Clinical Evaluation of Invigor Toric 1-Day Contact Lenses
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
An evaluation of the clinical performance of the 1-day toric test contact lens compared to the 1-day toric control contact lens over one hour of lens wear.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
A non-dispensing, double-masked, randomized, contralateral study comparing the 1-day toric test contact lens against the 1-day toric control contact lens to evaluate the clinical performance over one hour of lens wear. Each subject will be randomized to wear the test lens in one eye and the control lens in the other eye for each pair of lenses.
Each subject will be asked to wear four pairs of contact lenses in the study
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: 1-day toric test contact lens Each subject will wear the 1-day toric test (Test) lens in one eye and 1-day toric control (Control) contact lens in the other eye. Patient will wear as an unmatched pair, per predetermined randomization schedule (to determine which eye receives the Test or Control contact lens). |
Device: 1-day toric test contact lens
somofilcon A 1-day toric test contact lens
Other Names:
Device: 1-day toric control contact lens
somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: 1-day toric control contact lens Each subject will wear the 1-day toric test (Test) lens in one eye and 1-day toric control (Control) contact lens in the other eye. Patient will wear as an unmatched pair, per predetermined randomization schedule (to determine which eye receives the Test or Control contact lens). |
Device: 1-day toric test contact lens
somofilcon A 1-day toric test contact lens
Other Names:
Device: 1-day toric control contact lens
somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Visibility of Toric Mark [1 hour]
Toric Mark visible or not visible. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Degree of Lens Orientation [Baseline]
Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Degree of Lens Orientation [15 minutes]
Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Degree of Lens Orientation [1 hour]
Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Toric Stability [15 minutes]
Toric stability (maximal and minimal differences between extreme gazes) measured in degrees for up, down, right, and left gazes. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Toric Stability [1 hour]
Rotational stability (maximal and minimal differences between extreme gazes) measured in degrees for up, down, right, and left gazes. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Degree of Rotational Recovery [15 minutes]
Rotational Recovery for nasal and temporal - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Degree of Rotational Recovery [1 hour]
Rotational Recovery for nasal and temporal - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Toric Fit Acceptance [15 minutes]
Toric fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = can't be worn, 4 = optimum). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Toric Fit Acceptance [1 hour]
Toric fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = can't be worn, 4 = optimum). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Toric Fit Preference [Baseline]
Investigator's toric fitting preference - Test lens , No Preference , Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Toric Fit Preference [1 hour]
Investigator's toric fitting preference - Test lens, No Preference, Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration [15 Minutes]
Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration [1 hour]
Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Measurement of Lens Vertical Centration [15 minutes]
Lens Horizontal centration measured in mm. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Measurement of Lens Vertical Centration [1 hour]
Lens Horizontal centration measured in mm. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Measurement of Lens Movement [15 minutes]
Measurement of lens movement in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Measurement of Lens Movement [1 hour]
Measurement of lens movement in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Lens Push-Up [15 minutes]
Lens push-up measured in percentage. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Lens Push-Up [1 hour]
Lens push-up measured in percentage. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 control lenses).
- Primary Lens Gaze Lag [15 minutes]
Primary lens gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Primary Lens Gaze Lag [1 hour]
Primary lens gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- General Lens Fit Acceptance [15 minutes]
General lens fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = unacceptable, 4 = optimal). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- General Lens Fit Acceptance [1 hour]
General lens fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = unacceptable, 4 = optimal). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Up Gaze Lag [15 minutes]
Up gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- Up Gaze Lag [1 hour]
Up gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- General Lens Fit Preference [Baseline]
Investigator's general lens fit preference - Test lens, No preference, Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
- General Lens Fit Preference [1 hour]
Investigator's general lens fit preference - Test lens, No preference, Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Has had a self-reported oculo-visual examination in the last two years.
-
Is at least 18 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer.
-
Has read and understood the information consent letter.
-
Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule.
-
Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/40 or better (in each eye) with their habitual vision correction or 20/20 best-corrected.
-
Currently wears soft contact lenses.
-
Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease.
-
Has not worn lenses for at least 12 hours before the examination
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Has never worn contact lenses before.
-
Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health.
-
Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health.
-
Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion (moderate to severe dry eyes) that would affect the wearing of contact lenses.
-
Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining using sodium fluorescein dye.
-
Has any clinically significant lid or conjunctival abnormalities, active neovascularization or any central corneal scars.
-
Is aphakic.
