Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Originator Products Versus Biosimilars

Sponsor
Catherine M. Lockhart (Other)
Overall Status
Active, not recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04971304
Collaborator
Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (Other), HealthPartners Institute (Other)
20,000
82

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This comparative effectiveness and descriptive retrospective cohort study will evaluate safety and effectiveness outcomes among commercially insured adults who received a granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilar or originator product during the first cycle of clinical guideline-indicated intermediate or high febrile neutropenia risk chemotherapy.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Receipt of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor

Detailed Description

This comparative effectiveness and descriptive retrospective cohort study includes commercially insured adults enrolled in one of four health plans participating in the Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium (BBCIC) Distributed Research Network. The investigators included patients who received a granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) biosimilar or originator product during the first cycle of clinical guideline-indicated intermediate or high febrile neutropenia risk chemotherapy. The investigators will collect patient demographics, cancer diagnosis, chemotherapy regimen, and patterns of G-CSF biosimilar and originator product use. The investigators will follow patients from first G-CSF exposure until up to six cycles of chemotherapy receipt, death, or insurance disenrollment. The primary effectiveness outcome is incidence of febrile neutropenia. Secondary outcomes include incidence of adverse events and trends in product use over time. The investigators will compare febrile neutropenia incidence between originator and biosimilar products using inverse probability weighting to control for confounding. Secondary analyses will examine 'as treated' outcomes.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Anticipated Enrollment :
20000 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Retrospective
Official Title:
An Exploratory Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor Originator Products Versus Biosimilars in Real-world Practice
Actual Study Start Date :
Mar 1, 2015
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Sep 30, 2021
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2021

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
G-CSF originator receipt

Patients receiving filgrastim (Neupogen) or pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) per Health Care Procedural Coding System (HCPCS) J-codes.

Drug: Receipt of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor
Receipt of originator or biosimilar

G-CSF biosimilar receipt

Patients receiving filgrastim biosimilars (filgrastim-aafi, filgrastim-sndz, tbo-filgrastim) or pegfilgrastim biosimilars (pegfilgrastim-jmdb, pegfilgrastim-bmez, pegfilgrastim-cbqv) per Health Care Procedural Coding System (HCPCS) J-codes.

Drug: Receipt of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor
Receipt of originator or biosimilar

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of patients who develop febrile neutropenia [Within 30 days of receipt of first chemotherapy]

    ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes for inpatient or outpatient visit indicating fever with infection per validated algorithms.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Number of patients who develop G-CSF associated adverse events [Within 30 days of receipt of first chemotherapy]

    ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes indicating splenic rupture, anaphylaxis, or leukocytosis.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
20 Years and Older
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients age 20 or older

  • Diagnosis of lung, breast, colon, ovarian, pancreatic, testicular, cervical, uterine, or NHL cancer

  • Beginning intermediate or high neutropenia risk chemotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:
  • One inpatient or two outpatient cancer diagnoses at least 30 days apart in the 183 days prior to the Index Date for cancer different from enrolling cancer diagnosis

  • Any of the following in 183 days prior to Index Date:

  • Any chemotherapy or G-CSF product receipt

  • 2< medical claims at least 30 days apart for a skilled nursing facility or hospice care

  • 2< diagnoses/procedure codes at least 1 day apart for cancer-related radiotherapy, bone marrow or stem cell transplant, diagnosis of HIV/AIDS, severe hepatic disease, chronic kidney disease, or any non-oncology related neutropenia

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Catherine M. Lockhart
  • Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
  • HealthPartners Institute

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Catherine M. Lockhart, Executive Director, Biologics & Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04971304
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • BBCIC-GCSF-02
First Posted:
Jul 21, 2021
Last Update Posted:
Jul 30, 2021
Last Verified:
Jul 1, 2021
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
Yes
Keywords provided by Catherine M. Lockhart, Executive Director, Biologics & Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jul 30, 2021