HOT vs COT: Holbæk Obesity Treatment (HOT) Versus Conventional Obesity Treatment (COT) in Children With Overweight or Obesity.

Sponsor
Zealand University Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05038683
Collaborator
Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research (Other), University of Copenhagen (Other), Statens Serum Institut (Other), University of Florida (Other), Leeds Beckett University (Other), University of Minnesota (Other), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Other), Frederiksberg University Hospital (Other)
554
2
40

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The HOT versus COT trial aims to compare the effectiveness of two different lifestyle interventions for treatment of childhood overweight and obesity with the purpose of informing future clinical practice guidelines within this field. The aim is to conduct this investigation in an optimal trial design with the lowest possible risk of bias.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Holbæk Obesity Treatment
  • Behavioral: Conventional Obesity Treatment
N/A

Detailed Description

Obesity is a chronic, progressive, and severe disease that compromises growth, development, and the general health and well-being of children, adolescents, and adults all around the globe. Current treatment within this field varies considerably, but the prevailing concept is that treatment should be lifelong with a focus on implementing and maintaining changes regarding diet, physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep, etc. The Holbæk Obesity Treatment (HOT) is built on the understanding that obesity is a complex chronic disease regulated by a neuroendocrine system, where weight-reducing actions initiate counteractive mechanisms to defend fat mass. Conventional obesity treatment (COT) is based on a view that obesity results from energy imbalances and focuses on motivation, few changes at a time, and a narrative approach towards healthy energy intake and physical activity. These two approaches represent fundamentally different treatments of overweight and obesity.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
554 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Due to the nature of the interventions, it will not be possible to blind the healthcare providers administering the interventions. We will attempt to blind the participants by not informing them about which intervention group we consider experimental and which group we consider control. However, the participants included in HOT will be governed by a digital solution where Dr. Holm will be identifiable and thus revealing the HOT. In all other aspects of the trial, we will employ blinding, incl. outcome assessment. Statisticians, and investigators drawing conclusions will be fully blinded. We will conduct the statistical analyses with the intervention groups coded as eg. 'A' and 'B'. The steering committee will write two abstracts while the blinding is intact; one assuming the experimental intervention group is 'A' and the control intervention group is 'B', and one assuming the opposite. After these two abstracts have both obtained consensus, the code will be broken.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Holbæk Obesity Treatment (HOT) Versus Conventional Obesity Treatment (COT) in Children With Overweight or Obesity. An Investigator-initiated, Multi-center, Randomized, Parallel Group, Clinical Superiority Trial With Blinded Outcome Assessment. HOT Versus COT Trial.
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: HOT

Holbæk Obesity Treament

Behavioral: Holbæk Obesity Treatment
Obesity is a chronic, progressive, severe, recidivistic, and complex disease, which mandates that children and adolescents with overweight or obesity have access to a professional medical healthcare service as other pediatric chronic diseases, implying a lifelong course of treatment. The HOT method is further based on the physiological insight into the endocrine regulation of fat mass; especially on how the body adapts when it is challenged by weight loss. These insights include an understanding where the body shifts into an energy-preserving mode when the individual is initiating weight-reducing actions, such as a reduced caloric intake or an increased level of physical activity, which has numerus impacts on communication and pedagogy. HOT is administered by healthcare nurses and dietitians at healthcare centers in Danish municipalities. Each treatment will be conducted as face-to-face sessions totalling a range of six to 12 hours for 12 months.

Active Comparator: COT

Conventional Obesity Treatment

Behavioral: Conventional Obesity Treatment
Obesity is viewed as a chronic disease that is ultimately thought to result from an imbalance between energy intake and energy expenditure. However, multiple factors, both environmental and genetic, are thought to influence the disease as well. As obesity reflects energy imbalances, the treatment plan should be designed to induce a slightly negative energy balance by focusing on diet, physical activity, and inactivity through behavior change. Taking one step at a time, will in the end lead to the same energy balance result (i.e. weight loss) and will be more sustainable for the participant whose motivation is absolutely pivotal in this process. COT is administered by healthcare nurses and dietitians at healthcare centers in Danish municipalities. Each treatment will be conducted as face-to-face sessions totalling a range of six to 12 hours for 12 months.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. BMI SDS [End of intervention (12 months)]

    BMI SDS assessed according to the International Obesity Task Force cut-offs.

  2. Quality of life [End of intervention (12 months)]

    Quality of life assessed by Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Symptoms of depression and anxiety [End of intervention (12 months)]

    Symptoms of depression and anxiety assessed with the questionnaire RCADS.

  2. Serious adverse events (SAE) [End of intervention (12 months)]

    Proportion of participants with one or more SAEs defined as any adverse event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, or results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity.

  3. Anorexia or bulimia [End of intervention (12 months)]

    Proportion of participants with a clinical diagnosis of anorexia or bulimia

  4. School absence [End of intervention (12 months)]

    Number of days absent from kindergarten and school (excluding holidays).

  5. Body composition [End of intervention (12 months)]

    Body composition, defined as % body fat by using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)

  6. Waist circumference [End of intervention (12 months)]

    Waist circumference

  7. Systolic blood pressure [End of intervention (12 months)]

    Systolic blood pressure

  8. Diastolic blood pressure [End of intervention (12 months)]

    Diastolic blood pressure

  9. Serum leptin [End of intervention (12 months)]

    Concentrations of serum leptin

  10. Total cholesterol [End of intervention (12 months)]

    Concentrations of serum total cholesterol

  11. Low density lipoprotein (LDL) [End of intervention (12 months)]

    Concentrations of serum low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol

  12. Triglycerides [End of intervention (12 months)]

    Concentrations of serum triglycerides

  13. Insulin [End of intervention (12 months)]

    Concentrations of serum insulin

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
6 Years to 11 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Overweight or obesity defined as BMI corresponding to or above the 90th percentile for age and sex (International Obesity Task Force cut-offs).

  • Age six to < 12 years at enrolment.

  • Signed informed consent from both parents or legal guardians.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Participation in multidisciplinary obesity treatment (i.e. treatment involving more than one type of healthcare profession) within the past 12 months.

  • Having a sibling already enrolled in the HOT versus COT trial.

  • Both parents or legal guardians unable to communicate in Danish (written or oral).

  • Child unable to communicate in Danish (oral).

  • Current or previous clinical diagnosis of either anorexia or bulimia according to ICD-10.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Zealand University Hospital
  • Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Statens Serum Institut
  • University of Florida
  • Leeds Beckett University
  • University of Minnesota
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • Frederiksberg University Hospital

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jens-Christian Holm, Ph.d., MD, The Children's Obesity Clinic, Department of Pediatrics, Holbæk Hospital, Part of Copenhagen University Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Zealand University Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05038683
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HOT vs COT trial
First Posted:
Sep 9, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Sep 29, 2021
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 29, 2021