Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

Sponsor
Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (Other)
Overall Status
Completed
CT.gov ID
NCT03273114
Collaborator
(none)
148
1
2
33.7
4.4

Study Details

Study Description

Brief Summary

There is evidence, of a single randomized controlled trial, that CFT is better than combined manual therapy and motor control exercise for chronic low back pain. However, this study had significant methodological shortcomings regarding the failure to carry out the intention to treat analysis and a considerable loss of follow-up of patients. As it is, it is important to carry out more studies involving CFT compared to other interventions already used in clinical practice and to correct these methodological shortcomings. Therefore, the aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of Cognitive Functional Therapy in patients with chronic non specific low back pain.

Condition or Disease Intervention/Treatment Phase
  • Behavioral: Cognitive Functional Therapy
  • Other: Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy
N/A

Detailed Description

Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor, blinded participants and intention to treat analysis. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization, to assess the maintenance of any effect of treatment. The patients in the CFT group will be treated by a physical therapists that attended twice the CFT workshops with two of the tutors of the method. She completed 106 hours of training including workshops, patient examinations and a pilot study with the supervision of a physical therapist with more than three years of clinical experience in CFT. Patients in CORE-MT group will be treated by a physical therapist with clinical experience in manual therapy and core training exercises.

Study Design

Study Type:
Interventional
Actual Enrollment :
148 participants
Allocation:
Randomized
Intervention Model:
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description:
Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor, blinded participants and intention to treat analysis. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization, to assess the maintenance of any effect of treatment. The patients in the CFT group will be treated by a physical therapists that attended twice the CFT workshops with two of the tutors of the method. She completed 106 hours of training including workshops, patient examinations and a pilot study with the supervision of a physical therapist with more than three years of clinical experience in CFT. Patients in CORE group will be treated by a physical therapist with clinical experience in manual therapy and core training exercises.Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, blinded assessor, blinded participants and intention to treat analysis. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization, to assess the maintenance of any effect of treatment. The patients in the CFT group will be treated by a physical therapists that attended twice the CFT workshops with two of the tutors of the method. She completed 106 hours of training including workshops, patient examinations and a pilot study with the supervision of a physical therapist with more than three years of clinical experience in CFT. Patients in CORE group will be treated by a physical therapist with clinical experience in manual therapy and core training exercises.
Masking:
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking Description:
Clinical outcomes will be obtained in the evaluations carried out by a blinded assessor 8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization. Both arms include active treatments, and participants will not know whether they are in the experimental group or control group.
Primary Purpose:
Treatment
Official Title:
Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) Compared With a Combined Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT) in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Actual Study Start Date :
Sep 6, 2017
Actual Primary Completion Date :
Jun 28, 2020
Actual Study Completion Date :
Jun 28, 2020

Arms and Interventions

Arm Intervention/Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT)

Cognitive Functional Therapy (CFT) is a behavioral intervention that addresses multiple aspects of low back pain. This approach focuses on changing the patient's beliefs, confronting their fears, educating them about pain mechanisms, increasing mental strength, and control of their body. This is done with functional tasks performed by individuals training them to reduce excessive muscle activity in the trunk and generate behavioral changes related to pain, from postures and provocative movements.

Behavioral: Cognitive Functional Therapy
There will be four main components in the intervention, following the protocol used by O'Keefe et al. (2015): The cognitive component will focus on on the multidimensional nature of persistent pain about individual beliefs, and how emotions and behaviors (movement and lifestyle) can reinforce a vicious cycle of pain and disability. Specific Functional training is designed to normalize maladaptive or provocative movement and posture. Functional integration directed to activities of daily life that are avoided by the patient (rolling in bed, sitting, sitting to standing, walking, bending and lifting) Patients will be advised to gradually increase physical activity based on their preference, also focusing on sleep hygiene, stress, and management strategies

Active Comparator: Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT)

The active comparator will be the combination of Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy (CORE-MT).

