Calhoun Vision Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) in Subjects With Pre-Existing Corneal Astigmatism
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose is to evaluate the Calhoun Vision Light Adjustable Lens (LAL) and Light Delivery Device (LDD) for reducing astigmatism and improving uncorrected vision after implantation.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: LAL LAL implanted |
Device: LAL (Light Adjustable Lens) and Light Deliver Device (LDD)
LAL implanted and adjusted with LDD
|
Active Comparator: Monofocal control Monofocal control IOL implanted |
Device: Monofocal control IOL
Commercially available monofocal intraocular lens (IOL)
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Percent Reduction in Manifest Cylinder [6 months]
Percent reduction in manifest cylinder from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop. Manifest cylinder refers to only the astigmatic or cylindrical component of an ophthalmic manifest refraction. For example if someone had a refraction of +0.50-1.00x090, the -1.00 is the manifest cylinder component. The reduction of the manifest cylinder is determined from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop.
- Percent Absolute Reduction in MRSE [6 months]
Percent absolute reduction in Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop. It is used to describe an ophthalmic refraction with one number. It is defined as the (sphere)+ 0.5(cylinder). So, if you had a refraction of +1.00-1.00x090 the MRSE would be +0.50, the +1.00 is the sphere and the -1.00 is the cylinder in this example. If you had a refraction of +0.25-1.50x145 the MRSE would be -0.50. The absolute value of the MRSE is taken and its reduction is calculated from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop.
- Rotation of LAL Landmark Meridian to Anatomical Landmark at Pre-Adjustment and 6 Months Postop [6 months]
Number (%) of eyes with rotation of LAL meridian of ≤ 5 degrees from Pre-Adjustment to 6 months postop. This endpoint was achieved by taking dilated anterior segment photographs of the LAL at Pre-Adjustment and 6 months postop. The angular difference between a landmark on the LAL and an anatomical landmark on the subjects eye was measured. The same landmarks on the LAL and the subjects eye were used at each time point. The angular difference between the two time points was then determined.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Uncorrected Visual Acuity 20/20 or Better [6 months]
Percent of eyes with UCVA of 20/20 or better in the LAL treatment group at 6 months postoperatively was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent of eyes with UCVA of 20/20 or better in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively.
- Mean Reduction in Cylinder by Cylinder Adjustment Stratum (0.75D-1.25D) [6 months]
Percent reduction in absolute manifest cylinder in the LAL treatment group was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent reduction in absolute cylinder in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively compared to pre-adjustment in the LAL group/17-21 days postoperative in the control group. Results were to be evaluated for each cylinder adjustment stratum (0.75-1.25 D and 1.50-2.00 D) separately.
- Mean Reduction in Cylinder by Cylinder Adjustment Stratum (>1.25D) [6 months]
Percent reduction in absolute manifest cylinder in the LAL treatment group was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent reduction in absolute cylinder in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively compared to Pre-Adjustment in the LAL group/17-21 days postoperative in the control group.
- Percent Absolute Reduction in Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) for Eyes With <0.75 D Cylinder Postoperatively [6 months]
For eyes with <0.75 D of cylinder at pre-adjustment (LAL)/17-21 days (control group), percent mean absolute reduction in MRSE by subject in the LAL treatment group was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent reduction in mean absolute MRSE in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively compared to pre-adjustment in the LAL group/17-21 days postoperative in the control group.
