Combination Antibiotic Therapy Compared to Monotherapy in the Treatment of Acute COPD

Sponsor
Haiphong University of Medicine and Pharmacy (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04879030
Collaborator
(none)
170
1
2
12
14.2

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The investigators hypothesized that the empirical use of fluoroquinolones together with beta-lactam antibiotics will change their therapeutic success in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD compared to that in patients in whom a single beta-lactam treatment was used. The main goal of this study was to compare the clinical and bacterial success from the use of a combination of beta-lactam and fluoroquinolone antibiotics with that of a single beta-lactam treatment, in adult patients with COPD exacerbations.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2/Phase 3

Detailed Description

The study protocols were reviewed and approved by the Hai Phong International Hospital Institutional Review Board, Vietnam. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on the Harmonization of the Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use - Good Clinical Practice guidelines. All subjects gave written informed consent before study initiation.

The participants consisted of patients aged over 45 years, diagnosed with COPD stages I-IV as stated by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 13, with acute exacerbations (onset of signs under 14 days as defined by Anthonisen et al. 14: type 1 [increased dyspnea, increased sputum volume, and sputum purulence] or type 2 [involved two or three symptoms that needed hospitalization]), the incompetence to use medication by mouth, fever (temperature over 38.5°C), antibiotic usage for longer than 1 day, treatment with systemic administration of corticosteroids (dosage equivalent to more than 30 mg of prednisolon over four days), signs of pneumonia on radiographs, history of mechanical ventilation during acute exacerbations of COPD in the past, recently detected or unresolved pulmonary malignancy, other infectious diseases requiring antibiotic treatment, and kidney failure.

Randomization and Intervention This was an open-label, randomized study using two types of treatments. Participants were divided into two groups using a randomization procedure. Within 24 hours of admission, patients were assigned randomly to two groups, one to receive a course of single-antibiotic therapy with only beta-lactam antibiotics and the other to get concomitant antibiotic treatment, defined as the use of two antibiotics, including one beta-lactam antibiotic and one fluoroquinolone. The beta-lactam antibiotics with activity against gram-negative bacilli in this study included piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, imipenem-cilastin, meropenem, ertapenem, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and cefixime. The fluoroquinolone antibiotics included ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin. The other COPD medications were continued. When antibiotic therapy failed, the attending physician had the right to reevaluate the clinical status and to replace the antibiotic therapy in the study with a more appropriate treatment. Safety was recorded daily with the support of a clinical pharmacist to report adverse events. Patient data is stored in electronic medical records.

Outcomes and Follow-Up On days 1, 10, and 20, patients were evaluated clinically, and blood was drawn, collected and the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP, Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA) measured. Pulmonary function testing was done and expectorated sputum samples were collected. The symptoms were scored by using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for shortness of breath, tiredness, cough, and sputum color. The specific scores for each symptom ranged from 1 to 10 15. Separate and total scores were calculated.

The primary endpoint was a clinical outcome on day 20, as stated by Chow et al. 16. Successful treatment was defined as a cure (completely resolved signs and symptoms related to exacerbations) or improvement (resolved or decreased symptoms and signs without new symptoms or signs related to infection). Treatment failure was defined as the failure to address symptoms and signs, worsening of symptoms and signs, the appearance of new symptoms and signs related to the primary or a new infection, or death.

Secondary endpoints included clinical outcome on day 10 and clinical success on days 10 and 20, based on lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1]), serum CRP, symptoms, and microbiological responses.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
170 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
This was an open-label, randomized study using two types of treatments. Participants were divided into two groups using a randomization procedure. Within 24 hours of admission, patients were assigned randomly to two groups, one to receive a course of single-antibiotic therapy with only beta-lactam antibiotics and the other to get concomitant antibiotic treatment, defined as the use of two antibiotics, including one beta-lactam antibiotic and one fluoroquinolone. When antibiotic therapy failed, the attending physician had the right to reevaluate the clinical status and to replace the antibiotic therapy in the study with a more appropriate treatment. Patient data is stored in electronic medical records.This was an open-label, randomized study using two types of treatments. Participants were divided into two groups using a randomization procedure. Within 24 hours of admission, patients were assigned randomly to two groups, one to receive a course of single-antibiotic therapy with only beta-lactam antibiotics and the other to get concomitant antibiotic treatment, defined as the use of two antibiotics, including one beta-lactam antibiotic and one fluoroquinolone. When antibiotic therapy failed, the attending physician had the right to reevaluate the clinical status and to replace the antibiotic therapy in the study with a more appropriate treatment. Patient data is stored in electronic medical records.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Is Combination Antibiotic Therapy Superior to Monotherapy in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Aug 30, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Dec 30, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: beta-lactam monotherapy

