking hours). A study staff member works closely with families throughout the child's participation to provide support and encouragement and to make suggestions on methods parents can use to maximize spectacle wear.

Behavioral: Spectacle wear support
Parents of children in the full-time group are provided with encouragement, support, and counseling throughout the study in order to maximize their child's spectacle wear.

Device: Spectacles
Children prescribed and provided spectacles with full correction of their refractive error, with the exception of prescriptions with ≥ +1.50D sphere (plus cylinder notation) in the least hyperopic eye, which will be symmetrically reduced by 1.00D

Active Comparator: Ad-Lib Spectacle Wear

Parents are asked to encourage their child to wear the spectacles as much as possible for the initial 30 days after dispensing, and thereafter to continue to offer the spectacles to the child but not force the child to wear them if they resist or refuse. Limited support for parents is provided with regard to maximizing spectacle wear.

Device: Spectacles
Children prescribed and provided spectacles with full correction of their refractive error, with the exception of prescriptions with ≥ +1.50D sphere (plus cylinder notation) in the least hyperopic eye, which will be symmetrically reduced by 1.00D

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Cognitive Development [Measured at the Developmental and Visual Assessment Visit (when the child is age 1155-1275 days)]

    Cognitive Scale Composite Score on the "Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition". Tester is masked to the child's randomized group. Scores (continuous scale) are based on published age norms (mean =100, standard deviation = 15) and range from 40-160 with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A difference of ≥10 points between randomized groups will be considered clinically meaningful.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Language Development [Measured at the Developmental and Visual Assessment Visit (when the child is age 1155-1275 days)]

    Language Scale Composite Score on the "Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition". Tester is masked to the child's randomized group. Scores (continuous scale) are based on published age norms (mean =100, standard deviation = 15) and range from 40-160 with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A difference of ≥10 points between randomized groups will be considered clinically meaningful.

  2. Motor Development [Measured at the Developmental and Visual Assessment Visit (when the child is age 1155-1275 days)]

    Motor Scale Composite Score on the "Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition". Tester is masked to the child's randomized group. Scores (continuous scale) are based on published age norms (mean =100, standard deviation = 15) and range from 40-160 with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A difference of ≥10 points between randomized groups will be considered clinically meaningful.

  3. Social-Emotional Development [Measured at the Developmental and Visual Assessment Visit (when the child is age 1155-1275 days)]

    Social-Emotional Scale Composite Score on the "Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition". Tester is masked to the child's randomized group. Scores (continuous scale) are based on published age norms (mean =100, standard deviation = 15) and range from 40-160 with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A difference of ≥10 points between randomized groups will be considered clinically meaningful.

  4. Adaptive Behavior [Measured at the Developmental and Visual Assessment Visit (when the child is age 1155-1275 days)]

    Adaptive Behavior Scale Composite Score on the "Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition". Tester is masked to the child's randomized group. Scores (continuous scale) are based on published age norms (mean =100, standard deviation = 15) and range from 40-160 with higher scores indicating better outcomes. A difference of ≥10 points between randomized groups will be considered clinically meaningful.

  5. Visual Acuity [Measured at the Developmental and Visual Assessment Visit (when the child is age 1155-1275 days)]

    Binocular visual acuity tested using the Amblyopia Treatment Study HOTV Protocol. Child wears most recent prescription for testing (or no spectacles, if discontinued by study doctor). Tester is masked to the child's randomized group. Acuity is recorded and analyzed as log MAR values (continuous scale). A difference of 0.10 log MAR between randomized groups will be considered clinically meaningful.

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Duration of spectacle wear [From the date of dispensing of the first pair of spectacles at the Spectacle Prescription Verification Visit through the date of the Developmental and Visual Assessment Visit, up to 30 months.]

    Objective measures of duration of spectacle wear (hours/day) assessed objectively with a TheraMon® sensor attached to the child's spectacles. Temperature samples are recorded by the sensor every 15 minutes.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
12 Months to 35 Months
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Parent/guardian provision of signed and dated informed consent form for Baseline/Eligibility Examination.

  • Completion of Baseline/Eligibility Examination with cycloplegia.

  • Bilateral astigmatism: Astigmatism ≥2.25D in the most astigmatic eye and ≥1.75D in the fellow eye based on manual cycloplegic retinoscopy conducted at Baseline/Eligibility Examination.

  • Parent/guardian willing to accept assignment to either randomized group.

  • Parent/guardian provision of signed and dated informed consent form for randomized SPEC Study.

  • Parent willing to commit to study visits every 180 days, to be contacted (phone, email, or text) for reports of spectacle wear, and to allow their child to wear the TheraMon® sensor on the spectacle headband.

  • Child and Family are primarily English or Spanish speaking.

  • Parent/guardian does not anticipate moving out of Tucson area prior to their child reaching age 1275 days (approximately age 3 ½ years).

  • Parent/guardian has not enrolled another child in the SPEC trial.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Gestational age <32 weeks (per parent report).

  • Anisometropia ≥1.50 D spherical equivalent per manual cycloplegic retinoscopy conducted at the Baseline/Eligibility Examination.

  • Current manifest strabismus per Baseline/Eligibility Examination.

  • Ocular pathology per Baseline/Eligibility Examination (H44* or H25* diagnosis code).

  • Previously diagnosed manifest strabismus or other ocular abnormalities (per parent report and per medical record):

  • H25* (Cataract)

  • H44* (Disorders of the Globe)

  • H50* (Strabismus)

  • H55* (Irregular Eye Movement and Nystagmus)

  • Q15.0 (Congenital Glaucoma)

  • Previous spectacle wear, amblyopia therapy, or vision therapy (per parent report and per medical record).

o H53* (Amblyopia)

  • Current or previous diagnosis of developmental or neurological conditions (per parent report and per medical record):

  • H90.5 Congenital Deafness, and related disorders of hearing loss.

  • G40.909 Epilepsy or other seizure disorder.

  • P07.34 Prematurity 31 weeks, and other prematurity less than 32 weeks.

  • P91.6 Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy

  • Q90.9 Down Syndrome, and other congenital syndromes associated with developmental delay.

  • Q04.4 Septo-Optic Dysplasia

  • Q91-Q92 Trisomy Other (13, 18, partial, complete, unbalanced translocations, mosaicism, duplications)

  • R62.50 Developmental Delay, and related disorders exhibiting a delay in one or more streams of development (e.g. language, fine motor, gross motor, social).

  • History of allergic response to dilating eye drops (per parent report):

  • Local redness and swelling of the eyelid consistent with contact dermatitis which resulted in the parent being informed that the child had a drug allergy to one of the dilating eye drops (proparacaine or cyclopentolate) or one of the carrier or preservative agents used in the formulation of these drops.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 The University of Arizona Tucson Arizona United States 85719

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Arizona
  • National Eye Institute (NEI)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erin M Harvey, Ph.D., University of Arizona
  • Principal Investigator: Joseph M Miller, M.D., University of Arizona

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Erin Harvey, Associate Professor, University of Arizona
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04728451
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 1911187060
  • UG1EY029657
First Posted:
Jan 28, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Mar 31, 2022
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Erin Harvey, Associate Professor, University of Arizona
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 31, 2022