-
Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
-
Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Clinical Optics Research Lab (CORL) Indiana University School of Optometry, Indiana University | Bloomington | Indiana | United States | 47405 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Coopervision, Inc.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Pete S Kollbaum, OD PhD, Clinical Optics Research Lab (CORL) Indiana University School of Optometry, Indiana University
Study Documents (Full-Text)
More Information
Publications
None provided.- CV-19-27
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses / Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye for 1 hour. Four different powers of test and control lens were used. There was a 15-minute wash-out period between the two lens pairs 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens -1.00 -1.75 x 180, -1.00 -1.75 x 090, -6.00 -1.75 x 180, -6.00 -1.75 x 090 1-day toric control contact lens 1: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens -1.00 -1.75 x 180, -1.00 -1.75 x 090, -6.00 -1.75 x 180, -6.00 -1.75 x 090 |
Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense | |
STARTED | 10 |
COMPLETED | 10 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense | |
STARTED | 10 |
COMPLETED | 10 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense | |
STARTED | 10 |
COMPLETED | 10 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense | |
STARTED | 10 |
COMPLETED | 10 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense | |
STARTED | 10 |
COMPLETED | 10 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense | |
STARTED | 10 |
COMPLETED | 10 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense | |
STARTED | 10 |
COMPLETED | 10 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Period Title: Pair 1 Test / Control Dispense | |
STARTED | 10 |
COMPLETED | 10 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Total Participants |
Overall Participants | 10 |
Age (Count of Participants) | |
<=18 years |
0
0%
|
Between 18 and 65 years |
10
100%
|
>=65 years |
0
0%
|
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
25
(4)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |
Female |
8
80%
|
Male |
2
20%
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected (Count of Participants) | |
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number] | |
United States |
10
100%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Visibility of Toric Mark |
---|---|
Description | Toric Mark visible or not visible. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 1 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used and all the data was combined. 1-day toric test contact lens: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used and all the data was combined. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact Lenses | 40 | 40 |
Visible |
100
1000%
|
100
NaN
|
Not Visible |
0
0%
|
0
NaN
|
Title | Degree of Lens Orientation |
---|---|
Description | Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | Baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used and all the data was combined. 1-day toric test contact lens: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used and all the data was combined. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact Lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Degrees] |
0
(7)
|
-1
(7)
|
Title | Degree of Lens Orientation |
---|---|
Description | Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 15 minutes |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used and all the data was combined. 1-day toric test contact lens: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact Lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Degrees] |
1
(6)
|
0
(7)
|
Title | Degree of Lens Orientation |
---|---|
Description | Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 1 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Degrees] |
-1
(6)
|
-1
(6)
|
Title | Toric Stability |
---|---|
Description | Toric stability (maximal and minimal differences between extreme gazes) measured in degrees for up, down, right, and left gazes. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 15 minutes |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact Lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Degrees] |
4
(3)
|
4
(3)
|
Title | Toric Stability |
---|---|
Description | Rotational stability (maximal and minimal differences between extreme gazes) measured in degrees for up, down, right, and left gazes. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 1 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Degrees] |
5
(3)
|
4
(3)
|
Title | Degree of Rotational Recovery |
---|---|
Description | Rotational Recovery for nasal and temporal - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 15 minutes |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Nasal |
16
(9)
|
15
(10)
|
Temporal |
10
(10)
|
10
(9)
|
Title | Degree of Rotational Recovery |
---|---|
Description | Rotational Recovery for nasal and temporal - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 1 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Inigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Nasal |
16
(9)
|
12
(10)
|
Temporal |
9
(10)
|
10
(10)
|
Title | Toric Fit Acceptance |
---|---|
Description | Toric fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = can't be worn, 4 = optimum). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 15 minutes |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lens |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact Lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
3.5
(0.2)
|
3.4
(0.2)
|
Title | Toric Fit Acceptance |
---|---|
Description | Toric fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = can't be worn, 4 = optimum). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 1 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact Lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
3.5
(0.2)
|
3.4
(0.3)
|
Title | Toric Fit Preference |
---|---|
Description | Investigator's toric fitting preference - Test lens , No Preference , Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | Baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 |
Measure Contact Lenses | 40 |
Test Lens |
23
|
No Preference |
69
|
Control Lens |
8
|
Title | Toric Fit Preference |
---|---|
Description | Investigator's toric fitting preference - Test lens, No Preference, Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 1 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact Lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 |