- Mean BSCVA [6 months]
Mean BSCVA for the "best case" cohort (no macular problems) at 6 months postoperatively was compared between the LAL treatment group and the monofocal control group. Endpoint success was to be achieved if the difference in mean BSCVA between the LAL cohort and the monofocal control group is within 1 line (0.1 LogMAR) (non-inferiority margin or delta).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Undergoing cataract surgery and be willing to have LAL or commercially available IOL implanted
-
Pre-operative regular corneal astigmatism of >= 0.75 diopters and <= 2.0 diopters
-
Best spectacle corrected visual acuity reduced to 20/40 or worse with or without glare
-
Projected best spectacle corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better
-
Clear intraocular media other than cataract
-
Potentially good vision in fellow eye
-
Fully dilated pupil of >= 7.0 mm
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Zonular laxity or dehiscence
-
Pseudoexfoliation
-
Age related macular degeneration
-
Retinal degenerative disorder
-
Diabetes with any evidence of retinopathy
-
Glaucomatous optic neuropathy, uveitis, significant anterior segment pathology, keratoconus
-
Corneal dystrophy, previous corneal or intraocular surgery
-
Complications during cataract surgery
-
Serious co-morbid conditions
-
Systemic medications that my increase UV sensitivity
-
Irregular astigmatism
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Vold Vision | Fayetteville | Arkansas | United States | 72704 |
2 | Jules Stein Eye Institute | Los Angeles | California | United States | 90095 |
3 | Wolstan & Goldberg Eye Associates | Torrance | California | United States | 90505 |
4 | Newsom Eye | Sebring | Florida | United States | 33870 |
5 | Arbor Centers for Eye Care | Orland Park | Illinois | United States | 60467 |
6 | Eye Surgeons of Indiana | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States | 46256 |
7 | Jones Eye Clinic | Sioux City | Iowa | United States | 51104 |
8 | Discover Vision & Laser Center | Leawood | Kansas | United States | 66211 |
9 | Minnesota Eye Consultants, PA | Bloomington | Minnesota | United States | 55431 |
10 | Ophthalmology Consultants, Ltd. | Saint Louis | Missouri | United States | 63131 |
11 | EyeSight Ophthalmic Services, PA | Somersworth | New Hampshire | United States | 03878 |
12 | Carolina Vision Center | Fayetteville | North Carolina | United States | 28304 |
13 | Cleveland Eye Clinic | Brecksville | Ohio | United States | 44141 |
14 | Vance Thompson Vision | Sioux Falls | South Dakota | United States | 57105 |
15 | Eye Consultants of Texas | Grapevine | Texas | United States | 76051 |
16 | Focal Point Vision | San Antonio | Texas | United States | 78229 |
17 | Hoopes Vision | Draper | Utah | United States | 84020 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Calhoun Vision, Inc.
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- CSP-002-03
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | LAL Implant | Monofocal Control |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | LAL implanted LAL (Light Adjustable Lens) and Light Deliver Device (LDD): LAL implanted and adjusted with LDD | Monofocal control IOL implanted Monofocal control IOL: Commercially available monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) |
Period Title: Overall Study | ||
STARTED | 403 | 197 |
COMPLETED | 391 | 188 |
NOT COMPLETED | 12 | 9 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | LAL Implant | Monofocal Control | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | LAL implanted LAL (Light Adjustable Lens) and Light Deliver Device (LDD): LAL implanted and adjusted with LDD | Monofocal control IOL implanted Monofocal control IOL: Commercially available monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 403 | 197 | 600 |
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years] |
65.6
(7.9)
|
66.6
(7.2)
|
66.2
(7.7)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
242
60%
|
102
51.8%
|
344
57.3%
|
Male |
161
40%
|
95
48.2%
|
256
42.7%
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
Hispanic or Latino |
18
4.5%
|
7
3.6%
|
25
4.2%
|
Not Hispanic or Latino |
385
95.5%
|
190
96.4%
|
575
95.8%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants) | |||
American Indian or Alaska Native |
1
0.2%
|
0
0%
|
1
0.2%
|
Asian |
4
1%
|
0
0%
|
4
0.7%
|
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
0
0%
|
2
1%
|
2
0.3%
|
Black or African American |
15
3.7%
|
6
3%
|
21
3.5%
|
White |
383
95%
|
188
95.4%
|
571
95.2%
|
More than one race |
0
0%
|
1
0.5%
|
1
0.2%
|
Unknown or Not Reported |
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
0
0%
|
Right Eye (Eyes) [Number] | |||
Number [Eyes] |
226
|
96
|
322
|
Left Eye (Eyes) [Number] | |||
Number [Eyes] |
177
|
101
|
278
