Dexmedetomidine vs. Remifentanil Undergoing Cataract Surgery in Geriatrics

Sponsor
Selcuk University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04935541
Collaborator
Hacettepe University (Other)
80
1
2
16
5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Dexmedetomidine is an α2-adrenergic receptor agonist used for its sympatholytic effect, providing sedation, analgesia, and cardiovascular stabilization in the perioperative period. Remifentanil is a µ opioid agonist with a rapid onset and short duration of action, which is degraded by plasma esterase in tissues. Investigators aimed to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusions on sedation quality, side effects, and surgeon's satisfaction in geriatric outpatients who underwent cataract surgery.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Dexmedetomidine infusion
  • Drug: Remifentanil infusion
N/A

Detailed Description

Dexmedetomidine is an α2 agonist and remifentanil is a short-acting μ, opioid agonist. The aim of this study was to compare dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusions used for conscious sedation in geriatric patients undergoing outpatient cataract surgery in terms of sedation quality, hemodynamic stability, and surgeon satisfaction.

Eighty patients were divided into two groups according to the administration of dexmedetomidine (Group D) and remifentanil (Group R) infusion in this randomized, prospective, double-blinded study. In group D (n = 40), after a loading of 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine in 10 minutes, 0.4 µg/kg/h-1 infusion was administered. In Group R (n = 40), remifentanil at a dose of 0.05 µg/kg-1 was administered for 10 minutes, and then 0.05 µg/kg/min-1 infusion was continued.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
80 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
The surgeon who performed the surgery, the participants included in the study, and the technician who collected the study data were unaware of the study groups and the type of drugs used for sedation.
Primary Purpose:
Supportive Care
Official Title:
The Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil Infusion in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Outpatient Cataract Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Study
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2009
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Apr 1, 2010
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jul 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Dexmedetomidine infusion

Dexmedetomidine (Precedex, Meditera, USA) was administered at a loading dose of 1 µg/kg for 10 minutes before local anesthesia to be applied to the eye by the surgeon. During the surgical procedure, it was administered at a dose of 0.4 µg/kg/h-1 infusion.

Drug: Dexmedetomidine infusion
After Dexmedetomidine infusion was given for 10 minutes, local anesthesia was applied by the surgeon. Peribulbar block and periorbital infiltration application were performed by applying a mixture of lidocaine (Jetokain, Adeka, Turkey) and 1/200000 adrenaline. After the local anesthetic agent was applied by the surgeon, orbital compression was provided for 5 minutes with maximum pressure to block the eyelid movements. Cataract surgery procedures of all patients included in the study were performed by the same surgeon.
Other Names:
  • Cataract surgery
  • Active Comparator: Remifentanil infusion

    Remifentanil (Ultiva, Glaxo SmithKline, Turkey) infusion was started at a dose of 0.05 µg/kg/min-1, 10 minutes before the start of the surgery as baseline infusion and continued at the same infusion dose throughout the surgical procedure.

    Drug: Remifentanil infusion
    After Remifentanil infusion was given for 10 minutes, local anesthesia was applied by the surgeon. Peribulbar block and periorbital infiltration application were performed by applying a mixture of lidocaine (Jetokain, Adeka, Turkey) and 1/200000 adrenaline. After the local anesthetic agent was applied by the surgeon, orbital compression was provided for 5 minutes with maximum pressure to block the eyelid movements. Cataract surgery procedures of all patients included in the study were performed by the same surgeon.
    Other Names:
  • Cataract surgery
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Sedation quality [Time interval immediately after the start of the surgery and before the patient is transferred to the postoperative care unit.]

      The Observer Assessment Warning/Sedation Scale (OAA/S) was used to determine the sedation quality of each patient. The minimum and maximum values of OAA/S scale was between 0 and 5. Lower scores mean a better sedation quality.

    2. Sedation level [The time interval immediately after the surgery starts and immediately after the surgery ends.]

      Bispectral Index (BIS) was used to determine the sedation level of each patient. The minimum and maximum values for BIS were between 0 and 100. Lower scores mean a deep sedation level.

    3. Pain intensity [The time interval between the start of the surgery and the end of the surgery.]

      The Verbal Rating Scale was used to determine severity of the pain in the perioperative period. VRS is a 5-point scale including expressions defining the level of pain intensity (no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, intense pain and maximum pain). Higher scores mean intense pain.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Side effects [The time interval between the start and the end of the surgery.]

      The Vissual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to measure the frequency and severity of nausea and vomiting in the perioperative period. The VAS score is discovered by measuring the distance (mm) on the 100-mm line. Patients scoring 75 mm or more were considered to have clinically significant nausea and vomiting.

    2. Surgeon's satisfaction [Immediately after the surgeon finishes the operation.]

      The surgeon's satisfaction in terms of the patient's sedation level, cooperation, and anesthesia management was evaluated using a questionnaire. The clinician satisfaction questionnaire was also classified as follows; 0: Not satisfied, 1: Less Satisfied, 2: Satisfied.

    3. Pain intensity [Immediately after the surgical procedure is completed and the patient is transferred to the postoperative care unit and before the patient is transferred to the outpatient service.]

      The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to determine the pain intensity in the postoperative period. The pain score is discovered by measuring the distance (mm) on the 100-mm line. Pain level was classified as follows; no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain (5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75-100 mm).

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    65 Years to 80 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Patients between the ages of 65-80,

    • Who will undergo cataract surgery,

    • With the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I-III.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Second or third-degree heart block,

    • Chronic α2-agonist use,

    • Inability to communicate with the patient,

    • Uncontrolled systemic disease,

    • Allergy to local anesthetics,

    • Chronic analgesic or sedative drug use,

    • History of alcohol or substance addiction.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Hacettepe University Ankara Sıhhiye Turkey 06100

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Selcuk University
    • Hacettepe University

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Nalan Celebi, Professor, Hacettepe University

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Ozkan Onal, Associate Professor, Selcuk University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04935541
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • HEK 09/59-19
    First Posted:
    Jun 23, 2021
    Last Update Posted:
    Jun 23, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Jun 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    Yes
    Keywords provided by Ozkan Onal, Associate Professor, Selcuk University
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Jun 23, 2021