Clinical Evaluation of Invigor Toric 1-Day Contact Lenses

Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc. (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04016623
Collaborator
(none)
10
1
2
29
10.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

An evaluation of the clinical performance of the 1-day toric test contact lens compared to the 1-day toric control contact lens over one hour of lens wear.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: 1-day toric test contact lens
  • Device: 1-day toric control contact lens
N/A

Detailed Description

A non-dispensing, double-masked, randomized, contralateral study comparing the 1-day toric test contact lens against the 1-day toric control contact lens to evaluate the clinical performance over one hour of lens wear. Each subject will be randomized to wear the test lens in one eye and the control lens in the other eye for each pair of lenses.

Each subject will be asked to wear four pairs of contact lenses in the study

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
10 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Factorial Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
This is a non-dispensing, double-masked, randomized, contralateral study design. Each subject will be randomized to wear the test lens in one eye and the control lens in the other eye.This is a non-dispensing, double-masked, randomized, contralateral study design. Each subject will be randomized to wear the test lens in one eye and the control lens in the other eye.
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Clinical Evaluation of Invigor Toric 1-Day Contact Lenses
Actual Study Start Date :
May 6, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
May 15, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 4, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: 1-day toric test contact lens

Each subject will wear the 1-day toric test (Test) lens in one eye and 1-day toric control (Control) contact lens in the other eye. Patient will wear as an unmatched pair, per predetermined randomization schedule (to determine which eye receives the Test or Control contact lens).

Device: 1-day toric test contact lens
somofilcon A 1-day toric test contact lens
Other Names:
  • Test contact lens
  • Invigor toric 1-day contact lens
  • Device: 1-day toric control contact lens
    somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens
    Other Names:
  • Control contact lens
  • Active Comparator: 1-day toric control contact lens

    Each subject will wear the 1-day toric test (Test) lens in one eye and 1-day toric control (Control) contact lens in the other eye. Patient will wear as an unmatched pair, per predetermined randomization schedule (to determine which eye receives the Test or Control contact lens).

    Device: 1-day toric test contact lens
    somofilcon A 1-day toric test contact lens
    Other Names:
  • Test contact lens
  • Invigor toric 1-day contact lens
  • Device: 1-day toric control contact lens
    somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens
    Other Names:
  • Control contact lens
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Visibility of Toric Mark [1 hour]

      Toric Mark visible or not visible. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    2. Degree of Lens Orientation [Baseline]

      Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    3. Degree of Lens Orientation [15 minutes]

      Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    4. Degree of Lens Orientation [1 hour]

      Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    5. Toric Stability [15 minutes]

      Toric stability (maximal and minimal differences between extreme gazes) measured in degrees for up, down, right, and left gazes. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    6. Toric Stability [1 hour]

      Rotational stability (maximal and minimal differences between extreme gazes) measured in degrees for up, down, right, and left gazes. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    7. Degree of Rotational Recovery [15 minutes]

      Rotational Recovery for nasal and temporal - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    8. Degree of Rotational Recovery [1 hour]

      Rotational Recovery for nasal and temporal - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    9. Toric Fit Acceptance [15 minutes]

      Toric fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = can't be worn, 4 = optimum). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    10. Toric Fit Acceptance [1 hour]

      Toric fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = can't be worn, 4 = optimum). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    11. Toric Fit Preference [Baseline]

      Investigator's toric fitting preference - Test lens , No Preference , Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    12. Toric Fit Preference [1 hour]

      Investigator's toric fitting preference - Test lens, No Preference, Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration [15 Minutes]

      Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    2. Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration [1 hour]

      Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    3. Measurement of Lens Vertical Centration [15 minutes]

      Lens Horizontal centration measured in mm. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    4. Measurement of Lens Vertical Centration [1 hour]

      Lens Horizontal centration measured in mm. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    5. Measurement of Lens Movement [15 minutes]

      Measurement of lens movement in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    6. Measurement of Lens Movement [1 hour]

      Measurement of lens movement in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    7. Lens Push-Up [15 minutes]

      Lens push-up measured in percentage. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    8. Lens Push-Up [1 hour]

      Lens push-up measured in percentage. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 control lenses).

