ACL Reconstruction With Simple and Double Bundle Technique Using Two Different Implants for Graft Fixation
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
In this study our objective is to compare two tibial ACL graft fixation systems in patients undergoing two different reconstructions technique (with simple and double bundle) in terms of tendon graft osteointegration, functionality and return to sports.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
N/A |
Detailed Description
In this study our objective is to compare two tibial ACL graft fixation systems in patients undergoing two different reconstructions technique (with simple and double bundle) in terms of tendon graft osteointegration, functionality and return to sports.
This is a single-center prospective randomized clinical trial with 112 patients diagnosed with anterior cruciate ligament rupture randomly allocated in four groups: single bundle with autologous bioabsorbable implant; single bundle with intrafix implant; double bundle with autologous bioabsorbable implant; double bundle with intrafix implant.
Primary outcome is graft ligamentization assessed in MRI images at 4-6 months
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Group A single bundle technique with the use of bioabsorbable implants |
Other: Surgical technique combined with a specific choice of the material for the ligament reconstruction
The surgical procedure is done as standard of care. The intervention is to randomize the participant into the study arms, which none of those has been proved yet to be a superior choice
|
Active Comparator: Group B single bundle technique with the use of Bio-Intrafix |
Other: Surgical technique combined with a specific choice of the material for the ligament reconstruction
The surgical procedure is done as standard of care. The intervention is to randomize the participant into the study arms, which none of those has been proved yet to be a superior choice
|
Active Comparator: Group C double bundle technique with the use of bioabsorbable implants |
Other: Surgical technique combined with a specific choice of the material for the ligament reconstruction
The surgical procedure is done as standard of care. The intervention is to randomize the participant into the study arms, which none of those has been proved yet to be a superior choice
|
Active Comparator: Group D double bundle technique with the use of Bio-Intrafix |
Other: Surgical technique combined with a specific choice of the material for the ligament reconstruction
The surgical procedure is done as standard of care. The intervention is to randomize the participant into the study arms, which none of those has been proved yet to be a superior choice
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Bone-graft integration [4-6 months]
Bone-graft integration assessed in the MRI
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Clinical scores [4-12 months]
Knee laxity (KT1000, 0 to 5 mm range, higher scores = worse outcome), Objective and Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (Objective IKDC: 0-100 range, higher scores = better outcomes; Subjective IKDC: A-D range; A = better outcomes) scores, Lysholm score (0-100 range, higher scores = better outcomes) and Tegner Activity Scale (0-10 range, higher scores = higher levels of physical activity/ competitive sport activity)
- Retear [Through study completion, an average of 2 years]
Retear of the reconstructed ACL
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
isolated ACL injury for more than six weeks by physical examination and confirmed by magnetic resonance, adult non-elderly (18 to 60 years), nonobese (body mass index within the normal range)
Exclusion Criteria:
intraoperative complications requiring change in technique of reconstruction and / or anesthesia during surgery, patients undergoing cartilage piercing procedures ( such as microfractures) and / or meniscus suture, those with allergies to medications administered during anesthesia, surgery and / or post-operative patients with tourniquet time of more than two hours and patients who did not sign the consent form
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Instituto Vita | Sao Paulo | SP | Brazil | 01239-040 |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Vita Care
- Johnson & Johnson
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Wagner Castropil, Instituto Vita
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
None provided.- 022