Empagliflozin Add on to Linagliptin Study in Japanese Patient With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
This trial will compare the use of fixed dose combination of empagliflozin and linagliptin to linagliptin alone in patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Linagliptin patient to receive 5 mg linagliptin once daily |
Drug: Linagliptin
Other Names:
Drug: Empagliflozin placebo + linagliptin placebo low dose
Matching placebo empagliflozin + linagliptin
Drug: Empa + lina highdose placebo
|
Experimental: Empagliflozin + linagliptin low dose patient to receive one tablet once daily |
Drug: Empagliflozin + linagliptin low dose
tablet
Drug: Linagliptin placebo
Matching placebo linagliptin
|
Experimental: Empagliflozin + linagliptin high dose patient to receive one tablet once daily |
Drug: Linagliptin placebo
Matching placebo linagliptin
Drug: Empagliflozin + linagliptin high dose
tablet
|
Placebo Comparator: Linagliptin placebo
|
Drug: Empagliflozin + linagliptin low dose
tablet
Drug: Linagliptin placebo
Matching placebo linagliptin
Drug: Empagliflozin + linagliptin high dose
tablet
|
Placebo Comparator: Empagliflozin + linagliptin high dose placebo
|
Drug: Linagliptin
Other Names:
Drug: Empa + lina highdose placebo
|
Placebo Comparator: Empagliflozin + linagliptin low dose placebo
|
Drug: Linagliptin
Other Names:
Drug: Empagliflozin placebo + linagliptin placebo low dose
Matching placebo empagliflozin + linagliptin
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Change of Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment From Baseline) [Baseline and 24 week]
Change from baseline in Glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 24 was calculated as: HbA1c at Week 24 - HbA1c at baseline. Baseline is referred to the last observed measurement prior to the administration of randomized trial medication. Adjusted mean (Least square mean) and its standard error (SE) is presented.
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Change in HbA1c From Week 28 at Week 52 (Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg Only) [28 Week (pre up-titration) and 52 Week]
Change from Week 28 in HbA1c at Week 52 was calculated as: HbA1c at Week 52 - HbA1c at Week 28. Week 28 (pre up-titration) is referred to the last observed measurement prior to the first administration of any double-blind randomized trial medication in the up-titration period. Adjusted mean (Least square mean) and its standard error (SE) is presented. This endpoint was based on 1 group of the Full analysis set with up-titration (FASUT-II) whose dose was up-titrated to Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg fixed dose combination thus there is no comparison group. Hence, no comparison is made. A restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) approach was used with baseline HbA1c as linear covariate and baseline eGFR, prior use of antidiabetic drug, visit as fixed effect(s). The covariance used to fit the model was unstructured.
- Change in HbA1c From Baseline at Week 52 (All Empagliflozin Versus All Placebo) [Baseline and 52 week]
Change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 52 was calculated as: HbA1c at Week 52 - HbA1c at baseline. Baseline is referred to the last observed measurement prior to the administration of randomized trial medication. Adjusted mean (Least square mean) and its standard error (SE) is presented.
- Change in HbA1c From Baseline at Week 52 (Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg Versus Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 25 mg) [Baseline and 52 week]
Change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 52 was calculated as: HbA1c at Week 52 - HbA1c at baseline. Baseline is referred to the last observed measurement prior to the administration of randomized trial medication. Adjusted mean (Least square mean) and its standard error (SE) is presented.
- Change in HbA1c From Baseline at Week 52 (Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg Versus All Placebo) [Baseline and 52 week]
Change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 52 was calculated as: HbA1c at Week 52 - HbA1c at baseline. Baseline is referred to the last observed measurement prior to the administration of randomized trial medication. Adjusted mean (Least square mean) and its standard error (SE) is presented.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
-
Diagnosis of Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) prior to informed consent
-
Male and female patients on diet and exercise regimen for at least 12 weeks prior to informed consent who are:
-
1 drug-naïve, defined as no antidiabetic drugs for at least 12 weeks prior to informed consent, or
-
2 pre-treated with one oral antidiabetic drug (for sulfonylurea, with up to half of the maximum approved dose) on stable dosage for at least 12 weeks prior to informed consent (for thiazolidinedione, therapy has to be unchanged for at least 18 weeks prior to the informed consent, for linagliptin 5 mg at least 16 weeks prior to Visit 1). Individual antidiabetic drug (except linagliptin) will have to be discontinued at Visit 1.
