Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells vs Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Diabetic Patients With Chronic Limb Ischemia

Sponsor
Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander Clínica Carlos Ardila Lulle (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05631444
Collaborator
(none)
24
1
3
45.9
0.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Patients in the severe stages of Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) are prone to amputation and death, leading to poor quality of life and a great socioeconomic burden.

There is an urgent need to develop an effective therapeutic strategy to treat this disease. In this context, autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM-MNC) and allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells derived from different sources have emerged as promising therapeutic approaches for this condition.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Biological: Cell-based therapy
Phase 1/Phase 2

Detailed Description

Comparison of the therapeutic potential of BM-MNC vs. allogeneic Wharton jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (allo-WJ-MSCs) in diabetic patients with CLTI.

Twenty-four type 2 diabetic patients in the most severe stages of the CLTI (category 4 or 5 in Rutherford's classification and transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2) below 30 mm Hg were enrolled and randomized to receive 15 injections of (i) BM-MNC (7.197x106 ± 2.984 x106 cells/mL each with 2% of autologous serum) (n=7), (ii) allo-WJ-MSCs (1.333 x106 cells/mL each with 5% of human serum albumin serum) (n=7) or (iii) placebo solution (1 mL saline solution with 2% of autologous serum) (n=10), which were administered into the periadventitial arteries.

The follow-up visits were at months 1, 3, 6, and 12, to evaluate the following parameters:

(i) Rutherford classification (0 to 6) (ii) TcPO2 (mmHg) (iii) Wound closure (area cm2) (iv) pain (visual analogue scale (0-10) (v) pain-free walking distance (m) (vi) revascularization and limb-survival proportion during follow-up (vii) the quality of life (EQ-5D questionnaire).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
24 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of the Therapeutic Potential of Autologous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Versus Allogenic Wharton Jelly-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Diabetic Patients With Chronic Limb-threatening Ischemia
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2019
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Oct 28, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group

Placebo group (n=10), which consisted of 15 injections of 1 mL of vehicle (1 mL saline solution with 2% of autologous serum) on periadventitial arteries in one dose at day 0.

Biological: Cell-based therapy
One dose of auto-BM-MNC, one dose of allo-WJ-MSCs, or one dose of placebo solution (saline solution with 2% of autologous serum), were periadventitial arteries administration in CTLI patients.

Experimental: Auto-BM-MNC

Auto-BM-MNC (n=7) were obtained from diabetic patients. Fifteen injections of 7.197x106 ± 2.984x106 cells/mL each with 2% of autologous serum were periadventitial arteries administrated in one dose at day 0.

Biological: Cell-based therapy
One dose of auto-BM-MNC, one dose of allo-WJ-MSCs, or one dose of placebo solution (saline solution with 2% of autologous serum), were periadventitial arteries administration in CTLI patients.

Experimental: Allo-WJ-MSCs

Allo-WJ-MSCs (n=7) were obtained from culturing the WJ from healthy cordon umbilical donors unrelated to the patient. Fifteen injections of 1.333x106 cells/mL each with 5% of human serum albumin serum were periadventitial arteries administrated in one dose at day 0.

Biological: Cell-based therapy
One dose of auto-BM-MNC, one dose of allo-WJ-MSCs, or one dose of placebo solution (saline solution with 2% of autologous serum), were periadventitial arteries administration in CTLI patients.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Safety profile: (adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs) [12 months]

    AEs: (i) local toxicity, including signs of local inflammation (swelling, warmth, impairment of function), worsening of ulcer, new ulcer, or hematomas after auto-BM-MNC or allo-WJ-MSCs administration. (ii) systemic toxicity as fever, allergies. (iii) maximum grade toxicity for tissue.

  2. Safety profile [12 months]

    Serious AEs: hospitalization, malignancy, amputation, persistent or significant disability, or death.

  3. Efficacy profile: Rutherford's classification [12 months]

    0 to 6

  4. TcPO2 [12 months]

    mmHg

  5. Efficacy profile: Visual Analogue Scale pain [12 months]

    0 to10

  6. Efficacy profile: Pain-free walking distance [12 months]

    meters

  7. Efficacy profile: Wound closure [12 months]

    cm2

  8. Efficacy profile: Revascularization [12 months]

    Percentage

  9. Efficacy profile: Limb survival proportion [12 months]

    Percentage

  10. Efficacy profile: Quality of life [12 months]

    EQ-5D questionnaire

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
40 Years to 85 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adult male or female, 40 years of age or over (until 85 years old)

  • TcPO2 ≤ 30 mmHg.

  • Diagnosis of diabetes.

  • Patients with signs of critical ischemia such as (i) ulcer that does not heal, (ii) necrosis or loss of tissue, (iii) pain at rest, and (iv) intermittent claudication.

  • Basal Rutherford classification stage 3 to 5.

  • Non-revascularizable patients due to comorbidities and/or anatomy.

  • Patients that despite revascularization (vascular surgery), have adequate distal beds to perfuse the limb.

  • Ankle/brachial index less than 0.4.

  • Stenosis or occlusion of the infrapatellar arteries.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Participants that do not sign the informed consent.

  • Presence of osteomyelitis.

  • Hemodynamic instability (MAP<65 mmHg or vasopressor requirement).

  • Any acute systemic infectious disease process.

  • Severe sepsis.

  • Uncontrolled coagulopathy.

  • Condition of cancer.

  • Use of immunosuppressive or cytotoxic drugs

  • Alterations of the bone marrow that do not allow the adequate extraction of the components to be used as: acute leukemia, chronic leukemia, marrow aplasia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and myelophthisis.

  • Contraindication of sedation for bone marrow aspirate.

  • Patients who have suffered in a period < six months of myocardial infarction, disease cerebrovascular or coronary intervention.

  • Patients with liver failure indicated by serum transaminases (aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase), with values twice the normal limit.

  • Any acute or chronic contagious disease including hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV.

  • Any other comorbidity that the treating vascular surgeon considers as a contraindication to cell treatments.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander (FOSCAL) Bucaramanga Colombia

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander Clínica Carlos Ardila Lulle

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martha L Arango, PhD, Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander Clínica Carlos Ardila Lulle

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Martha Ligia Arango Rodríguez, Director Technical and Scientific Centro de Terapias Avanzadas Fundación Ofalmológica de Santander (FOSCAL), Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander Clínica Carlos Ardila Lulle
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05631444
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • CLTI 01
First Posted:
Nov 30, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Nov 30, 2022
Last Verified:
Nov 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Martha Ligia Arango Rodríguez, Director Technical and Scientific Centro de Terapias Avanzadas Fundación Ofalmológica de Santander (FOSCAL), Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander Clínica Carlos Ardila Lulle
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Nov 30, 2022