A Prospective Study for the Treatment of Children With Newly Diagnosed LCH Using a Cytarabine Contained Protocol
Study Details
Study Description
Brief Summary
From January 2010 to December 2014, 150 children with MS-LCH were treated in our hospital following a LCH II (Arm B) based protocol. Treatment was based on a modification of the LCH-II (Arm B) based protocol. However, the continuation treatment was extended to 56 weeks and etoposide was omitted from the continuation treatment.
For the 59 patients with RO involvement (RO+) (the lungs are not considered a RO in the current study), the rapid response rate (week 6) was 61.0% and the 3-year overall survival (OS) 73.4±5.9%. Rapid responders had a better 3-year survival rate than poor responders (90.9±5.0% vs. 45.7±11.0%, P<0.001). The 3-year OS in the current study is 10~20% lower than the rates reported by Gadner et al. and Morimoto et al.. We have not yet adopted effective salvage therapies for RO+ patients with recurrent disease. During the time of this study, cladribine was unavailable. Second-line therapy for non-responders or patients with disease reactivation was individualized treatment based on the physician's experience. An effective salvage therapy is essential for this high-risk group.
For 91without RO involvement (RO-), 78 patients (85.7%) were rapid responders at week 6. The 3-year cumulative reactivation rate was 10.7% for RO- patients. No death occurred in this subgroup, with a 3-year OS of 100% in RO- patients. Compared to the LCH II and LCH III trials, the current study had a more intensive initial treatment regimen for RO- patients. However, the addition of etoposide to prednisone and vincristine in the initial therapy did not increase the 6-week response rate for RO- patients (85.7% in this study compared to 83% in the LCH II study and 86% in the LCH III study). Surprisingly, with a relatively intense initial treatment, a relatively low 3-year cumulative reactivation rate was observed in RO- patients in the current study. This result suggests that the initial treatment intensity and duration of continuation therapy both impact disease reactivation. The intensity of induction can affect the degree of disease resolution. Insufficient treatment intensity might lead to late relapse. Similarity to that observed has been in other childhood hematological malignancies. This finding deserves to be tested in prospective clinical trials with long-term follow-up. Cytarabine has been applied for patients with LCH but has never been evaluated in our hospital prospectively. In this study, we administer a cytarabine contained protocol to patients with multisystem involvement with or without risk organs involvement. The treatment results will be compared with our historical studies.
Condition or Disease | Intervention/Treatment | Phase |
---|---|---|
|
Phase 3 |
Detailed Description
All patients with de novo pathological confirmed LCH enrolled in this study will be classified into 4 groups. Group 1: Multisystem patients (≥2 organs/systems) with involvement of one or more "Risk" organs" (hematopoietic system, liver or spleen);Group 2:Multisystem patients, but without involvement of "Risk" organs; Group 3: Single system, Multifocal+ Single system, unifocal and special site@ (Isolated lesion of special site)+ Single system, unifocal and CNS risk+Single system, unifocal i.e. thyroid, lung, thymus, hypothalamic-pituitary+Single system, unifocal and other functionally critical anatomical sites; Group 4: Single system, unifocal i.e. bone, skin or lymph node (not the draining lymph node of another LCH lesion). For patients in Group 1, a 6-week initial treatment, a 16-week consolidation continuation treatment and a 26-week maintenance continuation treatment containing cytarabine is applied. For patients in Group 2, a 6-week initial treatment containing cytarabine and a 46-week continuation treatment (without cytarabine) is applied. For patients in Group 3,a 6-week initial treatment and a 46-week continuation treatment (without cytarabine) is applied. For patients in Group 4, only local therapy followed by wait-and-see strategy is applied.
Study Design
Arms and Interventions
Arm | Intervention/Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Group 1 Multisystem patients (≥2 organs/systems) with involvement of one or more "Risk" organs, i.e. hematopoietic system, liver or spleen. All patients in this group receive an initial therapy (Week 1~6) followed by a consolidation continuation therapy (Week 7~22) and maintenance continuation therapy (Week 25~52). |
Drug: Prednisone+Cytarabine+vincristine
Group 1 initial treatment (W1~W6). Prednisone 40mg/m2×4w, taper 2w; Vincristine 1.5mg/m2 iv d1 of w1,2,3,4,5,6; Cytarabine 100mg/m2 iv/IH d1-4 q2w (w1,3,5)
Drug: Prednisone+Cytarabine+vincristine+Mercaptopurine
Group 1 Consolidation continuation treatment (W7~W22) . Prednisone 40mg/m2 d1-5 q3w (w7,10,13,16,19,22); VCR 1.5/m2 iv d1 q3w (w7,10,13,16,19,22); Cytarabine 100mg/m2 iv/IH d1-4 q3w (w7,10,13,16,19,22); 6-MP 50mg/m2/d,po,qn
Drug: Prednisone+Cytarabine+vincristine+Mercaptopurine
Group 1 Maintenance continuation treatment (W25~52) . Prednisone 40mg/m2 d1-5 q3w; Vincristine 1.5/m2 iv d1 q3w; Cytarabine 100mg/m2 iv/IH d1-4 q6w ×3 times (w25,31,37); 6-MP 50mg/m2/d,po,qn
|
Experimental: Group 2 Multisystem patients, but without involvement of "Risk" organs. All patients in this group receive an initial therapy (Week 1~6) followed by continuation therapy (Week 7~52). |
Drug: Prednisone+Cytarabine+vincristine
Group 2 Initial treatment (W1~W6) . Prednisone 40mg/m2×4w, taper 2w; Vincristine 1.5mg/m2 iv d1 of w1,2,3,4,5,6; Cytarabine 100mg/m2 iv/IH d1-4 q2w (w1,3,5)
Drug: Prednisone+vincristine+Mercaptopurine