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Percent Reduction in Manifest Cylinder |
---|---|
Description | Percent reduction in manifest cylinder from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop. Manifest cylinder refers to only the astigmatic or cylindrical component of an ophthalmic manifest refraction. For example if someone had a refraction of +0.50-1.00x090, the -1.00 is the manifest cylinder component. The reduction of the manifest cylinder is determined from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop. |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT. Only eyes that had cylinder in the range of treatment (>=0.75 D) were included in the analysis. Therefore the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure will not match the overall number of participants in the study. |
Arm/Group Title | Light Adjustable Lens Implanted | Control IOL Implanted |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Randomized to have the Light Adjustable Lens implanted | Randomized to have the monofocal control IOL implanted |
Measure Participants | 286 | 126 |
Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [percent reduction in manifest cylinder] |
74.6
|
19.9
|
Title | Percent Absolute Reduction in MRSE |
---|---|
Description | Percent absolute reduction in Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop. It is used to describe an ophthalmic refraction with one number. It is defined as the (sphere)+ 0.5(cylinder). So, if you had a refraction of +1.00-1.00x090 the MRSE would be +0.50, the +1.00 is the sphere and the -1.00 is the cylinder in this example. If you had a refraction of +0.25-1.50x145 the MRSE would be -0.50. The absolute value of the MRSE is taken and its reduction is calculated from Pre-Adjustment (LAL) or 17-21 days post-op (control) to 6 months postop. |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT. Any eyes that had an MRSE of zero at Pre-Adjustment were excluded since it is not possible to divide by zero. Therefore the number participants analyzed for this outcome will differ from the number of overall participants in the study. |
Arm/Group Title | Light Adjustable Lens | Monofocal Control IOL |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Eyes randomized to have Light Adjustable Lens implanted | Eyes randomized to have monofocal control IOL implanted |
Measure Participants | 380 | 166 |
Mean (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of reduction in MRSE] |
51.5
|
10.4
|
Title | Rotation of LAL Landmark Meridian to Anatomical Landmark at Pre-Adjustment and 6 Months Postop |
---|---|
Description | Number (%) of eyes with rotation of LAL meridian of ≤ 5 degrees from Pre-Adjustment to 6 months postop. This endpoint was achieved by taking dilated anterior segment photographs of the LAL at Pre-Adjustment and 6 months postop. The angular difference between a landmark on the LAL and an anatomical landmark on the subjects eye was measured. The same landmarks on the LAL and the subjects eye were used at each time point. The angular difference between the two time points was then determined. |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT: The overall number of participants analyzed differs from the other outcome measures because some photographs were unusable due to inadequate lighting, user error, or equipment failure. |
Arm/Group Title | Light Adjustable Lens |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Eyes randomized to be implanted with the Light Adjustable Lens |
Measure Participants | 358 |
Number (95% Confidence Interval) [percentage of eyes] |
96.1
|
Title | Uncorrected Visual Acuity 20/20 or Better |
---|---|
Description | Percent of eyes with UCVA of 20/20 or better in the LAL treatment group at 6 months postoperatively was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent of eyes with UCVA of 20/20 or better in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively. |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT |
Arm/Group Title | Light Adjustable Lens | Monofocal Control IOL |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Randomized to have the Light Adjustable Lens implanted | Randomized to have a Monofocal control IOL implanted |
Measure Participants | 391 | 193 |
Number [percentage of eyes] |
70.1
|
36.3
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Light Adjustable Lens Implanted, Control IOL Implanted |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Chi-squared | |
Comments |
Title | Mean Reduction in Cylinder by Cylinder Adjustment Stratum (0.75D-1.25D) |
---|---|
