Proactive Infliximab Optimization Using a PK Dashboard Versus SOC in Patients With Crohn's Disease: The OPTIMIZE Trial

Sponsor
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04835506
Collaborator
The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (Other), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (Other)
196
14
2
14
14
1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The OPTIMIZE Trial compares whether iDose dashboard-driven infliximab dosing (iDose-driven dosing) is more effective and safer than standard infliximab dosing for inducing and maintaining disease remission in moderately to severely active CD.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Crohn's disease (CD) is a life-long chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterized by transmural inflammation of the intestine. CD is a global disease in the 21st century with increasing incidence in newly industrialized countries. One of the most effective therapies to treat patients with moderate to severe CD is the antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent infliximab (IFX) either as monotherapy or as a combination therapy with an immunomodulator (IMM), such as azathioprine or methotrexate (MTX).

Although more effective, combination therapy is associated with more serious adverse events, such as serious opportunistic infections and cancers, as well as potential treatment adherence issues. Consequently, many patients and physicians choose to use IFX alone as safety is often prioritized over efficacy. Unfortunately, up to 30% of patients do not respond to induction therapy, and up to 50% of initial responders lose response over time. It is only if patients lose response that physicians check blood IFX concentrations (i.e., reactive therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM]), or empirically increase IFX dose. Reactive TDM helps to explain and better manage these patients with lack or loss of response to IFX. In many cases, the lack or LOR is due to low drug concentrations with or without development of antibodies to IFX (ATI). Unfortunately, reactive TDM or empiric dose escalation is often too late for patients who do not either respond to IFX induction therapy or lose response during maintenance. This reactive approach results in many patients losing IFX as a therapeutic option.

Preliminary data show that proactive IFX optimization to achieve a threshold drug concentration during maintenance therapy (even if the patient is asymptomatic) compared to empiric dose escalation and/or reactive TDM is associated with better long-term outcomes including longer drug persistence, reduced risk of relapse, and fewer hospitalizations and surgeries. IFX dosing by weight only (i.e., mg/kg) may not be adequate for many patients as interindividual variability in drug clearance and other factors affecting IFX concentrations and PK are often not accounted for. Dosing calculators take into account all of these individual factors and improve the precision of dosing towards better personalized medicine. These systems have already been validated, and personalized dosing has shown clinical benefit in patients with IBD.

This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label study that plans to enroll 196 participants with moderately to severely active CD. All eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either IFX monotherapy with proactive TDM or SOC IFX therapy, with or without concomitant IMM therapy, and empiric dose optimization or reactive TDM, at the discretion of the investigator.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
196 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Proactive Infliximab Optimization Using a Pharmacokinetic Dashboard Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Crohn's Disease: The OPTIMIZE Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Nov 1, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: proactive infliximab optimization

proactive infliximab optimization using a pharmacokinetic dashboard

Drug: Infliximab
infliximab

Experimental: standard of care infliximab dosing

standard of care infliximab dosing

Drug: Infliximab
infliximab

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. clinical remission [52 weeks]

    Proportion of subjects with sustained corticosteroid-free (no corticosteroid (CS) use from Week 14 through 52) ) clinical remission (on the CDAI at Weeks 14, 26, 52) and no need for rescue therapy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. clinical remission [52 weeks]

    Proportion of subjects in CS-free clinical remission (CDAI <150 and no use of CS within previous 6 months)

  2. deep remission [52 weeks]

    Proportion of subjects in deep remission (CDAI < 150 and SES-CD ≤ 4, with no individual subscore > 1)

  3. composite biological and endoscopic remission [52 weeks]

    Proportion of subjects with a composite biological (hs-CRP<10 mg/L) and endoscopic remission (SES-CD ≤ 4)

  4. sustained CS-free clinical remission [52 weeks]

    4. Proportion of subjects with sustained CS-free clinical remission (CDAI <150 and no CS use from Week 14 through Week 52)

  5. primary non-responders [14 weeks]

    Proportion of subjects who are primary nonresponders (≤ 70-point decrease in CDAI score and at least one of: hs-CRP ≥10 mg/L, FC > 250 μg/g, or SES-CD > 4; or need for rescue therapy prior to Week 14)

  6. biological remission [52 weeks]

    Proportion of subjects with sustained biological remission (hs-CRP <10 mg/L)

  7. endoscopic remission [52 weeks]

    Proportion of subjects with endoscopic remission (SES-CD ≤ 4, with no individual subscore > 1)

  8. hs-CRP normalization [52 weeks]