Group 2 continuation treatment (W7~W52) . Prednisone 40mg/m2 d1-5 q3w; VCR 1.5/m2 iv d1 q3w; 6-MP 50mg/m2/d,po,qn
|
Experimental: Group 3 Includes patients with single system, multifocal or with single system, unifocal and special site (Isolated lesion of special site) or with single system, unifocal and CNS risk or with single system, unifocal i.e. thyroid, lung, thymus, hypothalamic-pituitary or with single system, unifocal and other functionally critical anatomical sites. All patients in this group receive an initial therapy (Week 1~6) followed by continuation therapy (Week 7~52). |
Drug: Prednisone+vincristine
Group 3 Initial treatment (W1~W6) . Prednisone 40mg/m2×4w, taper 2w; Vincristine 1.5mg/m2 iv d1 of w1,2,3,4,5,6
Drug: Prednisone+vincristine
. Group 3 Continuation treatment (W7~W52)Prednisone 40mg/m2 d1-5 q3w; Vincristine 1.5/m2 iv d1 q3w
|
Experimental: Group 4 Patients with single system, unifocal i.e. bone, skin or lymph node (not the draining lymph node of another LCH lesion). All patients in this group enter into observation after local therapy. Chemotherapy only apply to patients with disease reactivation during observation. |
Other: Local therapy
Local therapy/wait and see. Group 4
|
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
- Rate of responders after initial treatment for patients with risk organ involvement [Evaluation at week 6 or 12]
Rate of responders after initial treatment and consolidation continuation treatment. A good response is defined as complete resolution (no evidence of active disease) in risk organs.
- Reactivation rate for all patients [Up to 5 years]
Reactivation is defined as progression or relapse in any organ or system after disease complete resolution (no evidence of active disease).
Secondary Outcome Measures
- Overall survival for patients with risk organ involvement [Up to 5 years]
Overall survival is measured using the Kaplan-Meier method. From the day of diagnosis to death for any reason or to the date of the last follow-up contact.
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Age under 18 years
-
Newly diagnosed LCH:Morphologic identification of the characteristic LCH cells, positive staining of the lesional cells with CD1α and/or Langerin
-
No congenital immunodeficiency, HIV infection, or prior organ transplant
-
No previous chemotherapy/target therapy/radiation, if any steroid applied, total prior steroids dosage < prednisone 280 mg/m2
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients have overwhelming infection, and a life expectancy of < 2 weeks
Contacts and Locations
Locations
Site | City | State | Country | Postal Code | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Shanghai Children's Medical Center | Shanghai | China |
Sponsors and Collaborators
- Shanghai Children's Medical Center
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yi-Jin Gao, MD, Shanghai Children's Medical Center
Study Documents (Full-Text)
None provided.More Information
Publications
- Braier J, Rosso D, Pollono D, Rey G, Lagomarsino E, Latella A, Zubizarreta P. Symptomatic bone langerhans cell histiocytosis treated at diagnosis or after reactivation with indomethacin alone. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014 Jul;36(5):e280-4. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000165001.
- Donadieu J, Bernard F, van Noesel M, Barkaoui M, Bardet O, Mura R, Arico M, Piguet C, Gandemer V, Armari Alla C, Clausen N, Jeziorski E, Lambilliote A, Weitzman S, Henter JI, Van Den Bos C; Salvage Group of the Histiocyte Society. Cladribine and cytarabine in refractory multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis: results of an international phase 2 study. Blood. 2015 Sep 17;126(12):1415-23. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-03-635151. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
- Egeler RM, de Kraker J, Voûte PA. Cytosine-arabinoside, vincristine, and prednisolone in the treatment of children with disseminated Langerhans cell histiocytosis with organ dysfunction: experience at a single institution. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1993;21(4):265-70.
- Gadner H, Grois N, Arico M, Broadbent V, Ceci A, Jakobson A, Komp D, Michaelis J, Nicholson S, Pötschger U, Pritchard J, Ladisch S; Histiocyte Society. A randomized trial of treatment for multisystem Langerhans' cell histiocytosis. J Pediatr. 2001 May;138(5):728-34. Erratum in: J Pediatr 2001 Jul;139(1):170.
- Gadner H, Grois N, Pötschger U, Minkov M, Aricò M, Braier J, Broadbent V, Donadieu J, Henter JI, McCarter R, Ladisch S; Histiocyte Society. Improved outcome in multisystem Langerhans cell histiocytosis is associated with therapy intensification. Blood. 2008 Mar 1;111(5):2556-62. Epub 2007 Dec 18.
- Héritier S, Jehanne M, Leverger G, Emile JF, Alvarez JC, Haroche J, Donadieu J. Vemurafenib Use in an Infant for High-Risk Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Sep;1(6):836-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0736.
- Simko SJ, McClain KL, Allen CE. Up-front therapy for LCH: is it time to test an alternative to vinblastine/prednisone? Br J Haematol. 2015 Apr;169(2):299-301. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13208. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
- Weitzman S, Braier J, Donadieu J, Egeler RM, Grois N, Ladisch S, Pötschger U, Webb D, Whitlock J, Arceci RJ. 2'-Chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA) as salvage therapy for Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). results of the LCH-S-98 protocol of the Histiocyte Society. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009 Dec 15;53(7):1271-6. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22229.
- SCMC-LCH-2018