    9. Primary Lens Gaze Lag [15 minutes]

      Primary lens gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    10. Primary Lens Gaze Lag [1 hour]

      Primary lens gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    11. General Lens Fit Acceptance [15 minutes]

      General lens fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = unacceptable, 4 = optimal). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    12. General Lens Fit Acceptance [1 hour]

      General lens fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = unacceptable, 4 = optimal). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    13. Up Gaze Lag [15 minutes]

      Up gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    14. Up Gaze Lag [1 hour]

      Up gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    15. General Lens Fit Preference [Baseline]

      Investigator's general lens fit preference - Test lens, No preference, Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    16. General Lens Fit Preference [1 hour]

      Investigator's general lens fit preference - Test lens, No preference, Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Has had a self-reported oculo-visual examination in the last two years.

    • Is at least 18 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer.

    • Has read and understood the information consent letter.

    • Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule.

    • Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/40 or better (in each eye) with their habitual vision correction or 20/20 best-corrected.

    • Currently wears soft contact lenses.

    • Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease.

    • Has not worn lenses for at least 12 hours before the examination

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Has never worn contact lenses before.

    • Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health.

    • Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health.

    • Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion (moderate to severe dry eyes) that would affect the wearing of contact lenses.

    • Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining using sodium fluorescein dye.

    • Has any clinically significant lid or conjunctival abnormalities, active neovascularization or any central corneal scars.

    • Is aphakic.

    • Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.

    • Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Clinical Optics Research Lab (CORL) Indiana University School of Optometry, Indiana University Bloomington Indiana United States 47405

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Coopervision, Inc.

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Pete S Kollbaum, OD PhD, Clinical Optics Research Lab (CORL) Indiana University School of Optometry, Indiana University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Coopervision, Inc.
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04016623
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CV-19-27
    First Posted:
    Jul 11, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 14, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    Participant Flow

    Recruitment Details
    Pre-assignment Detail
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses / Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye for 1 hour. Four different powers of test and control lens were used. There was a 15-minute wash-out period between the two lens pairs 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens -1.00 -1.75 x 180, -1.00 -1.75 x 090, -6.00 -1.75 x 180, -6.00 -1.75 x 090 1-day toric control contact lens 1: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens -1.00 -1.75 x 180, -1.00 -1.75 x 090, -6.00 -1.75 x 180, -6.00 -1.75 x 090
    Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense
    STARTED 10
    COMPLETED 10
    NOT COMPLETED 0
    Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense
    STARTED 10
    COMPLETED 10
    NOT COMPLETED 0
    Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense
    STARTED 10
    COMPLETED 10
    NOT COMPLETED 0
    Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense
    STARTED 10
    COMPLETED 10
    NOT COMPLETED 0
    Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense
    STARTED 10
    COMPLETED 10
    NOT COMPLETED 0
    Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense
    STARTED 10
    COMPLETED 10
    NOT COMPLETED 0
    Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense
    STARTED 10
    COMPLETED 10
    NOT COMPLETED 0
    Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense
    STARTED 10
    COMPLETED 10
    NOT COMPLETED 0

    Baseline Characteristics

    Arm/Group Title Overall Study
    Arm/Group Description Total Participants
    Overall Participants 10
    Age (Count of Participants)
    <=18 years
    0
    0%
    Between 18 and 65 years
    10
    100%
    >=65 years
    0
    0%
    Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
    25
    (4)
    Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
    Female
    8
    80%
    Male
    2
    20%
    Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants)
    Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
    United States
    10
    100%

    Outcome Measures

    1. Primary Outcome
    Title Visibility of Toric Mark
    Description Toric Mark visible or not visible. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 1 hour

