Factors Affecting Sensory and Motor Learning
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
How participants perceive the position of their own hand in various contexts will be examined. This will include changing the visual display to suggest the hand is in a slightly different position, and asking participants to indicate where they think it is by pointing with their other hand.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
Hand position can be estimated visually, from an image on the retina, and proprioceptively, from sensors in the joints, muscles, and skin. The brain is thought to weight and combine available sensory estimates to form an integrated multisensory estimate. Inherent in this process is the capacity to realign one or both sensory estimates when they become spatially mismatched, as when washing dishes with the hands immersed in water, which refracts light. It is generally assumed that if a person knows about the sensory mismatch somehow, the realignment will not occur. This assumption will be tested in two experiments by giving people this information in different ways. Expt. A: Conscious awareness of the mismatch will be presented in different ways, or absent. Expt. B: Movement error feedback will be presented in different ways, or absent.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Sham Comparator: Conscious awareness: No information Told nothing about the visuo-proprioceptive mismatch. Hand remains hidden beneath mirror that shows visual display. (control) |
Behavioral: Attend to the targets
Participants will not be told anything about the visuo-proprioceptive mismatch. Instead, they will be asked simply to attend to the target positions.
|
| Experimental: Conscious awareness: Explanatory diagram Told in advance about the visuo-proprioceptive mismatch, which will be explained with a diagram. Hand remains hidden. |
Behavioral: Explanatory diagram
Participant is told there will be a mismatch between their target finger and the visual indicator of target finger position. They will be shown a diagram explaining this.
|
| Experimental: Conscious awareness: Direct vision of hand Foamboard under mirror removed, making the mirror see-through and the hand directly visible. |
Behavioral: Direct vision
Foamboard under mirror removed, making the mirror see-through and the hand directly visible. Mismatch between target hand and visual indicator will be directly visible.
|
| Sham Comparator: Movement feedback: No feedback No movement feedback (control) |
Behavioral: No movement feedback
The visual indicator of the target hand will be displaced, but there will be no cursor to indicate the pointing hand's position.
|
| Experimental: Movement feedback: Target hand Movement feedback about the target hand. |
Behavioral: Movement feedback, target hand
After the participant points at each target, a cursor indicating final pointing position will be displayed briefly. The visual indicator of the target hand will be displaced.
|
| Experimental: Movement feedback: Pointing hand Movement feedback about the pointing hand. |
Behavioral: Movement feedback, pointing hand
After the participant points at each target, a cursor indicating final pointing position will be displayed briefly. The visual indicator of the target hand will not change, but the cursor indicating pointing hand position will change.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Realignment [1 day]
Measured by comparing where the subject points on a touchscreen when indicating perceived position of visual and proprioceptive targets early vs. late in the behavioral task.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Visuo-proprioceptive weighting [1 day]
The degree to which participant relies on vision vs. proprioception when both are available. Measured by comparing where the subject points on a touchscreen when indicating perceived position of visual vs. proprioceptive targets.
- Target estimation variance [1 day.]
Variance with which participant estimate visual and proprioceptive target positions. Computed from where subjects point at targets on a touchscreen.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Between the ages of 18-45 years old
-
Right-handed.
-
Covid has been found to have neurological effects in some people, but mostly the effects on sensorimotor control and neurophysiology are unknown. So we want to reduce the chances of inadvertently testing subjects who have covid. We will therefore only include individuals who are fully vaccinated (2+ weeks past their final vaccine dose) or have a negative Covid test within 4 days of testing. We will further only include individuals who report being free of Covid symptoms in week preceding testing.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Past or present history of seizure, stroke, any brain or peripheral nerve disease, severe head trauma, or spinal cord surgery.
-
Learning or attention conditions such as ADHD.
-
Orthopedic or pain conditions, or a history of seriously injured bones, joints or muscles in either arm.
-
Lack of normal or corrected-to-normal vision.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hannah Block | Bloomington | Indiana | United States | 47403 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Indiana University
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hannah J Block, Indiana University Bloomington
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 14804