Reduced Anticoagulation Targets in ECLS (RATE)

Sponsor
University Medical Center Groningen (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04536272
Collaborator
ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (Other), Erasmus Medical Center (Other), Leiden University Medical Center (Other), St. Antonius Hospital (Other), Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) (Other), Isala (Other), OLVG (Other), Radboud University Medical Center (Other)
330
9
3
41
36.7
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

The objective of the RATE-trial is to study if reduced anticoagulation targets during ECLS diminish bleeding complications without an increase in thromboembolic complications or a negative impact on outcome.

Detailed Description

Rationale: ECMO treatment has a mortality of 38%, for a large part treatment related due to complications. The most feared complication is ischemic stroke for which heparin is administered with an aPTT target 2.0-2.5 times baseline (approximately 60-75 sec).

However, there is no relation between aPTT and the occurrence of stroke (1.2%), but there is a relation with the much more frequent occurrence of bleeding complications (55%) and blood transfusion. Both are strongly related to outcome.

Objective: Our objective is to study if reduced anticoagulation targets diminish bleeding complications without an increase in thromboembolic complications or a negative impact on outcome.

Study design: Three-arm non-inferiority RCT.

Study population: All adult Dutch patients treated with ECMO during the 30 months of the study.

Intervention: Randomization between heparin administration with a target of 2-2.5 times baseline aPTT (usual care, about 60-75 sec.), 1.5-2.0 times baseline aPTT (45-60 sec.) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) guided by weight and renal function.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome parameter is a combined endpoint consisting of: 1) major bleeding including hemorrhagic stroke according to the ELSO definitions; 2) severe thromboembolic complication defined as ischemic stroke, limb ischemia (not related with distal perfusion catheter), or acute pump failure with emergency exchange; 3) mortality at 6 months.

Secondary outcome parameters are: 1) blood transfusions; 2) health related quality of life (HR-QoL) at 6 months; 3) exchange of the membrane oxygenator; 4) vessel thrombosis after ECMO removal detected by echography; 5) pulmonary embolism; 6) costs; 7) the individual components of the composite outcome; and 8) all thromboembolic complications combined.

Expected outcomes: We expect that with a target of 1.5-2.0x baseline aPTT or with LMWH the primary composite endpoint will be reached in 60% of patients compared to 70% in usual care. To show non-inferiority with a significance level (alpha) of 5%, power of 80% and a non-inferiority limit (delta) of 7.5% the corresponding sample size is 91 patients per group. In other words, if there is a true difference in favor of the experimental treatment of 10%, then 91 patients per group are required to be 80% sure that the upper limit of a one-sided 95% confidence interval (or equivalently a 90% two-sided confidence interval) will exclude a difference in favor of the standard group of more than 7.5%. To compensate for a lower effect and drop-outs 330 patients will be enrolled. Apart from anticoagulation targets, treatment will be as usual so study participation will not lead to a burden for the patient, e.g. no extra blood sampling, tests or visits. After 6 months the patients will be contacted for a short questionnaire to measure health-related quality of life.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
330 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Randomization between anticoagulation targets during ECLS of: 1). 2-2.5 times baseline aPTT (usual care, about 60-75 sec.), 2). 1.5-2.0 times baseline aPTT (45-60 sec.) or 3). LMWH guided by weight and renal function.Randomization between anticoagulation targets during ECLS of: 1). 2-2.5 times baseline aPTT (usual care, about 60-75 sec.), 2). 1.5-2.0 times baseline aPTT (45-60 sec.) or 3). LMWH guided by weight and renal function.
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Other
Official Title:
Reduced Anticoagulation Targets in ECLS (RATE)
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 1, 2020
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2023
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Mar 1, 2024

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Target of 2-2.5 times baseline aPTT (usual care, about 60-75)

Administration of heparin during ECLS with an aPTT target of 2-2.5 times baseline.

Drug: Heparin
Administration of heparin with a target of 2-2.5 or 1.5-2.0 times baseline aPTT during ECLS.
Other Names:
  • Unfractionated heparin
  • Active Comparator: Target of 1.5-2.0 times baseline aPTT (45-60 sec.)

    Administration of heparin during ECLS with an aPTT target of 1.5-2.0 times baseline.

