Safety and Efficacy of BRM421 for Dry Eye Syndrome Treatment

Sponsor
BRIM Biotechnology Inc. (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04343287
Collaborator
ORA, Inc. (Industry)
220
4
2
5.3
55
10.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution to placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 2/Phase 3

Detailed Description

This is a multi-center, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 study with approximately 200 subjects. (around 100 subjects per treatment arm).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
220 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Masking Description:
Double Masking
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double Masked, Placebo Controlled Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Dry Eye Using a Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE®) Model
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 15, 2020
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 23, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 23, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution

A topical solution of BRIM421 ophthalmic drops

Drug: BRM421
The active control with BRM421 solution

Placebo Comparator: Placebo

A vehicle ophthalmic drops

Drug: Placebo
The vehicle solution

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Ocular Sign: Change From Baseline in Total Corneal Staining Score to Day 14 [2 weeks]

    Corneal staining was performed to grade the degree of corneal epithelial cell injury as measured by fluorescence using slit-lamp examination. Ora Calibra® Scale from 0 to 4 with the use of half grade (0.5) increments, where grade 0 = None and 4 = Severe. Regions assessed were the central, superior, inferior, temporal, and nasal. Total corneal staining score was the sum of all five regions. Analyses were for study eye only.

  2. Ocular Symptom: Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Ocular Dryness Score to Day 14, Using Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort & 4-Symptom Questionnaire [2 weeks]

    Ocular dryness from the Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort & 4-Symptom Questionnaire was assessed at the subject level in regard to how both eyes felt. The Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort & 4-Symptom Questionnaire was used, which included rating the severity of 5 symptoms: ocular discomfort, burning, dryness, grittiness, and stinging. Each symptom rating ranged from 0 to 5, where 0 = None and 5 = Worst.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Eye Dryness: Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Ocular Symptom to Day 14, Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [2 weeks]

    Visual analog scale (VAS) was measured by asking subjects to rate each ocular symptom due to ocular dryness by placing a vertical mark on a horizontal line of length 100 mm to indicate the level of discomfort where 0 mm = No Discomfort and 100 mm = Maximal Discomfort. Symptoms assessed were burning/stinging, itching, foreign body sensation, blurred vision, eye dryness, photophobia, and pain.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Be at least 18 years of age;

  • Provide written informed consent;

  • Have a reported history of dry eye for at least 6 months prior to enrollment;

  • Have a history of use of eye drops

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Have any clinically significant slit lamp findings at Visit 1 that may include active blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), lid margin inflammation or active ocular allergies that require therapeutic treatment, and/or in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with study parameters;

  • Be diagnosed with an ongoing ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal), or active ocular inflammation at Visit 1;

  • Have worn contact lenses within 7 days of Visit 1 or anticipate using contact lenses during the study;

  • Have used any eye drops within 2 hours of Visit 1;

  • Have previously had laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery within the last 12 months;

  • Be a woman of childbearing potential who is not using an acceptable means of birth control; acceptable methods of contraception

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Eye Research Foundation Newport Beach California United States 92663
2 Midwest Cornea Associates, LLC Indianapolis Indiana United States 46290
3 Andover Eye Associates Andover Massachusetts United States 01810
4 Total Eye Care Memphis Tennessee United States 38119

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • BRIM Biotechnology Inc.
  • ORA, Inc.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gail Torkildsen, MD, Andover Eye Associates
  • Principal Investigator: Blair Boehmer, MD, Midwest Cornea Associates, LLC.
  • Principal Investigator: David Wirta, MD, Eye Research Foundation
  • Principal Investigator: Eugene B McLaurin, MD, Total Eye Care, PA

Study Documents (Full-Text)

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
BRIM Biotechnology Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04343287
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • BRM421-18-C001-PR
First Posted:
Apr 13, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Oct 21, 2021
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Pre-assignment Detail
Arm/Group Title BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution Placebo
Arm/Group Description A topical solution of BRIM421 ophthalmic drops BRM421: The active control with BRM421 solution A vehicle ophthalmic drops Placebo: The vehicle solution
Period Title: Overall Study
STARTED 108 112
COMPLETED 108 111
NOT COMPLETED 0 1