- HbA1c at Visit 1
-
1 HbA1c =8.0% and =10.5% for patients who are drug-naïve, or
-
2 HbA1c =7.5% and =10.5% for patients with one oral antidiabetic drug (except linagliptin), or
-
3 HbA1c =7.5% and =10.0% for patients with linagliptin 5 mg
-
HbA1c =7.5% and =10.0% at Visit 4 for randomisation into the double-blind treatment period. Patient who are pre-treated with linagliptin 5 mg for 16 weeks or more prior to Visit 1 and meet the criteria of HbA1c can directly move on to the run-in (Visit 4).
-
Age =20 years at informed consent
-
BMI =40.0 kg/m2 at Visit 1 (screening)
-
Signed and dated written informed consent by date of Visit 1 in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local legislation
Exclusion criteria:
-
Uncontrolled hyperglycemia with a glucose level >270 mg/dL (>15.0 mmol/L) after an overnight fast during the open-label stabilisation period (from Visit 2 to Visit 4) and run-in period (from Visit 4 to Visit 5) , confirmed by a second measurement (not on the same day and done either at the central or at local laboratory).
-
Acute coronary syndrome (ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], non-STEMI, and unstable angina pectoris), stroke or transient ischemic attack within 12 weeks prior to informed consent
-
Indication of liver disease, defined by serum levels of either alanine aminotransferase (ALT Serum glutamic pyruvate transaminase [SGPT]), aspartate aminotransferase (AST, Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase [SGOT]), or alkaline phosphatase (ALP) above 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) as determined during screening, open-label stabilisation period and/or run-in period
-
Impaired renal function, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (MDRD formula) as determined during screening, open-label stabilisation period and/or run-in period
-
Known hereditary galactose intolerance
-
Known contraindications to linagliptin and empagliflozin according to the Japanese label
-
Any previous (within 2 years prior to informed consent) or planned bariatric surgery (or any other weight loss surgery) or other gastrointestinal surgery that induce chronic malabsorption
-
Medical history of cancer (except for resected non-invasive basal cell or squamous carcinoma) and/or treatment for cancer within the last 5 years
-
Known blood dyscrasias or any disorders causing haemolysis or unstable red blood cell (RBC) count (e.g. malaria, babesiosis, haemolytic anaemia).
