Optimizing Ultrasound-induced Anti-inflammation in Human Subjects

Sponsor
University of Virginia (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05685108
Collaborator
(none)
30
1
2
10
3

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

This is a feasibility study to determine whether pulsed ultrasound stimulation targeting the splenic nerve or the cervical vagus nerve can elicit an anti-inflammatory immune response in healthy volunteers.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Device: Ultrasound stimulation intensity
  • Device: Ultrasound stimulation site
N/A

Detailed Description

Recent advances have shown that neural pathways are able to regulate immunity and inflammation. The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway is a well-characterized neural circuit that consists of the vagus nerve to spleen circuit, which has been stimulated with implantable devices to improve autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis.

Recently, the use of pulsed ultrasonic waves to modulate the neuroimmune pathway has gained interest due to its potential in treating inflammatory disorders non-invasively. This study is designed to test the hypothesis that pulsed ultrasound stimulation can be used effectively in human subjects to control pathogenic inflammatory responses. The overall goal of this project is to determine which, if any, ultrasound stimulation protocols are able to restrict the inflammatory response of immune cells collected from healthy subjects post-ultrasound stimulation.

Four different levels of ultrasound intensity ("doses") will be tested in this study to determine the dose(s) capable of producing an anti-inflammatory effect. The doses will be defined in terms of mechanical index and each subject will receive two different doses of ultrasound. In addition, the study will investigate the efficacy of cervical vagus (neck)-targeted ultrasound, given that it may have an effect similar to spleen-targeted ultrasound through upstream vagus nerve modulation.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
30 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
After screening, eligible participants will be assigned to one of the two groups and randomized to order of treatments.After screening, eligible participants will be assigned to one of the two groups and randomized to order of treatments.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Basic Science
Official Title:
Optimizing Ultrasound-induced Anti-inflammation in Human Subjects
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 1, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Oct 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Group 1

In Subgroup 1, individuals will receive pulsed ultrasound with a mechanical index of 0.6 and 1.4 delivered to the splenic hilum. In Subgroup 2, individuals will receive pulsed ultrasound with a mechanical index of 1.0 and 1.8 delivered to the splenic hilum. The two doses will be administered in separate visits with min. 14 days between each stimulation. In both Subgroups, the two doses will be administered in separate visits with min. 14 days between each stimulation.

Device: Ultrasound stimulation intensity
A clinical ultrasound transducer will be placed against the abdomen or neck of an individual in order to administer insonification to the splenic nerve.

Active Comparator: Group 2

Individuals will receive pulsed ultrasound with a mechanical index of 1.4 delivered to the splenic hilum and the cervical vagus nerve. The two doses will be administered in separate visits with min. 14 days between each stimulation.

Device: Ultrasound stimulation site
A clinical ultrasound transducer will be placed against the abdomen or neck of an individual in order to administer insonification to the splenic nerve and the cervical vagus nerve.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Ultrasound stimulation intensity [Immune cells will be stimulated and assessed prior to and within 24 to 48 hours post-ultrasound treatment. Results of Luminex analysis of the pre- and post-ultrasound stimulation supernatants will be compared to quantify the impacts of the treatment.]

    The primary outcome is to determine ultrasound intensities that have a biological effect on immune cells measured as a statistically significant change in the level of cytokines produced by immune cells. White blood cells will be isolated from peripheral blood and treated ex vivo with inflammatory stimuli to evaluate their capacity for cytokine production. The cytokines to be measured are (all will be measured in pg/ml): sCD40L; EGF; Eotaxin; FGF-2; FLT-3L; Fractalkine; G-CSF; GM-CSF; GRO; IFNα2; IFNy; IL-1α; IL-1β; IL-1Ra; IL-2; IL-3; IL-4; IL-5; IL-6; IL-7; IL-8; IL-9; IL-10; IL-12p40; IL-12p70; IL-13; IL-15; IL-17A; IL-17E; IL-17F; IL-18; IL-22; IL-27; IP-10; MCP-1; MCP-3; M-CSF; MDC; MIG; MIP-1α; MIP-1β; PDGF-AA; PDGF-AB/BB; TGFα; TNFα; TNFβ; VEGF-A.

  2. Ultrasound stimulation site [Immune cells will be stimulated and assessed prior to and within 24 to 48 hours post-ultrasound treatment. Results of Luminex analysis of the pre- and post-ultrasound stimulation supernatants will be compared to quantify the impacts of the treatment.]

