Embrace TDD: Post-Market Study to Evaluate Intrathecal Morphine as an Alternative to Systemic Opioids for Chronic Pain
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, multi-center, post market study to evaluate Intrathecal (IT) preservative-free morphine sulfate (PFMS) using the SynchroMed™ II infusion system as an alternative to systemic opioids for the treatment of chronic, intractable, non-malignant primary back pain with or without leg pain.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 4 |
Detailed Description
Subjects will be assessed for pain control and opioid-related side effects following a route of delivery change from systemic opioids to IT morphine therapy.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Intrathecal Therapy Enrolled subjects who successfully wean from all systemic opioids and have a successful intrathecal trial, proceed to the intervention phase. This includes implantation with a SynchroMed™ II infusion system in the intrathecal space for targeted drug delivery of preservative-free morphine sulfate (PFMS). |
Device: Medtronic SynchroMed™ II infusion system
Implanted infusion system consisting of a pump and catheter, as well as external components of a clinician programmer, refill and catheter access port kits, and the Personal Therapy Manager (myPTM™).
Drug: Preservative-free morphine sulfate (PFMS)
The pharmacological agent used in the pump for this study is limited to a preservative-free morphine sulfate (PFMS).
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Clinical Success at the 6-Month Visit [Baseline to 6-Month Visit]
To characterize the proportion of subjects with Clinical Success at the 6-Month Visit. Clinical Success is defined as any of the following: 1) Reduced opioid-related side effects with equal pain 2) Reduced pain with equal opioid-related side effects 3) Reduced pain and reduced opioid-related side effects.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Intensity at the 6-Month Visit [Baseline to 6-Month Visit]
To demonstrate pain intensity scores (VAS) at the 6-Month Visit is non-inferior to VAS at Baseline. Pain will be assessed using VAS. The VAS is a 100mm line, with "No pain" on the left side of the line and "Worst pain imaginable" on the right side of the line. Subjects will be asked to make a perpendicular mark on the VAS line that best describes their average pain in the last 24 hours.
- Numerical Opioid Side Effect (NOSE) Assessment Tool [Baseline to 6-Month Visit]
To characterize the change in opioid-related side effects scores (NOSE) from Baseline to the 6-Month Visit. The Numerical Opioid Side Effect (NOSE) Assessment Tool is a tool to evaluate 10 opioid-related side effects using a 11-point numerical scale. Subjects are asked to evaluate each of the 10 opioid-related side effects on a scale of 0 - 10 with 0 being "not present" and 10 being "as bad as you can imagine". A total sum score can range from 0 - 100.
- Systemic Opioid Elimination [Baseline to 6-Month Visit]
To characterize the proportion of subjects who eliminate systemic opioids through the 6-Month Visit.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Willing and able to provide a signed and dated (Medtronic and Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved) Informed Consent Form (ICF) and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Authorization Form prior to any study procedures being performed
-
A candidate per labeling for the Intrathecal Drug Delivery System (IDDS)
-
A diagnosis of chronic, intractable, non-malignant primary back pain with or without leg pain, treatable with the IDDS
-
Current daily systemic opioid dose of >0 and ≤ 120 Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME)
-
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of ≥50 mm for pain intensity at the Baseline Visit and/or a Numerical Opioid Side Effect (NOSE) Assessment Tool ≥40 for intolerable side effects at the Baseline Visit
-
Psychological evaluation or investigator assessment of patient psychological suitability for study participation
-
Has an MRI or CT prior to enrollment verifying patent spinal canal and no clinical change in status since last imaging
-
At least 18 years old at time of enrollment
-
Willing and able to attend visits and comply with the study protocol
-
Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female. Females must be post-menopausal or surgically sterile; or be utilizing a medically acceptable form of birth control (i.e. a hormonal contraceptive, intra-uterine device, diaphragm with spermicide, or condom with spermicide) for the duration of the study
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Previously trialed or implanted with an IDDS
-
Concomitant stimulation device implanted for the treatment of pain
-
Any ongoing health condition that would be expected to interfere with pain and/or quality of life ratings (i.e. active malignancy, other painful conditions not treatable with IT therapy, etc.)
