Leveraging Social Networks to Increase COVID-19 Testing Uptake

Sponsor
New York State Psychiatric Institute (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04873401
Collaborator
Alliance for Postive Change (Other), Argus Community Inc. (Other), Columbia University (Other), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) (NIH)
496
1
2
18.4
27

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This two-year project will adapt and conduct a trial examining the ability of two recruitment strategies, chain-referral and credible messenger, to reach those who use opioids and other substances in order to increase their uptake of onsite point of care COVID-19 testing that will be delivered in two community based organizations (CBOs): Alliance for Positive Change and Argus Health Inc. In Phase 1, Adapt two implementation strategies to support COVID-19 testing uptake and sustainability, adapting elements of existing efficacious social network-based interventions via a CBPR approach. In Phase 2, we will examine and compare the efficacy of two sets of implementation strategies on (i) reach, (ii) testing uptake, (iii) service delivery (i.e. quarantine, medical care, contact tracing) and (iv) sustainability for individuals who use opioids and other drugs. In Phase 3, Elucidate and compare the system/organizational-, staff-, and individual-level factors that influence implementation (i.e. fidelity, acceptability, feasibility, sustainability) of the strategies to develop a plan for dissemination and scale-up in other CBOs who serve opioid and other substance using individuals in NYC.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Chain-referral
  • Behavioral: Credible Messenger
N/A

Detailed Description

Aims. Building on the expertise and community out-reach infrastructure of two community-based organizations (CBOs), Argus Community Inc. and Alliance for Positive Change, and following a CBPR approach, investigators propose to take two implementation strategies that have been proven to increase the reach, access, and uptake of HIV testing and related services, and adapt them to support the uptake and sustainability of point-of-service (POS) onsite COVID-19 testing in CBOs that target the underserved population of those who use opioids and other substances. Guided by social cognitive theory, Andersen's model of health care access and the

EPIS framework, the specific aims are to:

(1). Adapt two implementation strategies to support COVID-19 testing uptake and sustainability, adapting elements of existing efficacious social network-based interventions via a CBPR approach; (2). Examine and compare the efficacy of two sets of implementation strategies on (i) reach, (ii) testing uptake, (iii) service delivery and (iv) sustainability for individuals who use opioids and other drugs. Use of data drawn from Healthix, a public health information exchange, will supplement this comparison by generating a baseline of participant prior testing and health behavior to determine access to underserved populations as well as long-term influence on future testing behavior; and (3) Elucidate and compare the system/organizational-, staff-, and individual-level factors that influence implementation of the strategies to develop a plan for dissemination and scale-up in other CBOs who serve opioid and other substance using individuals in NYC.

Settings. Alliance for Positive Change and Argus Health Inc have well-established partnership with members of the parent grant team following partnerships on numerous initiatives targeting HIV, HCV and STIs prevention, testing and treatment for over 20 years. Argus and Alliance have had a combined presence in the communities of Washington Heights, Harlem and the South Bronx for over 50 years, and have subsequently developed considerable trust, support and "credibility" within these communities.

Design, Sample Size and Randomization. Two distinct social network recruitment strategies will be adapted and compared. Guided by the EPIS framework, SCT, and Andersen's Model, this 2-year study will comprise three phases. In Phase 1: Adaptation of outreach recruitment strategies, investigators will work with our project CAB, via a CBPR approach, to adapt chain-referral and POL strategies for uptake of COVID-19 testing, to finalize recruitment and on-site testing protocols. In Phase 2: Strategy Efficacy Trial and Implementation Evaluation, investigators will compare the two strategies in a cross-over design at two CBOs, with initial strategy assignment randomly determined and rolled out for 4 months before cross-over. Investigators will examine the impact of each strategy on (i) reach, (ii) COVID-19 testing/repeat testing, and (iii) service delivery among those who test positive for COVID-19. In Phase 3: Sustainment, CBOs will implement the strategy with more favorable outcomes in Phase 2, and investigators will examine their sustainment of the program. Implementation evaluation will identify participant-, staff-, and organizational-level factors that influence the feasibility, acceptability, and sustainability of each strategy in the CBOs.

