GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Sponsor
Ethicon, Inc. (Industry)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT00521066
Collaborator
(none)
150
11
36
13.6
0.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to is to evaluate the success of the GYNECARE PROSIMA* system in women with symptoms for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) requiring surgical correction of POP.

(*TRADEMARK)

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System

Detailed Description

The GYNECARE PROSIMA* system provides a simplified mesh repair, avoiding the need for dissection outside the pelvic cavity.

Study Design

Study Type:
Observational
Actual Enrollment :
150 participants
Observational Model:
Cohort
Time Perspective:
Prospective
Official Title:
A Prospective, Multi-centre Study to Evaluate the Clinical Performance of the GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System as a Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Study Start Date :
Jun 1, 2007
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2008
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2010

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
1

Prosima Pelvic Floor Repair System

Device: GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System
procedure for pelvic organ prolapse
Other Names:
  • mesh pelvic floor repari
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Success based on overall POP-Q score at 12 months post-procedure. [12-months]

      Success is determined by achievement of an overall POP-Q score of ICS Stage ≤1, without further re-intervention for POP.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Success based on overall POP-Q score at 24 months post-procedure. [24 months]

      Success is determined by achievement of an overall POP-Q score of ICS Stage ≤1, without further re-intervention for POP

    2. Success based on treated compartment ICS POP-Q stage [12 months]

      Success will be determined by achievement of treated compartment POP-Q score of ICS Stage ≤1, without further re-intervention for POP.

    3. Success based on treated compartment ICS POP-Q stage [24 months]

      Success will be determined by achievement of treated compartment POP-Q score of ICS Stage ≤1, without further re-intervention for POP.

    4. Success defined as the leading edge within the hymen [12 months]

      Success defined as the leading edge within the hymen (i.e. all POP-Q values to be less than 0, without further re-intervention for POP)

    5. Success defined as the leading edge within the hymen [24 months]

      Success defined as the leading edge within the hymen (i.e. all POP-Q values to be less than 0, without further re-intervention for POP)

