Cyclosporine vs Steroids in DRESS

Sponsor
University of Southern California (Other)
Overall Status
Enrolling by invitation
CT.gov ID
NCT04988256
Collaborator
(none)
50
1
2
21.1
2.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Current treatments for patients with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) include supportive care, steroids and cyclosporine. No randomized controlled trial (RCT) exists in comparing these treatments and all available literature comes in the form of case reports and case series. These two treatments are considered standard of care and this trial seeks only to compare outcomes of DRESS between these two therapies. No additional labs, therapies or procedures will be used apart from those that are routinely done for patients with this diagnosis.

This will be a pilot study to determine efficacy of the two therapies with particular endpoints in mind so that the investigators can study the safety of these two therapies in patients with DRESS.

Data suggests a potential benefit for adults with DRESS using either steroids or cyclosporine but the investigators are seeking a comparison of efficacy of these two therapies. The study population will include adults with a Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (RegiSCAR) score of greater than 4 (i.e. a likely diagnosis of DRESS). The investigators will exclude patients with sepsis, active Hepatitis B or C, active tuberculosis, a documented allergy to steroids or cyclosporine, and patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 (unless on dialysis in which case the participants will be included).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Early Phase 1

Detailed Description

Current treatments for patients with drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) include supportive care, steroids, cyclosporine and to a lesser extent, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Regarding IVIG, a recent case series suggests no improved benefit in adults. No randomized controlled trial (RCT) exists in comparing these treatments and all available literature comes in the form of case reports and case series. These two treatments are considered standard of care and this trial seeks only to compare outcomes of DRESS between these two therapies. No additional labs, therapies or procedures will be used apart from those that are routinely done for patients with this diagnosis.

This will be a pilot study to determine efficacy of the two therapies with particular endpoints in mind so that the investigators can study the safety of these two therapies in patients with DRESS. Hopefully, this study will allow the investigators to better power a full prospective trial in the future.

This is a potentially life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) with significant potential morbidity. Data suggests a potential benefit for adults with DRESS using either steroids or cyclosporine but the investigators are seeking a comparison of efficacy of these two therapies. The study population will include adults with a Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (RegiSCAR) score of greater than 4 (i.e. a likely diagnosis of DRESS). The investigators will exclude patients with sepsis, active Hepatitis B or C, active tuberculosis, a documented allergy to steroids or cyclosporine, and patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 (unless on dialysis in which case the participants will be included).

Participants will be randomized using a randomization protocol at all sites. Primary endpoints will include percentage of participants with complete or near complete resolution of organ involvement as well as erythema resolution at day 7 and day 30.

Secondary endpoints will be:
  1. fever presence, resolution of facial edema, resolution of pruritus, lymphadenopathy, eosinophil count at days 7 and 30

  2. days of hospitalization

  3. mortality at days 7, 30 and 90

  4. viral reactivation at days 30, 60 and 90

  5. those with autoimmune development by day 30 and day 90

  6. 30 day re-admission rate.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
50 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of Cyclosporine vs Steroids in DRESS
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 27, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Apr 30, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 30, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Cyclosporine

All Patients start with 5 mg/kg/day (3 mg/kg/day if renal impairment) PO divided bid for 7 days (or IV if patient is NPO) If complete resolution, stop cyclosporine and monitor closely for relapse a. If patient relapses, give 5 (3 if renal impairment) mg/kg/day PO divided bid PO for 7 days i. If down-trending, start oral taper regimen ii. If not down-trending, switch to steroid arm If >25% improvement and labs are down-trending, start the oral taper regimen. If 0-25% improvement, give 5 (3 if renal impairment) mg/kg/day PO divided bid for 3 days If down-trending, start oral taper regimen If not down-trending, switch to steroid arm If no improvement or up-trending labs at 7 days, switch to steroid arm Oral Taper Regimen set as 3 mg/kg PO divided bid for 14 days, then 2 mg/kg PO divided bid for 20 days. If renal impairment, oral taper regimen set as 2 mg/kg PO divided bid for 14 days, then 1 mg/kg PO divided bid for 20 days

Drug: Cyclosporine
Patients randomized to cyclosporine will be treated as mentioned under "Arm/Group Description"

Experimental: Corticosteroids

All Patients start with 500 mg IV Methylprednisolone for 3 days 1. If >25% improvement (must be >25% in all involved organs), start the taper regimen 2. If 0-25% improvement (in ≥1 involved internal organ), give 500 mg IV Methylprednisolone for 4 days If no improvement, switch to cyclosporine arm of treatment If 0-25% improvement, give 500 mg IV Methylprednisolone for 3 days i. If labs are down-trending, start the taper regimen ii. If labs are not down-trending, switch to cyclosporine arm of the study c. If >25% improvement, start the taper regimen Taper Regimen set as: 125 mg IV Methylprednisolone x3 days 1.2 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week 1 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week 0.8 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week 0.6 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week 0.4 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week 0.2 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week 0.1 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week 0.05 mg/kg PO prednisone x1 week

