Clinical Utility of CDMT Among VillageMD Providers
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a health system-level research study of physicians and care providers. The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical evaluation and management (drug, procedures, counseling, and other) of a subset of common patient care indications.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The results of this study could contribute to improved quality of care for patients by encouraging better care practices and adherence to evidence-based guidelines. The data from this study will be submitted to a national journal for publication. The study plans to enroll up to 150 physicians.
Upon consenting and agreeing to participate in this study, participants will be asked to care for 3 simulated patient cases, known as Clinical Performance and Value Vignettes (CPV®). CPVs describe patients physicians typically encounter in their daily practice and are not meant to be difficult. In each vignette, physicians are asked to share their expected care through 5 domains: 1) history, 2) physical exam, 3) diagnostic workup, 4) diagnosis, and 5) treatment and follow-up. Each case takes approximately 15-20 minutes to complete and the investigators estimate the time commitment for each round of CPV administration to be approximately 45 - 60 minutes. All responses to the cases will be completed online and will be kept confidential. Over 2 CPV administration rounds, the total time to care for the simulated patients is estimated at 1.5-2 hours.
If physicians are randomized to the intervention group in this study, they will receive educational materials on a novel diagnostic test after the first round of CPV administration. They are asked to review these materials before moving to the next CPV administration round. The time to review educational materials is estimated to be approximately 15 minutes.
Depending on the results of this randomized controlled trial, there may be an opportunity for physicians to re-enroll in a follow-on study. If they choose to participate in this second study, they will be asked to identify and send de-identified records of patients in their practice that are similar to the simulated patients they previously cared for in this study.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| No Intervention: Standard Practice The Control group treats their simulated patients using standard practice and has no introduction to the new CDMT test. |
|
| Experimental: Chronic Disease Management Test (CDMT) The intervention will receive information regarding the CDMT test and will be given the test results, whether selected or not, in Round 2 of CPV administration. |
Other: Educational Materials for Chronic Disease Management Test (CDMT)
These materials detail what the test does, how it is used, the validity and specifications of the test, and how to read its test report.
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Clinical Performance and Value (CPV) -measured variation in assessment [[4 months]]
Using the responses to the simulated patient cases to measure the baseline levels of variation in the work-up, recognition, and management of medication non-adherence and/or DDI in patients with more than one cardiometabolic condition and associated polypharmacy. Work-up, recognition, and management scores will be combined to report variation in total assessment of the simulated patient cases.
- CPV-measured change in treatment Quality [[4 months]]
Measuring the difference in the quality of overall diagnostic scores between control participants using standard-of-care diagnostic tools and intervention participants using the CDMT. Scores will be on a scale of 0-100 with 100 representing the ideal management of a simulated patient.
- CPV-measured difference in amount of evidence-based decisions [[4 months]]
Differences in number of evidence-based decisions, particularly prescribing decisions, made by intervention providers and control providers, while controlling for provider and practice characteristics, between rounds 1 and 2.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- CPV-measured differences in cost of care between control and intervention arms [[4 months]]
Difference in the cost of care between control and intervention participants (Cost will be calculated by measuring differential rates of medical interventions/levels of care selected by each arm, and multiplying by Medicare reimbursement rates for these interventions, and/or by modeling the incidence of expected complications and calculating associated costs per above).
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Licensed primary care provider (PCP) (MD, DO, NP, PA) currently practicing in the following areas: a) Internal medicine b) Family medicine
-
Have practiced as a PCP in internal or family medicine for greater than 2 but less than 30 years
-
practicing in a community / non-academic based practice setting
-
≥ 40 patients under care weekly
-
Commonly treats patients with congestive heart failure/atrial fibrillation, diabetes, hypertension, and COPD
-
Practicing in the United States
-
English-speaking
-
Access to the internet
-
Informed and voluntarily consented to be in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Non-English speaking
-
Not a licensed primary care provider
-
Unable to access the internet
-
Not practicing in the U.S.
-
Do not voluntarily consent to be in the study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | QURE Healthcare | San Francisco | California | United States | 94109 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Qure Healthcare, LLC
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- Pro00064387