Comparison of Diagnostic Sensitivity Between ctDNA Methylation and CEA in Colorectal Cancer

Sponsor
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05558436
Collaborator
(none)
712
1
37
19.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a comparative study. This study is to compare the diagnostic sensitivity between circulating tumor DNA methylation and carcinoembryonic antigen in detecting colorectal cancer. There are two steps in this study. Firstly, the diagnostic model is established based on tumor-specific plasma circulating tumor DNA methylation markers. Secondly, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of plasma circulating tumor DNA methylation are compared with that of carcinoembryonic antigen in detecting colorectal cancer.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Diagnostic Test: Detection of ctDNA methylation

Detailed Description

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, the second deadliest cancer. It is reported that patients prefer non-invasive methods rather than invasive methods for the detection of CRC. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is commonly employed in clinical practice for early detection of CRC, but it is limited for its low sensitivity, which is around 30%-40%. DNA methylation is a commonly used biomarker for non-invasive tumor detection in plasma. We aim to develop and validate a methylation-based blood test for CRC based on genome-wide methylation detection. There are two steps. Firstly, this prospective, clinical study aims to establish the diagnostic model based on tumor-specific plasma ctDNA methylation markers. Secondly, this study is to compare the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) methylation with CEA in detecting colorectal cancer.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational [Patient Registry]
Anticipated Enrollment :
712 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Comparison of Diagnostic Sensitivity Between Circulating Tumor DNA Methylation and Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Colorectal Cancer
Actual Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Cancer group

Patients with colorectal cancer.

Diagnostic Test: Detection of ctDNA methylation
Detection for colorectal tumor-specific plasma ctDNA methylation markers before treatment

Control group

Patients with benign colorectal disease.

Diagnostic Test: Detection of ctDNA methylation
Detection for colorectal tumor-specific plasma ctDNA methylation markers before treatment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Diagnostic sensitivity [3 years]

    The comparison of diagnostic sensitivity between ctDNA methylation and CEA in detecting colorectal cancer

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Diagnostic specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value [3 years]

    The comparison of diagnostic specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value between ctDNA methylation and CEA in detecting colorectal cancer

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:

Cancer group

  • Patients must have histologically confirmed colorectal cancer before or after drawing blood sample.

  • Patients need to receive surgical resection or endoscopic resection.

  • Patients have a performance status of ≤1 on the ECOG Performance Scale.

  • Written informed consent must be obtained.

Control group

  • Written informed consent must be obtained.

  • Individuals must receive colonoscopy.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients received tumor treatment prior to the drawn of blood sample, including surgical resection,neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and targeted therapy.

  • Patients received antibiotics regularly.

  • Patients received blood transfusion two weeks before the drawn of blood sample.

  • Patients with indications of emergency surgery, including bleeding, obstruction and perforation.

  • Patients who are positive for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).

  • Patients with abnormal liver and kidney function.

  • Patients with the history of inflammatory bowel disease.

  • Patients who had history of other malignancies.

  • Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding.

  • Alcoholic or drug abusers.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong China 510000

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jun Yan, M.D., Ph.D., Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05558436
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • NFEC-2022-245
First Posted:
Sep 28, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Sep 28, 2022
Last Verified:
Jun 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Undecided
Plan to Share IPD:
Undecided
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 28, 2022