Feasibility of Mobile-CT-Assisted Bronchoscopy for the Diagnosis of Lung Lesion

Sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04995172
Collaborator
(none)
67
1
32.4
2.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This study investigates whether using a mobile-CT-assisted bronchoscopy (M-CAB) during a bronchoscopy procedure will better enable the study staff to reach the lung tumor, perform a biopsy, and obtain a diagnosis. One method that doctors use for diagnosing lung tumors is bronchoscopy guided by an X-ray machine (called fluoroscope). Though much better guidance could be provided with a CT scanner when compared to the fluoroscope, the standard CT equipment is very large, fixed in a radiology room, and difficult to use with bronchoscopy. Mobile CT imaging systems may more easily and effectively perform the same tasks of the standard CT imaging in the bronchoscopy room, offering better guidance than the standard fluoroscope.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: Computed Tomography
  • Other: Electronic Health Record Review
  • Procedure: Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopy

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

  1. To determine the added value of mobile-CT)-assisted bronchoscopy (M-CAB) for the diagnosis of peripheral lung nodules defined as the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy with radial-probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) and 2-D Fluoroscopy is non-diagnostic (lesion is not reached or rapid-onsite cytology is non-diagnostic) and diagnosis is obtained after utilizing mobile-CT assistance.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
  1. Describe the navigational yield of bronchoscopy with RP-EBUS/2-dimensional (2-D) fluoroscopy for peripheral nodules.

  2. Describe the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy with RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy for peripheral nodules.

  3. Describe the mobile-CT (M-CT) added navigational yield. IV. Describe the sensitivity for malignancy of bronchoscopy with RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy and its increase (if any) provided by mobile-CT assistance.

  4. Describe anatomical and procedural characteristics that can influence navigational and diagnostic yield (tumor location, tumor characteristics -solid, semisolid-, air-bronchus sign, biopsy tool, relationship between biopsy tool/tumor).

  5. Describe procedure duration. VII. Describe time required to obtain mobile CT scans VIII. Describe fluoroscopy time and estimate radiation dose to the patient. IX. Describe procedural complications.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo RP-EBUS bronchoscopy per standard of care. If the study staff cannot reach the target lesion or is unable to determine a diagnosis, patients undergo bronchoscopy using mobile CT imaging. Patients' medical records are also reviewed for up to 6 months.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
67 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
Mobile-CT-Assisted Bronchoscopy
Actual Study Start Date :
Apr 19, 2021
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Observational (CT-assisted bronchoscopy, chart review)

Patients undergo RP-EBUS bronchoscopy per standard of care. If the study staff cannot reach the target lesion or is unable to determine a diagnosis, patients undergo bronchoscopy using mobile CT imaging. Patients' medical records are also reviewed for up to 6 months.

Procedure: Computed Tomography
Undergo mobile CT-assisted bronchoscopy
Other Names:
  • CAT
  • CAT Scan
  • Computerized Axial Tomography
  • Computerized Tomography
  • CT
  • CT Scan
  • tomography
  • Other: Electronic Health Record Review
    Patients' medical records are reviewed

    Procedure: Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopy
    Undergo radial probe EBUS
    Other Names:
  • EBUS
  • Endobronchial Ultrasound
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. The added value of mobile-computed tomography (CT)-assisted bronchoscopy (M-CAB) [Up to 6 months]

      Defined as the proportion of patients in whom bronchoscopy with thin or ultrathin scope, radial-probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) and 2-dimensional (2-D) fluoroscopy is non-diagnostic (lesion is not reached or rapid-onsite cytology is non-diagnostic) and diagnosis is obtained after utilizing mobile-CT assistance. Descriptive statistics (mean standard deviation [SD] or median interquartile range [IQR], frequency [%]) will be used to summarize patient characteristics.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Navigational yield of thin/ultrathin scope/RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy for peripheral nodules [Up to 6 months]

      Navigational yield for standard of care (SOC) will be estimated along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

    2. Diagnostic yield of thin/ultrathin scope/RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy for peripheral nodules [Up to 6 months]

      Diagnostic yield of SOC and diagnostic yield of SOC + M-CT along with their 95% CIs will be estimated.

    3. Mobile-CT (M-CT) added navigational yield [Up to 6 months]

      M-CT added diagnostic yield in a subgroup with non-diagnostic subjects by SOC will be estimated along with its 95% CI. M-CT added diagnostic yield in a subgroup with non-diagnostic subjects by SOC will be estimated along with its 95% CI. Two-sided exact binomial test will be used to test if diagnostic yield of SOC + M-CT is significantly different from 0.2 in the subgroup.

    4. Sensitivity for malignancy of thin/ultrathin scope/RP-EBUS/2-D fluoroscopy and its increase (if any) provided by mobile-CT assistance [Up to 6 months]

      Sensitivity for malignancy of SOC and sensitivity for malignancy of SOC + M-CT will be estimated, considering final pathology as the gold standard test.

    5. Anatomical and procedural characteristics that can influence navigational and diagnostic yield [Up to 6 months]

      Anatomic and procedural characteristics that are associated with navigational and diagnostic yield will be evaluated by multivariate logistic regression models. A p-value of less than 0.05 will indicate a statistical significance.

    6. Procedure duration [Up to 6 months]

      Will be summarized by mean (standard deviation [SD]) or median (interquartile range [IQR]).

    7. Time required to obtain mobile CT scans [Up to 6 months]

      Will be summarized by mean (SD) or median (IQR).

    8. Fluoroscopy time [Up to 6 months]

      Will be summarized by mean (SD) or median (IQR).

    9. Radiation dose to the patient [Up to 6 months]

      Will be summarized by mean (SD) or median (IQR).

    10. Procedural complications [Up to 6 months]

      Complications will be tabulated.

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients of 18 years of age or older undergoing bronchoscopy for diagnosis of a peripheral lung lesion from 1 to 3.5 cm in diameter located in the outer 2/3 of the lung fields
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Pregnant or breastfeeding women

    • Patients who cannot tolerate raising both arms above their head (position for obtaining mobile-CT images)

    • Patients with any contraindication for general anesthesia (e.g., severe and active coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 1 liter, uncontrolled hypertension, increased intracranial pressure, history of intolerance to general anesthesia)

    • Dementia or other severe cognitive impairment causing inability to understand or consent to the procedure and study

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 M D Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas United States 77030

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Roberto F Casal, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Additional Information:

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04995172
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 2020-0760
    • NCI-2021-01331
    • 2020-0760
    First Posted:
    Aug 6, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Aug 22, 2022
    Last Verified:
    Aug 1, 2022
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Aug 22, 2022