    6. Mean PFDI-20 score [12 months]

    7. Mean PFDI-20 score [24 months]

    8. Mean change from baseline in PFDI-20 scores [24 months]

    9. Mean change from baseline in PFDI-20 scores [12 months]

    10. Mean POPDI score [12 months]

      POPDI is a sub score of PFDI-20

    11. Mean POPDI score [24 months]

      POPDI is a sub score of PFDI-20

    12. Mean change from baseline in POPDI score [12 months]

      POPDI is a sub scores of PFDI-20

    13. Mean change from baseline in POPDI score [24 months]

      POPDI is a sub score of PFDI-20

    14. Mean CRADI score [12 months]

      CRADI is a sub score of PFDI-20

    15. Mean CRADI score [24 months]

      CRADI is a sub score of PFDI-20

    16. Mean change from baseline in CRADI score [12 months]

      CRADI is a sub score of PFDI-20

    17. Mean change from baseline in CRADI score [24 months]

      CRADI is a sub score of PFDI-20

    18. Mean UDI score [12 months]

      UDI is a sub score of PFDI-20

    19. Mean UDI score [24 months]

      UDI is a sub score of PFDI-20

    20. Mean change from baseline in UDI score [12 months]

      UDI is a sub score of PFDI-20

    21. Mean change from baseline in UDI score [24 months]

      UDI is a sub score of PFDI-20

    22. EuroQol (EQ-5D health state) change from baseline [12 months]

    23. EuroQol (EQ-5D health state) change from baseline [24 months]

    24. Mean PFIQ-7 score [12 months]

    25. Mean PFIQ-7 score [24 months]

    26. Mean change from baseline in PFIQ-7 score [12 months]

    27. Mean change from baseline in PFIQ-7 score [24 months]

    28. Mean POPIQ score [12 months]

      POPIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7

    29. Mean POPIQ score [24 months]

      POPIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7

    30. Mean change from baseline in POPIQ score [12 months]

      POPIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7

    31. Mean change from baseline in POPIQ score [24 months]

      POPIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7

    32. Mean CRAIQ score [12 months]

      CRAIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7

    33. Mean CRAIQ score [24 months]

      CRAIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7

    34. Mean change from baseline in CRAIQ score [12 months]

      CRAIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7

    35. Mean change from baseline in CRAIQ score [24 months]

      CRAIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7

    36. Mean UIQ score [12 months]

      UIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7

    37. Mean UIQ score [24 months]

      UIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7

    38. Mean change from baseline in UIQ score [12 months]

      UIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7

    39. Mean change from baseline in UIQ score [24 months]

      UIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7

    40. Mean PISQ-12 score [12 months]

      In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function

    41. Mean PISQ-12 score [24 months]

      In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function

    42. Mean change from baseline in PISQ-12 score [12 months]

      In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function

    43. Mean change from baseline in PISQ-12 score [24 months]

      In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function

    44. Incidence of new onset dyspareunia, resolution or continuance of pre-existing dyspareunia [ongoing]

    45. Length of procedure [perioperative]

      From time to first incision to time of last suture used to secure VSD

    46. Pain score measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). [24 hours post surgery and at the 3-4 week visit]

    47. Discomfort of balloon removal, measured using VAS at time of removal. [24 hrs post-surgical]

    48. Subject perception of VSD: Awareness [3-4 week visit]

      Measured by visual analogue scale

    49. Subject perception of VSD: Discomfort [3-4 week visit]

      Measured by visual analogue scale

    50. Subject perception of VSD: Acceptability of discharge [3-4 week visit]

      Measured by visual analogue scale

    51. Subject global impression [12 month visit]

      assessed on a 5 point Likert scale

    52. Subject global impression [24 month visit]

      assessed on a 5 point Likert scale

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    Female
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Candidates with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse of ICS POP-Q Stage II or III, suitable for surgical repair. Vaginal hysterectomy, perineal repair and/or mid urethral sling procedures for incontinence may be performed concurrently.

    • Age ≥ 18 years.

    • Agrees to participate in the study, including completion of all study-related procedures, evaluations and questionnaires, and documents this agreement by signing the Ethics Committee / IRB approved informed consent.

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Additional surgical intervention concurrent to the PROSIMA procedure (e.g. sacrocolpopexy, paravaginal repair, tubal sterilisation).

    • Previous repair of pelvic organ prolapse involving insertion of mesh.

    • Previous hysterectomy within 6 months of scheduled surgery.

    • Experimental drug or experimental medical device within 3 months prior to the planned procedure.

    • Active genital, urinary or systemic infection at the time of the surgical procedure. Surgery may be delayed in such subjects until the infection is cleared.

    • Coagulation disorder or on therapeutic anticoagulant therapy at the time of surgery.

    • History of chemotherapy or pelvic radiation therapy.

    • Systemic disease known to affect bladder or bowel function (e.g. Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, spina bifida, spinal cord injury or trauma).

    • Current evaluation or treatment for chronic pelvic pain (e.g. interstitial cystitis, endometriosis, coccydynia, vulvodynia).

    • Nursing or pregnant or intends future pregnancy.

    • In the investigator's opinion, any medical condition or psychiatric illness that could potentially be life threatening or affect their ability to complete the study visits according to this protocol.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Specialists in Urology Naples Florida United States 34102
    2 Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogynecology Institute of Michigan Dearborn Michigan United States 48124
    3 Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogynecology Grand Rapids Michigan United States 49506
    4 The Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery Allentown Pennsylvania United States 18104
    5 Magee Women's Hospital of the Universtiy of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania United States 15213
    6 Royal Women's Hospital Melbourne Australia 3053
    7 Bereich Urogynakologie Halle Germany 06097
    8 Universitatsklinik Tubingen Tubingen Germany 72076
    9 Addenbrookes Hospital Cambridge United Kingdom CB2 0QQ
    10 North Hampshire Hospital Hampshire United Kingdom RG24 9NA
    11 St. Mary's Hospital Manchester United Kingdom M13 0JH

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Ethicon, Inc.

    Investigators

    • Study Director: David Robinson, M.D., Ethicon, Inc.

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Ethicon, Inc.
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT00521066
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 300-06-005
    First Posted:
    Aug 27, 2007
    Last Update Posted:
    May 6, 2014
    Last Verified:
    May 1, 2014
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of May 6, 2014