Zoo-P: The Effect of Zoledronate on the Prevention of Pneumonia in Hip Fracture Patients

Sponsor
The University of Hong Kong (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT05743179
Collaborator
Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong (Other), Caritas Medical Centre, Hong Kong (Other), Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong (Other), United Christian Hospital (Other)
2,692
4
2
29.9
673
22.5

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs; such as alendronate and zoledronate) are commonly used in the treatment of osteoporosis and fracture prevention, in which zoledronate has a proven better efficacy than alendronate. In 2018, our real-world propensity score matched study showed that the use of N-BPs was significantly associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in hip fracture patients. In addition to cardiovascular diseases, both preclinical study and sensitivity analysis also suggest evidence for N-BPs in pneumonia prevention. Moreover, a pragmatic clinical trial is developed to evaluate effect of the tested intervention in real-life routine clinical practice since traditional explanatory radomised controlled trial (RCT) may have poor generalizability due to highly selected patients and controlled environments. This study aims to evaluate if zoledronate reduces risk of pneumonia in hip fracture patients using pragmatic clinical trial approach.

This is an open-label, multi-centre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Patients will be recruited from 4 hospitals, namely Caritas Medical Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Queen Mary Hospital, and United Christian Hospital. Age, sex, body mass index, eGFR, history of fracture, chronic respiratory diseases, and other medical history, will be measured and recorded at recruitment.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Detailed Description

N-BPs are widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis and fracture prevention. Although alendronate is the first-line antiosteoporosis medication in many countries, it is associated with esophageal and gastrointestinal irritation. In addition, the regimen for alendronate is one tablet per week and careful use of alendronate is required to avoid gastrointestinal irritation (e.g. take the tablet on an empty stomach, stay upright for at least 30 minutes after taking the medication), leading to relative low drug compliance. On the other hand, the regimen of zoledronate is 5mg infusion once a year. Since the route of administration is intravenous infusion, it avoids the gastrointestinal irritation problem. In terms of fracture prevention, zoledronate has a proven better efficacy than alendronate. Most importantly, previous HORIZON recurrent fracture trial showed that zoledronate use reduced risk of mortality in addition to fracture prevention. Thus, zoledronate is considered the most efficacious N-BP in clinical use.

N-BPs could exert extra-skeletal beneficial effects. In 2018, our real-world propensity score matched study (N=34,991) using the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS), a clinical database managed by the Hong Kong Hospital Authority, showed that use of N-BPs was significantly associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction and stroke in hip fracture patients. Later in the same year, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in 2,000 osteopenic women showed that zoledronate may reduce risk of myocardial infarction with an odds ratio of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.36-1.02) after following up for 6 years. They subsequently performed a detailed post-hoc analysis and showed that zoledronate use was significantly associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction, composite cardiovascular end-point, and fatal stroke. This example demonstrated not only the extra-skeletal effect of N-BPs, but also showed that high-quality real-world data with state-of-the-art statistical method could potentially be useful in causal inference.

In addition to cardiovascular diseases, N-BPs may be useful in preventing pneumonia. Preclinical study showed that N-BPs are anti-inflammatory and may modulate macrophages in response to pneumonia. In addition, pharmacokinetic studies showed that the highest concentration of N-BPs was detected in trachea other than bone after oral ingestion or intravenous infusion of N-BPs. Among various N-BPs, alendronate was detected in the trachea with a concentration of 607 ng/ml 72 hours after oral ingestion, which was almost half of the concentration (1370 ng/ml) detected in vertebrae. Thus, we conducted a real-world population-based propensity score matched study in a cohort of 54,047 hip fracture patients to investigate the association of N-BP use with risk of pneumonia. Among hip fracture patients, N-BP use was significantly associated with 24% risk reduction in pneumonia (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.83), with an absolute risk difference of 2%. Similar significant association was observed for pneumonia mortality. To further reduce the potential bias of confounding by indication, we performed a sensitivity analysis by including users of other anti-osteoporosis medications in the control group, instead of patients without using any anti-osteoporosis medications. A similar significant association was observed. In agreement with the preclinical studies, we provided evidence for N-BPs in pneumonia prevention. This finding attracted wide media coverage, including Reuters and the New York Times.

Although utilisation of real-world data is an emerging approach in evaluating drug effectiveness, RCT is still considered the gold standard in evaluating drug efficacy. However, traditional explanatory RCT may have poor generalizability due to highly selected patients and controlled environments. Thus, pragmatic clinical trial is developed to evaluate if the tested intervention is effective in real-life routine clinical practice, by reducing bias using randomization and improving generalizability using real-world setting. We aim to evaluate if zoledronate reduces risk of pneumonia in hip fracture patients using pragmatic clinical trial approach.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
2692 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
The Effect of Zoledronate on the Prevention of Pneumonia in Hip Fracture Patients (Zoo-P): An Open-label, Pragmatic, Randomised Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Dec 5, 2022
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
May 1, 2025
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Jun 1, 2025

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Zoledronate

Zoledronate intravenous infusion (5mg) once and usual care will be provided to the patient and mark the start of 12-month follow-up period

Drug: Zoledronate
Aclasta Solution for Infusion 5mg/100ml (zoledronic acid)
Other Names:
  • Zoledronic acid
  • Aclasta
  • No Intervention: Control

    Only usual care will be provided to the patient with 12-month follow-up period.

    Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Pneumonia hospitalizations [12 months]

      Diagnosis records of pneumonia from electronic medical records

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    1. Cardiovascular events [12 months]

      Diagnosis records of cardiovascular events from electronic medical records

    2. Refracture events [12 months]

      Diagnosis records of refracture from electronic medical records

    3. Problems associated with fracture healing, including revision surgery [12 months]

      Diagnosis and operation records from electronic medical records

    4. All-cause mortality [12 months]

      Date of death and cause of death information from electronic medical records

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    60 Years and Older
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Male or female ≥ 60 years

    • With recent fragility hip fracture at proximal femur

    • Have the ability to understand the requirements of the study, provide written informed consent, including consent for the use and discloser of research-related health information, and comply with the study data collection procedures. Provide signed and dated informed consent form

    Exclusion Criteria:
    • Known to be hypersensitive to any N-BPs

    • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body surface area

    • Regular user of anti-osteoporosis medications (including bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatides, and raloxifene) or oral or intravenous systemic glucocorticoids in the previous year.

    • Subject currently involved in a clinical trial or in an exclusion period following participation in another clinical trial

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Queen Mary Hospital Hong Kong Hong Kong
    2 United Christian Hospital Kwun Tong Hong Kong
    3 Prince of Wales Hospital Sha Tin Hong Kong
    4 Caritas Medical Centre Sham Shui Po Hong Kong

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • The University of Hong Kong
    • Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
    • Caritas Medical Centre, Hong Kong
    • Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
    • United Christian Hospital

    Investigators

    • Principal Investigator: Kathryn Tan, MD, The University of Hong Kong

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    More Information

    Publications

    None provided.
    Responsible Party:
    The University of Hong Kong
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT05743179
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • Zoo-P_001
    First Posted:
    Feb 24, 2023
    Last Update Posted:
    Feb 24, 2023
    Last Verified:
    Dec 1, 2022
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Keywords provided by The University of Hong Kong
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Feb 24, 2023