Local Bisphosphonate Effect on Recurrence Rate in Extremity Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Sponsor
St. Louis University (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT03295981
Collaborator
Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation (Other), Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network Research Institute) (Other), University of Iowa (Other), Johns Hopkins University (Other), McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (Other), The Cleveland Clinic (Other), Medical College of Wisconsin (Other), Wake Forest University (Other), Oregon Health and Science University (Other), University of Kansas (Other), University of California, Los Angeles (Other), Indiana University (Other), University of Oklahoma (Other)
120
13
2
80
9.2
0.1

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of the clinical study is to investigate whether the local delivery of bisphosphonate as a surgical adjuvant can decrease the chance of a giant cell tumor of bone coming back to the same location. The hypothesis is that the local administration of bisphosphonate will decrease the rate of the tumor returning compared to traditional aggressive surgical removal of the tumor.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Zoledronic Acid
Phase 3

Detailed Description

The purpose of the clinical study is to investigate whether the local delivery of bisphosphonate (BP-loaded PMMA bone cement) as a surgical adjuvant can decrease the local recurrence rate of giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone. The investigators will evaluate whether bisphosphonate as a surgical adjuvant improves secondary outcomes, such as pain, function, fever, or wound complications. The hypothesis is that the local administration of bisphosphonate will decrease the recurrence rate of GCT compared to traditional aggressive intralesional curettage.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
120 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Randomized controlled trialRandomized controlled trial
Masking:
Single (Participant)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Local Bisphosphonate Effect on Recurrence Rate in Extremity Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
May 3, 2018
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2024
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
No Intervention: Control group

The surgical procedure for all patients will include extensive curettage of the lesion to remove macroscopic tumor, high-speed burring of the residual cavity, adjuvant treatment to the residual cavity, followed by packing of the cavity with either polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement (Simplex P; Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey) alone or bone cement with subchondral allograft bone graft. The choice of cavity reconstruction will be at the discretion of the treating surgeon. Traditional local adjuvants (argon beam coagulation, phenol, ethanol, or cryotherapy) will be used depending on surgeon preference. In addition to the above standard treatment, the patients will be randomized into one of two study arms. In Arm 1, the control group, no additional local therapy will be utilized.

Experimental: Bisphosphonate group

In Arm 2, the bisphosphonate group, 4 mg of zoledronic acid (Zometa) will be added to each bag of bone cement.

Drug: Zoledronic Acid
4 mg of zoledronic acid (Zometa) will be added to each bag of bone cement
Other Names:
  • zoledronate
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. The endpoint for patient participation will be local recurrence [Followed for 2 years postoperatively for study end points]

      Local recurrence of giant cell tumor of bone

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. MSTS Score [Followed for 2 years postoperatively for study end points]

      The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system is a validated and well-accepted functional scoring system used in orthopaedic oncology research

    2. Surgical site infection [Follow-ups will consist of clinical visits. The clinical visits will be at 2 weeks postoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively, and then every three months for the first two years after surgery.]

      The surgical site will be assessed for a surgical site infection (SSI) as defined by CDC guidelines after surgery and during scheduled follow-up as outlined in time frame below.

    3. Wound healing [Follow-ups will consist of clinical visits. The clinical visits will be at 2 weeks postoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively, and then every three months for the first two years after surgery.]

      The surgical site will be assessed after surgery and during scheduled follow-up as outlined in time frame below for wound healing issues/concerns.

    4. Potential bisphosphonate complications related to systemic administration [Followed for 2 years postoperatively for study end points]

      Patients will be followed for atypical femur fractures and avascular necrosis (AVN) of jaw

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    Yes
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Primary benign GCT of bone

    • Lesion located in an extremity

    • Lesion amenable to reconstruction (intralesional curettage) defined as having at least one intact column of bone after removal

    • No previous systemic bisphosphonate or denosumab therapy

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Recurrent GCT of bone

    • Non-extremity location

    • Lesion too extensive for intralesional treatment, either due to bone loss, joint invasion, or large soft tissue component

    • Children and pregnancy

    • Previous systemic bisphosphonate or denosumab therapy

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 University of California - Los Angeles Los Angeles California United States 90404
    2 Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana United States 46202
    3 University of Iowa Iowa City Iowa United States 52242
    4 University of Kansas Overland Park Kansas United States 66211
    5 Johns Hopkins University Hospital Baltimore Maryland United States 21287
    6 Saint Louis University Saint Louis Missouri United States 63110
    7 Wake Forest University Winston-Salem North Carolina United States 27157
    8 Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio United States 44195
    9 University of Oklahoma Oklahoma City Oklahoma United States 73104
    10 Oregon Health & Science University Portland Oregon United States 97239
    11 Allegheny-Singer Research Institute Pittsburgh Pennsylvania United States 15212
    12 Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee Wisconsin United States 53226
    13 McGill University Health Centre Montréal Quebec Canada H3G 1A4

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • St. Louis University
    • Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation
    • Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network Research Institute)
    • University of Iowa
    • Johns Hopkins University
    • McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
    • The Cleveland Clinic
    • Medical College of Wisconsin
    • Wake Forest University
    • Oregon Health and Science University
    • University of Kansas
    • University of California, Los Angeles
    • Indiana University
    • University of Oklahoma

    Investigators

    None specified.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    David Greenberg, MD;; Associate Professor, Associate Professor Orthopaedic Surgery Saint Louis University, St. Louis University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03295981
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 28229
    First Posted:
    Sep 28, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 25, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
    Yes
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Oct 25, 2021