Comparison of Viusal Outcomes After Implantation of the POD 26% FineVision Toric (PhysIOL) and POD 26% Toric (PhysIOL)
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
The study is an observational non-randomised controlled study comparing the visual acuity after implantation of the POD 26% FINEVISION TORIC with respect to the POD 26% TORIC
| Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Detailed Description
The study is an observational non-randomised controlled study comparing the visual acuity after implantation of the POD 26% FINEVISION TORIC with respect to the POD 26% TORIC This study includes both eyes of 24 patients implanted with the POD 26%FineVision Toric (group 1: 12 patients) and the POD 26% Toric (group 2: 12 patients) .
The study primary goal is to compare the near visual acuity in both groups. Distance and intermediate visual acuities, defocus curve, refraction and straylight will be compared.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
| Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
|---|---|
| 1POD26PFT Patients implanted with the POD 26% FineVision Toric |
Device: FineVision Toric
Posterior chamber IOL which consists in a small plastic lens with plastic side struts, called haptics, to hold the lens in place within the capsular bag inside the eye
|
| 2POD26PT Patients implanted with the POD 26% Toric |
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- The visual acuity at near of the POD 26% FINEVISION TORIC with respect to the POD 26% TORIC is improved of at least LogMAR 0.2. [3 months]
Secondary Outcome Measures
- The secondary objective is to measure far and intermediate visual acuity, the refraction, centration, rotational stability and to determine the amount of photic phenomena for both IOLs: POD 26% FINEVISION TORIC and POD 26% TORIC. [3 months]
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Patient older than 50 years old
-
Regular corneal astigmatism >1.0 dioptres by IOL Master (regularity determined by the topography of the keratometry).
-
Regular corneal astigmatism <2.5 dioptres by IOL Master (regularity determined by the topography of the keratometry).
-
Group 1: patients after cataract surgery with Fine Vision toric implanted in both eyes
-
Group 2: patients after cataract surgery with Ankoris implanted in both eyes
-
Availability, willingness and sufficient cognitive awareness to comply with examination procedures
Exclusion Criteria:
• - Irregular astigmatism
-
Difficulty for cooperation (distance from their home, general health condition)
-
Acute or chronic disease or illness that would increase risk or confound study results (e.g. diabetes mellitus (with retinopathy), immunocompromised, glaucoma etc…)
-
Any ocular comorbidity
-
History of ocular trauma or prior ocular surgery including refractive procedures
-
Capsule or zonular abnormalities that may affect postoperative centration or tilt of the lens (e.g. pseudoexfoliation syndrome, chronic Uveitis, Marfan's syndrome)
-
Pupil abnormalitis (non-reactive, tonic pupils, abnormally shaped pupils or pupils that do not dilate under mesopic/scotopic conditions)
-
IOL spherical equivalent power lower than 10 D or greater than 30D
-
Complicated surgery
Contacts and Locations
Locations
No locations specified.Sponsors and Collaborators
- Beaver-Visitec International, Inc.
Investigators
None specified.Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- TaneriPODAYFT/PODAYT