Drug Sensitivity Detection of Micro Tumor (PTC) to Guide Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment Strategy of Colorectal Cancer
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The research objectives is to compare vitro 3D drug sensitivity test results of micro tumor (PTC) with the clinical outcomes of patients, evaluate the consistency between the test results of the technology platform and the clinical prognosis, and explore the decision-making value and guiding significance of this technology in assisting the precise treatment of colorectal cancer. The completion of this study will provide real-world data support for the clinical application of micro tumor (PTC) in vitro 3D drug sensitivity detection technology, and provide more valuable reference basis for realizing the individualization and accuracy of colorectal cancer treatment and improving the clinical benefit rate.
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
The study is a multi agency prospective cohort study in China. The subjects were patients aged 18 ~ 75 years with colorectal cancer diagnosed by histopathology or cytology. They must be colorectal cancer patients who have at least one assessable tumor focus, need adjuvant therapy after radical surgery, and have not received neoadjuvant therapy， ECoG physical condition score ≤ 2 points. And they must be voluntarily participate in and sign informed consent.
The patients were randomly divided into PTC drug sensitivity test group and control group. The PTC drug sensitivity test group selected the adjuvant chemotherapy scheme according to the 3D drug sensitivity test results of micro tumor (PTC) in vitro. The control group made adjuvant chemotherapy strategy according to clinical experience. All exon (WES) data collection was used to predict postoperative survival in both groups.
The primary endpoint was the non inferiority test, and the 3-year disease-free survival rate was T-C >- Δ
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| Experimental: PTC test group The adjuvant chemotherapy scheme was selected according to the 3D drug sensitivity test results of micro tumor (PTC) in vitro |
Drug: 5-fluorouracil + formyltetrahydrofolate/Oxaliplatin + 5-fluorouracil + formyltetrahydrofolate/Irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil + formyltetrahydrofolate/Cetuximab + 5-fluorouracil + formyltetrahydrofolate
Choose chemotherapeutic drugs（5-fluorouracil + formyltetrahydrofolate/Oxaliplatin + 5-fluorouracil + formyltetrahydrofolate/Irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil + formyltetrahydrofolate/Cetuximab + 5-fluorouracil + formyltetrahydrofolate） based on PTC drug sensitivity results.
Other Names:
|
| No Intervention: control group Making adjuvant chemotherapy strategy based on clinical experience |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- The difference of 3-year disease-free survival rate of patients in both group [3 years]
Follow-up the survival status of patients, and calculate 3-year disease-free survival rate of patients in both group
Secondary Outcome Measures
- The relation between TMB and clinical outcomes [3 years]
Use tumor whole exon (WES) sequencing to detect the Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB) of patients, and use correlation analysis to detect whether it's risk factor of clinical outcomes.
- The relation between MSI and clinical outcomes [3 years]
Use tumor whole exon (WES) sequencing to detect the Microsatellite Instability (MSI) of patients, and use correlation analysis to detect whether it's risk factor of clinical outcomes.
- The relation between dMMR and clinical outcomes [3 years]
Use tumor whole exon (WES) sequencing to detect the Deficient Mismatch Repair (dMMR) of patients, and use correlation analysis to detect whether it's risk factor of clinical outcomes.
- The difference of clinical outcomes of patients in both group [3 years]
Follow-up the health status and weather tumor recurrence and metastasis of patients, and evaluate whether the test results of extended drug regimen correspond with clinical outcomes
- The difference of TTP of patients in both group [3 years]
Follow-up the results of patients' periodic reviews and calculate Time To Progress (TTP） of patients in both group, and use survival analysis to detect whether the two group has difference in TTP.
- The difference of ORR of patients in both group [three years]
Follow-up the results of patients' periodic reviews and calculate Objective Response Rate (ORR） of patients in both group, and use survival analysis to detect whether the two group has difference in ORR.
- The difference of DFS of patients in both group [3 years]
Follow-up the results of patients' periodic reviews and calculate Disease Free Survival (DFS) of patients in both group, and use survival analysis to detect whether the two group has difference in DFS.