Phase 1: Adaptation of Outreach Strategies. Investigators will employ a CBPR-guided approach to adapt the social network-based outreach strategies. To do this, investigators will hold four 1-hour working groups with our CAB. All CAB members will be reimbursed for their time. These groups will address how to best employ the different strategies to reach our target population and motivate testing uptake. Protocols will be shaped by findings from working group meetings and shared back to the CAB who will provide feedback to inform changes in content and format, and help identify markers of success and potential challenges.

Phase 2: Strategy Efficacy Trial and Implementation Evaluation Overview. During the first 4 months of Phase II each site will roll out a different recruitment strategy (randomly assigned 1:1) to the site Following four months of implementation, the sites will conduct a rapid PDSA through a series of four, weekly workgroups. Revisions to protocols will be made during these meetings and then the sites will "cross-over" and implement the other recruitment strategy for the next four months. Participants may be recruited twice, once in each strategy; any instances of repeat testing will be documented.

Participants. In Phase 2, using two different strategies, investigators aim to enroll N=500 individuals with a history of opioid and/or substance abuse within the past 6 months. Based on the geographic catchment areas of Argus and Alliance and current demographics of their current substance using clientele, investigators anticipate participants will be 64% male, 51% African American, 39% Hispanic. Inclusion/exclusion criteria. All participants, regardless of recruitment strategy, must endorse opioid or other substance abuse in the past 6 months, and must speak English or Spanish; >18years.

Study enrollment, and consent. Once an individual is screened at the agency and determined to be eligible, Research Assistants (RAs) will obtain written informed consent for study participation and consent to access their clinical information in Healthix, a large health information exchange in NYC. Following consent, the RA will administer the baseline assessment in a private office. Participants will receive remuneration in accordance with standards in this population. These procedures will occur in the same way regardless of recruitment method into the study.

Strategy Efficacy Trial and Implementation Evaluation. Chain-referral Strategy. Recruitment of seed participants. N=16 participants who meet inclusion criteria will be recruited from among clients at Argus and Alliance (n=8 at each site) to serve as seeds. Seeds will be stratified by substance use treatment status and gender. Site staff will contact selected individuals and refer those interested to the research team who will screen for eligibility. Following the completion of the screen, the participant will be offered COVID-19 testing; they will be compensated $20 for completing the interview at the end of the visit. Participants will be given the option to help recruit others to receive a COVID-19 test for a small incentive. If participants agree, they will receive a brief training on recruitment and three coupons. The participants will be instructed to give these coupons only to people they know who use substances.

Chain-referral recruitment: Individuals redeeming coupons will be screened for study participation, assessed and offered COVID-19 testing. Those eligible and interested will be enrolled. Procedures for informed consent, study enrollment and peer education training will be identical to those for seeds. Participants will return after three weeks to receive a recruitment incentive of $10 for every coupon redeemed. During this second visit they will complete a brief questionnaire to quantify peer-recruitment attempts.

Sample size: All participants will receive a maximum of four coupons to prevent the development of "professional recruiters." The process will continue until the sample size exceeds 125 persons (at each site) or the recruitment period is over. Based on prior work with similar populations in NYC investigators anticipate being able to recruit 125 participants for a COVID-19 test in 16 weeks.

POL Strategy: Alliance and Argus have existing POL/peer outreach programs with well-established histories of community involvement. Investigators will leverage this existing infrastructure and adapt to focus on COVID-19 testing. Based on protocols developed in Phase 1, POLs will be trained to (i) initiate conversations related to stopping transmission of COVID-19; (ii) deliver effective messages endorsing benefits of COVID-19 testing, social distancing and mask wearing; (iii) identify and visit those venues known to them where those with substance use will likely congregate; (iv) set goals to engage in conversations about COVID-19 testing with the target population and (v) document/track efforts.

Recruitment of participants via credible messengers: Based on these organizations' previous POL recruitment, 4 POLs are able to recruit 10 participants per week for HIV testing and related services. This will permit recruitment of 3-4 participants/week per POL (12-16 total/week), allowing completion of enrollment for outreach strategy in 4 total months. Participants recruited via POL will be consented and interviewed in the same manner as described above. Following the interview, participants will then be offered COVID-19 testing; they will be compensated $20 for completing the interview.