only beta-lactam antibiotics

Drug: Beta-Lactams
The patient was randomized to use beta-lactams antibiotic
Other Names:
  • piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, imipenem-cilastin, meropenem, ertapenem, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and cefixime
  • Experimental: beta-lactam and fluoroquinolone combination therapy

    one beta-lactam antibiotic and one fluoroquinolone

    Drug: Beta-Lactams
    The patient was randomized to use beta-lactams antibiotic
    Other Names:
  • piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, imipenem-cilastin, meropenem, ertapenem, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, and cefixime
  • Drug: Fluoroquinolone
    The patient was indicated to use a combination of beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones
    Other Names:
  • ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. clinical success on day 20 [on day 20]

      Proportion of patients were clinically successful on day 20 (%)

    2. FEV1 on day 20 [on day 20]

      Percent Predicted forced expiratory volume in one second on day 20 [FEV1] (%)

    3. FVC on day 20 [on day 20]

      Percent Predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) on day 20 (%)

    4. serum CRP on day 20 [on day 20]

      Concentration of serum CRP on day 20 (mg/L)

    5. WBC on day 20 [on day 20]

      white blood cell count on day 20 (10x109/L)

    6. microbiological success on day 20 [on day 20]

      The number of patients with success on microbiological outcomes on day 20

    7. VAS on day 20 [on day 20]

      the visual analogue scale (VAS) (Units on scale)

    8. PaO2 on day 20 [on day 20]

      pressure of oxygen (PaO2) on day 20 (mm Hg)

    9. PaCO2 on day 20 [on day 20]

      partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) (mm Hg)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. clinical success on day 10 [on day 10]

      Proportion of patients were clinically successful on day 10 (%)

    2. FEV1 on day 10 [on day 10]

      Percent Predicted forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1] on day 10 (%)

    3. FVC on day 10 [on day 10]

      Percent Predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) on day 10 (%)

    4. serum CRP on day 10 [on day 10]

      Concentration of serum CRP on day 10 on day 10 (mg/L)

    5. WBC on day 10 [on day 10]

      white blood cell count on day 10 (10x109/L)

    6. VAS on day 10 [on day 10]

      the visual analogue scale (VAS) on day 10 (Units on scale)

    7. PaO2 on day 10 [on day 10]

      pressure of oxygen (PaO2) on day 10 (mm Hg)

    8. PaCO2 on day 10 [on day 10]

      partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) on day 10 (mm Hg)

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    N/A and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • diagnosed with COPD stages I-IV with acute exacerbations

    • incompetence to use medication by mouth

    • fever

    • antibiotic usage for longer than 1 day

    • treatment with systemic administration of corticosteroids

    • signs of pneumonia on radiographs

    • history of mechanical ventilation during acute exacerbations of COPD in the past

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • recently detected or unresolved pulmonary malignancy

    • other infectious diseases requiring antibiotic treatment

    • kidney failure

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Haiphong International Hospital Hải Phòng Vietnam 18000

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Haiphong University of Medicine and Pharmacy

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Phuong TT Nguyen, PhD MD, Haiphong University of Medicine and Pharmacy

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Haiphong University of Medicine and Pharmacy
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04879030
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • HPMU.01.04.21
    First Posted:
    May 10, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    May 10, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Feb 1, 2020
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Haiphong University of Medicine and Pharmacy
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 10, 2021