Measure Contact Lenses | 40 |
Test Lens |
33
|
No Preference |
57
|
Control Lens |
10
|
Title | Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration |
---|---|
Description | Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 15 Minutes |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact Lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)] |
-0.08
(0.24)
|
-0.05
(0.21)
|
Title | Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration |
---|---|
Description | Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 1 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)] |
-0.06
(0.22)
|
-0.08
(0.21)
|
Title | Measurement of Lens Vertical Centration |
---|---|
Description | Lens Horizontal centration measured in mm. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 15 minutes |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. Both lens type and powers were randomized. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)] |
0.34
(0.22)
|
0.34
(0.21)
|
Title | Measurement of Lens Vertical Centration |
---|---|
Description | Lens Horizontal centration measured in mm. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 1 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)] |
0.32
(0.19)
|
0.27
(0.26)
|
Title | Measurement of Lens Movement |
---|---|
Description | Measurement of lens movement in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 15 minutes |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)] |
0.26
(0.09)
|
0.25
(0.08)
|
Title | Measurement of Lens Movement |
---|---|
Description | Measurement of lens movement in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 1 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact Lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)] |
0.25
(0.08)
|
0.24
(0.08)
|
Title | Lens Push-Up |
---|---|
Description | Lens push-up measured in percentage. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 15 minutes |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage] |
45
(6)
|
47
(6)
|
Title | Lens Push-Up |
---|---|
Description | Lens push-up measured in percentage. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 control lenses). |
Time Frame | 1 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact Lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percentage] |
47
(5)
|
47
(6)
|
Title | Primary Lens Gaze Lag |
---|---|
Description | Primary lens gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 15 minutes |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)] |
0.20
(0.08)
|
0.21
(0.08)
|
Title | Primary Lens Gaze Lag |
---|---|
Description | Primary lens gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 1 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)] |
0.20
(0.06)
|
0.19
(0.08)
|
Title | General Lens Fit Acceptance |
---|---|
Description | General lens fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = unacceptable, 4 = optimal). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 15 minutes |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
3.4
(0.2)
|
3.4
(0.2)
|
Title | General Lens Fit Acceptance |
---|---|
Description | General lens fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = unacceptable, 4 = optimal). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 1 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure Contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale] |
3.4
(0.2)
|
3.4
(0.2)
|
Title | Up Gaze Lag |
---|---|
Description | Up gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 15 minutes |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 Contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)] |
0.25
(0.10)
|
0.25
(0.09)
|
Title | Up Gaze Lag |
---|---|
Description | Up gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 1 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lense |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric control contact lens: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 | 10 |
Measure contact lenses | 40 | 40 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [millimeters (mm)] |
0.22
(0.08)
|
0.22
(0.08)
|
Title | General Lens Fit Preference |
---|---|
Description | Investigator's general lens fit preference - Test lens, No preference, Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | Baseline |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens 1-day toric control contact lens 1: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 |
Measure Contact lenses | 40 |
Test Lens |
5
|
No preference |
92
|
Control lens |
3
|
Title | General Lens Fit Preference |
---|---|
Description | Investigator's general lens fit preference - Test lens, No preference, Control lens. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Time Frame | 1 hour |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. |
Arm/Group Title | Overall Study |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used. 1-day toric test contact lens 1: Invigor 1-day toric test contact lens 1-day toric control contact lens 1: somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses). |
Measure Participants | 10 |
Measure contact lenses | 40 |
Test Lens |
3
|
No preference |
94
|
Control lens |
3
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame | From dispense up to 1 hour on each pair of lenses. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses | ||
Arm/Group Description | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used and the data was combined as the primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. 1-day toric test contact lens -1.00 -1.75 x 180, -1.00 -1.75 x 090, -6.00 -1.75 x 180, -6.00 -1.75 x 090 | Subjects were randomized to wear 1-day toric test lens in one eye and 1-day toric control contact lens in the other eye. Four different powers of test and control contact lenses were used and the data was combined as the primary objective of the study was to validate the clinical performance of test and control contact lenses. The various lens powers and axis of test and control lenses were combined as the primary objective was not to validate different power of test and control lenses. 1-day toric control contact lens -1.00 -1.75 x 180, -1.00 -1.75 x 090, -6.00 -1.75 x 180, -6.00 -1.75 x 090 | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Test Contact Lenses | Control Contact Lenses | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Myhanh Nguyen |
---|---|
Organization | CooperVision, Inc. |
Phone | 925-730-6716 |
mnguyen@coopervision.com |
- CV-19-27