-
Treatment with insulin, Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists, within 12 weeks prior to informed consent
-
Treatment with anti-obesity drugs within 12 weeks prior to informed consent or any other treatment at the time of screening (i.e., surgery, aggressive diet regimen, etc.) leading to unstable body weight
-
Current treatment with systemic steroids (other than inhaled or topical steroids) at informed consent or change in dosage of thyroid hormones within 6 weeks prior to informed consent or any other uncontrolled endocrine disorder except T2DM
-
Pre-menopausal women (last menstruation =1 year prior to informed consent) who:
-
1 are nursing or pregnant or
-
2 are of child-bearing potential and are not practicing an acceptable method of birth control, or do not plan to continue using this method throughout the trial and do not agree to submit to periodic pregnancy testing during participation in the trial. Acceptable methods of birth control include tubal ligation, intra uterine devices/systems, oral contraceptives, complete sexual abstinence, double barrier method and vasectomised partner
-
Known or suspected allergy or hypersensitivity to trial products or related products (e.g., Dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors or Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors)
-
Alcohol or drug abuse within the 12 weeks prior to informed consent that would interfere with trial participation or any ongoing condition leading to a decreased compliance to trial procedures or trial drug intake, by the judgment of the investigator
-
Intake of an investigational drug in another trial within 30 days prior to Visit 1 or participation in the follow-up period of another trial (participation in observational studies is permitted)
-
Any other clinical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would jeopardize patient's safety while participating in this clinical trial
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Nagoya Kyoritsu Hospital | Aichi, Nagoya | Japan | 454-0933 | |
2 | Kashiwa City Hospital | Chiba, Kashiwa | Japan | 277-0825 | |
3 | Otabe internal medicine clinic | Fukuoka, Fukuoka | Japan | 811-1346 | |
4 | Nakamura Cardiovascular Clinic | Fukuoka, Itoshima | Japan | 819-1104 | |
5 | Tanaka I.M. Clinic, Fukuoka, I.M. | Fukuoka, Kurume | Japan | 830-0023 | |
6 | Seino I.M. Clinic, Fukushima, I.M. | Fukushima, Koriyama | Japan | 963-8851 | |
7 | Hiraoka Naika Clinic, Hiroshima, I.M. | Hiroshima, Hiroshima | Japan | 733-0011 | |
8 | Matsuda Cardiovascular Clinic | Hokkaido, Sapporo | Japan | 003-0026 | |
9 | Teine Keijinkai Clinic | Hokkaido, Sapporo | Japan | 006-0811 | |
10 | Mita Internal Medicine Cardiology Clinic | Hokkaido, Sapporo | Japan | 006-0852 | |
11 | Miyanosawa Clinic of Internal Medicine and Cardiology | Hokkaido, Sapporo | Japan | 063-0826 | |
12 | Itabashi Diabetic medicine and Dermatology Clinic | Ibaraki, Koga | Japan | 306-0232 | |
13 | Nakakinen Clinic | Ibaraki, Naka | Japan | 311-0113 | |
14 | Kubota Clinic | Kanagawa, Kawasaki | Japan | 214-0014 | |
15 | Kitasato University Hospital | Kanagawa, Sagamihara | Japan | 252-0375 | |
16 | H.E.C Science Clinic | Kanagawa, Yokohama | Japan | 235-0045 | |
17 | Yoshimasa Diabetes & Endocrine Clinic | Kyoto, Kyoto | Japan | 604-8151 | |
18 | Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital | Kyoto, Kyoto | Japan | 607-8062 | |
19 | Medical Corporation Hayashi Katagihara Clinic | Kyoto, Kyoto | Japan | 615-8125 | |
20 | Miyamoto Naika Clinic, Nagano, I.M. | Nagano, Matsumoto | Japan | 390-0848 | |
21 | Gibo Hepatology Clinic, Nagano, Digestive Tract I.M. | Nagano, Matsumoto | Japan | 399-0036 | |
22 | Takekawa Clinic, Osaka, I.M. | Osaka, Higashi-Osaka | Japan | 577-0803 | |
23 | Medical Corporation Koseikai Fukuda Naika Clinic | Osaka, Osaka | Japan | 532-0003 | |
24 | Kinugawa Cardiovascular Internal Medicine clinic | Osaka, Osaka | Japan | 532-0026 | |
25 | Sato Hospital | Osaka, Osaka | Japan | 536-0023 | |
26 | Nakaoka Clinic | Osaka, Osaka | Japan | 555-0032 | |
27 | OCROM Clinic | Osaka, Suita | Japan | 565-0853 | |
28 | Miyauchi Medical Center | Osaka, Takatsuki | Japan | 569-1123 | |
29 | Medical Corporation Shinseikai Mashiba Clinic | Saitama, Hanno | Japan | 357-0024 | |
30 | Asano Clinic | Saitama, Kawagoe | Japan | 350-0851 | |
31 | Medical Corporation Fusa Shimizu Clinic Fusa | Saitama, Saitama | Japan | 336-0963 | |
32 | Ogino Clinic | Saitama, Tokorozawa | Japan | 359-1161 | |
33 | Kanda Clinic | Tokyo, Chiyoda-ku | Japan | 101-0047 | |
34 | Fukuwa Clinic | Tokyo, Chuo-ku | Japan | 103-0027 | |
35 | Tokyo-Eki Center-building Clinic | Tokyo, Chuo-ku | Japan | 103-0027 | |
36 | Myojin Tou Clinic | Tokyo, Hachioji | Japan | 192-0046 | |
37 | Sawai Medical Clinic | Tokyo, Koto-ku | Japan | 136-0073 | |
38 | Mishuku Hospital | Tokyo, Meguro-ku | Japan | 153-0051 | |
39 | Toshiba General Hospital | Tokyo, Shinagawa-ku | Japan | 140-8522 | |
40 | ToCROM Clinic | Tokyo, Shinjuku-ku | Japan | 160-0022 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Eli Lilly and Company
