Comparison of Quality of Vision After Bifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
To compare the visual performance of the extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) to bifocal and spherical monofocal IOL
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
This study was conducted from 2018 to 2020. This study included patients who were with presence of cataract in both eyes, age between 50 and 80 years, and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of both eyes under 20/40. Phacoemulsification cataract surgery was arranged for both eyes for all patients. The study groups of IOL models include EDOF Symfony IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA), bifocal Restor +2.5D IOL (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA), and monofocal Sensar AR40e IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA). The patients were routinely examined preoperatively as well as 1 month after surgery for far and near visual acuity (in LogMAR unit). Contrast sensitivity, wavefront aberration and quality of vision questionnaire was measured at the 1-month postoperative visit. These aforementioned outcomes were recorded and compared between groups.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Bifocal group Patients in bifocal group implanted with Restor +2.5D IOL (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA) in bilateral eyes |
Procedure: Clear corneal phacoemulsification and IOL implantation
Clear corneal phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were performed by 2 surgeons (Chao-Kai Chang and Hung-Yuan Lin) by using an identical technique to minimize differences in surgically induced aberrations between groups. The surgical process involved topical anesthesia, a 3-step clear corneal incision (2.75 mm) at 180° (temporal in both eyes), a 5.0-mm continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification using the stop-and-chop technique, IOL implantation with an injector, IOL centration, and a sutureless incision. The study IOL models include EDOF Symfony IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA), bifocal Restor +2.5D IOL (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA), and monofocal Sensar AR40e IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA).
|
Extended depth of focus group Patients in extended depth of focus group implanted with EDOF Symfony IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA) in bilateral eyes |
Procedure: Clear corneal phacoemulsification and IOL implantation
Clear corneal phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were performed by 2 surgeons (Chao-Kai Chang and Hung-Yuan Lin) by using an identical technique to minimize differences in surgically induced aberrations between groups. The surgical process involved topical anesthesia, a 3-step clear corneal incision (2.75 mm) at 180° (temporal in both eyes), a 5.0-mm continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification using the stop-and-chop technique, IOL implantation with an injector, IOL centration, and a sutureless incision. The study IOL models include EDOF Symfony IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA), bifocal Restor +2.5D IOL (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA), and monofocal Sensar AR40e IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA).
|
Monofocal group Patients in monofocal group implanted with Sensar AR40e IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA) in bilateral eyes |
Procedure: Clear corneal phacoemulsification and IOL implantation
Clear corneal phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were performed by 2 surgeons (Chao-Kai Chang and Hung-Yuan Lin) by using an identical technique to minimize differences in surgically induced aberrations between groups. The surgical process involved topical anesthesia, a 3-step clear corneal incision (2.75 mm) at 180° (temporal in both eyes), a 5.0-mm continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification using the stop-and-chop technique, IOL implantation with an injector, IOL centration, and a sutureless incision. The study IOL models include EDOF Symfony IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA), bifocal Restor +2.5D IOL (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA), and monofocal Sensar AR40e IOL (AMO, Santa Ana, CA, USA).
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Ophthalmic examinations [1 month after surgery.]
far uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), near UCVA in LogMAR unit
- Wavefront examination [at the 1-month postoperative visit]
Wavefront analysis was performed only at the 1-month postoperative visit with an AMO WaveScan Hartmann-Shack sensor (Santa Clara, CA, USA). The wavefront maps were analyzed using a 6-mm pupil diameter and a Zernike polynomial expansion up to the sixth-order of Zernike coefficients. Higher order aberrations including RMS errors of horizontal coma aberration (Z 3,1), spherical aberration (4,0), trefoil aberration and the higher order aberrations were assessed.
- Contrast sensitivity [at the 1-month postoperative visit]
CS was also measured at the 1-month postoperative visit using the Vector Vision CSV-1000 (Greenville, OH, USA) chart. All subjects were tested at the recommended distance of 8 feet. The CSV-1000 consists of a series of circular achromatic sine-wave patches having a 1.5-in. diameter and comprising 4 rows, each corresponding to one of 4 spatial frequencies: 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (cpd). We selected 3, 6 and 12 cpd for analysis.
- Questionnaire [at the 1-month postoperative visit]
Subjective QoV was evaluated using a questionnaire adopted from a near-activity 19-item questionnaire and the NEI-RQL-42. Our questionnaire contains 11 questions and the subscales include far vision, diurnal fluctuation, glare and halos, spectacle dependence, near vision, and intermediate vision. In general, questionnaires were completed without assistance; however, on the patient's request, explanations of the questions were provided.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
presence of cataract in both eyes
-
age between 50 and 80 years
-
CDVA of both eyes under 20/40
-
Phacoemulsification cataract surgery was arranged for both eyes
Exclusion Criteria:
-
complicated cataract
-
corneal opacities or irregularities
-
corneal astigmatism > 1.5 diopter
-
dry eye (Schirmer's test I ≤ 5mm)
-
amblyopia
-
anisometropia
-
surgical complications such as posterior capsular bag rupture or vitreous loss
-
IOL tilt or decentration
-
coexisting ocular pathologies
-
glaucoma
-
non-dilating pupil
-
history of intraocular surgery, laser therapy, or retinopathy
-
optic nerve or macular diseases
-
refusal or unable to maintain follow-up.
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Taipei Nobel Eye Clinic | Taipei | Taiwan |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Taipei Nobel Eye Clinic
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Chao-Kai Chang, Ph.D., Taipei Nobel Eye Clinic
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Calladine D, Evans JR, Shah S, Leyland M. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;(9):CD003169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub3. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 12;12 :CD003169.
- Denoyer A, Le Lez ML, Majzoub S, Pisella PJ. Quality of vision after cataract surgery after Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens implantation: effect of contrast sensitivity and wavefront aberration improvements on the quality of daily vision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Feb;33(2):210-6.
- Kohnen T, Nuijts R, Levy P, Haefliger E, Alfonso JF. Visual function after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses with a +3.0 D addition. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Dec;35(12):2062-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.08.013.
- Pérez-Merino P, Dorronsoro C, Llorente L, Durán S, Jiménez-Alfaro I, Marcos S. In vivo chromatic aberration in eyes implanted with intraocular lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Apr 12;54(4):2654-61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-11912.
- Thibos LN, Ye M, Zhang X, Bradley A. The chromatic eye: a new reduced-eye model of ocular chromatic aberration in humans. Appl Opt. 1992 Jul 1;31(19):3594-600. doi: 10.1364/AO.31.003594.
- Weeber HA, Piers PA. Theoretical performance of intraocular lenses correcting both spherical and chromatic aberration. J Refract Surg. 2012 Jan;28(1):48-52. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20111103-01. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
- 001