Quality Improvement (QI)/PDSA: Following the completion of the first 4-month recruitment period, agency staff, CAB members and POLs will participate in quality improvement. Using an abbreviated PDSA protocol, stakeholders across both agencies will participate to facilitate information sharing, cross-learning, and capacity building. They will refine messaging, procedures, and educational content, and make a plan to implement change during the next recruitment period. The fourth workgroup will address issues associated with internal site logistics.

Assessment and analysis. Investigators will examine the impact of the intervention on (i) reach, (ii) testing uptake and (iii) service delivery; and (iv) sustainability for individuals who use opioids and other drugs as well as potential mediating/moderating variables from the Andersen, SCT and EPIS models. Data drawn from Healthix on prior and future COVID-19 testing will augment study data to determine access to underserved populations and influence on future testing behavior.

Implementation assessment. A multi-method approach will allow us to identify implementation features that promote optimal testing uptake in the context of these CBOs. To quantify implementation, investigators will conduct staff survey assessments, monthly process checklists and a focus group.

Staff recruitment for surveys and focus groups. Staff will be eligible if they are currently employed at either Argus or Alliance, including POLs participating in Peer programs. Considerable effort will be taken to ensure that staff do not feel coerced to participate. Staff and organizational-level EPIS-derived factors will be assessed the launch of the testing initiative and after 12 months.

Monthly process assessments. Once the recruitment strategy protocols are finalized, investigators will develop the following monthly process assessments to be completed by agency staff and POLs. Feasibility: Investigators will develop a strategy specific feasibility checklist measuring three types of program delivery obstacles: obstacles to target population participation; concrete obstacles; and site/staffing obstacles. Fidelity: To assess the relationship between planned and actual implementation, investigators will design a checklist-based monitoring system with assessments completed by POLs and agency staff after a) testing/screening, b) education of recruits; recruits will also complete a brief checklist that documents time and effort in recruiting chains. Acceptability and Sustainability: Investigators will assess qualitatively implementation challenges to acceptability and sustainability via a series of two implementation focus groups with agency staff and POLs following completion of the project.

Analysis overview and main outcomes. The primary outcome of interest comparing the strategies will be testing occurrence as an indicator of testing uptake. An important secondary outcome will be reach measured through the number of coupons redeemed.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
496 participants
Allocation:
Non-Randomized
Intervention Model:
Crossover Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Groups are randomly assigned to either condition/arm; after 6 months they each cross over into the other armGroups are randomly assigned to either condition/arm; after 6 months they each cross over into the other arm
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
Leveraging Social Networks to Increase COVID-19 Testing Uptake: A Comparison of Credible Messenger and Chain Referral Recruitment Approaches
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 20, 2021
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Mar 18, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Nov 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Chain Referral

In the chain-referral intervention, a discrete number of "seeds" will be recruited from the community partners, trained and incentivized to recruit and refer members of their social networks to receive COVID-19 testing; these recruits are then trained to do the same.

Behavioral: Chain-referral
In the chain-referral intervention, a discrete number of "seeds" will be recruited from the community partners, trained and incentivized to recruit and refer members of their social networks to receive COVID-19 testing. The peer recruiters are paid for each suvcessful and eligible recruit who enrolls to be tested. Those individuals are then themselves trained to recruit peers from their social networks to receive COVID-19 testing. This is repeated over a period of 4-6 months.

Experimental: Credible Messenger

In the credible messenger intervention, peers identified as popular and socially influential individuals within their respective communities with lived experience are trained to engage within formal and informal social networks to promote behavior change.