Investigators
- Study Chair: Boehringer Ingelheim, Boehringer Ingelheim
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Additional Information:
Publications
None provided.- 1275.19
Study Results
Participant Flow
Recruitment Details | |
---|---|
Pre-assignment Detail |
Arm/Group Title | Empagliflozin 10 Milligram (mg)/Linagliptin 5 Milligram (mg) | Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 10 mg | Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg (Extension Period) | Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg (Extension Period) | Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 25 mg (Extension Period) | Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 10 mg (Extension Period) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients were administered a fixed dose combination (FDC) of 10 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with matching placebo of Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period. | Patients were administered a matching placebo of FDC of 10 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period. | Patients with insufficient response based on Glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) after 24-week of double-blind treatment period were up-titrated to a FDC of 25 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with matching placebo of Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of up-titration period (from Week 28 to Week 52). | Patients with sufficient response based on HbA1c after 24-week of double-blind treatment period were continued on a FDC of 10 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with matching placebo of Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for subsequent 28 weeks of extension period. | Patients with insufficient response based on HbA1c after 24-week of double-blind treatment period were up-titrated to receive a matching placebo of FDC of 25 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of up-titration period (from Week 28 to Week 52). | Patients with sufficient response based on HbA1c after 24-week of double-blind treatment period were continued on a matching placebo of FDC of 10 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for subsequent 28 weeks of extension period. |
Period Title: 24-week Double-blind Treatment Period | ||||||
STARTED | 182 | 93 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
COMPLETED | 177 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
NOT COMPLETED | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Period Title: 24-week Double-blind Treatment Period | ||||||
STARTED | 0 | 0 | 126 | 51 | 80 | 6 |
COMPLETED | 0 | 0 | 123 | 49 | 79 | 5 |
NOT COMPLETED | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Baseline Characteristics
Arm/Group Title | Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg | Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 10 mg | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients were administered a fixed dose combination (FDC) of 10 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with matching placebo of Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period. | Patients were administered a matching placebo of FDC of 10 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period. | Total of all reporting groups |
Overall Participants | 182 | 93 | 275 |
Age (Years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ] | |||
Mean (Standard Deviation) [Years] |
60.0
(9.9)
|
59.8
(10.8)
|
59.9
(10.2)
|
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants) | |||
Female |
40
22%
|
21
22.6%
|
61
22.2%
|
Male |
142
78%
|
72
77.4%
|
214
77.8%
|
Outcome Measures
Title | Change of Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment From Baseline) |
---|---|
Description | Change from baseline in Glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 24 was calculated as: HbA1c at Week 24 - HbA1c at baseline. Baseline is referred to the last observed measurement prior to the administration of randomized trial medication. Adjusted mean (Least square mean) and its standard error (SE) is presented. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 24 week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The primary analysis was performed on the FAS (observed case [OC]) with treatment assignment as randomised. |
Arm/Group Title | Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg | Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients were administered a fixed dose combination (FDC) of 10 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with matching placebo of Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period. | Patients were administered a matching placebo of FDC of 10 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period. |
Measure Participants | 182 | 93 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Percentage (%)] |
-0.93
(0.06)
|
0.21
