DOLCE: Determining the Impact of Optellum's Lung Cancer Prediction Solution

Sponsor
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05389774
Collaborator
Optellum Ltd. (Other)
2,000
10
26
200
7.7

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study is a multi-centre prospective observational cohort study recruiting patients with 5-30mm solid and part-solid pulmonary nodules that have been detected on CT chest scans performed as part of routine practice. The aim is to determine whether physician decision making with the AI-based LCP tool, generates clinical and health-economic benefits over the current standard of care of these patients.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
2000 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
DOLCE: Determining the Impact of Optellum's Lung Cancer Prediction (LCP) Artificial Intelligence Solution on Service Utilisation, Health Economics and Patient Outcomes
Anticipated Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Aug 1, 2024

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Determine the potential effect of the LCP on discharge [up to 1 year.]

    Measured difference between standard care, LCP and LCP-guided care for: Percentage of cancer patients discharged (straight after assessment of the baseline scan) Percentage of benign-nodule patients discharged (straight after assessment of the baseline scan)

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Determine the potential effect of the LCP on overall clinical management, as well as scan and procedure utilization. [up to 1 year.]

    Percentage of cancer patients for whom there would have been a change in clinical management by LCP and LCP-guided care compared with the actual (standard) care (correctly by more aggressive management and incorrectly for less aggressive management). Percentage of benign-nodule patients for whom there would have been a change in clinical management by LCP and LCP-guided care compared with the actual (standard) care (incorrectly by more aggressive management and correctly for less aggressive management). Measured difference between standard care, LCP and LCP-guided care for: Percentage of CT scans and PET/CT scans performed on benign-nodule patients Percentage of non-surgical biopsies performed on benign-nodule patients Percentage of surgical excisions on benign-nodule patients

  2. Determine the potential effect of the hypothetical LCP-informed care versus standard care on patient outcomes. [up to 1 year.]

    Measured difference between standard care, LCP and LCP-guided care for: Percentage of thoracic, respiratory or vascular events related to biopsies or surgical excisions for lung nodules or suspected lung cancer occurring within 30 days of the procedure on benign-nodule patients Percentage of lung cancers stratified by stage Time in days between nodule detection and lung cancer diagnosis

  3. Determine the potential health-economic effect of the hypothetical LCP-informed care versus standard care [up to 1 year.]

    Measured difference between standard care, LCP and LCP-guided care for: The composite standardized GBP costs of all healthcare-related activity for lung nodules or suspected lung cancer Health-related utilities (life years and QALYs)

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
35 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients are eligible for the study if all of the following apply:
  • Are aged 35 years or above

  • Have baseline CT study with at least one incidentally detected solid or part-solid pulmonary nodule that:

  • is not fully calcified

  • Is 5-30mm inclusive in maximum axial diameter for the whole lesion measured using manual electronic callipers

  • Have baseline CT study that includes at least one series that meets all of the following (training for this will be provided):

  • Is of a type that meets VNC instructions for use

  • Comprises at least one full-inspiration breath-hold scans without a high degree of contrast media and does not exhibit quality issues (e.g., motion artefacts)

Exclusion Criteria:
Patients will be excluded from the study if any of the following apply:
  • Have received a diagnosis for cancer in the last 5 years

  • Have thoracic implants that impact the image appearance of the nodule

  • Have more than five reported pulmonary nodules of any size or type excluding fully calcified nodules (marker of infection or metastatic lung cancer)

  • Have one or more additional nodules where any of the following applies:

  • Are already undergoing follow-up according to pulmonary nodule management standard care

  • Pure ground glass opacity (GGO) of >=5mm in maximum axial diameter for the whole lesion measured using manual electronic callipers

  • 30mm in maximum axial diameter for the whole lesion measured using manual electronic callipers

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University Hospitals of Derby And Burton NHS Foundation Trust Derby United Kingdom
2 Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds United Kingdom
3 University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Leicester United Kingdom
4 King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
5 Royal Free Hospital London United Kingdom
6 St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
7 The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
8 University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
9 Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust Nottingham United Kingdom
10 Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford United Kingdom

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Optellum Ltd.

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05389774
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 21RM052
First Posted:
May 25, 2022
Last Update Posted:
May 25, 2022
Last Verified:
May 1, 2022
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 25, 2022