-
Psychological or other health conditions, financial and/or legal concerns that would interfere with the subject's ability to fulfill the requirements of the protocol as per the investigator's discretion
-
Substance Use Disorder (SUD) within the last 2 years or current Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) for substance use disorder
-
Currently using cannabinoids or illicit drugs
-
History of allergy or significant adverse reaction to morphine per investigator discretion
-
Currently participating or plans to participate in another investigational study unless written approval is provided by Medtronic Study Team
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Neuroversion | Anchorage | Alaska | United States | 99508 |
2 | Coastal Pain and Spinal Diagnostics | Carlsbad | California | United States | 92009 |
3 | Napa Valley Orthopaedic Medical Group | Napa | California | United States | 94558 |
4 | Florida Pain Institute | Merritt Island | Florida | United States | 32935 |
5 | Regional Brain & Spine, LLC | Cape Girardeau | Missouri | United States | 63701 |
6 | Christian Hospital Pain Management | Saint Louis | Missouri | United States | 63136 |
7 | Comprehensive and Interventional Pain Management | Henderson | Nevada | United States | 89052 |
8 | The Pain Management Center | Voorhees | New Jersey | United States | 08043 |
9 | Premier Pain Treatment Institute | Mount Orab | Ohio | United States | 45154 |
10 | Clinical Investigations, LLC | Edmond | Oklahoma | United States | 73013 |
11 | Moss Rehabilitation-Einstein Healthcare Network | Elkins Park | Pennsylvania | United States | 19027 |
12 | University of Texas Medical Branch | Galveston | Texas | United States | 77555 |
13 | Precision Spine Care | Tyler | Texas | United States | 75701 |
14 | University of Virginia Pain Management Center | Charlottesville | Virginia | United States | 22908 |
15 | Eastern Virginia Medical School | Norfolk | Virginia | United States | 23507 |
16 | Northwest Pain Care, Inc. | Spokane | Washington | United States | 99201 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- MedtronicNeuro
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
- Grider JS, Etscheidt MA, Harned ME, Lee J, Smith B, Lamar C, Bux A. Trialing and Maintenance Dosing Using a Low-Dose Intrathecal Opioid Method for Chronic Nonmalignant Pain: A Prospective 36-Month Study. Neuromodulation. 2016 Feb;19(2):206-19. doi: 10.1111/ner.12352. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
- Grider JS, Harned ME, Etscheidt MA. Patient selection and outcomes using a low-dose intrathecal opioid trialing method for chronic nonmalignant pain. Pain Physician. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(4):343-51. Review.
- Hamza M, Doleys D, Wells M, Weisbein J, Hoff J, Martin M, Soteropoulos C, Barreto J, Deschner S, Ketchum J. Prospective study of 3-year follow-up of low-dose intrathecal opioids in the management of chronic nonmalignant pain. Pain Med. 2012 Oct;13(10):1304-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01451.x. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
- Hamza M, Doleys DM, Saleh IA, Medvedovsky A, Verdolin MH, Hamza M. A Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blinded, Head-to-Head Long-Term Outcome Study, Comparing Intrathecal (IT) Boluses With Continuous Infusion Trialing Techniques Prior to Implantation of Drug Delivery Systems (DDS) for the Treatment of Severe Intractable Chronic Nonmalignant Pain. Neuromodulation. 2015 Oct;18(7):636-48; discussion 649. doi: 10.1111/ner.12342. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
- Smith TJ, Staats PS, Deer T, Stearns LJ, Rauck RL, Boortz-Marx RL, Buchser E, Català E, Bryce DA, Coyne PJ, Pool GE; Implantable Drug Delivery Systems Study Group. Randomized clinical trial of an implantable drug delivery system compared with comprehensive medical management for refractory cancer pain: impact on pain, drug-related toxicity, and survival. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Oct 1;20(19):4040-9.
- Wilkes DM, Orillosa SJ, Hustak EC, Williams CG, Doulatram GR, Solanki DR, Garcia EA, Huang LM. Efficacy, Safety, and Feasibility of the Morphine Microdose Method in Community-Based Clinics. Pain Med. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):1782-1789. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx132.
- MDT18026