Comparison of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy, Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Laparoscopic Pectopexy.
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy, laparoscopic modified lateral suspens9ion and laparoscopic pectopexy between January 2017 and December 2019 in our clinic.(Patients with at least 12 months of the date of surgery will be called for examination.)
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy, laparoscopic modified lateral suspens9ion and laparoscopic pectopexy between January 2017 and December 2019 in our clinic.(Patients with at least 12 months of the date of surgery will be called for examination.)
We will evaluate Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative System (POP-Q), Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (PQoL), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS), Visual Analogue Score (VAS), routine gynecologic USG, failure, complication, operation time .
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy, Under general anesthesia,laparoscopic approach is used to enter the abdomen.Following this, visceral peritoneum is held with forceps from the point where the sacro-uterine ligaments adhere to the uterus. cut with unipolar scissors to the sacrouterin ligaments approximately 2-4 cm in the midline a transverse incision is made and the posterior wall of the cervix is reached. Approx. 10-15 x2 cm polypropylene mesh 5 mm trocar is inserted into the abdomen with the help of grasper and one end three points with 2/0 non-absorbable prolene sutures in the midline cervix Intracorporeal suture technique. After the sacral promontorium on peritona about 2 The transverse incision is made to the normal anatomical position and the appropriate mesh length is determined and the other end is fixed to the area prepared on the sacral promontorium at 3 points with 2-0 prolene. Bleeding reperitonization according to intracorporeal suture technique with 2/0 vicry |
Diagnostic Test: medical examination
medical examination
Other Names:
|
Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension A 10 cm diameter trocar is passed through a 1 cm infraumbical incision. In addition, two 5 mm diameter trocar are placed on 4 cm on both sides of the spinal iliac crest, and a 5 mm diameter trocar is placed laterally in the rectus muscle at the left lateral level of the umbilicus. A Prolene network of 25 cm in length is prepared. Dissection of the uterine cavity is performed to expose a mustache. The bottom of the web is secured by suturing the web in the midline and sides of the web with 2-0 prolene. The left and right modified lateral ports are then removed by moving under the bottom of the planet with the help of the planet until the isthmus reaches the bottom of the round ligament. The lateral ports are again slid onto the mesh, placed and sutured with peritoneal 2-0 vicryil, the mesh ends are cut at the skin level and the procedure is terminated. |
Diagnostic Test: medical examination
medical examination
Other Names:
|
Laparoscopic Pectopexy First, the peritoneal layer on the top and side of the bladder opens parallel to the round ligament toward the right pelvic sidewall. The iliopectineal ligament is then located under the guidance of the obliterated umbilical artery, lateral to the obliterated umbilical artery and medially of the outer iliac vein. iliopectineal (Cooper) ligament exposing a segment of approximately 3-4 cm is formed. After completion of the dissections, the ends of the mesh are sutured to both iliopectineal ligaments by intracorporeal suture using nonabsorbable sutures. The middle of the net is fixed with three sutures to the lower anterior segment of the uterus. The peritoneum on the mesh is sutured with an absorbable suture material. |
Diagnostic Test: medical examination
medical examination
Other Names:
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Anatomical improvement according to POP-Q score [12 months after intervention]
a system for assessing the degree of prolapse of pelvic organs
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change from baseline Prolapse Quality of Life questionnaire (PQoL) to measure quality of life according to pelvic organ prolapse [12 months after intervention]
The survey includes 20 questions grouped in chapters (areas) related to a specific aspect of quality of life
- Change from baseline Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS) to measure quality of life according to pelvic organ prolapse [12 months after intervention]
measures the effect of changes in pelvic organ prolapse on quality of life
- Change from baseline Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain [12 months after intervention]
Participant describes the pain related to the mesh
- Failure (%) [12 months after intervention]
Recurrence rate
- Complications [12 months after intervention]
İnjury
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients requiring surgical treatment for the symptomatic stage of pelvic organ prolapse ≥ 2
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Age > 70 years
-
Severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease
-
Pregnancy
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Diyarbakır Women's and Children's Hospital | Diyarbakır | Turkey | 21100 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Diyarbakir Women's and Children's Diseases Hospital
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Şerif Aksin, Yes
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Bojahr B, Tchartchian G, Waldschmidt M, Ohlinger R, De Wilde RL. Laparoscopic sacropexy: a retrospective analysis of the subjective outcome in 310 cases. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:538426. doi: 10.1155/2012/538426. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
- Noé KG, Schiermeier S, Alkatout I, Anapolski M. Laparoscopic pectopexy: a prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trial of standard laparoscopic sacral colpocervicopexy with the new laparoscopic pectopexy-postoperative results and intermediate-term follow-up in a pilot study. J Endourol. 2015 Feb;29(2):210-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0413. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
- Veit-Rubin N, Dubuisson JB, Gayet-Ageron A, Lange S, Eperon I, Dubuisson J. Patient satisfaction after laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: outcome report of a continuous series of 417 patients. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1685-1693. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3327-2. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
- DiyarbakirWCDH 2