BREATH COPD: Effect on Bronchodilation Response and Ventilation Heterogeneity of Different Inhalation Volumes in COPD

Sponsor
University of Milan (Other)
Overall Status
Not yet recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05381415
Collaborator
Dejan Radovanovic (Other), Matteo Pecchiari (Other), Marina Saad (Other), Department of Clinical and Surgical Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. (Other)
30
1
12
2.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

During bronchodilator tests, it's common to ask patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to take bronchodilator therapy by inhaling after a maximal exhalation, when the respiratory system volume equals the residual volume. The same maneuver is required for the chronic therapy.

Nevertheless, in patients with COPD the distribution of ventilation is more heterogeneous, especially when lung volumes are closer to residual volume . It is therefore predictable that the distribution of air volume containing bronchodilator that has been inhaled at residual volume is more heterogeneous than at higher volumes, such as at functional residual capacity. Accordingly, the bronchodilator can be preferentially distributed in more open airways than in less patent ones, with a heterogeneous distribution of the medication. Therefore, the overall bronchodilation should be greater when the drug inhalation is performed at functional residual capacity than at residual volume.

It is common knowledge that the effectiveness of bronchodilator therapy with pMDI in subjects with COPD is greatly affected by the inhalation technique, which can be difficult to perform for many patients. Therefore, in addition to the possibility that inhalation of bronchilation therapy at residual volume could lower the drug effectiveness, this maneuver complicates the sequence of actions required to the patient, enhancing the risk of errors and decreasing the aderence to treatment.

The aim of this study is to investigate whether the inhalation of a bronchodilator at different lung volumes can affect its effectiveness in terms of respiratory function, in patients with COPD.

Assuming that the bronchodilator effectiveness is equal or greater when inhaled at functional residual capacity rather than at residual volume, the inhalation maneuver can be simplified for patients with COPD.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Inhalation of bronchodilation therapy at FRC
  • Other: Inhalation of bronchodilation therapy at RV

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
30 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Effect on Bronchodilatation Response and Ventilation Heterogeneity of Different Inhalation Volumes in COPD: the BREATH COPD Study
Anticipated Study Start Date :
May 10, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
May 10, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
May 10, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Patients with COPD

Patients with COPD diagnosis (VEMS/FVC after bronchodilatation <0.7) will be enrolled in a stable state of disease, diagnosed from at least 12 months [GOLD]. Each patient will be studied during three visits. In the first visit it will be established the patient eligibility. Furthermore, the patient will be able to familiarize with the experimental procedure. Chronic inhalation therapy will be suspended 24 (long action) and 8 (short action) hours before the second and third visit. If a patient is on tiotropium bromide, it will be required to be suspended 7 days before the visit. During the second and third visit, which will be scheduled 30 days one from another, the patient will be asked to inhale the bronchodilator (salbutamol pMDI, 400 µg) with a spacer from VR or FRC, in a random order. Before and after the administration it will be asked to the patient to execute a spirometry, a plethysmography, a lung diffusion test, and the NEP technique.

Other: Inhalation of bronchodilation therapy at FRC
the patient will be asked to inhale the bronchodilator (salbutamol pMDI, 400 µg) with a spacer from FRC (functional residual capacity, in a random order, with the assistance of an operator. The spacer will be connected to a Fleish flowmeter placed in series with the pMDI device. The valve included in the spacer will guarantee that only the air inhaled by the patient will pass through the flowmeter, reducing the risk of contamination. In both cases a low inspiratory flux and a period of apnea after inhalation of 10 seconds will be used. Before and after the administration it will be asked to the patient to execute a spirometry, a plethysmography, a lung diffusion test, and the NEP technique. These will allow the characterization of the bronchodilator effect in terms of static and dynamic volumes, heterogeneity of ventilation distribution and volume of closure, expiration flux-limitation.

Other: Inhalation of bronchodilation therapy at RV
the patient will be asked to inhale the bronchodilator (salbutamol pMDI, 400 µg) with a spacer from VR , with the assistance of an operator. The spacer will be connected to a Fleish flowmeter placed in series with the pMDI device. The valve included in the spacer will guarantee that only the air inhaled by the patient will pass through the flowmeter, reducing the risk of contamination. In both cases a low inspiratory flux and a period of apnea after inhalation of 10 seconds will be used. Before and after the administration it will be asked to the patient to execute a spirometry, a plethysmography, a lung diffusion test, and the NEP technique. These will allow the characterization of the bronchodilator effect in terms of static and dynamic volumes, heterogeneity of ventilation distribution and volume of closure, expiration flux-limitation.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Efficacy of bronchodilation therapy inhaled at Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) on Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) [1 year]

    Assuming that the bronchodilator effectiveness is equal or greater when inhaled at functional residual capacity rather than at residual volume, the inhalation maneuver can be simplified for patients with COPD.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Effects on change in phase III slope of the closing volume curve [1 year]

    Efficacy of bronchodilation therapy inhaled at FRC on reducing phase III slope of the closing volume, as compared to bronchodilation therapy inhaled at RV

  2. Effects on forced vital capacity (FVC) [1 year]

    Efficacy of bronchodilation therapy inhaled at FRC on static and dynamic lung volumes as compared to bronchodilation therapy inhaled at RV

  3. Effects on vital capacity (VC) [1 year]

    Efficacy of bronchodilation therapy inhaled at FRC on static and dynamic lung volumes as compared to bronchodilation therapy inhaled at RV

  4. Effects on residual volume (RV) [1 year]

    Efficacy of bronchodilation therapy inhaled at FRC on static and dynamic lung volumes as compared to bronchodilation therapy inhaled at RV

  5. Effects on total lung capacity (TLC) [1 year]

    Efficacy of bronchodilation therapy inhaled at FRC on static and dynamic lung volumes as compared to bronchodilation therapy inhaled at RV

  6. Effects on sensation of dyspnea as measured by modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score [1 year]

    Efficacy of bronchodilation therapy at functional residual capacity on sensation of dyspnea

  7. Effects on specific airway resistance (sRAW) [1 year]

    Efficacy of bronchodilation therapy at functional residual capacity on specific pulmonary resistances

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
40 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • age above 40 years old;

  • history of smoking equal or above 10 PKYs;

  • VEMS after bronchodilatation ≤ 70%,

  • medical Necessity to perform a bronchodilatation test.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • history of bronchial asthma or other chronic respiratory diseases such as pulmonary fibrosis;

  • uncontrolled cardiovascular diseases at the time of the visit;

  • current pregnancy;

  • incapacity to execute lung function tests for cognitive impairment, substance abuse or claustrophobia;

  • known hypersensitivity or intolerance to salbutamol.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 L. Sacco Hospital Milan Italy 20157

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Milan
  • Dejan Radovanovic
  • Matteo Pecchiari
  • Marina Saad
  • Department of Clinical and Surgical Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Pierachille Santus, MD, PhD, Professor of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Milan
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05381415
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • BREATHCOPD2022
First Posted:
May 19, 2022
Last Update Posted:
May 19, 2022
Last Verified:
May 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of May 19, 2022