(0.09)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg, Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | A restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) approach was used with baseline HbA1c as linear covariate and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] formula), prior use of antidiabetic drug, treatment, visit, visit by Treatment interaction as fixed effect(s). The covariance used to fit the model was unstructured. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Mean Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | -1.14 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.36 to -0.91 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.11 |
|
Estimation Comments | Adjusted Mean Difference was calculated as: (adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 in Empagliflozin 10 mg/linagliptin 5 mg group) - (adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 in Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 10 mg group) |
Title | Change in HbA1c From Week 28 at Week 52 (Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg Only) |
---|---|
Description | Change from Week 28 in HbA1c at Week 52 was calculated as: HbA1c at Week 52 - HbA1c at Week 28. Week 28 (pre up-titration) is referred to the last observed measurement prior to the first administration of any double-blind randomized trial medication in the up-titration period. Adjusted mean (Least square mean) and its standard error (SE) is presented. This endpoint was based on 1 group of the Full analysis set with up-titration (FASUT-II) whose dose was up-titrated to Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg fixed dose combination thus there is no comparison group. Hence, no comparison is made. A restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) approach was used with baseline HbA1c as linear covariate and baseline eGFR, prior use of antidiabetic drug, visit as fixed effect(s). The covariance used to fit the model was unstructured. |
Time Frame | 28 Week (pre up-titration) and 52 Week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The full analysis set with up-titration-I (FASUT-I) consisted of all patients who were up-titrated and were treated with at least 1 dose of Empagliflozin 25 mg/linagliptin 5 mg or Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 25 mg after dose up-titration and who had a baseline HbA1c assessment and at least 1 on-treatment HbA1c assessment after dose up-titration. |
Arm/Group Title | Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg |
---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients with insufficient response based on HbA1c after 24-week of double-blind treatment period were up-titrated to a FDC of 25 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with matching placebo of Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of up-titration period (from Week 28 to Week 52). |
Measure Participants | 124 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Percentage (%)] |
-0.21
(0.03)
|
Title | Change in HbA1c From Baseline at Week 52 (All Empagliflozin Versus All Placebo) |
---|---|
Description | Change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 52 was calculated as: HbA1c at Week 52 - HbA1c at baseline. Baseline is referred to the last observed measurement prior to the administration of randomized trial medication. Adjusted mean (Least square mean) and its standard error (SE) is presented. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 52 week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
The analysis was performed on the FAS (observed case [OC]) with treatment assignment as randomised. |
Arm/Group Title | All Empagliflozin | All Placebo |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients were administered a FDC of 10 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with matching placebo of Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period. In the up-titration period (from Week 28 to Week 52), patients with insufficient response measured after 24 weeks of double-blind treatment got up-titrated to FDC of 25 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin while the other patients kept the same dose. | Patients were administered a matching placebo of FDC of 10 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period. In the up-titration period (from Week 28 to Week 52), patients with insufficient response measured after 24 weeks of double-blind treatment got up-titrated to matching placebo of FDC of 25 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin while the other patients kept the same dose. |
Measure Participants | 182 | 93 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Percentage (%)] |
-1.16
(0.06)
|
0.06
(0.10)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg, Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | A restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) approach was used with baseline HbA1c as linear covariate and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] formula), prior use of antidiabetic drug, treatment, visit, visit by Treatment interaction as fixed effect(s). The covariance used to fit the model was unstructured. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Mean Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | -1.22 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.45 to -0.99 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.12 |