    Drug: Heparin
    Administration of heparin with a target of 2-2.5 or 1.5-2.0 times baseline aPTT during ECLS.
    Other Names:
  • Unfractionated heparin
  • Active Comparator: LMWH guided by weight and renal function.

    Administration of LMWH guided by weight and renal function during ECLS.

    Drug: LMWH
    Administration of LMWH guided by weight and renal function during ECLS.
    Other Names:
  • Dalteparine
  • Enoxaparine
  • Nadroparine
  • Tinzaparine
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Hemorrhagic complications [Through ECLS completion, an average of 14 days]

      Severe hemorrhagic complications will be registered according to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) definitions for major bleeding and is defined as clinically overt bleeding with a decrease in hemoglobin of at least 1,24 mmol/L (2 g/dl)/24 hours, or a transfusion requirement of ≥ 3 EH RBC over that same time period. Bleeding that is retroperitoneal, pulmonary or involves the central nervous system, or bleeding that requires surgical intervention is also considered major bleeding.

    2. Severe thromboembolic complications [Through ECLS completion, an average of 14 days]

      Severe thromboembolic complication defined as ischemic stroke, limb ischemia, or acute pump failure

    3. Mortality [6 months after ECLS]

      Mortality at 6 months

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Number of blood transfusions [Through ECLS completion, an average of 14 days]

      Number of blood transfusions during ECLS

    2. Quality of life at 6 months [6 months after ECLS]

      Quality of life (HR-QoL) measured 6 months after decannulation from ECMO

    3. Exchange of the membrane oxygenator [Through ECLS completion, an average of 14 days]

      Number of echanges of the membrane oxygenator during ECLS

    4. Vessel thrombosis after ECLS removal [After ECLS completion, an average of 14 days]

      Vessel thrombosis after ECLS removal detected by echography

    5. Cost- effectiveness [6 months after ECLS]

      Cost- effectiveness will be based on reduced costs of blood transfusions and interventions for bleeding (e.g. surgery, interventional radiology) as well as improved outcome. All medical cost items expected to be affected by the ECMO therapy will be measured and valued according to the Dutch standard guidelines for economic evaluations, e.g. blood transfusion, number of ECMO replacements, surgery, and hospital length of stay.

    6. Pulmonary embolism [Through ECLS completion, an average of 14 days]

      The occurrence of Pulmonary embolism during ECLS

    7. All thromboembolic complications combined [Through ECLS completion, an average of 14 days]

      The occurrence of all thromboembolic complications combined during ECLS

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • ECMO treatment during the study period in one of the participating centers

    • Age above 18 years

    • Written informed consent

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Patients in whom the ECMO is only used to bridge a procedure

    • Vital indication for robust anticoagulation (e.g. mechanic valve, pulmonary embolism)

    • History of heparin induced thrombocytopenia

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Radboud UMC Nijmegen Gelderland Netherlands 6525GA
    2 Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+ Maastricht Limburg Netherlands 6229HX
    3 OLVG, location East Amsterdam Noord-Holland Netherlands 1091AC
    4 Amsterdam UMC, location AMC Amsterdam Noord-Holland Netherlands 1100DD
    5 Isala Clinics Zwolle Overijssel Netherlands 8025AB
    6 St. Antonius Ziekenhuis Nieuwegein Utrecht Netherlands 3430EM
    7 Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum Leiden Zuid-Holland Netherlands 2300RC
    8 Erasmus MC Rotterdam Zuid-Holland Netherlands 3000CA
    9 University Medical Center Groningen Groningen Netherlands 9700RB

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • University Medical Center Groningen
    • ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
    • Erasmus Medical Center
    • Leiden University Medical Center
    • St. Antonius Hospital
    • Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
    • Isala
    • OLVG
    • Radboud University Medical Center

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: W.M. van den Bergh, PhD, MD, University Medical Center Groningen

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    Walter M. van den Bergh, Principal investigator, University Medical Center Groningen
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT04536272
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • 201900659
    • 848018014
    • 7969
    • 2019-004125-24
    First Posted:
    Sep 2, 2020
    Last Update Posted:
    Oct 15, 2021
    Last Verified:
    Oct 1, 2021
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    Yes
    Plan to Share IPD:
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by Walter M. van den Bergh, Principal investigator, University Medical Center Groningen
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Oct 15, 2021