NE-PERT: Effect of Non-enteric Coated Enzymes Substitution on Pain in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis

Sponsor
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05042284
Collaborator
(none)
126
1
2
16
7.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Pain in CP entails several independent yet overlapping mechanisms including oxidative stress-mediated parenchymal inflammation, pancreatic and central neuropathy and neuroplasticity. Medical modalities for long-term pain management includes antioxidants and neuromodulators. Pancreatic enzymes are also invariably used for pain management. CP with ductal obstruction and pain is treated with either endotherapy or drainage surgery. However, it has been observed that a substantially increasing proportion of patients experience pain recurrence as the duration of follow-up after endotherapy or surgery gets longer.

Neural and dietary (proteins) stimuli activate CCK receptors in D1 & D2 which gives a positive feedback signal for pancreatic secretion. Once enzyme secretion starts, due to ductal and interstitial/tissue hypertension, nociception begins that results in pain. Blockade of the duodenal CCK receptors could inhibit the positive feedback loop, thereby reducing pancreatic secretion and resulting pain. Currently available enteric coated enzyme supplements are released throughout the small bowel and therefore may not be released sufficiently in the duodenum to effectively suppress the feedback loops. High doses of proteases (~25k-30k) would be required to block the receptors, while most of the currently available preparations have higher lipase but not proteases.

This led to the investigators' hypothesis that negative feedback of CCK by non enteric coated pancreatic enzymes could ameliorate pain in a more effective manner by NE-PERT.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Non-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme preparation
N/A

Detailed Description

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a fibro-inflammatory disorder of the pancreas characterized by progressive and irreversible damage. It manifests with abdominal pain and/or exocrine or endocrine insufficiency. Recurrent abdominal pain is the dominant clinical hallmark that mandates aggressive management. Pain in CP entails several independent yet overlapping mechanisms including oxidative stress-mediated parenchymal inflammation, pancreatic and central neuropathy and neuroplasticity.

Medical modalities for long-term pain management includes antioxidants and neuromodulators. Pancreatic enzymes are also invariably used for pain management. CP with ductal obstruction and pain is treated with either endotherapy or drainage surgery. However, it has been observed that a substantially increasing proportion of patients experience pain recurrence as the duration of follow-up after endotherapy or surgery gets longer.

It has been postulated that neural and dietary (proteins) stimuli activate CCK receptors in D1 & D2 which gives a positive feedback signal for pancreatic secretion. Once enzyme secretion from the pancreas begins, due to ductal and interstitial/tissue hypertension, nociception is initiated that results in pain. On this premise, the investigators hypothesized that blocking the duodenal CCK receptors could inhibit the positive feedback loop, thereby reducing pancreatic secretion and resulting pain.

Earlier meta-analyses that evaluated the effect of pancreatic enzyme supplementation on pain reported that there were no overall benefits in pain management. All but two of those studies used enteric coated enzyme. Currently available enteric coated enzyme supplements are released throughout the small bowel and therefore may not be released sufficiently in the duodenum to effectively suppress the feedback loops. High doses of proteases (~25k-30k) would be required to block the receptors, while most of the currently available preparations have higher lipase but not proteases. However, on subgroup analyses in the aforementioned meta-analyses, pain reduction was observed in the two studies that used non-enteric coated preparations. These studies were done several years earlier, had a small sample size, and had a cross over design. This formed that rationale of the investigators' current study to test the hypothesis using a statistically valid design with a higher sample size that would allow subgroup analyses, adjust for alternative pain mechanisms, and achieve a better effect size.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
126 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Effect of Non-enteric Coated Enzymes Substitution on Pain in Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis: a Double -Blinded Placebo Controlled Randomized Trial (NE-PERT Trial)
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Sep 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Aug 31, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: NE PERT

Non-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme preparation containing 30,000U of protease.

Drug: Non-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme preparation
The patients will be given a non-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme capsule containing 30000 U of protease thrice daily along with meals for 3 months.
Other Names:
  • Placebo
  • Placebo Comparator: Placebo

    Similar appearing glucose capsules.

    Drug: Non-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme preparation
    The patients will be given a non-enteric coated pancreatic enzyme capsule containing 30000 U of protease thrice daily along with meals for 3 months.
    Other Names:
  • Placebo
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in pain score [3 months]

      IZBICKI pain score will be used. Score ranges from 0-100, 100 indicating most severe.

    2. Change in pain score [6 months]

      IZBICKI pain score will be used. Score ranges from 0-100, 100 indicating most severe.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Change in number of painful days [3 months]

      Number of days when the patient experienced pain

    2. Change in number of painful days [6 months]

      Number of days when the patient experienced pain

    3. Change in quality of life [3 months]

      Will be measured using the EORTC QLQ c30 with PAN28 tool. Score ranges from 0 to 100. 0 indicates worst for function scales, while 100 indicates worst for symptom scales.

    4. Change in quality of life [6 months]

      Will be measured using the EORTC QLQ c30 with PAN28 tool. Score ranges from 0 to 100. 0 indicates worst for function scales, while 100 indicates worst for symptom scales.

    5. Change in analgesic requirement [3 months]

      Number of analgesic tablets required will be recorded

    6. Change in analgesic requirement [6 months]

      Number of analgesic tablets required will be recorded

    7. Change in the number of hospitalization [3 months]

      Number of hospital admissions and days in hospital will be recorded

    8. Change in the number of hospitalization [6 months]

      Number of hospital admissions and days in hospital will be recorded

    Other Outcome Measures

    1. Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (pin prick) [First follow-up] [3 months]

      Pin prick sensation (0-10; 10 indicates maximum)

    2. Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (pin prick) [Second follow-up] [6 months]

      Pin prick sensation (0-10; 10 indicates maximum);

    3. Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (cold tolerance) [First follow-up] [3 months]

      Cold tolerance (0-10 VAS every 10secs for 2 mins.; 10 indicates severe)

    4. Change in Quantitative sensory testing parameters (cold tolerance) [Second follow-up] [6 months]

      Cold tolerance (0-10 VAS every 10secs for 2 mins.; 10 indicates severe)

    5. Change in pain DETECT score [First follow-up] [3 months]

      The painDETECT questionnaire will be used. Range is 0-38, 38 indicates most severe neuropathic pain.

    6. Change in pain DETECT score [Second follow-up] [6 months]

      The painDETECT questionnaire will be used. Range is 0-38, 38 indicates most severe neuropathic pain.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 60 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Chronic pancreatitis of at least 3 years

    • At least 3 episodes of pain in the past 3 months

    • Pain score of at least 3 on VAS (0-10)

    • Age 18-60yrs

    • Both genders

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Acute pancreatitis episode at the time of enrolment.

    • Pancreatic cancer.

    • Other chronic painful conditions.

    • Active substance use (alcohol, smoking, smokeless tobacco, illicit drugs).

    • Pregnancy and lactation.

    • Inability to give informed consent.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh India 500082

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Rupjyoti Talukdar, MD, AGAF, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Rupjyoti Talukdar, Director, Pancreatology; Head, Pancreas Research Group and Division of Gut Microbiome Research, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05042284
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • NE PERT 1
    First Posted:
    Sep 13, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Sep 13, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Sep 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Sep 13, 2021