Evaluation of Complication Rates Using Filter vs. Centrifuge and Heparin vs. Citrate Anticoagulation

Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04351438
Collaborator
(none)
108
1
133.9
0.8

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Despite its growing use across the world, and similar efficacy, filter-based therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) continues to be used less often that centrifuge-based TPE. One of the reasons is that the patient and circuit complications of centrifuge-based TPE are familiar to the clinical team. There is little data on the patient and circuit complications of filter-based TPE (using the Prismaflex). Furthermore, there is a reluctance to use filter-based TPE because historically, most TPE programs have used citrate-regional anticoagulation, and there is a large gap in knowledge in the use of citrate regional anti-coagulation when using filter-based TPE.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Active Comparator: centrifuge TPE with citrate
  • Device: Active Comparator: Filter TPE with heparin
  • Drug: Active comparator: Filter TPE with citrate

Detailed Description

Studies that evaluate differences between filter-based vs. centrifuge based TPE are lacking. Heparin-based TPE is the most commonly used method of anti-coagulation when performing filter-based TPE. Citrate anticoagulation is FDA approved for use during TPE and its use is the gold-standard anti-coagulant method for TPE. However, citrate has not been studied rigorously in patients who are on filtration-based TPE on Prismaflex.

Providing citrate-based anticoagulation during TPE is challenging for several reasons. First, because calcium will bind to albumin, one must provide additional albumin in some way to prevent hypocalcemia. Second, when the replacement fluid is fresh frozen plasma (FFP), the clinician must account for a very large dose of citrate (which can be 3 times higher than the dose used to anti-coagulate whole blood) that is present in the FFP. Based on these principles, with clinical observations and experience using citrate-based continuous renal replacement therapy, this hospital developed a clinical protocol for use during filter-based TPE. This protocol has been in use since 2012 in the Renal Care Center at the Children's of Alabama.

As the use of filter-based TPE continue to rise, clinicians need evidence-based data to help them care for their patients. Although there are a few reports on the complication rates during centrifuge TPE, known, there are no published reports on the complication rate during filter-based TPE. A comparison of the complications rate between filter-based TPE and centrifuge TPE will help providers recognize the safety of filter-based TPE. There are no known regional citrate anticoagulation protocols for patients receiving filter-based TPE using Prismaflex. As the use of filter-based TPE continues to rise, there is a great need to fill this important knowledge gap. As more patients are cared in critical care arena, more clinicians will need evidence-based protocols for regional citrate anti-coagulation. This study will fill important gaps in knowledge that will improve the ability of clinical teams to provide filter-based TPE using Prismaflex.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
108 participants
Observational Model:
Case-Only
Time Perspective:
Retrospective
Official Title:
Prismaflex Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: Evaluation of Complication Rates Using Filter vs. Centrifuge and Heparin vs. Citrate Anticoagulation
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2019
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Centrifuge TPE with citrate

These participants were undergoing centrifuge TPE using citrate anticoagulant

Device: Active Comparator: centrifuge TPE with citrate
Patients who received citrate-based anticoagulation with centrifuge TPE

Filter TPE with heparin

These participants were undergoing filter TPE using filter-based heparin anticoagulant

Device: Active Comparator: Filter TPE with heparin
Patients who received heparin-based anticoagulation with filter TPE

Filter TPE with citrate

These participants were undergoing filter TPE using filter-based citrate anticoagulant

Drug: Active comparator: Filter TPE with citrate
Patients who received citrate-based anticoagulation with filter TPE

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of patient complications during TPE [complications during any TPE procedure (3 hours to 400 days)]

    patient-related complications during procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of circuit-related complications during TPE [4 hours]

    circuit-related complications during procedure

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
0 Years to 24 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients who received therapeutic plasma exchange at Children's of Alabama between 2012 and 2019
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients that received TPE with concomitant extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Alabama Birmingham Alabama United States 35233

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Askenazi, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
David Askenazi, Principal Investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04351438
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 300003769
First Posted:
Apr 17, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Feb 8, 2022
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
Yes
Keywords provided by David Askenazi, Principal Investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 8, 2022