    The primary outcome is to determine the effects of spleen-targeted versus cervical vagus-targeted ultrasound stimulation on the inflammatory capacity of immune cells. This will be measured by stimulating white blood cells from peripheral blood ex vivo with inflammatory stimuli to evaluate their capacity for cytokine production. The cytokines to be measured are (all will be measured in pg/ml): sCD40L; EGF ; Eotaxin; FGF-2; FLT-3L; Fractalkine; G-CSF; GM-CSF; GRO; IFNα2; IFNy; IL-1α; IL-1β; IL-1Ra; IL-2; IL-3; IL-4; IL-5; IL-6; IL-7; IL-8; IL-9; IL-10; IL-12p40; IL-12p70; IL-13; IL-15; IL-17A; IL-17E; IL-17F ; IL-18; IL-22; IL-27; IP-10; MCP-1; MCP-3; M-CSF; MDC; MIG; MIP-1α; MIP-1β; PDGF-AA; PDGF-AB/BB; TGFα; TNFα; TNFβ; VEGF-A.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Distribution of immune cells [The secondary outcome will be assessed before and max 48-hours after receiving ultrasound stimulation.]

    The secondary outcome is to determine the effects of ultrasound stimulation on the distribution of immune cells measured as a statistically significant change in the distribution of white blood cells using flow cytometry associated with the inflammatory response following delivery of ultrasound.

Other Outcome Measures

  1. Participant comfort, experience, and new-onset sensations by questionnaire [The outcome will be assessed immediately after, within 24 to 48 hours, and 2 weeks after receiving ultrasound stimulation]

    Participants will complete a questionnaire based on a dichotomous scale ("yes" or "no") to evaluate their experience of discomfort and new-onset sensations following ultrasound stimulation.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
25 Years to 50 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
Yes
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Male or female, aged 25-50 years

  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form

  • Able to comprehend the study goals and procedures, stated willingness to comply with all study procedures, and availability for the duration of the study

  • Considered English proficient so that the subject can follow verbal commands during the ultrasound procedure

  • In good general health, as evidenced by medical history

  • Laboratory results indicating normal blood count and adequate organ function

  • Agreement to adhere to Lifestyle Considerations throughout study duration.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Chronic medical conditions, including cancer (in remission or active cancer), cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, heart conditions (such as heart failure, coronary artery disease, cardiomyopathies), lung disease, liver disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus type 1 and 2, human immunodeficiency virus infection, primary immunodeficiencies, solid organ or hematopoietic cell transplantation, tuberculosis, and cystic fibrosis, autoimmune disorders (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease), sickle cell anemia or other anemia syndromes

  • Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure values during screening of ≥160 and ≥100 mm Hg, respectively, hypertension on non-selective beta-blockers and/or alpha-methyl dopa, or hypertension requiring more than two anti-hypertension medications

  • Obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2)

  • Use of anti-inflammatory or immunomodulatory medication, such as non- steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, or other immunosuppressants, within one week of receiving ultrasound delivery

  • Use of anticoagulant drugs (e.g., coumadin, direct oral anticoagulants) or antiplatelet drugs (e.g., aspirin, clopidogrel) within one week of receiving ultrasound delivery

  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant during the study

  • Active bacterial or viral infection; febrile illness within 2 weeks of receiving ultrasound delivery

  • Known allergic reactions to ultrasound gel

  • Treatment with another investigational drug or other intervention within 1 month of receiving ultrasound delivery

  • Any vaccination received within 1 month of receiving ultrasound delivery

  • Current smoker or nicotine use within 2 weeks of receiving ultrasound delivery

  • Use of recreational drugs within 2 weeks of receiving ultrasound delivery

  • History of arrythmia (e.g., clinically significant bradycardia, atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrythmias)

  • History of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism

  • History of bleeding disorder

  • History of seizure

  • History of unilateral or bilateral vagotomy

  • Participants with an implantable medical device, such as pacemaker, hearing aid implant, or any implanted electronic device

  • Surgery or traumatic injury (e.g., visceral injury, cerebral injury) in the past 3 months

  • Prior surgery on thyroid or parathyroid glands, esophagus, stomach, or spleen

  • Participant is considered by the Investigator, after reviewing medical and psychiatric history, physical examination, and laboratory evaluations, to be unsuitable for any other reason that may either place the patient at increased risk during participation or interfere with the interpretation of the study. outcomes.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 University of Virginia, Division of Nephrology; Center for Immunity, Inflammation & Regenerative Medicine Charlottesville Virginia United States 22903

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • University of Virginia

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark D. Okusa, MD, FASN, University of Virginia

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Mark Okusa, MD, Chief, Division of Nephrology, University of Virginia
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05685108
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • HSR220029
First Posted:
Jan 13, 2023
Last Update Posted:
Jan 13, 2023
Last Verified:
Dec 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
Yes
Keywords provided by Mark Okusa, MD, Chief, Division of Nephrology, University of Virginia
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Jan 13, 2023