|
Estimation Comments | Adjusted Mean Difference was calculated as: (adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 52 in All Empagliflozin group) - (adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 52 in All Placebo group) |
Title | Change in HbA1c From Baseline at Week 52 (Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg Versus Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 25 mg) |
---|---|
Description | Change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 52 was calculated as: HbA1c at Week 52 - HbA1c at baseline. Baseline is referred to the last observed measurement prior to the administration of randomized trial medication. Adjusted mean (Least square mean) and its standard error (SE) is presented. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 52 week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
FASUT-I |
Arm/Group Title | Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg | Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 25 mg |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients with insufficient response based on HbA1c after 24-week of double-blind treatment period were up-titrated to a FDC of 25 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with matching placebo of Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of up-titration period (from Week 28 to Week 52). | Patients with insufficient response based on HbA1c after 24-week of double-blind treatment period were up-titrated to receive a matching placebo of FDC of 25 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of up-titration period (from Week 28 to Week 52). |
Measure Participants | 126 | 80 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Percentage (%)] |
-1.10
(0.07)
|
0.11
(0.10)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg, Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | A restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) approach was used with baseline HbA1c as linear covariate and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] formula), prior use of antidiabetic drug, treatment, visit, visit by Treatment interaction as fixed effect(s). The covariance used to fit the model was unstructured. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Mean Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | -1.21 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.45 to -0.96 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.12 |
|
Estimation Comments | Adjusted Mean Difference was calculated as: (adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 52 in Empagliflozin 25 mg/linagliptin 5 mg group) - (adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 52 in Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 25 mg group) |
Title | Change in HbA1c From Baseline at Week 52 (Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg Versus All Placebo) |
---|---|
Description | Change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 52 was calculated as: HbA1c at Week 52 - HbA1c at baseline. Baseline is referred to the last observed measurement prior to the administration of randomized trial medication. Adjusted mean (Least square mean) and its standard error (SE) is presented. |
Time Frame | Baseline and 52 week |
Outcome Measure Data
Analysis Population Description |
---|
Full analysis set with up-titration-II consisted patients who were up-titrated to Empagliflozin 25/linagliptin 5 and were treated with at least 1 dose after dose up-titration and who were randomized to receive Linagliptin 5 + Placebo 10 or Linagliptin 5 + Placebo 25 and who had HbA1c assessment at baseline and at least once after dose up-titration. |
Arm/Group Title | Empagliflozin 25 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg | All Placebo |
---|---|---|
Arm/Group Description | Patients with insufficient response based on HbA1c after 24-week of double-blind treatment period were up-titrated to a FDC of 25 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with matching placebo of Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of up-titration period (from Week 28 to Week 52). | Patients were administered a matching placebo of FDC of 10 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period. In the up-titration period (from Week 28 to Week 52), patients with insufficient response measured after 24 weeks of double-blind treatment got up-titrated to matching placebo of FDC of 25 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin while the other patients kept the same dose. |
Measure Participants | 126 | 86 |
Least Squares Mean (Standard Error) [Percentage (%)] |
-1.10
(0.07)
|
-0.01
(0.10)
|
Statistical Analysis 1
Statistical Analysis Overview | Comparison Group Selection | Empagliflozin 10 mg/Linagliptin 5 mg, Linagliptin 5 mg + Placebo 10 mg |
---|---|---|
