Delayed Breast Reconstruction by Prepectoral Implant After Lipo-preparation (RM2prepec)

Sponsor
Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04343820
Collaborator
(none)
60
1
48
1.3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Breast implants associated with the installation of a complementary matrix (of dermal or synthetic origin), showed satisfactory results in term of post-operative follow-up but also aesthetic outcomes.

The objective of the subcutaneous positioning of this implant, is to reduce the muscular pain related to the stretching of the muscular muscle, the deformations related to the muscular contraction with an animation of the prothesis, but also the risk of hull when associated with a matrix. It also pursues the objective, of obtaining a better aesthetic result, by systematically coupling at least one lipo-modelling session.

For a long time, patients with a history of mastectomy and radiotherapy benefited from secondary breast flap reconstruction, in order to reduce the risk of complications and achieve a satisfying aesthetic outcome. But the lipo-filling technique allowed to reconsider the management of these patients.

The benefits of fat tissue transplants are know to improve tissue trophicity (flexibility, thickness, vascularization).

The objective of this study, is to evaluate the feasibility of secondary breast reconstructions by prepectoral positioned implant after lipo-preparation of the wall.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Breast reconstruction

Detailed Description

60 women who have had a mastectomy and want a secondary breast reconstruction by implant at Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest well be included in this study.

Patients will be recruited in consultation before the start of reconstruction and up to 18 months after radiation therapy.

They will be followed for 24 months from the end of the breast reconstruction.

The following data will be collected indirectly from the clinical medical record (letters, reports of examinations, consultations, surgical report, hospitalization) of the patient, supplemented if necessary by specific records (radiotherapy records, chemotherapy, physiotherapy management) :

  • Clinical data

  • Technique-related data

  • Complication-related data : adverse events will be evaluated at 15 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after reconstruction

  • Aesthetic results data : aesthetic result will be evaluated by patients and surgeons at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after reconstruction

  • Quality of life data : a questionnaire will be submitted prior to the intervention, at 12 months and 24 months after reconstruction

Clinicians at Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest may be asked to complete the previous informations.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
60 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Delayed Breast Reconstruction by Prepectoral Implant After Lipo-preparation : Feasibility, Complications, Evaluation of Aesthetic Result and Quality of Life.
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 24, 2019
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 24, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 24, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Breast reconstruction

Women who have had a mastectomy and want a secondary breast reconstruction by implant.

Procedure: Breast reconstruction
Breast reconstruction by prepectoral positioned implant after lipo-preparation of the wall.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Describe the complications that occurs after a prepectoral placed implant with lipo-preparation [12 months]

    Pre-surgical implant positioning failure at 12 months. A failure will be defined by the occurence of at least one of the following complications : documented infection ; red breast syndrome ; hematoma ; lymphocele ; delayed healing ; prothesis removal ; stage 1 hull (Baker classification) ; prothesis rotation ; waves / folds ; muscle contractions with prothesis animation ; pain (EVA 4 or 5)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Evaluate the aesthetic result [6 months, 12 months and 24 months]

    Aesthetic result will be assessed by giving a mark from 0 to 5 for the following categories : general breast appearance ; breast curve ; breast consistency ; breast volume Both clinician and patient will complete the evaluation.

  2. Evaluate the quality of life [24 months]

    Patient satisfaction and quality of life will be assessed from Breast Q. The evaluation criteria will be the Breast Q score 24 months after the intervention.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Woman aged over 18

  • Medical history of mastectomy +/- radiotherapy

  • Woman requesting breast reconstruction by implant

  • Patient treated for non-metastatic cancer

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Locally uncontrolled disease

  • Metastatic disease

  • Patient with major cutaneous atrophy allowing only flap reconstruction

  • Patients under guardianship or trusteeship

  • Patients who objected to the research

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau Saint-Herblain France 44805

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Victoire BRILLAUD-MEFLAH, MD, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04343820
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • ICO-N-2018-15
First Posted:
Apr 13, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Mar 11, 2022
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 11, 2022