ACL Reconstruction With Simple and Double Bundle Technique Using Two Different Implants for Graft Fixation

Sponsor
Vita Care (Other)
Overall Status
Recruiting
CT.gov ID
NCT04550299
Collaborator
Johnson & Johnson (Industry)
112
1
4
129.1
0.9

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

In this study our objective is to compare two tibial ACL graft fixation systems in patients undergoing two different reconstructions technique (with simple and double bundle) in terms of tendon graft osteointegration, functionality and return to sports.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Other: Surgical technique combined with a specific choice of the material for the ligament reconstruction
N/A

Detailed Description

In this study our objective is to compare two tibial ACL graft fixation systems in patients undergoing two different reconstructions technique (with simple and double bundle) in terms of tendon graft osteointegration, functionality and return to sports.

This is a single-center prospective randomized clinical trial with 112 patients diagnosed with anterior cruciate ligament rupture randomly allocated in four groups: single bundle with autologous bioabsorbable implant; single bundle with intrafix implant; double bundle with autologous bioabsorbable implant; double bundle with intrafix implant.

Primary outcome is graft ligamentization assessed in MRI images at 4-6 months

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Anticipated Enrollment :
112 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Masking:
None (Open Label)
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Results of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Simple and Double Bundle Technique Using Two Different Implants for Graft Fixation
Actual Study Start Date :
Feb 26, 2013
Anticipated Primary Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2022
Anticipated Study Completion Date :
Dec 1, 2023

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A

single bundle technique with the use of bioabsorbable implants

Other: Surgical technique combined with a specific choice of the material for the ligament reconstruction
The surgical procedure is done as standard of care. The intervention is to randomize the participant into the study arms, which none of those has been proved yet to be a superior choice

Active Comparator: Group B

single bundle technique with the use of Bio-Intrafix

Other: Surgical technique combined with a specific choice of the material for the ligament reconstruction
The surgical procedure is done as standard of care. The intervention is to randomize the participant into the study arms, which none of those has been proved yet to be a superior choice

Active Comparator: Group C

double bundle technique with the use of bioabsorbable implants

Other: Surgical technique combined with a specific choice of the material for the ligament reconstruction
The surgical procedure is done as standard of care. The intervention is to randomize the participant into the study arms, which none of those has been proved yet to be a superior choice

Active Comparator: Group D

double bundle technique with the use of Bio-Intrafix

Other: Surgical technique combined with a specific choice of the material for the ligament reconstruction
The surgical procedure is done as standard of care. The intervention is to randomize the participant into the study arms, which none of those has been proved yet to be a superior choice

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Bone-graft integration [4-6 months]

    Bone-graft integration assessed in the MRI

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Clinical scores [4-12 months]

    Knee laxity (KT1000, 0 to 5 mm range, higher scores = worse outcome), Objective and Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (Objective IKDC: 0-100 range, higher scores = better outcomes; Subjective IKDC: A-D range; A = better outcomes) scores, Lysholm score (0-100 range, higher scores = better outcomes) and Tegner Activity Scale (0-10 range, higher scores = higher levels of physical activity/ competitive sport activity)

  2. Retear [Through study completion, an average of 2 years]

    Retear of the reconstructed ACL

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:

isolated ACL injury for more than six weeks by physical examination and confirmed by magnetic resonance, adult non-elderly (18 to 60 years), nonobese (body mass index within the normal range)

Exclusion Criteria:

intraoperative complications requiring change in technique of reconstruction and / or anesthesia during surgery, patients undergoing cartilage piercing procedures ( such as microfractures) and / or meniscus suture, those with allergies to medications administered during anesthesia, surgery and / or post-operative patients with tourniquet time of more than two hours and patients who did not sign the consent form

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Instituto Vita Sao Paulo SP Brazil 01239-040

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Vita Care
  • Johnson & Johnson

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wagner Castropil, Instituto Vita

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

None provided.
Responsible Party:
Vita Care
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT04550299
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • 022
First Posted:
Sep 16, 2020
Last Update Posted:
Sep 16, 2020
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2020
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement:
No
Plan to Share IPD:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.:
No
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 16, 2020