Vinorelbine Plus (+) Trastuzumab vs Docetaxel Plus (+) Trastuzumab as 1 Line Treatment for HER2 Positive (+) Metastatic Breast Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
In an open-label randomised phase III-trial patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer naive to chemotherapy with normal organ function and WHO performance status < 3 are randomised to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 i.v. plus trastuzumab 6 mg/kg (8 mg/kg loading dose) q 3 weeks or vinorelbine 30 or 35 mg/m2 days 1+8 plus trastuzumab 6 mg/kg (8 mg/kg loading dose) q 3 weeks. Primary endpoint is time to progression. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, time to treatment failure, response rate, duration of response and toxicity. The study hypothesis is that docetaxel is more efficient than vinorelbine but also more toxic.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Disease free survival [median]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- response rate, overall survival, toxicity [Median]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer
-
WHO performance status < 3
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer or adjuvant therapy within 12 months with docetaxel, vinorelbine or trastuzumab
-
Severe dyspnoea
-
Abnormal organ function including cardiac
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet | Copenhagen | Denmark | 2100 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sanofi
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael Andersson, MD D Med Sci, Department of Oncology 5074, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- HERNATA