Esketamine Sedation and Fentanyl Sedation in Pediatric Dental Patients

Sponsor
Peking University (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT04597320
Collaborator
(none)
48
1
2
2.3
20.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

Since the 1970s, ketamine has been used in clinical anesthesia treatment. Compared with ketamine, esketamine has a higher clearance rate, so it has a shorter recovery time after anesthesia. This feature also makes ketamine more suitable for pediatric dental patients.The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the efficacy of esketamine sedation and fentanyl sedation in pediatric dental patients

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
Phase 4

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
48 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Fentanyl group and Esketamine groupFentanyl group and Esketamine group
Masking:
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose:
Prevention
Official Title:
The Effects of Esketamine Sedation Compared With Fentanyl Sedation in Pediatric Dental Patients: A Double Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Jan 1, 2022
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Feb 28, 2022
Actual Study Completion Date :
Mar 12, 2022

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Fentanyl group

The fentanyl group was prepared by 1ug/kg fentanyl in 5ml normal saline, assembled with 5ml injection, labeled as "Anesthesia inducer". Midazolam 0.05mg/kg+ "Anesthesia inducer" was applied to all patients for procedural induction by intravenous injection. According to the MOAA/S score of the patients, midazolam could be added 0.5mg per time at more than 2 minutes until the MOAA/S score reached 3, the maximum infusion dose of midazolam was less than 10mg and less than 0.1mg/kg.

Drug: Fentanyl
The fentanyl group was prepared by 1ug/kg fentanyl in 5ml normal saline, assembled with 5ml injection, labeled as "Anesthesia inducer".

Drug: Midazolam
Midazolam 0.05mg/kg+ "Anesthesia inducer" was applied to all patients for procedural induction by intravenous injection. According to the MOAA/S score of the patients, midazolam could be added 0.5mg per time at more than 2 minutes until the MOAA/S score reached 3, the maximum infusion dose of midazolam was less than 10mg and less than 0.1mg/kg.

Experimental: Esketamine group

The esketamine group was prepared by 0.5mg/kg esketamine in 5ml normal saline, assembled with 5ml injection, labeled as "Anesthesia inducer". Midazolam 0.05mg/kg+ "Anesthesia inducer" was applied to all patients for procedural induction by intravenous injection. According to the MOAA/S score of the patients, midazolam could be added 0.5mg per time at more than 2 minutes until the MOAA/S score reached 3, the maximum infusion dose of midazolam was less than 10mg and less than 0.1mg/kg.

Drug: Esketamine
The esketamine group was prepared by 0.5mg/kg esketamine in 5ml normal saline, assembled with 5ml injection, labeled as "Anesthesia inducer".

Drug: Midazolam
Midazolam 0.05mg/kg+ "Anesthesia inducer" was applied to all patients for procedural induction by intravenous injection. According to the MOAA/S score of the patients, midazolam could be added 0.5mg per time at more than 2 minutes until the MOAA/S score reached 3, the maximum infusion dose of midazolam was less than 10mg and less than 0.1mg/kg.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Hypoxemia [Day 0]

    The incidence of intraoperative hypoxemia (Spo2<92%)

  2. Midazolam use [Day 0]

    The total use of midazolam

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Successful sedation [Day 0]

    Success rate of sedation

  2. Respiratory depression [Day 0]

    Incidence of intraoperative respiratory depression and the need for airway support such as mandibular dragging

  3. Agitation and delirium [Day 0]

    The incidence of agitation and delirium during and after operation

  4. Circulatory fluctuation [Day 0]

    Occurrence of hypertension, hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia and other side effects

  5. Propofol requiring [Day 0]

    Incidence of sedation requiring propofol

  6. Time of successful sedation [Day 0]

    The time when the MOAA/S score was equal to 3 points for the first time after patients were given anesthetic inducer

  7. MOAA/S score in recovery room [Day 0]

    MOAA/S score of patients every 15 minutes after entering the recovery room

  8. The time for Modified Observer Assessment of Sedation Score(MOAA/S)>4 [Day 0]

    The time for MOAA/S score to be greater than 4 since the end of clinical operation and the cessation of anesthetic infusion. MOAA/S is from 0 to 5, the higher of the score means the less sedative condition.

  9. Directional force recovery time [Day 0]

    Recovery time of directional force

  10. Recall of intraoperative events [Day 0]

    The child's recall of intraoperative events

  11. Treatment comfort score [Day 0]

    Patients' satisfaction score of treatment comfort. This score is from 0 to 10, the higher of the score means the more comfortable of the treatment patients received.

  12. The incidence of complications [Day 1]

    The incidence of patients suffered from pain, drowsiness, vomiting, nausea, mental emotion,within 1 day after treatment

  13. Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) of pain in recovery room [Day 0]

    Evaluate patients' VAS of pain every 15 minutes after entering the recovery room. This scale is from 0 to 10, the higher of the scale means the more painful patients feel.

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
6 Years to 14 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Age 6-14 years old.

  • Oral out-patient sedative treatment in our hospital.

  • BMI between 18 to 30 kg/m2. ④. ASA: I-II degree. ⑤. Sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patients who are allergic to esketamine, opioids, propofol, or have contraindications for these drug use.

  • Patients with mental illness or who are unable to cooperate.

  • Patients who have abnormal reaction to midazolam. ④. Patients who suffer from Apnea. ⑤. Patients who refuse to sign informed consent. ⑥. Patients who participated in other clinical trials within 4 weeks.

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Peking University Hospital of Stomatology Beijing Beijing China 100081

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Peking University

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Xudong Yang, MD, Department of anesthesiology of peking university school of stomatology

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Yang Xudong, Chief of Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04597320
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • PKUSSIRB-202056103
First Posted:
Oct 22, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Mar 15, 2022
Last Verified:
Mar 1, 2022
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
Yes
Plan to Share IPD:
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Yang Xudong, Chief of Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Mar 15, 2022