Description | Percent reduction in absolute manifest cylinder in the LAL treatment group was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent reduction in absolute cylinder in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively compared to pre-adjustment in the LAL group/17-21 days postoperative in the control group. Results were to be evaluated for each cylinder adjustment stratum (0.75-1.25 D and 1.50-2.00 D) separately. |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants with eyes in ITT with 0.75-1.25 D cylinder prior to light treatment |
Arm/Group Title | Light Adjustable Lens | Monofocal Control IOL |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Randomized to have the Light Adjustable Lens implanted | Randomized to have the monofocal control IOL implanted |
Measure Participants | 203 | 90 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent reduction in cylinder] |
73.4
(33.1)
|
18.6
(57.0)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Light Adjustable Lens Implanted, Control IOL Implanted |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 2 sided | |
Comments |
Title | Mean Reduction in Cylinder by Cylinder Adjustment Stratum (>1.25D) |
---|---|
Description | Percent reduction in absolute manifest cylinder in the LAL treatment group was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent reduction in absolute cylinder in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively compared to Pre-Adjustment in the LAL group/17-21 days postoperative in the control group. |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants with eyes in ITT with >1.25 D of cylinder prior to light treatment |
Arm/Group Title | Light Adjustable Lens | Monofocal Control IOL |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Randomized to have the Light Adjustable Lens implanted | Randomized to have the monofocal control IOL implanted |
Measure Participants | 83 | 36 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent reduction in cylinder] |
77.5
(20.7)
|
23.1
(32.3)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Light Adjustable Lens Implanted, Control IOL Implanted |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 2 sided | |
Comments |
Title | Percent Absolute Reduction in Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) for Eyes With <0.75 D Cylinder Postoperatively |
---|---|
Description | For eyes with <0.75 D of cylinder at pre-adjustment (LAL)/17-21 days (control group), percent mean absolute reduction in MRSE by subject in the LAL treatment group was calculated to determine if it is significantly greater than the percent reduction in mean absolute MRSE in the monofocal control group at 6 months postoperatively compared to pre-adjustment in the LAL group/17-21 days postoperative in the control group. |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Participants with eyes in ITT with <0.75 D of cylinder prior to light treatment |
Arm/Group Title | Light Adjustable Lens | Monofocal Control IOL |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Randomized to have the Light Adjustable Lens implanted | Randomized to have the monofocal control IOL implanted |
Measure Participants | 100 | 53 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [percent absolute reduction in MRSE] |
55.2
(76.3)
|
27.2
(75.2)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Light Adjustable Lens Implanted, Control IOL Implanted |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | .0318 |
Comments | ||
Method | t-test, 2 sided | |
Comments |
Title | Mean BSCVA |
---|---|
Description | Mean BSCVA for the "best case" cohort (no macular problems) at 6 months postoperatively was compared between the LAL treatment group and the monofocal control group. Endpoint success was to be achieved if the difference in mean BSCVA between the LAL cohort and the monofocal control group is within 1 line (0.1 LogMAR) (non-inferiority margin or delta). |
Time Frame | 6 months |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
ITT population best case cohort with no macular problems |
Arm/Group Title | Light Adjustable Lens | Monofocal Control IOL |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Randomized to have the Light Adjustable Lens implanted | Randomized to have the Monofocal control IOL implanted |
Measure Participants | 390 | 191 |
Mean (Standard Deviation) [LogMAR] |
-0.066
(0.083)
|
-0.029
(0.090)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Light Adjustable Lens Implanted, Control IOL Implanted |
---|---|---|
Comments | ||
Type of Statistical Test | Equivalence | |
Comments | a two-group t-test of equivalence in means was used | |
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | |
Comments | ||
Method | ||
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Mean Difference (Final Values) |
Estimated Value | -0.04 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 99% -0.06 to -0.02 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Value: |
|
Estimation Comments |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | 12 months | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | ||||
