DPDMAX: Study of the Impact of DPD Activity on the Efficacy of Capecitabine

Sponsor
Centre Antoine Lacassagne (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04198727
Collaborator
Cerbaliance (Other)
155
5
1
56.4
31
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the Impact of DihydroPyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) activity on the efficacy of Capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The DPD phenotype before the initiation of treatment will be assess and then the patient will be follow up during the treatment with Capecitabine up to 24 month.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
155 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
This is an open-label multi-center prospective cohort study to compare the response of patients with high phenotype to patients with normal phenotype. The analyzes performed will focus on clinical and biological criteria.This is an open-label multi-center prospective cohort study to compare the response of patients with high phenotype to patients with normal phenotype. The analyzes performed will focus on clinical and biological criteria.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Study of the Impact of DPD Activity on the Efficacy of Capecitabine
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 20, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: DPD activity

Other: DPD activity assessment
Phenotyping DPD with enzyme activity measure and uracil dosage
Other Names:
  • Phenotyping
  • Drug: Capecitabine
    Capecitabine assignement at 1000mg per square meter twice daily, cycle of 21 days, 14 days of intake, 7 days of

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. 6 months objective response rate [6 months]

      The primary endpoint will be the 6-month objective response to treatment measured using the RECIST 1.1 scale, or PERCIST 1.0. The objective response is defined as the aggregation of the complete + partial response against stabilization + progression. The distribution of the objective response rate with respect to the value of individual lymphocyte DPD activity before treatment will be examined. This analysis will consist in comparing the objective response rate between patients with a proficient DPD phenotype, measured by lymphocyte DPD activity (> at the 3rd quartile, ie 25% of the initial population) and non-deficient patients with DPD (including phenotype). between the 13th and 75th percentiles of the initial population).

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. 6 months objective response in proficient DPD phenotype [6 months]

      RECIST 1.1 or PERCIST 1.0 criteria

    2. Correlation between the level of lymphocyte DPD activity and uracil dosage [1 month]

    3. Progression-free survival [24 months]

    4. Capecitabine Toxicity using CTCAE v 5.0 [24 months]

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Age over 18,

    • Performance status 0 to 2,

    • Patients with metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer,

    • Patients eligible for capecitabine monotherapy at a dose of 2000 mg / m² / day, 14 days every 21 days,

    • Determination of Uracil level performed according to national recommendations,

    • Patients with at least one lesion evaluable according to the RECIST criteria 1.1, or presenting at least 1 hypermetabolic lesion on PET-TDM according to PERCIST 1.0 criteria. In the case of single cutaneous metastasis (s), it is required to make photographs of lesions with a measure of the lesions using a ruler,

    • Patients receiving social coverage.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Performance status> 2,

    • Contraindication to capecitabine monotherapy at a dose of 2000 mg / m² / day, 14 days every 21 days,

    • Presence of untreated or uncontrolled symptomatic cerebral or leptomeningeal metastases (unstable corticosteroid requirements) and / or non-clinically stable in the 3 months prior to inclusion,

    • History of cancer, with the exception of cancers in complete remission for more than 5 years, totally resected cutaneous basal cell carcinoma, in situ carcinoma or in situ cervical epithelioma treated,

    • Vulnerable people

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Clinique Saint Jean Cagnes-sur-Mer France 06800
    2 Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie Mougins France 06250
    3 Clinique St Georges Nice France 06105
    4 Centre Antoine Lacassagne Nice France 06189
    5 Hôpital Princesse Grâce Monaco Monaco 98000

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Centre Antoine Lacassagne
    • Cerbaliance

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Centre Antoine Lacassagne
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04198727
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2017/15
    First Posted:
    Dec 13, 2019
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 7, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Oct 7, 2021