Comments | A restricted maximum likelihood (REML)-based mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) approach was used with baseline HbA1c as linear covariate and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] formula), prior use of antidiabetic drug, treatment, visit, visit by Treatment interaction as fixed effect(s). The covariance used to fit the model was unstructured. | |
Type of Statistical Test | Superiority or Other | |
Comments | ||
Statistical Test of Hypothesis | p-Value | <0.0001 |
Comments | ||
Method | Mixed Models Analysis | |
Comments | ||
Method of Estimation | Estimation Parameter | Adjusted Mean Difference (Net) |
Estimated Value | -1.09 | |
Confidence Interval |
(2-Sided) 95% -1.34 to -0.84 |
|
Parameter Dispersion |
Type: Standard Error of the Mean Value: 0.13 |
|
Estimation Comments | Adjusted Mean Difference was calculated as: (adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 52 in Empagliflozin 25 mg/linagliptin 5 mg group) - (adjusted mean change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 52 in All Placebo group) |
Adverse Events
Time Frame | From first drug administration till 52 weeks, up to 7 days after last drug administration. | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Adverse Event Reporting Description | TreatedSet(TS) included of patients who were randomised and treated with at least 1Dose of trial drug. Patients were randomized into 2Groups and remained in these groups after 28Weeks treatment. Patients got dose up-titrated after treatment,but had the same medication as it was before up-titrated.Data was reported for 2Arms based on randomization. | |||
Arm/Group Title | All Empagliflozin | All Placebo | ||
Arm/Group Description | Patients were administered a FDC of 10 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with matching placebo of Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period. In the up-titration period (from Week 28 to Week 52), patients with insufficient response measured after 24 weeks of double-blind treatment got up-titrated to FDC of 25 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin while the other patients kept the same dose. | Patients were administered a matching placebo of FDC of 10 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin tablet along with Linagliptin 5 mg orally once daily for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period. In the up-titration period (from Week 28 to Week 52), patients with insufficient response measured after 24 weeks of double-blind treatment got up-titrated to matching placebo of FDC of 25 mg Empagliflozin and 5 mg Linagliptin while the other patients kept the same dose. | ||
All Cause Mortality |
||||
All Empagliflozin | All Placebo | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | / (NaN) | / (NaN) | ||
Serious Adverse Events |
||||
All Empagliflozin | All Placebo | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 8/182 (4.4%) | 1/93 (1.1%) | ||
Cardiac disorders | ||||
Prinzmetal angina | 1/182 (0.5%) | 0/93 (0%) | ||
Eye disorders | ||||
Glaucoma | 1/182 (0.5%) | 0/93 (0%) | ||
Hepatobiliary disorders | ||||
Cholelithiasis | 1/182 (0.5%) | 0/93 (0%) | ||
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||||
Patella fracture | 1/182 (0.5%) | 0/93 (0%) | ||
Foot fracture | 1/182 (0.5%) | 0/93 (0%) | ||
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||||
Lumbar spinal stenosis | 0/182 (0%) | 1/93 (1.1%) | ||
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | ||||
Oesophageal carcinoma | 1/182 (0.5%) | 0/93 (0%) | ||
Adrenal neoplasm | 1/182 (0.5%) | 0/93 (0%) | ||
Lung neoplasm malignant | 1/182 (0.5%) | 0/93 (0%) | ||
Nervous system disorders | ||||
Cerebral haemorrhage | 1/182 (0.5%) | 0/93 (0%) | ||
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events |
||||
All Empagliflozin | All Placebo | |||
Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | Affected / at Risk (%) | # Events | |
Total | 62/182 (34.1%) | 46/93 (49.5%) | ||
Infections and infestations | ||||
Nasopharyngitis | 35/182 (19.2%) | 34/93 (36.6%) | ||
Asymptomatic bacteriuria | 13/182 (7.1%) | 6/93 (6.5%) | ||
Investigations | ||||
Blood ketone body increased | 12/182 (6.6%) | 1/93 (1.1%) | ||
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | ||||
Upper respiratory tract inflammation | 14/182 (7.7%) | 10/93 (10.8%) |
Limitations/Caveats
More Information
Certain Agreements
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
Other - Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) acknowledges that investigators have the right to publish the study results. Investigators shall provide BI with a copy of any publication or presentation for review prior to any submission. Such review will be done with regard to proprietary information, information related to patentable inventions, medical, scientific, and statistical accuracy within 60 days. BI may request a delay of the publication in order to protect BI's intellectual property rights.
Results Point of Contact
Name/Title | Boehringer Ingelheim Call Center |
---|---|
Organization | Boehringer Ingelheim |
Phone | 1-800-243-0127 |
clintriage.rdg@boehringer-ingelheim.com |
- 1275.19