Other: Core Training Exercise and Manual Therapy
According to the pragmatic clinical decision of the physiotherapist responsible for this intervention arm, participants allocated to the comparison group will be treated with active exercises will involve contractions of abdominal and back muscles in different functional positions, as well as joint mobilization or manipulation techniques applied to the lower back or pélvis, when necessary. Most patients in this group will receive exercises to perform at home, but not related to CFT.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

  1. Pain intensity [8 weeks]

    It will be measured by the Brazilian version of the Numerical Scale of Pain 11 points (END). The END scale goes from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable." Participants will be asked to answer about their pain levels based on the last seven days

  2. Disability associated to low back pain [8 weeks]

    It will be assessed by the Brazilian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). It is a tool widely used in research and clinical practice to assess the disability low back pain. This questionnaire has 10 items (0-5 points each) related to activities of daily living that patients with low back pain have more difficulties to do. The sum of the scores of items is multiplied by two and the percentage of disability varies from 0 to 100 %.

Secondary Outcome Measures

  1. Global impression of recovery [8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization]

    It will be evaluated based on the Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPES) which is an 11-point scale ranging from -5 ('vastly worse'), through 0 (no change) to +5 (completely recovered).

  2. Pain intensity [6 and 12 months after randomization]

    It will be measured by the Brazilian version of the Numerical Scale of Pain 11 points (END) 13. The END scale goes from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "the worst pain imaginable." Participants will be asked to answer about their pain levels based on the last seven days.

  3. Disability associated to low back pain [6 and 12 months after randomization]

    It will be assessed by the Brazilian version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). It is a tool widely used in research and clinical practice to assess the disability low back pain. This questionnaire has 10 items (0-5 points each) related to activities of daily living that patients with low back pain have more difficulties to do. The sum of the scores of items is multiplied by two and the percentage of disability varies from 0 to 100 %.

  4. Patient Satisfaction (mediator of outcome) [8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization]

    This is a simple questionnaire from 1 to 5 asking the patients how satisfied they were with their treatment: 1 = satisfied, 2 = just a little satisfied, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = just a little dissatisfied, 5 = dissatisfied

  5. Catastrophization (mediator of outcome) [8 weeks, 6 and 12 months after randomization]

    It will be evaluated by the question "When I feel pain, it's terrible and I feel it's never going to get any better."with the response options ranging from "Never do that" = 0 to "Always do that" = 10.

  6. Depression (mediator of outcome) [8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization]

    It will be evaluated by the question "During the past month have you often been bothered by feeling down, depressed or hopeless?" with the response options ranging from "Never" = 0 to "All the time" = 10.

  7. Fear of movement (mediator of outcome) [8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization]

    It will be assessed by the question "Physical activity might harm my back" and the response options will range from 0 ("completely disagree") to 10 ("completely agree).

  8. Stress (mediator of outcome) [8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization]

    It will be evaluated by the question "Do you feel stressed? and the response options will range from 0 ("completely disagree") to 10 ("completely agree)

  9. Sleep (mediator of outcome) [8 weeks, 6 and 12 months months after randomization]

    It will be evaluated by the question "Did you have sleep problems last month?" based on Subjective Health Complaints Inventory19. The response options will be "Not at all"=0, "A little"=1, "Some"=2, and "Serious"=3

Eligibility Criteria

Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study:
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes Eligible for Study:
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:
No
Inclusion Criteria:
  • Aged between 18 and 65 years

  • Low back pain for more than 3 months

  • Disability score of 14% or more on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

  • Being able to walk independently with or without support

  • Understand Portuguese well enough to be able to fill in the questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:
  • Main pain area is not the lumbar spine (from T12 to buttocks)

  • Main pain as leg pain (eg: nerve root compression or herniated disc with radicular pain / radiculopathy, lateral and central stenosis)

  • Less than 6 months after lumbar spine, lower limb or abdomen surgery

  • Invasive procedures for pain relief (ex: epidural injection, rhizotomy) in the last 3 months

  • Pregnancy

  • Inflammatory/rheumatological diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Scheuermann's disease)

Contacts and Locations

Locations

Site City State Country Postal Code
1 Instituto da Coluna Campinas São Paulo Brazil 13084-759

Sponsors and Collaborators

  • Centro Universitário Augusto Motta

Investigators

None specified.

Study Documents (Full-Text)

None provided.

More Information

Publications

Responsible Party:
Ney Armando Meziat Filho, Assistant Professor, Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT03273114
Other Study ID Numbers:
  • neymeziat
First Posted:
Sep 6, 2017
Last Update Posted:
Sep 9, 2020
Last Verified:
Sep 1, 2020
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product:
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product:
No
Keywords provided by Ney Armando Meziat Filho, Assistant Professor, Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta
Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Study Results

No Results Posted as of Sep 9, 2020