Comparison of Two Induction Regimens Using Topical Lidocaine or Muscle Relaxant on Sore Throat and Hemodynamics

Sponsor
Ostfold Hospital Trust (Other)
Overall Status
Unknown status
CT.gov ID
NCT03031808
Collaborator
(none)
100
1
3
38
2.6

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

When a surgical procedure is performed under general anesthesia, the Airways are often secured With an endotracheal tube. Some patients experience sore throat thereafter. Studies have shown a reduction of these side effects when by use of muscle relaxants or a lidocain spray prior to the intubation. At Ostfold Hospital Trust, the investigators use one of the two methods or nothing. These methods will be studied systematically.

Heart rate and blood pressure rise during the intubation procedure. The investigators will also study the differences between the groups.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Drug: Lidocaine spray (2%)
  • Drug: Muscle Relaxant (Rocuronium)
  • Other: No Muscle relaxant, no Lidocaine
Phase 4

Detailed Description

Post-operative sore throat and cough are common complications of endotracheal intubation and occurs in 30% to 70% of patients. Spraying with Lidocaine reduces this incident of postoperative sore Throat (POST). The use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) alone will also diminish the incidence of adverse postoperative upper airway symptoms. The use of topical Lidocaine is shown to reduce the cardiovascular responses during and after endotracheal intubation.

Hypertension and tachycardia as a response to endotracheal intubation are probably of little consequence in healthy individuals. These reactions might though be harmful in patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Postoperative sore throat is an undesired outcome for the patient. Topical or systemic pharmacological interventions is shown to reduce the POST.

Our anesthetists practice very different. The investigators sometime use topical lidocaine 2% as a spray, sometime muscle relaxants and often nothing but propofol and remifentanil prior to laryngoscopy an endotracheal intubation.

The objective of this study is to determine, whether the use of topical administered lidocaine, 2 %, has a better impact on POST compared with NMBA alone in general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. Patients receiving nothing but propofol and remifentanil will be the reference group. Assessment of the intubation conditions will be done according to a standard scheme

The primary endpoint:
  • Differences in the intubation conditions between the three groups.

  • Cardiovascular responses caused by the laryngoscopy and intubation.

The secondary endpoint:

• Post operative upper airways symptoms. Power and Sample Size Calculator To detect a decrease in the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal symptoms from 60% to 45%, we calculated that we needed 150 patients per study arm (power of the study, 0,8; type I error, 0,05).

450 adult patients have to be scheduled for the study.

The study is double blind, randomized:
  • Group Topical lidocaine 4%:

  • Group NMBA

  • Control group Premedication: Paracetamol 2g General anaesthesia: TCI (Target Control of Infusion is a principle, an anesthesia infusion after protocol): Propofol and Remifentanil Surgical procedure: Not specified short lasting (<1 h) procedures The experienced anesthesiologist performing the intubating procedure will not be in the room until immediately before the intubation.

Postoperatively:
  • Oral paracetamol and codeine-fixed combination up to 1000 mg and 60 mg, respectively, every 6 h

  • When nausea and vomiting occurs postoperatively, ondansetron 4 mg IV administers as the drug of first choice followed by droperidol 0,625 mg IV if the nausea/vomiting persists.

Collected data:
  • Patient characteristics inclusive smoke habits

  • Intubation conditions according to the Copenhagen score

  • Blood pressure prior to laryngoscopy and after 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15 minutes, then every 15 min.

  • Cuff pressure

  • Pharyngolaryngeal discomfort 2 and 24 hours (telephone interview if released from hospital) after extubation

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
100 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Comparison of Two Induction Regimens Using Topical Lidocaine or Muscle Relaxant; Impact on Postoperative Sore Throat and Haemodynamics
Actual Study Start Date :
Oct 31, 2017
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2020
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 31, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Other: Lidocaine spray

Endotracheal lidocaine spray prior to intubation

Drug: Lidocaine spray (2%)
Spraying trachea from 2 cm above the vocal cords and 5 cm down with a straw with multiple side holes
Other Names:
  • Xylocain 2% Astra Zeneca
  • Other: Muscle relaxant

    Muscle relaxant prior to intubation

    Drug: Muscle Relaxant (Rocuronium)
    After induction of anesthesia, the participants are given 0,6 mg/kg bodyweight intravenously.
    Other Names:
  • Esmeron MSD
  • Other: No Muscle relaxant, no Lidocaine

    'No Muscle relaxant, no Lidocaine Control group

    Other: No Muscle relaxant, no Lidocaine
    This group get general anesthesia without Rocuronium or Lidocaine
    Other Names:
  • Control group
  • Outcome Measures

    Primary Outcome Measures

    1. Sore Throat postoperative. Assessment of complaints and changes in complaints [2 h and 24 h after extubation]

      Postoperative sore throat, described 2 h and 24 h after extubation. If the patient has sore throat or is hoarse, the complaint is assessed on a VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) 1 - 10.

    2. Intubation conditions directly after induction of anesthesia [90 sec. after established general anesthesia]

      Describes the intubation conditions: Jaw relaxation, resistance to laryngoscopy blade, the position and movement of vocal cords, the movement of limbs and coughing. Each variable rates as excellent, good or poor. Intubation conditions are many variables described once and should not be divided into several outcomes.

    3. Hemodynamic parameters, change in HR (Heart Rate) is being assessed [Prior to induction, then every second minute the next 15 minutes, thereafter every 15 minute until end of surgery (max. 2 h.)]

      Describes changes in HR (Heart Rate)

    4. Hemodynamic parameters, change in BP (blood pressure) is being assessed [Prior to induction, then every second minute the next 15 minutes, thereafter every 15 minute until end of surgery (max. 2 h.)]

      Describes changes in BP(Blood Pressure)

    Eligibility Criteria

    Criteria

    Ages Eligible for Study:
    18 Years to 70 Years
    Sexes Eligible for Study:
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
    No
    Inclusion Criteria:
    • Scheduled elective surgery with general anesthesia and planned endotracheal intubation.
    Exclusion Criteria:
    • ASA≥3,

    • 20>BMI<35

    • Allergy to local anesthetics or neuromuscular blocking agents.

    • The ASA physical status classification system is a system for assessing the fitness of patients before surgery. BMI is Body Mass Index measured in kilograms/square meter.

    Contacts and Locations

    Locations

    Site City State Country Postal Code
    1 Ostfold Hospital Trust, Moss Grålum Ostfold Norway 1714

    Sponsors and Collaborators

    • Ostfold Hospital Trust

    Investigators

    • Study Chair: Jan Sverre Vamnes, MD, Ph.D., Senior consultant

    Study Documents (Full-Text)

    None provided.

    More Information

    Publications

    Responsible Party:
    Jan Sverre Vamnes, Senior consultant, Ph.D., Ostfold Hospital Trust
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
    NCT03031808
    Other Study ID Numbers:
    • AB3383
    First Posted:
    Jan 26, 2017
    Last Update Posted:
    Mar 13, 2019
    Last Verified:
    Mar 1, 2019
    Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
    No
    Plan to Share IPD:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
    No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:

    Study Results

    No Results Posted as of Mar 13, 2019