TRINCOS: Defining Core Outcome Sets in Trigeminal Neuralgia

Sponsor
University College, London (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04272385
Collaborator
Rosetrees Trust (Other)
32
1
30
1.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to determine what patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN), clinicians and researchers in the field, consider to be the most important outcomes to be expected after undergoing treatment for trigeminal neuralgia and how this could be measured in all studies relating to this condition. This would enable different treatments to be compared using the same standards.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Observational

Detailed Description

Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN) is a rare chronic condition that causes agonizing, unpredictable, short-lasting electric shock-like one-sided facial pain and is commonly provoked by triggers such as light touch. This debilitating chronic pain disorder has a significant impact on the quality of life of patients with increased risk of depression and suicide. The current varied outcome measures make it difficult for patients to make decisions about choice of treatments which was highlighted in a study among 156 United Kingdom (UK) patients with TN who completed an adapted time-trade - off utility measure to ascertain how they valued the potential outcomes from various surgical and medical treatments.

Patients can be managed with a range of anticonvulsants or by several types of neurosurgical interventions. To successfully compare the effectiveness and tolerability of various treatment options data is needed from well designed and conducted randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohorts which use the same outcome measures. Apart from pain relief only a handful of other outcome measures have been used. It has to date not been possible to compare medical versus neurosurgical treatments and yet this is one of the most frequently asked patient questions. The impact of complications on ability to return to normal activities and improvement in mental health needs to be determined. The development and implementation of Core Outcome Sets (COS) and measures in clinical practice across the UK and in future trials would allow standardised outcome data, thereby facilitating meta-analysis and thus clinical decision-making.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
32 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Defining Core Outcome Sets in Trigeminal Neuralgia
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 2, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Sep 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Focus Group

Qualitative research done with a group of patients with TN. Patients will describe their experience of living with the disease and what outcomes of treatment they consider to be important.

Other: Observational
Observational

Delphi survey

Group of relevant stakeholders - patients, clinicians and researchers will rate the outcomes of treatment in a 3 round Delphi survey.

Other: Observational
Observational

Consensus meeting

Group of relevant stakeholders - patients, clinicians and researchers will rate the outcomes of treatment and finalise the COS for Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Other: Observational
Observational

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Define the trigeminal neuralgia core outcome set [2020-2022]

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Identify the instruments to use in the core outcome set [2020-2022]

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria for the focus groups:
  • Adult patients (>18ys) diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia

  • Willing to attend a focus group meeting

  • Able to give informed consent

  • Undergoing management for trigeminal neuralgia

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Unable to attend a focus group meeting

  • Insufficient English to take part in a group discussion

  • Unable to take part in discussions

Inclusion Criteria for the Delphi survey:
  • Adult patients (>18ys) diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia

  • Clinicians working in the field of Trigeminal Neuralgia

  • Researchers working in the field of Trigeminal Neuralgia

  • Willing to complete a 3 round Delphi survey

  • Able to give informed consent

Inclusion Criteria for the online consensus meeting:
  • Adult patients (>18ys) diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia

  • Clinicians working in the field of Trigeminal Neuralgia

  • Researchers working in the field of Trigeminal Neuralgia

  • Able to join an online meeting

  • Have internet access

  • Willing to participate in a discussion with others about the important treatment outcomes in Trigeminal Neuralgia

  • Able to give informed consent

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 The Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals London United Kingdom WC1E 6DG

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University College, London
  • Rosetrees Trust

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joanna Zakrzweska, Professor, University College, London

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Additional Information:

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University College, London
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04272385
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 17/0901
First Posted:
Feb 17, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Feb 21, 2022
Last Verified:
Feb 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by University College, London
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Feb 21, 2022