- The difference of PFS of patients in both group [3 years]
Follow-up the results of patients' periodic reviews and calculate Progress Free Survival (PFS） of patients in both group, and use survival analysis to detect whether the two group has difference in PFS.
- The difference of OS of patients in both group [3 years]
Follow-up the results of patients' periodic reviews and calculate Overall Survival (OS） of patients in both group, and use survival analysis to detect whether the two group has difference in OS.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age 18 ~ 75 years old, regardless of gender
-
Patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by histopathology or cytology
-
Colorectal cancer patients who need adjuvant therapy after radical surgery and have not received neoadjuvant therapy
-
Having at least one assessable tumor focus
-
ECoG physical condition score ≤ 2 points
-
Voluntarily participate and sign informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients diagnosed with metastasis
-
Patients who cannot obtain tumor samples
-
Pregnant and lactating women
-
Patients with poor compliance
-
Patients with severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications who cannot receive adjuvant treatment
-
Patients with other malignant tumors
-
Suffering from serious mental and nervous system diseases
-
The researchers believe that patients should not be selected for this study
Contacts and Locations
Locations
| Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peking Union Medical College Hospital | Beijing | Beijing | China | 100730 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Investigators
- Study Chair: Guole Lin, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
- Study Director: Jiaolin Zhou, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Cassidy J, Clarke S, Díaz-Rubio E, Scheithauer W, Figer A, Wong R, Koski S, Lichinitser M, Yang TS, Rivera F, Couture F, Sirzén F, Saltz L. Randomized phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 20;26(12):2006-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.9898.
- de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, Homerin M, Hmissi A, Cassidy J, Boni C, Cortes-Funes H, Cervantes A, Freyer G, Papamichael D, Le Bail N, Louvet C, Hendler D, de Braud F, Wilson C, Morvan F, Bonetti A. Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Aug;18(16):2938-47.
- Gao H, Korn JM, Ferretti S, Monahan JE, Wang Y, Singh M, Zhang C, Schnell C, Yang G, Zhang Y, Balbin OA, Barbe S, Cai H, Casey F, Chatterjee S, Chiang DY, Chuai S, Cogan SM, Collins SD, Dammassa E, Ebel N, Embry M, Green J, Kauffmann A, Kowal C, Leary RJ, Lehar J, Liang Y, Loo A, Lorenzana E, Robert McDonald E 3rd, McLaughlin ME, Merkin J, Meyer R, Naylor TL, Patawaran M, Reddy A, Röelli C, Ruddy DA, Salangsang F, Santacroce F, Singh AP, Tang Y, Tinetto W, Tobler S, Velazquez R, Venkatesan K, Von Arx F, Wang HQ, Wang Z, Wiesmann M, Wyss D, Xu F, Bitter H, Atadja P, Lees E, Hofmann F, Li E, Keen N, Cozens R, Jensen MR, Pryer NK, Williams JA, Sellers WR. High-throughput screening using patient-derived tumor xenografts to predict clinical trial drug response. Nat Med. 2015 Nov;21(11):1318-25. doi: 10.1038/nm.3954. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
- Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF, Fuchs CS, Ramanathan RK, Williamson SK, Findlay BP, Pitot HC, Alberts SR. A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan 1;22(1):23-30. Epub 2003 Dec 9.
- Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, Smith T, Cooper D, Gansler T, Lerro C, Fedewa S, Lin C, Leach C, Cannady RS, Cho H, Scoppa S, Hachey M, Kirch R, Jemal A, Ward E. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jul-Aug;62(4):220-41. doi: 10.3322/caac.21149. Epub 2012 Jun 14. Review. Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Sep-Oct;62(5):348.
- Yin S, Xi R, Wu A, Wang S, Li Y, Wang C, Tang L, Xia Y, Yang D, Li J, Ye B, Yu Y, Wang J, Zhang H, Ren F, Zhang Y, Shen D, Wang L, Ying X, Li Z, Bu Z, Ji X, Gao X, Jia Y, Jia Z, Li N, Li Z, Ji JF, Xi JJ. Patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters for drug testing in cancer therapy. Sci Transl Med. 2020 Jun 24;12(549). pii: eaaz1723. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz1723.
- PekingUMCHPTC