Baseline Characteristics

Arm/Group Title BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution Placebo Total
Arm/Group Description A topical solution of BRIM421 ophthalmic drops BRM421: The active control with BRM421 solution A vehicle ophthalmic drops Placebo: The vehicle solution Total of all reporting groups
Overall Participants 108 112 220
Age (Count of Participants)
<=18 years
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Between 18 and 65 years
50
46.3%
57
50.9%
107
48.6%
>=65 years
58
53.7%
55
49.1%
113
51.4%
Age (years) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [years]
63.9
(10.9)
63.4
(12.07)
63.7
(11.49)
Sex: Female, Male (Count of Participants)
Female
69
63.9%
83
74.1%
152
69.1%
Male
39
36.1%
29
25.9%
68
30.9%
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
Hispanic or Latino
8
7.4%
6
5.4%
14
6.4%
Not Hispanic or Latino
100
92.6%
106
94.6%
206
93.6%
Unknown or Not Reported
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Race (NIH/OMB) (Count of Participants)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1
0.9%
0
0%
1
0.5%
Asian
4
3.7%
9
8%
13
5.9%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Black or African American
21
19.4%
19
17%
40
18.2%
White
82
75.9%
84
75%
166
75.5%
More than one race
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Unknown or Not Reported
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
Region of Enrollment (participants) [Number]
United States
108
100%
112
100%
220
100%
Total Corneal Fluorescein Staining (0-12: Higher is Worse) (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
6.19
(0.904)
6.15
(0.835)
6.17
(0.868)
Dryness from Ocular Discomfort & 4-Symptom Questionnaire (0-5: Higher is Worse) (units on a scale) [Mean (Standard Deviation) ]
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
3.0
(1.00)
3.3
(0.93)
3.2
(0.97)

Outcome Measures

1. Primary Outcome
Title Ocular Sign: Change From Baseline in Total Corneal Staining Score to Day 14
Description Corneal staining was performed to grade the degree of corneal epithelial cell injury as measured by fluorescence using slit-lamp examination. Ora Calibra® Scale from 0 to 4 with the use of half grade (0.5) increments, where grade 0 = None and 4 = Severe. Regions assessed were the central, superior, inferior, temporal, and nasal. Total corneal staining score was the sum of all five regions. Analyses were for study eye only.
Time Frame 2 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution Placebo
Arm/Group Description A topical solution of BRIM421 ophthalmic drops BRM421: The active control with BRM421 solution A vehicle ophthalmic drops Placebo: The vehicle solution
Measure Participants 81 83
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
-1
(1.245)
-0.68
(1.392)
2. Primary Outcome
Title Ocular Symptom: Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Ocular Dryness Score to Day 14, Using Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort & 4-Symptom Questionnaire
Description Ocular dryness from the Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort & 4-Symptom Questionnaire was assessed at the subject level in regard to how both eyes felt. The Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort & 4-Symptom Questionnaire was used, which included rating the severity of 5 symptoms: ocular discomfort, burning, dryness, grittiness, and stinging. Each symptom rating ranged from 0 to 5, where 0 = None and 5 = Worst.
Time Frame 2 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution Placebo
Arm/Group Description A topical solution of BRIM421 ophthalmic drops BRM421: The active control with BRM421 solution A vehicle ophthalmic drops Placebo: The vehicle solution
Measure Participants 108 112
Mean (Standard Deviation) [units on a scale]
-0.3
(0.98)
-0.5
(0.99)
3. Secondary Outcome
Title Eye Dryness: Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Ocular Symptom to Day 14, Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Description Visual analog scale (VAS) was measured by asking subjects to rate each ocular symptom due to ocular dryness by placing a vertical mark on a horizontal line of length 100 mm to indicate the level of discomfort where 0 mm = No Discomfort and 100 mm = Maximal Discomfort. Symptoms assessed were burning/stinging, itching, foreign body sensation, blurred vision, eye dryness, photophobia, and pain.
Time Frame 2 weeks

Outcome Measure Data

Analysis Population Description
[Not Specified]
Arm/Group Title BRM421 Placebo
Arm/Group Description The active control with BRM421 solution BRM421: A topical solution of BRIM421 ophthalmic drops The vehicle solution
Measure Participants 108 112
Mean (Standard Deviation) [score on a scale]
-8.4
(19.22)
-3.7
(18.29)

Adverse Events

Time Frame 6 weeks
Adverse Event Reporting Description
Arm/Group Title BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution Placebo
Arm/Group Description A topical solution of BRIM421 ophthalmic drops BRM421: The active control with BRM421 solution A vehicle ophthalmic drops Placebo: The vehicle solution
All Cause Mortality
BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 0/108 (0%) 0/112 (0%)
Serious Adverse Events
BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 1/108 (0.9%) 0/112 (0%)
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis-left second toe/Infections and infestations/Osteomyelitis 1/108 (0.9%) 0/112 (0%)
Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events
BRM421 Ophthalmic Solution Placebo
Affected / at Risk (%) # Events Affected / at Risk (%) # Events
Total 38/108 (35.2%) 46/112 (41.1%)
Eye disorders
instillation site pain 38/108 (35.2%) 46/112 (41.1%)

Limitations/Caveats

[Not Specified]

More Information

Certain Agreements

Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.

There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.

Results Point of Contact

Name/Title Erin Chang, Vice President of Portfolio Management Department
Organization BRIM Biotechnology, Inc.
Phone 0226598779 ext 119
Email erin.chang@brimbiotech.com
Responsible Party:
BRIM Biotechnology Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04343287
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • BRM421-18-C001-PR
First Posted:
Apr 13, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Oct 21, 2021
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2021