Feasibility And Efficacy Of An iPad-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation Program In Brain Tumor Patients

Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco (Other)
Overall Status
Terminated
CT.gov ID
NCT02783495
Collaborator
Tilburg University (Other)
11
1
1
30
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This pilot clinical trial studies how well an iPad-based cognitive rehabilitation program works in improving quality of life in patients with grade II-III glioma. An iPad-based cognitive rehabilitation program may help to increase patients cognitive function and quality of life, and may provide doctors with valuable information for optimizing care of patients with brain tumors.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Device: iPad
N/A

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
11 participants
Allocation:
N/A
Intervention Model:
Single Group Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Feasibility And Efficacy Of An iPad-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation Program In Brain Tumor Patients
Actual Study Start Date :
Jul 19, 2016
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jan 17, 2019
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 17, 2019

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Device: iPad

Patients with brain tumors receive an iPad with the ReMind app. The patients will use the app to train neurocognitive and compensatory skills for 3 hours per week over the course of 12 weeks (36 hours in total)

Behavioral: Device: iPad
All patients will receive baseline neurocognitive and quality of life testing, followed by 3 months of the iPad-based intervention. At the end of the baseline visit, subjects will be lent an iPad to take home (or will be assisted in the installation of the ReMind app on their personal iPad) and instructed in the use of the ReMind app (and more basic iPad skills, if necessary). Subjects will review the intervention schedule (approximately 3 hours per week). Testing will be repeated 3 months after the baseline visit (i.e., immediately after the intervention) and 9 months after the baseline visit (i.e., 6 months after completion of the intervention), both time-points including a new MRI.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of subjects who complete the intervention [At 3 months after start of training]

    Subjects who complete all of the intervention exercises (approximately 36 hours of intervention).

  2. Patient-reported ease of use [At 3 months after start of training]

    Questionnaire based measure of ease of use as a measure of feasibility.

  3. Patient-reported user satisfaction [At 3 months after start of training]

    Questionnaire based measure of user satisfaction as a measure of feasibility.

  4. Change in attention [At baseline, 3 months past training start, 9 months past training start]

    Evaluation of visual attention on the NIH Toolbox Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test. The attention score ranges from 0 to 10 (10 = best performance)

  5. Change in working memory [At baseline, 3 months past training start, 9 months past training start]

    Evaluation of working memory using the NIH Toolbox List Sorting Working Memory Test. Higher scores on each of these indicate higher levels of working memory.

  6. Change in Quality of Life [At baseline, 3 months past training start, 9 months past training start]

    Measurement of general quality of life (QOL) using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br), a multi-item questionnaire. Higher ratings suggest higher QOL.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Improvement on neurocognitive testing [At baseline, 3 months past training start, 9 months past training start]

    Improvement on neurocognitive testing as measured by the NIH Toolbox assessment after the intervention.

  2. Subjective assessment of cognitive symptoms will be assessed [At baseline, 3 months past training start, 9 months past training start]

    Subjective assessment of cognitive symptoms using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) questionnaire

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients must have histologically confirmed WHO grade 2 or 3 gliomas.

  • Patients must be > 18 years old

  • Patients must have a life expectancy > 12 weeks.

  • Patients must have a Karnofsky performance status of > 70.

  • This study was designed to include women and minorities, but was not designed to measure differences between them. Males and females will be recruited with no preference to gender. Minorities will actively be recruited to participate. No exclusion to this study will be based on race.

  • Patients must speak and be able to read English fluently.

  • All patients must sign an informed consent indicating that they are aware of the investigational nature of this study. Patients must sign an authorization for the release of their protected health information.

  • Patients may not be known to be HIV-positive. HIV testing is not required for study participation.

  • Patients must not have a history of any other cancer (except non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in-situ of the cervix), unless in complete remission and off of all therapy for that disease for a minimum of 3 years.

  • Patients must be receiving MRI scans at UCSF

  • Patients must be clinically stable and off treatment (e.g. radiation or chemotherapy) for ≥ 6 months

  • Patients must be ≥ 6 months from craniotomy

  • Patients must have subjective complaints of cognitive deficits.

  • Patients must have adequate seizure control and be on a stable, or decreasing, dose of anti-epileptics

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients who are not able to comply with study and/or follow-up procedures.

  • Patients who do not have home access to the Internet.

  • Patients who, based on the physician's opinion, are unable to participate in neurocognitive testing and/or neurocognitive rehab secondary to significant neurologic deficit

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California United States 94143

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of California, San Francisco
  • Tilburg University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennie W Taylor, MD, MPH, University of California, San Francisco

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
University of California, San Francisco
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT02783495
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 16106
  • NCI-2017-01881
First Posted:
May 26, 2016
Last Update Posted:
Jan 18, 2020
Last Verified:
Jan 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Keywords provided by University of California, San Francisco
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 18, 2020