Drug: Methylprednisolone and Prednisone
All patients randomized to steroids will initially be treated with IV methylprednisolone and eventually started on an oral prednisone taper.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of patients with complete or near complete resolution of organ involvement at day 30, on steroid therapy and cyclosporine therapy [Day 7]

    Measured by the following quantitative metrics: Creatinine within 1.25x of baseline or upper limit of normal, whichever is higher Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) within 1.5x of baseline or upper limit of normal, whichever is higher Troponin-T, Creatine Kinase Myocardial Band (CK-MB), Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP), and lipase within 1.25x of baseline or upper limit of normal, whichever is higher Resolution of interstitial pneumonitis on chest x-ray

  2. Percentage of patients with complete or near complete resolution of organ involvement at day 30, on steroid therapy and cyclosporine therapy [Day 30]

    Measured by the following quantitative metrics: Creatinine within 1.25x of baseline or upper limit of normal, whichever is higher Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) within 1.5x of baseline or upper limit of normal, whichever is higher Troponin-T, Creatine Kinase Myocardial Band (CK-MB), Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (Pro-BNP), and lipase within 1.25x of baseline or upper limit of normal, whichever is higher Resolution of interstitial pneumonitis on chest x-ray

  3. Percentage of patients with complete or near complete resolution of erythema at day 7, on steroid therapy and cyclosporine therapy [Day 7]

    Clinical measurement of erythema

  4. Percentage of patients with complete or near complete resolution of erythema at day 30, on steroid therapy and cyclosporine therapy [Day 30]

    Clinical measurement of erythema

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Percentage of patients with resolution of fever [Day 7]

    Less than 38 degrees Celsius for at least 24 hours

  2. Percentage of patients with resolution of fever [Day 30]

    Less than 38 degrees Celsius for at least 24 hours

  3. Percentage of patients with resolution of facial edema [Day 7]

    Clinical resolution of edema for at least 24 hours

  4. Percentage of patients with resolution of facial edema [Day 30]

    Clinical resolution of edema for at least 24 hours

  5. Percentage of patients with resolution of pruritus [Day 7]

    Resolution for at least 24 hours

  6. Percentage of patients with resolution of pruritus [Day 30]

    Resolution for at least 24 hours

  7. Percentage of patients with resolution of lymphadenopathy [Day 7]

    Clinical resolution of lymphadenopathy for at least 24 hours

  8. Percentage of patients with resolution of lymphadenopathy [Day 30]

    Clinical resolution of lymphadenopathy for at least 24 hours

  9. Absolute eosinophil proportion compared to peak value [Day 7]

    Proportion of absolute eosinophils

  10. Absolute eosinophil proportion compared to peak value [Day 30]

    Proportion of absolute eosinophils

  11. Patients with autoimmune disease development [Day 30]

    Measured by titers of autoimmune markers (Antinuclear Antibody (ANA), Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)) compared to baseline

  12. Patients with autoimmune disease development [Day 90]

    Measured by titers of autoimmune markers (Antinuclear Antibody (ANA), Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH)) compared to baseline

  13. Total days of hospitalization after initial dermatology consult [0-120 days]

    Number of days

  14. Viral reactivation [Day 30]

    Measured by titers of Human Herpesvirus 6 (HHV6), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)

  15. Viral reactivation [Day 60]

    Measured by titers of Human Herpesvirus 6 (HHV6), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)

  16. Viral reactivation [Day 90]

    Measured by titers of Human Herpesvirus 6 (HHV6), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV)

  17. Mortality [Day 7]

    Proportion of patient mortality

  18. Mortality [Day 30]

    Proportion of patient mortality

  19. Mortality [Day 90]

    Proportion of patient mortality

  20. 30-day readmission rate [Day 30]

    Proportion of patients re-admitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Adults with a RegiSCAR score of greater than 4 (i.e a likely diagnosis of DRESS)
Exclusion Criteria:
  • Active sepsis

  • Active hepatitis B or C

  • Active tuberculosis

  • Documented allergy to steroids or cyclosporine

  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 (unless on dialysis, in which case they will be included)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 USC Los Angeles California United States 90033

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Southern California

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Scott Worswick, Associate Professor, University of Southern California
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04988256
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HS-20-00118
First Posted:
Aug 3, 2021
Last Update Posted:
May 10, 2022
Last Verified:
May 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 10, 2022