    Proportion of subjects with normalization of hs-CRP (decrease from ≥ 10 at baseline to < 10 mg/L)

  9. hs-CRP change from baseline [week 14, week 26, and week 52]

    Hs-CRP change from baseline

  10. endoscopic response [52 weeks]

    Proportion of subjects with an endoscopic response (≥ 50% decrease from baseline SES-CD score)

  11. fecal calprotectin [52 weeks]

    Proportion of subjects with normalization of fecal calprotectin (decrease from >250 µg/g at baseline to ≤ 250 µg/g)

  12. fecal calprotectin change [52 weeks]

    fecal calprotectin change from baseline

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
16 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  1. Males or nonpregnant, nonlactating females aged 16 to 80 years inclusive.

  2. Diagnosis of CD prior to screening using standard endoscopic, histologic, or radiologic criteria. Subjects with patchy colonic inflammation initially diagnosed as indeterminate colitis would meet inclusion criteria, if the investigator feels that the findings are consistent with CD.

  3. Moderately to severely active CD, defined by a total Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score between 220 and 450 points, and at least 1 of the following:

  4. Elevated CRP > upper limit of normal )

  5. Elevated fecal calprotectin (FC) (> 250 μg/g)

  6. SES-CD > 6, or SES-CD > 3 for isolated ileal disease

  7. Physician intends to prescribe IFX as part of the usual care of the subject.

  8. No previous use of IFX.

  9. Able to participate fully in all aspects of this clinical trial.

  10. Written informed consent must be obtained and documented.

Exclusion Criteria:
  1. Subjects with any of the following CD-related complications:

  2. Abdominal or pelvic abscess, including perianal

  3. Presence of stoma or ostomy

  4. Isolated perianal disease

  5. Obstructive disease, such as obstructive stricture

  6. Short gut syndrome

  7. Toxic megacolon or any other complications that might require surgery, or any other manifestation that precludes or confounds the assessment of disease activity (CDAI or SES-CD)

  8. Total colectomy.

  9. History or current diagnosis of ulcerative colitis, indeterminate colitis, microscopic colitis, ischemic colitis, colonic mucosal dysplasia, or untreated bile acid malabsorption.

  10. Current bacterial or parasitic pathogenic enteric infection, according to SOC assessments, including: Clostridioides difficile; tuberculosis; known infection with hepatitis B or C virus; known infection with HIV; sepsis; abscesses. History of the following: opportunistic infection within 6 months prior to screening; any infection requiring antimicrobial therapy within 2 weeks prior to screening; more than 1 episode of herpes zoster or any episode of disseminated zoster; any other infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous antimicrobial therapy within 4 weeks prior to screening.

  11. Has any malignancy or lymphoproliferative disorder other than nonmelanoma cutaneous malignancies or cervical carcinoma in situ that has been treated with no evidence of recurrence within the last 5 years.

  12. Known primary or secondary immunodeficiency.

  13. PNR to adalimumab, defined as no objective evidence of clinical benefit after 14 weeks of therapy.

  14. Subjects with failure to a prior biologic, defined as PNR or SLR, will be excluded when a maximum of 40% of the planned enrollment (approximately 78 subjects) have failure to prior biologic exposure.

  15. Presence of any medical condition or use of any medication that is a contraindication for IFX use, as outlined on the product label.

  16. A concurrent clinically significant, serious, unstable, or uncontrolled underlying cardiovascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, GI, genitourinary, hematological, coagulation, immunological, endocrine/metabolic, or other medical disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the study results, pose additional risk to the subject, or interfere with the subject's ability to participate fully in the study.

  17. Pregnant or lactating women, to be excluded based on the physician's usual practice for determining pregnancy or lactation status.

  18. Known intolerance or hypersensitivity to IFX or other murine proteins.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Miami Miami Florida United States 33136
2 University of Chicago Medicine Chicago Illinois United States 60637
3 Northwestern University Evanston Illinois United States 60208
4 Rockford GI Rockford Illinois United States 61107
5 Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts United States 02215
6 University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota United States 55455
7 Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Lebanon New Hampshire United States 03766
8 NYU Langone Health New York New York United States 10016
9 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York United States 10029
10 Atrium Health Center for Digestive Health Charlotte North Carolina United States 28204
11 Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio United States 44195
12 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas United States 75390
13 University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah United States 84132
14 Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin United States 53226

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Adam Cheifetz, Professor of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04835506
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 2021P000391
First Posted:
Apr 8, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Aug 17, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
Yes
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 17, 2022