Comparison of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) and Lichtenstein Technique

Sponsor
Kocaeli Derince Education and Research Hospital (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT05504122
Collaborator
(none)
102
2
120

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Open tension-free mesh repair (Lichtenstein) and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair are the most commonly preferred techniques for inguinal hernia surgery. There's still a debate going on about which of these two techniques (open versus laparoscopic) is effective. This prospective randomized study aimed at comparing the early and long-term results of these two techniques (TEP vs. Lichtenstein).

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Procedure: inguinal hernia repair
N/A

Detailed Description

Various studies comparing the laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and Lichtenstein techniques have been reported. These studies have shown that TEP repair is associated with less postoperative pain and faster recovery. However, there are different views on the long-term (recurrence, chronic pain, etc.) results of the two techniques. This study was designed to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of open tension-free mesh repair technique(Lichtenstein) and laparoscopic repair technique(TEP).

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
102 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) and Lichtenstein Technique in Long-term Follow-up
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2012
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2014
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jan 1, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP)

Patients who underwent Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) will be included in this group.

Procedure: inguinal hernia repair
Patients who will undergo inguinal hernia repair will be divided into two groups(TEP versus Lichtenstein) according to the technique to be applied

Placebo Comparator: Open tension-free mesh repair technique (Lichtenstein)

Patients with open tension-free inguinal hernia(Lichtenstein) repair will be included in this group.

Procedure: inguinal hernia repair
Patients who will undergo inguinal hernia repair will be divided into two groups(TEP versus Lichtenstein) according to the technique to be applied

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. postoperative complication status [up to the first 10 days postoperatively]

    number of patients with complications

  2. early period complication status [up to the first 3 months postoperatively]

    number of patients with complications

  3. late period complication status [Postoperative 3rd to 84th month]

    number of patients with complications

  4. early recurrence rate [up to the first 3 months postoperatively]

    number of patients with recurrence

  5. late recurrence rate [Postoperative 3rd to 84th month]

    number of patients with recurrence

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Visual Analog Score for pain [postoperative 24th hour]

    Units on a Scale; 0: no pain, 1-3: mild pain, 4-6: moderate pain, 7-9: severe pain, 10: worst pain possible.

  2. total analgesic requirement [postoperative 1 to 10 days]

    the number of analgesics used.

  3. time to return to work after surgery [Postoperative 3rd month]

    day

  4. early complication status [postoperative 1st month]

    Number of patients with complications

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Patients who were diagnosed with inguinal hernia (primary, recurrent, unilateral, bilateral)

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of I and II

  • Gave informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients with scrotal, strangulated, or obstructed hernia

  • Periumbilical or subumbilical incision scar (median, right or left paramedian)

  • Undergoing prostatectomy or abdominal bladder surgery

  • Pfannenstiel incision scar

  • ASA score >3

Contacts and Locations

Locations

No locations specified.

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Kocaeli Derince Education and Research Hospital

Investigators

  • Study Director: Murat Coskun, MD, Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Adem Yuksel, Head of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kocaeli Derince Education and Research Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT05504122
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • KOU KAEK 2012/161-17/14
First Posted:
Aug 17, 2022
Last Update Posted:
Aug 17, 2022
Last Verified:
Aug 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Adem Yuksel, Head of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kocaeli Derince Education and Research Hospital
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Aug 17, 2022