Effectiveness of Transverse Abdominus Plane Catheter Blocks to Patient-controlled Analgesia in Laparoscopic Colon Resections
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The control of postoperative pain has become a major issue in surgery awareness and it is considered an important measurement of patient satisfaction. Improvements in pain relief, including stopping pain before it starts (i.e. preemptive treatment) is of great benefit to the surgical patient. When pain is aggressively addressed, patients respond by recovering faster.
The use of opioids remains the mainstay to minimize postoperative pain. Lately, long acting local anesthetic wound infiltration has been widely recognized as a useful adjunct to multimodal postoperative pain management. On that basis, a system that delivers a continuous local anesthetic to the surgical wound was developed, and better pain control has been achieved after several surgical procedures.
In patients undergoing abdominal procedures, such as colon resection, adequate pain control remains an issue. It is known that innervation to the antero-lateral abdomen is provided by sensory nerves T7-L1, ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves, which travel through the transverse abdominis muscle plane (TAP). Local anesthetic block of these nerves has been described and has shown to be effective for immediate postoperative pain control.
Recently, the use of the On-Q pain relief system with catheters placed within the TAP has been evaluated. Published results have shown significant improvement of pain control (Forastiere). The idea of placing the pain catheters at the TAP plane seems to be more coherent with the anatomical distribution of the sensory nerves trunks. Due to the lack of prospective trials investigating the effectiveness of a continuous wound infusion with local anesthetics after general surgery procedures the investigators sought to determine the efficacy of this technique after laparoscopic colon resection procedures.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Ropivacaine Subjects with TAP catheters attached to the On-Q pump with 0.2% ropivacaine |
Drug: 0.2% ropivacaine
On-Q pumps containing 0.2% ropivacaine to be attached to TAP catheters
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Saline Subjects with TAP catheters attached to the On-Q pump with saline |
Drug: Saline
On-Q pumps containing saline to be attached to TAP catheters
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Time to flatus [1 week]
Post-operative time measurement for the patient to pass flatus
- Hospital Length of Stay [1 week]
Post-operative time measurement until patient discharge
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Passage of Stool [1 week]
Post-operative time measurement for the patient to pass stool
- Narcotic use [1 week]
Post-operative measurement of patient narcotic requirements
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patients age 18 - 100 years of age undergoing laparoscopic colon resections.
-
Patients must be able to read and write English.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Patients undergoing open procedures.
-
Lap converted to open procedures.
-
Patients with known liver dysfunction, or the following laboratory assays: ALT/AST/alk. Phos/total bilirubin of 2x ULN
-
Cirrhosis Child's class A-C, INR >1.5. There is no specific isolated value of protein or albumin which would disqualify the subject.
-
All emergent/urgent cases taken to the OR for colon resections.
-
All patients with previous drug abuse/narcotic abuse history.
-
Patients without the mental capacity to consent for the procedure/study.
-
Subjects requiring a translator in order to sign the informed consent.
-
Subjects with a history of an allergic reaction to local anesthetics or acetaminophen.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Colon and Rectal Surgery | Stamford | Connecticut | United States | 06902 |
2 | Stamford Hospital | Stamford | Connecticut | United States | 06904 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Stamford Hospital
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Chester JF, Ravindranath K, White BD, Shanahan D, Taylor RS, Lloyd-Williams K. Wound perfusion with bupivacaine: objective evidence for efficacy in postoperative pain relief. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989 Nov;71(6):394-6.
- De Oliveira GS Jr, Fitzgerald PC, Marcus RJ, Ahmad S, McCarthy RJ. A dose-ranging study of the effect of transversus abdominis block on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after outpatient laparoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1218-25. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182303a1a. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
- Edwards CL, Fillingim RB, Keefe F. Race, ethnicity and pain. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):133-137. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00408-0. Review.
- Faucett J, Gordon N, Levine J. Differences in postoperative pain severity among four ethnic groups. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1994 Aug;9(6):383-9.
- Gupta A, Fant F, Axelsson K, Sandblom D, Rykowski J, Johansson JE, Andersson SO. Postoperative analgesia after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a double-blind comparison between low thoracic epidural and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2006 Oct;105(4):784-93.
- McDonnell JG, O'Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jan;104(1):193-7. Erratum in: Anesth Analg. 2007 May;104(5):1108.
- Niraj G, Kelkar A, Jeyapalan I, Graff-Baker P, Williams O, Darbar A, Maheshwaran A, Powell R. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of subcostal transversus abdominis plane blocks with epidural analgesia following upper abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2011 Jun;66(6):465-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06700.x. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
- Raue W, Haase O, Junghans T, Scharfenberg M, Müller JM, Schwenk W. 'Fast-track' multimodal rehabilitation program improves outcome after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a controlled prospective evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2004 Oct;18(10):1463-8. Epub 2004 Aug 26.
- 11-1017.01