Intraestromal Corneal Ring in Mild Keratoconus

Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03127163
Collaborator
(none)
65
1
1
24
2.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

To determine whether the implantation of an intrastromal corneal ring is an effective treatment for a homogeneous group of mild keratoconus patients.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Intraestromal corneal ring
N/A

Detailed Description

A group of 65 patients with mild keratoconus were implanted with a Ferrara ring in a single eye. Six months after surgery, the aberrations were measured and the visual function was determined using clinical indices. The aberrations, especially comatic aberration (coma), were measured independently.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
65 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Intraestromal corneal ringIntraestromal corneal ring
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Intrastromal Corneal Ring Was Effective for the Treatment of Mild Keratoconus
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 10, 2015
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 10, 2016
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 10, 2017

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Mild Keratoconus

A group of 65 patients with keratoconus who were implanted with an intrastromal corneal ring; the group was composed of 40 males (61.50%) and 25 females (38.50%), with a mean age of 27.88 ± 7.38 years (range, 17-47 years). The patients were fully informed about the study and signed a consent form previously approved by the ethics committee of our institution. We used the Amsler-Krumeich classification and included only patients classified as grade I or II. The investigators performed the intraestromal corneal ring surgery in the selected group.

Device: Intraestromal corneal ring
The patients underwent surgery to implant the intrastromal corneal ring (Ferrara Ophthalmics, Belo Horizonte, Brazil) using a manual technique. The procedures were performed by a single surgeon with extensive training in corneal surgery. All patients received the same ring, and the number (1 or 2 segments), thickness, and arc size were calculated using the nomogram provided by the manufacturer.
Other Names:
  • Ferrara ring
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Aberrations were measured and the visual function was determined using clinical indices. [3 months after surgery]

      Wave front data

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. UCVA [3 months after surgery]

      Uncorrected visual acuity

    2. BCVA [3 months after surgery]

      Best corrected visual acuity

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    17 Years to 47 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Investigators used the Amsler-Krumeich classification and included only patients classified as grade I or II.
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Investigators excluded patients with central corneal scarring, with other eye disorders, or with previous ocular surgery. We also excluded patients with a history of herpes infection, keratitis, corneal dystrophies, diagnoses of autoimmune diseases, systemic connective tissue disorders, or acute keratoconus.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Hospital das Clínicas Sao Paulo SP Brazil 05403-000

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University of Sao Paulo

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Mário Lima, PhD, São Paulo University investigator

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Mário Henrique Camargos de Lima, PhD, University of Sao Paulo
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03127163
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 0591/11
    First Posted:
    Apr 25, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Apr 25, 2017
    Last Verified:
    Apr 1, 2017
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Apr 25, 2017