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used and all the data was combined. 1-day toric test contact lens: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used and all the data was combined. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact Lenses 40 40
    Visible
    100
    1000%
    100
    NaN
    Not Visible
    0
    0%
    0
    NaN
    2. Primary Outcome
    Title Degree of Lens Orientation
    Description Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used and all the data was combined. 1-day toric test contact lens: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used and all the data was combined. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact Lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Degrees]
    0
    (7)
    -1
    (7)
    3. Primary Outcome
    Title Degree of Lens Orientation
    Description Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 15 minutes

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used and all the data was combined. 1-day toric test contact lens: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact Lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Degrees]
    1
    (6)
    0
    (7)
    4. Primary Outcome
    Title Degree of Lens Orientation
    Description Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 1 hour

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Degrees]
    -1
    (6)
    -1
    (6)
    5. Primary Outcome
    Title Toric Stability
    Description Toric stability (maximal and minimal differences between extreme gazes) measured in degrees for up, down, right, and left gazes. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 15 minutes

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact Lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Degrees]
    4
    (3)
    4
    (3)
    6. Primary Outcome
    Title Toric Stability
    Description Rotational stability (maximal and minimal differences between extreme gazes) measured in degrees for up, down, right, and left gazes. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 1 hour

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [Degrees]
    5
    (3)
    4
    (3)
    7. Primary Outcome
    Title Degree of Rotational Recovery
    Description Rotational Recovery for nasal and temporal - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 15 minutes

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure contact lenses 40 40
    Nasal
    16
    (9)
    15
    (10)
    Temporal
    10
    (10)
    10
    (9)
    8. Primary Outcome
    Title Degree of Rotational Recovery
    Description Rotational Recovery for nasal and temporal - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 1 hour

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Inigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact lenses 40 40
    Nasal
    16
    (9)
    12
    (10)
    Temporal
    9
    (10)
    10
    (10)
    9. Primary Outcome
    Title Toric Fit Acceptance
    Description Toric fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = can't be worn, 4 = optimum). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 15 minutes

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lens
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact Lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    3.5
    (0.2)
    3.4
    (0.2)
    10. Primary Outcome
    Title Toric Fit Acceptance
    Description Toric fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = can't be worn, 4 = optimum). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 1 hour

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact Lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    3.5
    (0.2)
    3.4
    (0.3)
    11. Primary Outcome
    Title Toric Fit Preference
    Description Investigator's toric fitting preference - Test lens , No Preference , Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Overall Study
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10
    Measure Contact Lenses 40
    Test Lens
    23
    No Preference
    69
    Control Lens
    8
    12. Primary Outcome
    Title Toric Fit Preference
    Description Investigator's toric fitting preference - Test lens, No Preference, Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 1 hour

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Overall Study
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact Lenses).
    Measure Participants 10
    Measure Contact Lenses 40
    Test Lens
    33
    No Preference
    57
    Control Lens
    10
    13. Secondary Outcome
    Title Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration
    Description Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 15 Minutes

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact Lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)]
    -0.08
    (0.24)
    -0.05
    (0.21)
    14. Secondary Outcome
    Title Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration
    Description Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 1 hour

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)]
    -0.06
    (0.22)
    -0.08
    (0.21)
    15. Secondary Outcome
    Title Measurement of Lens Vertical Centration
    Description Lens Horizontal centration measured in mm. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 15 minutes

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. Both lens type and powers were randomized. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)]
    0.34
    (0.22)
    0.34
    (0.21)
    16. Secondary Outcome
    Title Measurement of Lens Vertical Centration
    Description Lens Horizontal centration measured in mm. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 1 hour

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)]
    0.32
    (0.19)
    0.27
    (0.26)
    17. Secondary Outcome
    Title Measurement of Lens Movement
    Description Measurement of lens movement in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 15 minutes