Arm/Group Title | Light Adjustable Lens | Monofocal Control IOL | ||
Arm/Group Description | Randomized to have the Light Adjustable Lens implanted | Randomized to have the Monofocal control IOL implanted | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
Light Adjustable Lens | Monofocal Control IOL | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 1/403 (0.2%) | 4/197 (2%) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
Light Adjustable Lens | Monofocal Control IOL | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 42/403 (10.4%) | 10/197 (5.1%) | ||
Blood and lymphatic system disorders | ||||
Blood clots due to lymphoma | 0/403 (0%) | 0 | 1/197 (0.5%) | 1 |
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Chest pain with pacemaker | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Heart palpitations | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Heart surgery | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Triple bypass surgery | 0/403 (0%) | 0 | 1/197 (0.5%) | 1 |
Eye disorders | ||||
Herpetic Keratouveitis | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Persistent Induced Tritan Color Anomaly | 2/403 (0.5%) | 2 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Cystoid Macular Edema | 3/403 (0.7%) | 3 | 3/197 (1.5%) | 3 |
Endophthalmitis | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Horseshoe retinal tear with vitreous hemorrhage | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 1/197 (0.5%) | 1 |
Hypopyon | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Surgical complication | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Secondary surgical intervention | 7/403 (1.7%) | 7 | 1/197 (0.5%) | 1 |
Phytotoxic retinal damage causing temporary loss of BSCVA | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Persistent induced erythropsia | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Persistent unanticipated increase refractive error | 5/403 (1.2%) | 5 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Intraoperative capsular tear | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | ||||
Hospitalization for colitis | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
General disorders | ||||
Broken wrist | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Hospitalization due to syncope | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Hospitalization due to low blood pressure and syncope | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Hospitalization due to dizziness | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Infections and infestations | ||||
Hospitalization due to cellulitis | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Hospitalization due to infection after knee surgery | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Hospitalization due to concussion with subdural hematoma | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Breast cancer | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Liver cancer | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Malignant neuroendocrine tumors | 0/403 (0%) | 0 | 1/197 (0.5%) | 1 |
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Anxiety | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Renal and urinary disorders | ||||
Kidney disease | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
COPD | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Hospitalization due to emphysema/COPD | 1/403 (0.2%) | 1 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Vascular disorders | ||||
Broken blood vessel in brain | 0/403 (0%) | 0 | 1/197 (0.5%) | 1 |
Stroke | 2/403 (0.5%) | 2 | 0/197 (0%) | 0 |
Transient ischemic attack | 0/403 (0%) | 0 | 1/197 (0.5%) | 1 |
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
Light Adjustable Lens | Monofocal Control IOL | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 292/403 (72.5%) | 125/197 (63.5%) | ||
Eye disorders | ||||
Anterior chamber cells | 43/403 (10.7%) | 43 | 21/197 (10.7%) | 21 |
Anterior chamber flare | 19/403 (4.7%) | 19 | 11/197 (5.6%) | 11 |
Blurred vision | 31/403 (7.7%) | 31 | 19/197 (9.6%) | 19 |
Corneal edema central | 25/403 (6.2%) | 25 | 13/197 (6.6%) | 13 |
corneal edema wound | 43/403 (10.7%) | 43 | 14/197 (7.1%) | 14 |
Posterior capsular opacity | 51/403 (12.7%) | 51 | 26/197 (13.2%) | 26 |
Raised IOP not requiring treatment | 32/403 (7.9%) | 32 | 2/197 (1%) | 2 |
Raised IOP requiring treatment | 26/403 (6.5%) | 26 | 14/197 (7.1%) | 14 |
Superficial punctate keratitis | 22/403 (5.5%) | 22 | 5/197 (2.5%) | 5 |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There is NOT an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Maureen O'Connell Vice President, Regulator and Clinical Affairs |
---|---|
Organization | RxSight, Inc. |
Phone | 978-207-12415 |
moconnell@rxsight.com |
- CSP-002-03