Behavioral: Credible Messenger
In the credible messenger intervention, peers noted to be popular and socially influential individuals with lived experience will be trained to engage within community settings and areas to encourage community members to receive COVID-19 testing at the community partnering agencies. Peers will recruit community members over a period of 4-6 months.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Testing uptake binary [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Yes/No

  2. Testing uptake continuous [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Number of first-time testers

  3. Uptake of the recruitment strategy into the community [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Number of coupons redeemed

  4. Reach of the recruitment strategy into the community [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Number if coupons distributed

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Participant acceptability of recruitment strategy and testing program scale [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Scale developed for study to assed ranked participant perceived acceptability of elements of the recruitment strategy and testing experience

  2. Sustainability of the testing program [From Implementation to end of sustainability Phase, approximately 6 months]

    Number of tests conducted after the Implementation phase

  3. Fidelity to recruitment and testing protocols [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Scale developed for study to assess fidelity to recruitment and testing protocols by credible messengers

  4. Feasibility of recruitment and testing protocols [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Scale developed for study to quantitatively assess the number of facilitators and barriers to recruitment and testing

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Organizational support [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Survey of Perceived Organizational Support

  2. Affective Commitment [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Meyer and Allen's Affective Commitment Scale

  3. COVID-19 knowledge /attitudes [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Understanding America Study - Corona Virus Tracking Survey; Instrument assessing a) knowledge of symptoms b) subjective effectiveness of safety practices c) subjective safety/unsafety of activities d) vaccination acceptability e) COVID-19 stigma

  4. Perceived potential sustainability of testing program [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Program Sustainability Assessment Tool: Political support, Partnerships, Capacity, Evaluation, Communications, (20 items; (.79-.92)

  5. Mental health symptoms [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Brief Symptom Inventory: Self-report assessment of symptoms; 9 subscales and 3 global psychological distress scales (0.68-0.81)

  6. Social support [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Berlin Social Support Scale: perceived emotional and instrumental support; need and support seeking subscales

  7. Substance use frequency - days [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    NIDA AIDS Risk Behavior and Drug use assessment measuring frequency (number of days) of substance use in past 3 months

  8. Substance use frequency - times [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    NIDA AIDS Risk Behavior and Drug use assessment measuring frequency (number of times) of substance use in past 30 days

  9. Actual/possible COVID-19 exposure [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Coronavirus Health Impact Survey (CRISIS): self-report assessment of symptoms, exposure, diagnosis of household member

  10. General self-efficacy [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    General self-efficacy Scale; 10 items to assess positive self-beliefs to manage difficult demands

  11. Fear of COVID-19 [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Fear of COVID-19 Scale: 15 items: a) perceived infectability b) germ aversion

  12. Facilitators and barriers to treatment access [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    C3PNO COVID-19 Survey; a) COVID-19 treatment b) impact of COVID-19 on desire/ability to access SU treatment

  13. Stigma [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Social Distance Scale for Substance Users, Affect Scale for Substance Users; perceptions of prevalence of stigmatizing beliefs toward substance use

  14. Housing Security [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Housing Security Scale; Type of housing, housing history, stability and housing satisfaction

  15. Food insecurity [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Impacts of COVID-19 on Food Security (PBRC): 7 items: 1) utilization of government assisted food resources 2) food insecurity before COVID-19 outbreak 3) food insecurity after COVID-19

  16. Trauma experiences [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    Lifetime Incidence of Trauma scale: Frequency of traumatic events and impact

  17. COVID-19 Knowledge and Attitudes [Through implementation phase completion, approximately 12 months]

    COVID-19 Knowledge and Attitudes scale measuring: a) knowledge of symptoms b) subjective effectiveness of safety practices c) subjective safety/unsafety of going outside, socializing, touching shared surfaces d) vaccination acceptability e) COVID-19 stigma

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Endorse opioid use in the past 6 months

  • Speak English or Spanish

  • Age 18+

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Deny history of opioid use (but will be offered COVID-19 testing)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 New York State Psychiatric Institute New York New York United States 10032

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • New York State Psychiatric Institute
  • Alliance for Postive Change
  • Argus Community Inc.
  • Columbia University
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Katherine Elkington, PhD, New York State Psychiatric Institute

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Katherine Elkington, Research Scientist, New York State Psychiatric Institute
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04873401
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 8153
  • UG1DA050071
First Posted:
May 5, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Jul 28, 2022
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 28, 2022