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure contact lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)]
    0.26
    (0.09)
    0.25
    (0.08)
    18. Secondary Outcome
    Title Measurement of Lens Movement
    Description Measurement of lens movement in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 1 hour

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact Lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)]
    0.25
    (0.08)
    0.24
    (0.08)
    19. Secondary Outcome
    Title Lens Push-Up
    Description Lens push-up measured in percentage. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 15 minutes

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage]
    45
    (6)
    47
    (6)
    20. Secondary Outcome
    Title Lens Push-Up
    Description Lens push-up measured in percentage. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 control lenses).
    Time Frame 1 hour

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact Lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage]
    47
    (5)
    47
    (6)
    21. Secondary Outcome
    Title Primary Lens Gaze Lag
    Description Primary lens gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 15 minutes

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)]
    0.20
    (0.08)
    0.21
    (0.08)
    22. Secondary Outcome
    Title Primary Lens Gaze Lag
    Description Primary lens gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 1 hour

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)]
    0.20
    (0.06)
    0.19
    (0.08)
    23. Secondary Outcome
    Title General Lens Fit Acceptance
    Description General lens fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = unacceptable, 4 = optimal). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 15 minutes

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    3.4
    (0.2)
    3.4
    (0.2)
    24. Secondary Outcome
    Title General Lens Fit Acceptance
    Description General lens fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = unacceptable, 4 = optimal). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 1 hour

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure Contact lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
    3.4
    (0.2)
    3.4
    (0.2)
    25. Secondary Outcome
    Title Up Gaze Lag
    Description Up gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 15 minutes

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure contact lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)]
    0.25
    (0.10)
    0.25
    (0.09)
    26. Secondary Outcome
    Title Up Gaze Lag
    Description Up gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 1 hour

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lense
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10 10
    Measure contact lenses 40 40
    Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)]
    0.22
    (0.08)
    0.22
    (0.08)
    27. Secondary Outcome
    Title General Lens Fit Preference
    Description Investigator's general lens fit preference - Test lens, No preference, Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame Baseline

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Overall Study
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens 1-day toric control contact lens 1: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10
    Measure Contact lenses 40
    Test Lens
    5
    No preference
    92
    Control lens
    3
    28. Secondary Outcome
    Title General Lens Fit Preference
    Description Investigator's general lens fit preference - Test lens, No preference, Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Time Frame 1 hour

    Outcome Measure Data

    Analysis Population Description
    The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses.
    Arm/Group Title Overall Study
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens 1-day toric control contact lens 1: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
    Measure Participants 10
    Measure contact lenses 40
    Test Lens
    3
    No preference
    94
    Control lens
    3

    Adverse Events

    Time Frame From dispense up to 1 hour on each pair of lenses.
    Adverse Event Reporting Description
    Arm/Group Title Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Arm/Group Description Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used and the data was combined as the primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. 1-day toric test contact lens -1.00 -1.75 x 180, -1.00 -1.75 x 090, -6.00 -1.75 x 180, -6.00 -1.75 x 090 Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used and the data was combined as the primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. 1-day toric control contact lens -1.00 -1.75 x 180, -1.00 -1.75 x 090, -6.00 -1.75 x 180, -6.00 -1.75 x 090
    All Cause Mortality
    Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/10 (0%) 0/10 (0%)
    Serious Adverse Events
    Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/10 (0%) 0/10 (0%)
    Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
    Test Contact Lenses Control Contact Lenses
    Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
    Total 0/10 (0%) 0/10 (0%)

    Limitations/Caveats

    [Not Specified]

    More Information

    Certain Agreements

    Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

    There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

    Results Point of Contact

    Name/Title Myhanh Nguyen
    Organization CooperVision, Inc.
    Phone 925-730-6716
    Email mnguyen@coopervision.com
    Responsible Party:
    Coopervision, Inc.
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04016623
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • CV-19-27
    First Posted:
    Jul 11, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 14, 2020
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2020